[Declude.JunkMail] method for reducing CPU load

2006-11-28 Thread Scott Fisher
I've been mulling this one over as I watch my spam filtering CPU time slowly taking over the email server. And I don't expect the number of emails to go down. For external programs and filters I think it would be a good idea to add two optional fields to the global.cfg definition line: a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] method for reducing CPU load

2006-11-28 Thread Matt
Scott, This is _exactly_ what I have wanted Declude to do for over two years now all the way down to the spec. This would add low and high skip weight functionality to all filters, external apps and anything else that might be skippable, and do so by using the config in such a way that

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] method for reducing CPU load

2006-11-28 Thread Darin Cox
Ditto. I've been wanting the same functionality. Darin. - Original Message - From: Matt To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 1:34 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] method for reducing CPU load Scott, This is exactly what I have wanted Declude to do

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] method for reducing CPU load

2006-11-28 Thread Michael Cummins
I think this would be fantastic. Twice now this week I've had to comment out sniffer and invuribl because the proc folder was swelling. Some of my customers are grumbling because the service I've provided for years isn't as good anymore. Right now I'm thinking of putting a PirateFish type

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude v2.06 and Imail 2006.1

2006-11-28 Thread Matt
Sharyn, You should specify what version of Declude you are asking about. FYI, IMail 8.2+ requires Declude 3+. Some claim that older versions of Declude will work, however there are also widely reported problems with IMail 8.2+ and it is no doubt safest to run Declude 3+. Matt Sharyn

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude v2.06 and Imail 2006.1

2006-11-28 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
Um, I did... (in the subject line) Decluded v2.06 and Imail 2006.1 Sharyn, You should specify what version of Declude you are asking about. FYI, IMail 8.2+ requires Declude 3+. Some claim that older versions of Declude will work, however there are also widely reported problems with

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude v2.06 and Imail 2006.1

2006-11-28 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
MessageAs Matt said - Imail 8.22+ requires Declude 3+. So if you end up trying to use 2.x under 2006 you may or may not have issues. Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] method for reducing CPU load

2006-11-28 Thread Doug Traylor
Anyway, this idea would probably help out a great deal. PirateFish sounds good, although it looks like you are just buying support and an ebook based on http://www.howtoforge.com/linux_spam_filter_mail_gateway The Piratefish system is a set of instructions on how to construct an anti-spam

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] method for reducing CPU load

2006-11-28 Thread Christopher Jaime
This is an excellent suggestion. I can't wait to see it implemented. In the mean time, it's worth taking a look at WeightGate.exe (FREE). http://kb.armresearch.com/index.php?title=Message_Sniffer.TechnicalDetails.Tools I am personally using it with Message Sniffer and invURIBL with great