]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua M. Hughes
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 3:28 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 2005 SpamHeaders - Fix -
John,
It took me a while to get these stats. I reviewed the SMTP logs for 12/4,
12/5, 12/7, 12/8. I know
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 2005 SpamHeaders - Fix
Hi, Scott, et.al,
I have upgraded to the new Declude.exe v1.82. Within a matter of minutes of
doing this upgrade I've noticed that my mail server has started to bog down.
I don't know if I'm getting his with a new wave of spam and the server's
I have not upgraded to fix the 2005 spamheaders test as of yet. Our CPU has
been maxed out and the server bogged down since my return after the New
Year. I have commented out the spamheaders test and the CPU is still maxed.
I went into IMAIL and changed the delivery application from declude.exe
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 8:22 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 2005 SpamHeaders - Fix
I have not upgraded to fix the 2005 spamheaders test as of yet. Our CPU
has
been maxed out and the server bogged down since my return after the New
Year. I have
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 10:18 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 2005 SpamHeaders - Fix
Hi, Scott, et.al,
I have upgraded to the new Declude.exe v1.82. Within a matter of minutes of
doing
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 12:02 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 2005 SpamHeaders - Fix
I have not upgraded to fix the 2005 spamheaders test as of yet. Our CPU has
been maxed out
] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 12:40 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 2005 SpamHeaders - Fix
Have you added a lot of filters? These tend to run up the CPU. Are you
currently experiencing a dictionary attack? Are you still
Sorted by CPU the system process is first and second is a toss up between
declude, smtpd32, and queuemgr followed by as many as 16 simultaneous
instances of declude with cpu between 1 and 4.
That normal indicates an above average volume of mail (or, in other words,
the system is at full
power?
Thank you,
Joshua
Sunline Team
(941) 206-7870
http://www.sunline.net/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 12:02 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 2005
, 2005 12:40 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 2005 SpamHeaders - Fix
Have you added a lot of filters? These tend to run up the CPU. Are you
currently experiencing a dictionary attack? Are you still seeing a normal
mail pattern?
Darrell
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua M.
Hughes
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 9:44 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 2005 SpamHeaders - Fix -
Sorted by CPU the system process is first and second is a toss up
between declude, smtpd32, and queuemgr followed
Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 1:29 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 2005 SpamHeaders - Fix -
Joshua, if I remember correctly, the IMail daily report shows you the
number of messages inbound to your mailserver, but it does not show the
number
05 1:29 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 2005 SpamHeaders - Fix -
Joshua, if I remember correctly, the IMail daily report shows you the
number of messages inbound to your mailserver, but it does not show the
number of recipients.
You may be getting hit with a "di
PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 2005 SpamHeaders - Fix
The CPU spike is probably do to sheer volume.
What is the current volume of messages being processed?
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Team
(941) 206-7870
http://www.sunline.net/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 12:17 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 2005 SpamHeaders - Fix
The
Joshua-
How many files do you have in your spool? Anytime I've had this problem
there has been a corresponding increase in the spool contents.
I agree with Matt that it may well be a user sending high volumes of SMTP
traffic through your server. It doesn't have to be a lot of messages, but if
This appears to be working as desired. Thanks!
Matt
Barry Simpson wrote:
All of the input and suggestions as to how issues like this could be handled
has been noted and I thank you for your input
We will be posting the updated, fixed .exe on our site tomorrow. For those
who have current service
I have upgraded to the new Declude.exe v1.82. Within a matter of minutes of
doing this upgrade I've noticed that my mail server has started to bog down.
Were you running v1.81 before, or a different version?
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The
Hi, Scott, et.al,
I have upgraded to the new Declude.exe v1.82. Within a matter of minutes of
doing this upgrade I've noticed that my mail server has started to bog down.
I don't know if I'm getting his with a new wave of spam and the server's
straining to keep up or if there might be something
Scott,
I was running 1.81.
Thanks,
Dan
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 2005 SpamHeaders - Fix
I have upgraded to the new Declude.exe v1.82. Within
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 2005 SpamHeaders - Fix
Scott,
I was running 1.81.
Thanks,
Dan
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 2005 SpamHeaders - Fix
I have
I moved from 1.81 to 1.82 this morning and I am not seeing any extra cpu
load, so it doesn't seem to be universal.
I moved from the last full release..1.75? To 1.82 this morning and things
seem fine here.
Sharyn
We are the worldwide producer and marketer of the award winning Cruzan
Thanks Barry and Scott... much appreciated! I'm sure all of the customers,
on and off of service agreements appreciate you making appropriate versions
with fixes available to them.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Barry Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent:
23 matches
Mail list logo
