RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure

2006-03-15 Thread John T \(Lists\)
15, 2006 3:53 PM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure > > I guess I am missing what the local DNS really has to do with the ip4r > tests. > > The way I understand the ip4r filter is that Declude does a DSN lookup at > lets say SPAMCOP a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure

2006-03-15 Thread Rick Baranowski
please correct me. Thanks Rick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 11:56 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure That may speed up resolution, but that's n

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure

2006-03-15 Thread Matt
ginal Message From: "John T \(Lists\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 1:22 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure Although others opinions may vary, you are better off using a cache only DNS server in-hous

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure

2006-03-15 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
rvices For You "Seek, and ye shall find!" -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 10:05 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure How do I fi

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure

2006-03-15 Thread John T \(Lists\)
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 11:49 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure   Gary, Let me confuse things a bit more here.  I would recommend not using Windows DNS as your caching server if you are using Windows

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure

2006-03-15 Thread Matt
ail and SM succeed? Gary Original Message From: "John T \(Lists\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 1:22 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure Although others opinions may vary, you are better o

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure

2006-03-15 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
hin a few seconds of each other. Why does Declude fail and SM succeed? Gary Original Message From: "John T \(Lists\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 1:22 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failu

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure

2006-03-15 Thread John T \(Lists\)
15, 2006 10:56 AM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure > > That may speed up resolution, but that's not my issue. The question is why does > SmarterMail catch the spam using the same ip4r tests? It is the same message, and > the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure

2006-03-15 Thread Kevin Bilbee
; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gary Steiner > Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 10:56 AM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure > > > That may speed up resolution, but that's not my issue. The > que

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure

2006-03-15 Thread Gary Steiner
Gary Original Message > From: "John T \(Lists\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 1:22 PM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure > > Although others opinions may vary, you are bet

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure

2006-03-15 Thread Dave Doherty
Same here. It works very well for us. -d - Original Message - From: "John T (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 1:20 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure Although others opinions may vary, you are better off using a cache on

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure

2006-03-15 Thread John T \(Lists\)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner > Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 10:05 AM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure > > How do I find that out? It is just an address that my hosting

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure

2006-03-15 Thread Gary Steiner
15, 2006 2:40 AM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure > > What is the OS of the DNS server being used? > > John T > eServices For You > > "Seek, and ye shall find!" > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure

2006-03-15 Thread John T \(Lists\)
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Baranowski > Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 6:49 AM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure > > We are currently testing SM3 and Delude 4 for our migration and seeing the > same thing. When I last checke

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure

2006-03-15 Thread Rick Baranowski
config changes that Gary did too. Rick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 12:38 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure What is the OS of the DNS server

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure

2006-03-14 Thread John T \(Lists\)
What is the OS of the DNS server being used? John T eServices For You "Seek, and ye shall find!" > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner > Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 7:27 PM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.