Manual
http://shopping.declude.com/Version/Manuals/JunkMail/JM_3.0.5.asp
David B
www.declude.com
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geoff Varney
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006
2:49 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]
Declude
Hi,
Does anyone happen to have a copy of the “old”
JunkMail 3.0.5 manual that they saved from the Web? It used to be
available here:
http://www.declude.com/Version/Manuals/JunkMail/JM_3.0.5.asp
Of course now it redirects you to the new “manual”
area. While the new one is OK, I re
Nope, I think I'll have to get on the SA list and see what I can find out.
To be honest I am not sure what it was doing before my JM changes, but I
know I was seeing a LOT more 10 scores.
Thanks for your help.
Geoff
__
Geoff Varney
Network Support Speci
gt; ERRORLEVEL: 1
>
> SAMPLE-NONSPAM.TXT
> ERRORLEVEL: 0
>
> SAMPLE-SPAM.TXT
> Scored 1001.1
> ERRORLEVEL: 0
>
> This looks good.
>
> Geoff
>
>
> __
> Geoff Varney
> Network Support Specialist
> Educatio
hat* looks better. Adding -et 10 gives ERRORLEVEL 10 on the one
scoring 33...
Geoff
______
Geoff Varney
Network Support Specialist
Educational Service District 112
Ridgefield School District
360-619-1405
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTE
\filters\SPAMC32\test.eml
5.1/5.0
ERRORLEVEL: 1
SAMPLE-NONSPAM.TXT
ERRORLEVEL: 0
SAMPLE-SPAM.TXT
Scored 1001.1
ERRORLEVEL: 0
This looks good.
Geoff
__
Geoff Varney
Network Support Specialist
Educational Service District 112
Ridgefield School District
360
_SPAMASSASSIN_RULE
Hmm...
It appears this is at least partially on the SA side. Any ideas??
Thanks,
Geoff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 10:31 AM
To: Geoff Varney
Subject: Re: [Declude.J
Hello,
Several months ago I got SPAMC32 working with my spamd server and reporting
scores to Declude properly (as far as I know). With Sandy's help I set it
up to use the following method:
SA1 external 1
"c:\imail\declude\filters\spamc32\spamc32.exe -d -u spamd -p 783
-cw %WEIGHT% -s
Thanks Sandy. "Later in the week" was pretty soon!
I have installed this and have been testing out the new functionality. One
question I have is about checking for negative results that have a lt and an
ht that are negative. In my early tests it appears that if I set up a few
tests like this:
Thanks Sandy. Believe me, I don't mind the wait. You definition of "wait"
is not bad! This isn't an emergency anyway, just something I'm hoping to
utilize to fine-tune things and make HAM results useful.
Keep up the good work!
Geoff
______
If I can't get any
better results with this, I'll see if Declude can help.
Thanks,
Geoff
______
Geoff Varney
Network Support Specialist
Educational Service District 112
Ridgefield School District
360-619-1405
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
F
impossible or am I just messing up somewhere?
Thanks,
Geoff
______
Geoff Varney
Network Administrator
Ridgefield School District
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geoff Varney
Sent: Tuesday, January 03,
Hi,
I recall that in the past few months I got some help from Sanford on getting
SPAMC32 set up to report the rounded actual score to Declude and assign that
many points to the score. Ie. if SA says 4.75 as a score, SPAMC32 reports 4
(or does it round up?) and then I have multiple lines in global.
Hi all,
I now successfully have JunkMail using SPAMC32 to access a
Linux spamd server for SPAM. I am training the bayes database as the user that
SPAMC32 is using to contact the spamd server. However, in this setup I am not
getting any subject line info (SPAM) or whatever I set u
tance...
Thanks for weighing in here with your suggestion. It's good to have people
who create things around to help out with them!
Geoff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 3:50 PM
To: Ge
points. It is working for me quite well.
Travis
- Original Message -
From: "Geoff Varney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 12:53 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMC32 -e option in JunkMail
> Hi,
> I am finally getting SpamAssassin working for m
Hi,
I am finally getting SpamAssassin working for my JunkMail with SPAMC32
(0.5.57) calling SPAMD from a Linux box. With training of the Bayesian
databases well underway I am seeing significantly more SPAM being caught.
However, I'd like to verify the way the SPAMASSASSIN entry in the Declude
glob
Hi all,
I’m a Linux newbie, so I think this may have to do
with that end of things, since I seem to have a problem there as well.
I have Redhat Fedora Core 3. I have spamd running with
–d to daemonize, –i to allow all IPs. Even if I leave at the
defaults and run it, spamc test on tha
18 matches
Mail list logo