RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread Kevin Bilbee
> I can say that the latest interim is 1.79i7. That is great then I know the latest interim. > But that won't help someone > who is running 1.79i3 in this case, because they don't know if the new > feature was added before or after 1.79i3. Correct but they will know they do not have the latest i

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread R. Scott Perry
That one is 1.79i6. Scott just said that the latest interim was v1.79i7? The latest interim available at the web site is 1.79i6. Just out of curiosity, how did you come by this valuable piece of information. As I said, I found no mention of it in the archives. http://www.mail-archive.com is hav

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread Dermot Keenan
PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 3:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim http://www.declude.com/version/interim/ Neal M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Dermot Keenan" <[EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread GlobalWeb.net Webmaster
count! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dermot Keenan Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 3:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim OK, I give up. Where can I download the interim release? I haven't been ab

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread R. Scott Perry
BTW, what is the new link for interims ? The URL for interim releases is http://www.declude.com/version/interim . -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers since 2000. Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread nrmathew
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott PerrySent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 3:18 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim>"Please understand that I hold you in the highest regard..."...>>Surely you know which interim you have available when you post t

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread Serge
BTW, what is the new link for interims ? - Original Message - From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 7:33 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim > hehe...he said "do do". > > Unde

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread Dermot Keenan
ermot -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 3:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim >"Please understand that I hold you in the highest regard..."... > >Surel

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread Darin Cox
PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 3:18 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim >"Please understand that I hold you in the highest regard..."... > >Surely you know which interim you have available when you post to the list >that

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread Scott Fisher
I just wish a little more info was available on what the interim release added/fixed/removed. Frankly, I'm sometimes amazed you get any work done, considering the number of posts you have on the Declude and Imail forums. Add to that the number of e-mails that arrive at the support and virus tra

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread R. Scott Perry
"Please understand that I hold you in the highest regard..."... Surely you know which interim you have available when you post to the list that something is added or fixed in the latest interim? I can say that the latest interim is 1.79i7. But that won't help someone who is running 1.79i3 in th

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread Darin Cox
-- From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 2:46 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim >All I asked for was the inclusion of this in your emails.. > >... This is added in our latest interim (1.76i6)

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread Nick Hayer
> I agree...this would be an immense help. > > Darin. > > > - Original Message - > From: "Kami Razvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 2:26 PM > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest inte

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread R. Scott Perry
The management of interim releases comes up in regular intervals. I agree, it is a waste of resources of time that email messages refer to a mysterious "latest interim" - instead of simply qualifying, "interim 1.76i6". I just can't see how that can possible take more time to the author - but it w

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread R. Scott Perry
All I asked for was the inclusion of this in your emails.. ... This is added in our latest interim (1.76i6) Blah blah blah That is it.. :) True. But that means that we need to add extra record keeping as to what was added to each specific interim. And it means that when people ask abou

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread Andy Schmidt
Behalf Of Kami Razvan Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 02:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim :) "This definitely will not happen -- that's one of the more time-consuming parts of the interims." Scott... All I asked for was the inclusion of this

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread Darin Cox
I agree...this would be an immense help. Darin. - Original Message - From: "Kami Razvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 2:26 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim :) "This definitely will not happen --

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread Kami Razvan
:) "This definitely will not happen -- that's one of the more time-consuming parts of the interims." Scott... All I asked for was the inclusion of this in your emails.. ... This is added in our latest interim (1.76i6) Blah blah blah That is it.. :) I know we have 1.79i6- so I won't be d

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread R. Scott Perry
The file date does display on the webpage. But I agree the version number displayed in some manner would be very useful. We can do that, but then it is back to just releases/betas. I think the final answer really should be "If you don't like the way that interim releases work, pretend that ther

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread Scott Fisher
The file date does display on the webpage. But I agree the version number displayed in some manner would be very useful. As for searching the archives, since they haven't been updated for over two weeks, won't this start being an incomplete information source? Perhaps having the release notes c

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread R. Scott Perry
It would be a great help if you can indicate what is the latest interim number- for one big reason... It will reduce the load on your server since we really have no way to know other than downloading it and seeing if a new version shows up. If we know the latest interim is the one we have then we

[Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread Kami Razvan
" and the latest interim will decode encoded subjects" Scott: It would be a great help if you can indicate what is the latest interim number- for one big reason... It will reduce the load on your server since we really have no way to know other than downloading it and seeing if a new version sho