I have taken Roger Eriksson's SURBL batch file and using the magic of copy and paste
have altered it to use the Spam Assassin SURBL.
This list is much larger than the Spamcop SURBL so your performance may suffer.
Attached renamed exclusion file and the cmd file.
You'll need to rename the
is 339 kb in size.
Have a nice weekend.
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 5:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Assassin SURBL batch file
I have taken
in size.
SASURBL actually is 339 kb in size.
Have a nice weekend.
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 5:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Assassin SURBL batch
It's too bad there isn't a SKIPIFWEIGHTLESSTHAN command for the filters.
Used with a SKIFIFWEIGHT command, it could only be called on those pesky
e-mails
that fall into that grey area.
So, if a spam message has only 5 points, you do not want that test to run
which may then cause it to have a
If I have a hold weight of 20, and the Spam Assassin SURBL test would create at most
10 points, an e-mail that went in with 5 points would end up with at most 15, which is
still below my minimum action weight.
It certainly only applies to the last filters to be run. Which would be in my case
