Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Gibberish and Anti-Gibberish Testing

2004-04-14 Thread Matt
Sheldon, I did decide last year not to try to keep two different sets of files updated at the same time.  Those using 1.78+ should definitely be using the versions in the beta directory because they have additional counterbalances and other improvements. Matt Sheldon Koehler wrote:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Gibberish and Anti-Gibberish Testing

2004-04-14 Thread Matt
Scott is of course correct.  If you are using Declude 1.78+ (beta and interim releases), there are single file versions of these filters that will only show a hit when they actually score, and they are also a lot more efficient.  They can be found in the following location:     http://www.mail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Gibberish and Anti-Gibberish Testing

2004-04-14 Thread Scott Fisher
They are posted in the beta section. See this link for the link: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg17542.html Scott Fisher Director of IT Farm Progress Companies >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/14/04 12:02PM >>> > I know [EMAIL PROTECTED] has new filters out in his Beta area that > don't

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Gibberish and Anti-Gibberish Testing

2004-04-14 Thread Sheldon Koehler
> I know [EMAIL PROTECTED] has new filters out in his Beta area that > don't utilize the anti-gibberish test. There is just a gibberish and > a gibberish-sub tests. I was beginning to wonder as nothing new has been posted at http://www.mailpure.com/software/decludefilters/ since last year. Sheldo

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Gibberish and Anti-Gibberish Testing

2004-04-14 Thread Scott Fisher
I know [EMAIL PROTECTED] has new filters out in his Beta area that don't utilize the anti-gibberish test. There is just a gibberish and a gibberish-sub tests. Scott Fisher Director of IT Farm Progress Companies >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/14/04 09:57AM >>> I have been using the SPAM filters from M

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Gibberish and Anti-Gibberish Testing

2004-04-14 Thread System Administrator
on 4/14/04 10:57 AM, TC Online Support wrote: > I was > wondering if there was a way to skip the Anti-Gibberish Test if the > Gibberish is not triggered. (This goes to all the test that contain an > "Anti-" test) If/when we get a NOTCONTAINS filter command a lot of things like this could be done

[Declude.JunkMail] Gibberish and Anti-Gibberish Testing

2004-04-14 Thread TC Online Support
I have been using the SPAM filters from MailPure and I have notices that the Anti-Gibberish Test has been triggered a lot more than the Gibberish test (5:1 ratio) The Anti-Gibberish Test has been causing a lot of SPAM to go through by applying negative weight to the message. I was wondering if th