RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Experience with 4.x

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: 26. maj 2006 00:16 Declude could easily plug into Alligate if they wanted to since it supports dropping files into a directory instead of delivering them, and then it will pick them up when the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - Server Watching.

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sent: 23. januar 2006 20:41 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - Server Watching. We use (mostly): IPMonitor Another vote for ipMonitor, except it's

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - SMTP Gateway

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am hoping that if we can generate some interest from the Declude community, we might see some interest by Barry in providing direct Declude support for our gateway. This would make Declude 100% mail server neutral, and it could be

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: when to try lower priority MX

Hi I have a problem sending mail to a specific domain, ag.aaa.dk. The problem is that the primary MX closes the connection right away, newer returns any response. Imail seems to treat this as a temporary problem, and newer tries the other server with lower priority MX record. Is this the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] declude problems after imail upgrade.

Hi I also got one mail that I noticed did not have any Declude headers (it was spam, that's why I checked the headers to see why it was not marked as spam) From the logs I found traces of the e-mail in Imail, and in Declude Virus, but not in Declude Spam. I made no changes to the setup of

[Declude.JunkMail] Message id with ATTACH action

Hi I'm using Imail+Declude as a anti-spam+virus smtp-relay in front of my exchange server. It seems to me that when I use the ATTACH options every message gets a message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] I suspect that causes some strange issues at my exchange server - at least when I use message tracking.

RE: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry SimpsonSent: 26. oktober 2004 20:02To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS Our immediate goal is to produce a ‘gateway’ version of Declude that will

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] IPSwitch ICS

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim So add me to the 'what other products will Declude support' question. As has been suggested before: Microsoft SMTP. That would be pretty universal, and could make it easier to get into the

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude 1.80 and e-mail notifications

Hi Just upgraded to 1.80, and checked the configuration. Everything seems to be working except that I noticed that I got no notifications of the test Eicar-virus e-mails I sent to myself after upgrading. Just sent Eicarplain base 64 MIME enocoded mails from

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 1.80 and e-mail notifications

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Thanks for pointing that out -- it should be fixed now. The format used for the forging virus lookups was changed, and we had to also make a change on our end to reflect that

[Declude.JunkMail] SPF - ignore internal IP

Hi I finally got spf set up for my domain. I'm running Imail + declude as a gateway scanner, so it only relays mail to and from the two mailservers. So now I see that mail from my mail-servers are tested with spf, and get an result of unknown (I use v=spf1 mx ?all). Should I set this up

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Logtool

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frederick Samarelli Sent: 7. februar 2004 04:16 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Logtool Warning for anyone thinking of purchasing Logtool. (See Below). Scott you may want