Andrew 8)
p.s. Sorry for theshot yesterday Matt, but when I see
fish in a barrel, I just can't help myself.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin
CoxSent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 5:42 AMTo:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [D
You can read about or get your own version of the password
stealing app here:
http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/pspv.html
Andrew 8)
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 6:36
PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT:
another SOBERing though
Wow!
It's like 1995 - 2005 had never been.
:-|
ok, I must say I never worked with Declude Hijack. It's
not simply this what we need now?
Markus
Yes we are listening
David B
www.declude.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Serge
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 1:55 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: another SOBERing though
hijack
I was just thinking the same thing, that strictly going by
file name would not be best.
Well at least it would be ressource friendly.
Some thoughts:
Count attached file names but
1)ignore extensions like gif, jpg, pdf, ...
or alternatively look only for known risky extensions like zip,
@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT:
another SOBERing though
Wow!
It's like 1995 - 2005 had never been.
:-|
ok, I must say I never worked with Declude Hijack. It's
not simply this what we need now?
Markus
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
We are
all listening
Barry
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck,
AndrewSent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 2:14 PMTo:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT:
another SOBERing though
It certainly does feel like deja vu all over
: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: another SOBERing though
We are all listening
Barry
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 2:14 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE
George,
Let's talk offline. I'll call you later.
Barry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of george
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 3:45 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: another SOBERing though
Barry
?
-
Original Message -
From:
Markus
Gufler
To:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent:
Thursday, November 17, 2005 6:36 PM
Subject:
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: another SOBERing though
@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 7:24
PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT:
another SOBERing though
I think one of the issues here is that Hijack was
designed to solve a problem that existed due to omission on the part of
IMail, but being a separate app
17, 2005 11:31
PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT:
another SOBERing though
Serge, that's a misleading line of
reasoning.
Here's the thing:
Auth on port 587 is the right best practice for ISPs (and
some corporations) so that they can properly secure their MTA against
-
From:
Colbeck,
Andrew
To:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent:
Thursday, November 17, 2005 11:31 PM
Subject:
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: another SOBERing though
Serge, that's a misleading line
of reasoning.
Here's the thing:
Auth
Hmm, who would have thunk?
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF Success
Date 12/24/2004 9:24 AM
http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/msg22584.html
IMO, the best way to stop forging is to stop zombie spammers. The way
to do this is FIRST implement port 587 as AUTH-only, and
Well Matt when I read the link I was figuring you were fessing up to
how far off you were [are] on SPF - it was only until I read the end
that I understood to what you were referring. :)
-Nick
Matt wrote:
Hmm, who would have thunk?
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF Success
Date
:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT:
another SOBERing though
Well Matt when I read the link I was figuring you were fessing up
to how far off you were [are] on SPF - it was only until I read the end that I
understood to what you were referring. :)-NickMatt
;)
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nick
Hayer
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 3:31 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: another SOBERing though
Well Matt when I read the link I was figuring you
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
OT: another SOBERing though
Nick, I thought at first that was the
shortest message Matt ever wrote... then I realized it was because he had the
luxury of quoting himself!
Andrew ;)
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
into...
Darin.
-
Original Message -
From:
Matt
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 6:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: another SOBERing
though
Hmm, who would have thunk?
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF Success
Date
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 8:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: another SOBERing
though
Darin,I would pretty much skip over #1 except for some
obvious things like not allowing the username to be the password, and having a
minimum length of 4 or more
20 matches
Mail list logo
