RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with 'fromfile'

v1.75 ~Brad -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 5:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with 'fromfile' And this in junkmail_blockedsendrs.cfg: sweet-n-sour.com

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with 'fromfile'

Aha! Another one hasn't been sent yet, but I think I see it already: 12/05/2003 14:17:34.980 Q03fd3cc fromfile: Starting BLOCKEDSENDERS 12/05/2003 14:17:34.980 Q03fd3cc fromfile: Done with BLOCKEDSENDERS [2 lines processed] I had three lines, but only two cariage return line feeds. I think I've

[Declude.JunkMail] Help with 'fromfile'

I got an email with this in the headers: X-RBL-Warning: REVDNS: This E-mail was sent from a MUA/MTA 210.17.164.118 with no reverse DNS entry. X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [210.17.164.118] X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail (www.declude.com) for spam. X-Spam-Tests-Failed:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] sniffer

:\IMail\Declude\TPA\Sniffer\LicenseID.exe AuthenticationCode 12 0 You would need to adjust the weights to fit your own needs. However, this will at least give you a starting point. Bill - Original Message - From: T. Bradley Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] sniffer

How does Sniffer work? Their web page says: In the best implementations allow you to assign a weight to each possible result code. Declude, mxGuard, and SpamAssassin are all good examples of systems that allow weights to be assigned to the result codes from Message Sniffer. So if Sniffer says

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Why was this message delivered?

eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Bradley Dean Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 6:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Why was this message delivered? A message was delivered

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Why was this message delivered?

Is the E-mail to that account forwarded to another account (in which case the MAILBOX action would not apply)? I didn't even think of that, yes it is. Why does the MAILBOX action not apply? Is it always happening for the same user(s), or just randomly? So far it's just me and one other user

[Declude.JunkMail] Why was this message delivered?

A message was delivered with a weight of 38. The logs show this: 11/25/2003 01:09:06 Q1c273da Msg failed WEIGHT10 (Weight of 38 reaches or exceeds the limit of 10.). Action=WARN. 11/25/2003 01:09:06 Q1c273da Msg failed WEIGHT15 (Weight of 38 reaches or exceeds the limit of 15.). Action=MAILBOX.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] EASYNET tests going away December 1

Bummer. So we need to take those out of our global.cfg. Yes, but what to replace them with? I'm running the defaults at this point (DSBL, ORDB, SPACOP, BLITZEDALL, SBL). Scott, what will replace the EASYNETs in the new install .CFG? ~Brad --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude

[Declude.JunkMail] How good does it get?

I just installed the demo (Tuesday I believe) and I have it set to warn only. My plan is to move everything with a weight of 20 or above to a 'spam' folder in each users webmail. I may be able to do 15, so far the highest legitimate mail we've seen was 14. Looking at what's coming in, I'm getting

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How good does it get?

and abandon their mail accounts. Glenn Z. - Original Message - From: T. Bradley Dean To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 3:07 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] How good does it get? I just installed the demo (Tuesday I believe) and I have it set to warn only. My plan