Huh? What? Not useful? IPSwitch is charging thousands of dollars for
that very feature on steroids .. G
Jonathan
Darin Cox wrote:
Was the webmail vulnerability only with web calendaring? We might be able
to get away with turning it off. It hasn't been a very useful product for
our
the most basic things.. :\
Jonathan
Kevin Bilbee wrote:
Best thing to do is call SmarterMail Sales. They are knowledgable on the
product and the features slated for the 3.0 release but definitly call htem
and let them know you would like to see Program Aliases.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message
assume 2006.
Any thoughts?
Jonathan
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Rats. I was hoping I was totally off-base, and all these features were
actually hidden in the program or configs somewhere. Not really sure how
thrilled I am about moving our customers' servers over without some of
these items.
Jonathan
Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango wrote:
I
from all the scanners, and makes a decision on whether or not it's a
virus or a false-positive. Back in the early days, I had a hunch they
would come out with a Pro version, and stuff like this would be in
there .. but then they did come out with a Pro, and still no dice.
*confused*
Jonathan
I think you're looking for virus_domains.txt - it has inbound only,
outbound only, both, etc options.
Jonathan
Evans Martin wrote:
So there is no way to turn off outbound scanning?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Yeah, I haven't played with smartermail in much depth, but I assumed a
global filter could be created based on header, then have Declude mark
up the headers accordingly..
Jonathan
David Franco-Rocha [ Declude ] wrote:
Declude does not currently plug directly into SmarterMail's spam
tools
I missing something?
Sidenote, I assume SmarterMail can act as a domain filtering gateway
with Declude, right? Pretty sure I saw some marketing spam saying it
could ..
Jonathan
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Sidenote, I assume SmarterMail can act as a domain filtering gateway
with Declude, right? Pretty sure I saw some marketing spam saying it
could ..
Yes, that is absolutly correct - Declude will work on Smartermail.
So I was just playing with the SM web
Seems like it'd be trivial to write, hooking their svcUserAdmin.asmx and
svcDomainAliasAdmin.asmx (GetAliases and GetUsers). Yeah, it'd be nice
if they do it natively, but it looks like a 1 hour project to do it
manually. Guess I wouldn't be too worked up about that.
Jonathan
Dave Doherty
No prob - being a dev myself, I tend to try to find the most complex
ways to do things. ;)
Jonathan
Dave Doherty wrote:
Hi Jonathan-
Thanks for pointing that out. I'm really surprised their tech support
folks didn't recommend it.
-d
- Original Message - From: Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED
Bummer... seems like they could make it work hand in hand, Declude and
SM seem to be all buddy buddy .. that'd make a pretty powerful tool.
Jonathan
Kevin Bilbee wrote:
No declude does not pluginto SM's spam filtering. Delcude works pretymuch
just like it does on Imail.
Kevin Bilbee
Yup, I've seen that in your sig for years .. just never had a use for it. :)
Jonathan
Sanford Whiteman wrote:
No it does not have this feature built in but Sandy wrote some nifty
scripts that make this task a bit easier.
. . . see my sig for details.
--Sandy
Hanging on the new licensing routines? g
This is why I never run stuff in production till it's old and tested.
Jonathan
At 11:30 PM 2/1/2005, you wrote:
I had the same problem today while installing v2.0. All Declude functions
stopped. I called them and went back to the old version and everything
one of their new features, is whitelisting publicly traded
companies. :)
Jonathan
At 12:30 AM 1/9/2005, you wrote:
Hi,
Today I finally took the time (I didn't have)
and ran both Sniffer and SURBL Tests (using
http://www.invariantsystems.com/invURIBL/).
Result:
1,860 tagged by invURIBL only
grep? :)
Jonathan
At 09:45 PM 1/4/2005, you wrote:
Is there a utility that you can type the message ID and get back the
reasons a test failed tests..instead of going into the logs and pulling it
out..
Richard Farris
Ethixs Online
1.270.247. Office
1.800.548.3877 Tech Support
Crossroads
Thanks, but I doubt that's the issue.
They're on one of our IP blocks, and have had that IP for .. I dunno ..
several years. Surely somewhere in Yahoo! there's a department where you
can address these issues. I haven't been able to find out where, though.
Jonathan
At 11:21 AM 6/8/2004, you
the best way to get out of Yahoo's filters?
Thanks in advance,
Jonathan
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe
As much as I believe FoxFriends morning show tells no lies .. I'd rather
verify it with a reputable source:
- Google does in fact own Gmail.com
- It sits on the Google network
- gmail.google.com == gmail.com
- and www.Gmail.com says 1000 MB.
I'd say that makes it official.
Jonathan
At 03:06 PM
.
Nutsehell, I'd say there are some performance benefits on 2k3, especially
on larger hardware .. but overall, your install *should* be so tweaked,
that it really doesn't matter.
Jonathan
At 02:56 PM 2/4/2004, you wrote:
2003.
It's MUCH more secure than 2000 because many services
Imail web stuff never gets scanned anyway, does it? I thought it hit
imail1.exe directly ..
Jonathan
At 06:44 AM 1/7/2004, you wrote:
on 1/7/04 6:35 AM, Matthew Bramble wrote:
BADHEADERS will FP a whole lot more,
Over 95% of the outgoing messages from our subscribers are failing the
CMDSPACE
Can't imagine why you'd need to restart .. it hooks the EXE each time it
spawns an smtp thread, so the next message after the EXE is in place,
should use the new exe.
Jonathan
At 07:20 PM 1/6/2004, you wrote:
It has been a while since I upgrade my versionare there any special
step
a bit, considering it's mostly text.
Is there a compelling reason to go with win2k3?
Jonathan
At 12:12 PM 12/19/2003, you wrote:
For the majority, W2K3 is the way to go if you are able to. Ipswitch does
support running Imail on W2K3.
There are some possible issues.
1. Running MS DSN service
support it well yet.
g
Thoughts?
Jonathan
At 05:04 PM 12/4/2003, you wrote:
The issues seem to appear at high volumes.
Besides, I am more than willing to use those licenses for you. ;)
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
(and *robust*) now? Relatively high volumes of email ..
Jonathan
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe
I'm sorry, when I said the help files .. I meant the online manual. Those
are the files I used as a reference.
Jonathan
At 08:13 PM 11/11/2003, you wrote:
In an effort to clean up our junkmail configs, and only use valid tests,
we cleaned out our previous tests (old services that were dead
is it safe to put *all* the redirects in global.cfg?
Jonathan
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe
I don't understand - I thought you said if it was a gateway domain
(presuming that means it doesn't actually have a host entry in imail, just
that imail is acting as a relay for it), to put the REDIRECT in global.cfg.
But now you're saying it doesn't look there for REDIRECT?
Jonathan
At 11:42
I'm sure I'm missing something, but that doesn't seem to be working.
In my D:\Imail\Declude\$default$.junkmail, I have:
REDIRECT @domain.com d:\Imail\Declude\templates\group1.cfg
and, in that group1.cfg file, I have copied the file that used to work in:
d:\imail\declude\domain.com.
I removed the
to that user. Is
the spam blocked when it comes into the alias? or does it see that it
ultimately hits that user, and allow it?
Thanks,
Jonathan
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list
At 01:15 PM 9/27/2003, you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 5:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Auto White Listing
With the auto whitelist feature,
The MS example I saw was to use a domain
that ended .local if you did not want
to use a real/public domain. This seems to work, lets hope that
.local never becomes a real tld.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Miller
Internet Service Department
ACCS.net
Advanced Computer Communication
32 matches
Mail list logo
