RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Bah, puny spammer!

2003-09-17 Thread Sean Fahey
That is funny - it goes to show that the more they try to hide, the more obvious they become. Most of the spam that makes it through my filters are perfectly legitimate looking e-mail, which I have to manually add to the kill list. Congrats - I think this is the highest score I've ever seen.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bah, puny spammer!

2003-09-17 Thread paul
DSBL:6 SPAMCOP:10 BADHEADERS:6 HELOBOGUS:6 REVDNS:4 ROUTING:8 IPNOTINMX:2 NOLEGITCONTENT:2 COUNTRY:10 COMMENTS:153 SNIFFER:7 FIVETENSRC:5 EASYNET-DNSBL:7 EASYNET-DYNA:6 EASYNET-PROXIES:5 BH-CNKR:10 SORBS-HTTP:7 PSBL:5 CBL:5 GIBBERISHBODY:3 VERISCAM:7 BENTALLIPBL:7 BENTALLSPAMHINT:22

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Bah, puny spammer!

2003-09-17 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
DSBL:6 SPAMCOP:10 BADHEADERS:6 HELOBOGUS:6 REVDNS:4 ROUTING:8 IPNOTINMX:2 NOLEGITCONTENT:2 COUNTRY:10 COMMENTS:153 SNIFFER:7 FIVETENSRC:5 EASYNET-DNSBL:7 EASYNET-DYNA:6 EASYNET-PROXIES:5 BH-CNKR:10 SORBS-HTTP:7 PSBL:5 CBL:5 GIBBERISHBODY:3 VERISCAM:7 BENTALLIPBL:7 BENTALLSPAMHINT:22

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bah, puny spammer!

2003-09-17 Thread paul
Paul, those last 3 tests are our in-house tests that may or may not be suitable for anyone else. The first of the three is an IPFILE test that contains our banned IPs. We put them here instead of IMail because we like the logging of the mail-handling decisions to all be in Declude's log.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Bah, puny spammer!

2003-09-17 Thread Kami Razvan
] Bah, puny spammer! Paul, those last 3 tests are our in-house tests that may or may not be suitable for anyone else. The first of the three is an IPFILE test that contains our banned IPs. We put them here instead of IMail because we like the logging of the mail-handling decisions to all