FWD: Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam getting through

2004-10-30 Thread Kim Premuda
-- Original Message -- From: Sheldon Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 12:12:11 -0700 It is obvious they are using disposable domain names. They come in flavors like gbzqrx.info and so on.

Re: Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam getting through

2004-10-30 Thread Darin Cox
$10 domain names don't put much of a dent in their profits. Darin. - Original Message - From: Kim Premuda [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude JunkMail Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 1:34 AM Subject: FWD: Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam getting through

Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam getting through

2004-10-28 Thread Sheldon Koehler
This is a good argument for the delayed-scan-and-deliver feature I suggested previously. The porn guys you are probably talking about we call the mad-lib pornsters. Every day or so they will come out with a brand new set of domains delivering a wide array of porn traffic. Actually, our robots

Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam getting through

2004-10-28 Thread Darin Cox
PM they have huge bandwidth behind them so they get quite a bit of PM content out before the updated rules can go in place. You're not kidding about the bandwidth. There's a medium-sized hosting center in downtown Tampa that was an offshoot from one of the largest porn websites. Their content

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam getting through

2004-10-28 Thread Mark E. Smith
This is a good argument for the delayed-scan-and-deliver feature I suggested previously. The porn guys you are probably talking about we call the mad-lib pornsters. Every day or so they will come out with a brand new set of domains delivering a wide array of porn traffic. Actually, our

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam getting through

2004-10-28 Thread R. Scott Perry
Check my logic on this... For the first rule we would run the external filter DELAYSCANANDDELIVER. The external .exe checks the sender IP against the database and either issues exit code 0 (process) 1 (STOPALLTESTS) If the external .exe doesn't find an IP w/ proper timeset offset in the database