I am still see lots of these in my logs (v1.78i4):
=
02/29/2004 02:35:34 Qc0656280009442df Unknown Var: %TESTNAMEX-RBL-Warni
X-RBL-Warning: %TESTNAMEX-RBL-
Could you E-mail me one of your log files (off-list), so that I can check
it out in more detail? The latest interim has some extra code
Scott,
I'm on 1.75, with LogLevel MID.
In parsing the JM log, I noticedthe oddity
below
02/27/2004 00:03:26 Qcf9a013b030eb667 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IP: 141.158.231.134 ID:
061A40A1F2
02/27/2004 00:03:26 Qcf9d01b00336bec4
nNOLEGITCONTENT:-3 . Total weight =
I'm on 1.75, with LogLevel MID.
In parsing the JM log, I noticed the oddity below
02/27/2004 00:03:26 Qcf9a013b030eb667 From:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] IP: 141.158.231.134 ID: 061A40A1F2
02/27/2004 00:03:26 Qcf9d01b00336bec4
: Sunday, February 29, 2004 8:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible Missing JM Log lines in 1.75
I'm on 1.75, with LogLevel MID.
In parsing the JM log, I noticed the oddity below
02/27/2004 00:03:26 Qcf9a013b030eb667 From:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
BTW, I have to throw away lines occasionally because of intermittent CRs
that cause problems with parsing. For my log parsing, I initially tried to
use SQL Server DTS to isolate fields and parse from there, but SQL would
merge two lines together at times because of a related problem with EOL
.
Appreciate it.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible Missing JM Log lines in 1.75
BTW, I have to throw away lines occasionally because of intermittent CRs
Scott,
There are some minor issues still with logging and processing of
whitelisted E-mail. I'm using WHITELIST AUTH, AUTOWHITELIST ON and
PREWHITELIST ON. Depending on how I whitelist though, I see all sorts
of different logging, and on at least two of the methods, PREWHITELIST
ON doesn't
have some stability in our reporting.
Appreciate it.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible Missing JM Log lines in 1.75
BTW, I have to throw away lines
Still would like input on the CR CR LF problem, though.
I would suggest using 1.78 to see if the problem persists. I don't believe
we have had any reports of CR CR LF's appearing in the log files like what
you are seeing. If the problem continues with 1.78, could you E-mail me
(off-list) the
There are some minor issues still with logging and processing of
whitelisted E-mail. I'm using WHITELIST AUTH, AUTOWHITELIST ON and
PREWHITELIST ON. Depending on how I whitelist though, I see all sorts of
different logging, and on at least two of the methods, PREWHITELIST ON
doesn't appear
Ok, I'll test it out and let you know.
Thanks, Scott.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 8:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible Missing JM Log lines in 1.75
Still would like input
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FWIW, I'm not aware of any bugs with logging (as of the latest interim,
which fixes an issue where two lines could be combined if certain control
characters appeared in the subject).
I am still see lots of these in my logs
12 matches
Mail list logo
