[Declude.JunkMail] GIBBERISH test adjustment

2003-10-08 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
I have added the following line to both GIBBERISH and ANTIGIBBERISH tests: BODY0 CONTAINSQS-9000 BODY0 CONTAINSQS9000 BODY0 CONTAINSQS 9000 This is in response to messages that mention certifications, specifically the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] GIBBERISH test adjustment

2003-10-08 Thread Matthew Bramble
I'll add these to the list that I maintain as well for both the ANTIGIBBERISHSUB and ANTIGIBBERISH filters. You shouldn't need to add these to the base filters though since the two letter string will trip it without any assistance. I took note of your parts suggestion as well, but haven't yet

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] GIBBERISH test adjustment

2003-10-08 Thread Frederick Samarelli
Matt can I take a look at an updated version of you files. Fred - Original Message - From: Matthew Bramble [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 11:48 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] GIBBERISH test adjustment I'll add these to the list that I

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] GIBBERISH test adjustment

2003-10-08 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
I'll add these to the list that I maintain as well for both the ANTIGIBBERISHSUB and ANTIGIBBERISH filters. You shouldn't need to add these to the base filters though since the two letter string will trip it without any assistance. I did not want to loose the QS, so I added the legit use of

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] GIBBERISH test adjustment

2003-10-08 Thread Matthew Bramble
John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote: I'll add these to the list that I maintain as well for both the ANTIGIBBERISHSUB and ANTIGIBBERISH filters. You shouldn't need to add these to the base filters though since the two letter string will trip it without any assistance. I did not

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] GIBBERISH test adjustment

2003-10-08 Thread Matthew Bramble
PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 11:48 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] GIBBERISH test adjustment I'll add these to the list that I maintain as well for both the ANTIGIBBERISHSUB and ANTIGIBBERISH filters. You shouldn't need to add these to the ba

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] GIBBERISH test adjustment

2003-10-08 Thread JR Tatum
]Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] GIBBERISH test adjustment Fred,If you don't mind a short delay, I just finished the design on my new site in which I am planning on placing this stuff. Given a little bit of additional time to populate the pages in question and clean up the files, I'll have

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] GIBBERISH test adjustment

2003-10-08 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
I just wanted to point out that you would not in fact lose the QS hit the way I suggested because it will hit QS in the main file and then get credit back for QS-9000 in the anti file. Putting QS-9000 in the main file is redundant with the two letter strings that appear there. Ah, gotcha.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] GIBBERISH test adjustment

2003-10-08 Thread Matthew Bramble
and expertise. Thanks from all of us!!! JR -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matthew Bramble Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 1:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] GIBBERISH test adjustment