[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 12:51 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Switch to control
bandwidth
I've got a nice solution for this called IPcheck Server Monitor from
Paessler (http://www.paessler.com/
Thanks, this looks like another good candidate. The software license of
$795 isn't that bad, and you don't need anything special to run it to
capacity on my network. I would like to see it in action however, and
figure out if it was easy to use (worth money to me), and also as stable
as could
Darin Cox wrote:
For the specific cases you outlined,
it sounds like IMGate might help. We don't use it, but from what I've
read on the lists, it sounds like it could be configured to protect
against these scenarios.
We use a single box solution integrating VamSoft's ORF with MS
s soon as traffic goes beyond a given
threshold and react accordingly.
Darin.
-
Original Message -
From:
Matt
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Switch to control
bandwi
ing,
however, you can be notified as soon as traffic goes beyond a given threshold
and react accordingly.
Darin.
-
Original Message -
From:
Matt
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT:
lude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Switch to control bandwidth
I just wanted to follow up on this thread. First, thanks for all of the suggestions. Here's a summary of what caught my eye.
1) There are some decent ch
eyond
a given threshold and react accordingly.
Darin.
-
Original Message -
From:
Matt
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Switch to control
bandwidth
I just wanted to follow up on this thread. First,
Wednesday, February 16, 2005 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Switch to control
bandwidth
I just wanted to follow up on this thread. First, thanks
for all of the suggestions. Here's a summary of what caught my eye.
1) There are some decent choices out there, and seemingly a
I just wanted to follow up on this thread. First, thanks for all of
the suggestions. Here's a summary of what caught my eye.
1) There are some decent choices out there, and seemingly a
3COM SuperStack 3 3226 comes at a nice price point (around $500) and
allows limiting per port at 1 Mbps incr
> It
> might even be nice to do this on a per-IP basis instead of a
> per-port basis, though that's not absolutely necessary.
> Since this is a Web hosting segment and our bandwidth is
> naturally limited going out, and very little intra-DMZ
> traffic exists, something that is 10/100 is all
Hi Matt-
We do this on our Fortigate antivirus firewall, which allows us bandwidth
limits and guarantees, both inbound and outbound, on a service and IP basis.
-Dave
- Original Message -
From: "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 1:30 PM
Subject: [Declude.Ju
Hi Matt,
There may be other options, but we settled on Cisco 3350 switches for this.
Their rate-limiting is much more granular than most others we looked at
(most would only limit to 1Mbps per port, not below), however they are both
pricey (~$3500) for 48 10/100 Mbps ports and 2 Gbps ports. You c
I don't know if this will work the way you want it to, but I saw this
company at Networld + Interop last year. It does have manual rate shaping
available but it's biggest benefit is that it will automatically rate
control connections to ensure no service can run away with too much
bandwidth.
Matt,
This might be a little more than what you need, but we use a product
called a NetEnforcer for bandwidth limiting at our shop. There are a
lot of other monitoring and accounting features as well. You can find
information about them at www.allot.com. This will allow you to rate
limit based
Matt,
I would recommend Cisco for this than again I seem to recommend Cisco for
everything. You can get rate limiting in the EMI images of the 2950 series
or the SMI images of the 3550 series. What type of other options do you
need with this? Straight L2 or L3? Gig uplinks etc?
Darrell
15 matches
Mail list logo
