Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam lists

2003-09-26 Thread Bill Landry
Except you will never know how a test will work in your environment without
trying it.  What works for one person in their environment may not work for
someone else, and vise versa.  I guess that's the beauty of a weighted
system like Declude.

Also, because you can try different tests without causing any problems by
simply using the LOG and/or IGNORE actions, there should be no hesitation to
see how a particular test will work in your environment.  If the results
looks good, change the action to WARN, and if not, remove the test, all the
while you have not negatively impacted your mail flow in any way during your
testing.

Again, just my two cents...

Bill
- Original Message - 
From: Chuck Schick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 8:55 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam lists


 Very true, Bill.

 I just tend to be very careful about making changes.  Usually adding one
 test at a time.  Also, good feedback tends to keep me from reinventing the
 wheel.  If I was told from this list that a test had high false positives,
I
 would avoid the test or weigh it low.  Just plunging ahead is something I
do
 from time to time but is not my preferred course.

 Chuck Schick
 Warp 8, Inc.
 303-421-5140
 www.warp8.com


  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Landry
  Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 5:48 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam lists
 
 
  Everybody's experiences with spam test, including DNS based
  tests, are going
  to be different.  Why be so hesitant to try a test to see how
  it works for
  you.  Simply setup the test in your global.cfg and set the
  action to IGNORE
  or LOG, that way you can evaluate the test results without
  impacting your
  customers or your e-mail flow.
 
  Bill
  - Original Message -
  From: Chuck Schick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 4:38 PM
  Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam lists
 
 
   John:
  
   You actually are using some I was not so thanks for posting
  that.  About
  the
   only one that I am using that you are not is NJABL (see
  entry below).  It
   does not catch very many per day - about the same amount as ORDB.
  
   NJABL ip4r dnsbl.njabl.org 127.0.0.2 5 0
  
   I have been toying with testing Reynolds.  But have not gotten any
  feedback.
  
   Chuck Schick
   Warp 8, Inc.
   303-421-5140
   www.warp8.com
  
  
  
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John
Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 12:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam lists
   
   
With the loss in the last month of several spam lists, I am
reviewing what I
have been using.
   
This is the current list. Any recommendations on additions?
   
   
DSBL ip4r list.dsbl.org *
6 0
ORDB ip4r relays.ordb.org *
2 0
SPAMCOP ip4r bl.spamcop.net
127.0.0.2
15 0
EASYNET-DNSBL ip4r blackholes.easynet.nl
127.0.0.2
7 0
EASYNET-PROXIES ip4r
proxies.blackholes.easynet.nl 127.0.0.2
7 0
BLITZEDALL ip4r opm.blitzed.org *
7 0
   
SORBS-HTTP ip4r dnsbl.sorbs.net
127.0.0.2
50
SORBS-SOCKS ip4r dnsbl.sorbs.net
127.0.0.3
50
SORBS-MISC ip4r dnsbl.sorbs.net
127.0.0.4
50
SORBS-SMTP ip4r dnsbl.sorbs.net
127.0.0.5
50
SORBS-WEB ip4r dnsbl.sorbs.net
127.0.0.7
50
SORBS-ZOMBIE ip4r dnsbl.sorbs.net
127.0.0.9
50
SORBS-DUL ip4r dnsbl.sorbs.net
127.0.0.10
50
SORBS-NOMAIL ip4r dnsbl.sorbs.net
127.0.0.12
50
   
DSN rhsbl dsn.rfc-ignorant.org
127.0.0.2
10 0
NOABUSE rhsbl abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
127.0.0.4
3 0
NOPOSTMASTER rhsbl postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
127.0.0.3
3 0
MAILPOLICE-BULK rhsbl bulk.rhs.mailpolice.com
127.0.0.2
7 0
MAILPOLICE-PORN rhsbl porn.rhs.mailpolice.com
127.0.0.2
10 0
DNSFRAUD rhsbl in.dnsbl.org
127.0.0.3
10 0
DNSILLEGAL rhsbl in.dnsbl.org
127.0.0.5
10 0
DNSPROMO rhsbl in.dnsbl.org
127.0.0.4
10 0
   
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
   
   
   
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
   (http://www.declude.com)]
  
   ---
   This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
   unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
   type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
   at http://www.mail-archive.com.
  
   ---
   [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
  (http://www.declude.com)]
  
   ---
   This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
   unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
   type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The 

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam lists

2003-09-26 Thread Kami Razvan

Also, because you can try different tests without causing any problems by
simply using the LOG and/or IGNORE actions, there should be no hesitation to
see how a particular test will work in your environment.

I agree.. What we always do is add the test with a weight of Zero and use
the WARN action to simply watch the headers and see how the test behaves.
After a week or so of watching the spam then we simply add a weight between
1-5 depending on the response we see.  In time change the weight to what
makes sense..

Every test we have done has started with a weight of Zero and WARN action.

Just some thought..

Regards,
Kami

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review

2003-09-26 Thread andyb
Can you give me the syntax for that?

- Original Message -
From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 12:37 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review



  How do I get the Weight: to show?

 Andy,

 It's not the answer but maybe this will also work for you.
 I've configured Declude to add the weight to the subject-line from a
 certain weight on.

 WEIGHT75 SUBJECT [spam%WEIGHT%]

 We hold on 100 and can now see immediatly the weight and also sort by
 this weight. This makes it much easier to search for FP's because our
 experience shows that all messages above 200 points can be deleted
 without any further control.


 Markus


 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam lists

2003-09-26 Thread Sheldon Koehler
 Darrell,

Does DLA also do Imail log files? I would love to have a program that can
email me a summary every day and then a larger report text file I can look
at if needed.


Sheldon


Sheldon Koehler, Owner/Partnerhttp://www.tenforward.com
Ten Forward Communications   360-457-9023
Nationwide access, neighborhood support!

Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time
to pause and reflect. Mark Twain


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Attacks prompt shutdown of antispam lists

2003-09-26 Thread Sheldon Koehler
 Three Web sites that provide spam-blocking lists have been forced
 offline as a result of crippling Internet attacks in what experts on
 Thursday said is an escalation in the war between spammers and opponents
 of unsolicited e-mails.

These lists that we all have come to love, could be made available via FTP
and we can host them on our own servers...

Sheldon


Sheldon Koehler, Owner/Partnerhttp://www.tenforward.com
Ten Forward Communications   360-457-9023
Nationwide access, neighborhood support!

Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time
to pause and reflect. Mark Twain


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Attacks prompt shutdown of antispam lists

2003-09-26 Thread Bill Landry
You would have to download the lists quite often to stay current, and they
are rather large.  And if the site is being DDoSed, and it cannot even
respond to regular DNS queries, how are you going to be able to connect to
download the updates?

Bill
- Original Message - 
From: Sheldon Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 10:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Attacks prompt shutdown of antispam lists


  Three Web sites that provide spam-blocking lists have been forced
  offline as a result of crippling Internet attacks in what experts on
  Thursday said is an escalation in the war between spammers and opponents
  of unsolicited e-mails.

 These lists that we all have come to love, could be made available via FTP
 and we can host them on our own servers...

 Sheldon


 Sheldon Koehler, Owner/Partnerhttp://www.tenforward.com
 Ten Forward Communications   360-457-9023
 Nationwide access, neighborhood support!

 Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time
 to pause and reflect. Mark Twain


 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Attacks prompt shutdown of antispam lists

2003-09-26 Thread Sheldon Koehler
I get the Sniffer updates several times per day. And if it was a CNAME and
not an IP, it could be changed.


Sheldon


Sheldon Koehler, Owner/Partnerhttp://www.tenforward.com
Ten Forward Communications   360-457-9023
Nationwide access, neighborhood support!

He who sends a message by the hand of a fool
Cuts off his own feet and drinks violence.
-- Proverbs 26:6



- Original Message - 
From: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Attacks prompt shutdown of antispam lists


 You would have to download the lists quite often to stay current, and they
 are rather large.  And if the site is being DDoSed, and it cannot even
 respond to regular DNS queries, how are you going to be able to connect to
 download the updates?

 Bill
 - Original Message - 
 From: Sheldon Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 10:50 AM
 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Attacks prompt shutdown of antispam lists


   Three Web sites that provide spam-blocking lists have been forced
   offline as a result of crippling Internet attacks in what experts on
   Thursday said is an escalation in the war between spammers and
opponents
   of unsolicited e-mails.
 
  These lists that we all have come to love, could be made available via
FTP
  and we can host them on our own servers...
 
  Sheldon
 
 
  Sheldon Koehler, Owner/Partnerhttp://www.tenforward.com
  Ten Forward Communications   360-457-9023
  Nationwide access, neighborhood support!
 
  Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time
  to pause and reflect. Mark Twain
 
 
  ---
  [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review

2003-09-26 Thread Markus Gufler
 Can you give me the syntax for that?


Assuming you have configured 2 weight tests like

WEIGHT10
WEIGHT20

in your global.cfg file and you want to hold on 20 points:

Set the two actions

WEIGHT10 SUBJECT [spam%WEIGHT%] 
WEIGHT20 HOLD

in your $default$.junkmail file. (Note the space after the ] !)

This will add a [spamXX]  to the subject line of every message
collecting at least 10 points.
Any massage above 20 points will be moved to the hold folder.

Now you can list all hold messages with spam review and see the weight
of every message in the subject-column.

Hope this helps
Markus


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Attacks prompt shutdown of antispam lists

2003-09-26 Thread Bill Landry
DNS blacklist databases are very much larger than the Sniffer rule set
files.

Bill
- Original Message - 
From: Sheldon Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Attacks prompt shutdown of antispam lists


 I get the Sniffer updates several times per day. And if it was a CNAME and
 not an IP, it could be changed.


 Sheldon


 Sheldon Koehler, Owner/Partnerhttp://www.tenforward.com
 Ten Forward Communications   360-457-9023
 Nationwide access, neighborhood support!

 He who sends a message by the hand of a fool
 Cuts off his own feet and drinks violence.
 -- Proverbs 26:6



 - Original Message - 
 From: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 11:00 AM
 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Attacks prompt shutdown of antispam lists


  You would have to download the lists quite often to stay current, and
they
  are rather large.  And if the site is being DDoSed, and it cannot even
  respond to regular DNS queries, how are you going to be able to connect
to
  download the updates?
 
  Bill
  - Original Message - 
  From: Sheldon Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 10:50 AM
  Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Attacks prompt shutdown of antispam
lists
 
 
Three Web sites that provide spam-blocking lists have been forced
offline as a result of crippling Internet attacks in what experts on
Thursday said is an escalation in the war between spammers and
 opponents
of unsolicited e-mails.
  
   These lists that we all have come to love, could be made available via
 FTP
   and we can host them on our own servers...
  
   Sheldon
  
  
   Sheldon Koehler, Owner/Partnerhttp://www.tenforward.com
   Ten Forward Communications   360-457-9023
   Nationwide access, neighborhood support!
  
   Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time
   to pause and reflect. Mark Twain
  
  
   ---
   [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
  (http://www.declude.com)]
  
   ---
   This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
   unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
   type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
   at http://www.mail-archive.com.
  
 
  ---
  [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review

2003-09-26 Thread andyb
Yes, that part I already have.

But I already have WEIGHT10 HOLD and WEIGHT20 DELETE

What is the syntax for getting the weight in the subject line?

thanks, andy

- Original Message -
From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 2:08 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review


  Can you give me the syntax for that?


 Assuming you have configured 2 weight tests like

 WEIGHT10
 WEIGHT20

 in your global.cfg file and you want to hold on 20 points:

 Set the two actions

 WEIGHT10 SUBJECT [spam%WEIGHT%]
 WEIGHT20 HOLD

 in your $default$.junkmail file. (Note the space after the ] !)

 This will add a [spamXX]  to the subject line of every message
 collecting at least 10 points.
 Any massage above 20 points will be moved to the hold folder.

 Now you can list all hold messages with spam review and see the weight
 of every message in the subject-column.

 Hope this helps
 Markus


 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Attacks prompt shutdown of antispam lists

2003-09-26 Thread Sheldon Koehler
 DNS blacklist databases are very much larger than the Sniffer rule set
 files.

OK, bad idea...

Sheldon
 


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Attacks prompt shutdown of antispam lists

2003-09-26 Thread Markus Gufler

 
  These lists that we all have come to love, could be made 
  available via 
  FTP and we can host them on our own servers...
 

 You would have to download the lists quite often to stay 
 current, and they are rather large.  And if the site is being 
 DDoSed, and it cannot even respond to regular DNS queries, 
 how are you going to be able to connect to download the updates?


I think it's a good idea to share such tables. (If the blacklist
maintainer agree to share his entire knowledge)
Regarding updates the file sizes should be much lower if they contain
only the changed values.

Something like
+123.123.123.123
-122.122.122.122
...

Then it's also a question huw much traffic creates the
[your_processed_messages] x [your_ip4r+rbls_tests] DNS-lookups any day.

My opinion about sharing tecnologies:
It's a little bit programming work but why not use P2P tecnologies to
search for special signed file names containing the update for a certain
day? If this file is signed with a digital certificate it should be save
to run such a update over P2P in automatic mode. The maintainer of this
list can work from everywhere arround the world. He must only put the
daily updates in the P2P network.

Spammers shouldn't have any advantage from such public blacklists
because they are already able to check DNS based blacklists if the IP
they use currently to send out spam is blacklisted somewhere.

Maybe daily updates are to slow for effective spam filtering and also
hourly updates would ask some changes on the local anti spam filters
(for example a queue-wait for suspiciuos messages)

On the other side such shared blacklists can contain also additional
data like a relative weight about any listed IP to indicate not only
yes or no but also maybe yes, for shure! and so on.

I preffer also to have a clear defined maintainer that follows his
rules to maintain a certain list. Something like a open-blacklist can
be a little bit difficult because it's not clear who can add or delete
IPs.

Have a nice weekend!

Markus

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Attacks prompt shutdown of antispam lists

2003-09-26 Thread Markus Gufler
 DNS blacklist databases are very much larger than the Sniffer 
 rule set files.

A textfile containing only IP-Addresses can by zipped down to around 1/3
of his size.
A file containing 200 Ips has an original size of 3,1 kB
The zipped file has 1,1 kB
(Probably the zip algoritmus will work bether for larger files because
there are more equal 3-digit-strings.)

Multiplicating it by 100.000 assuming a blacklist containing 20 million
bad IPs would create a 110 MB file.

But this 20 million IP's are a initial value. I have no exact idea but I
assume there should be something between 1000 and 1 new/removed IPs
per day. 

If my theory has no errors we can expect daily updates between 0,5 and
5,5 MB. 
That shouldn't be a problem.

Markus

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Sender Permitted From (SPF)

2003-09-26 Thread Bill Landry
What do people think of this proposed solution to spam: Sender Permitted
From (SPF)?  You can find out more about it at:

http://spf.pobox.com/howithelps.html

Sounds like it could be an effective tool against spam, although there would
need to be mass adoption in order for it to be of much use.

Bill

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Attacks prompt shutdown of antispam lists lists

2003-09-26 Thread Scott MacLean

It wouldn't make sense to repeatedly download what was
essentially the same list with small changes. It would make much more
sense to have one large file to download once, followed by a distribution
of small diff files to apply to the main file, containing any
additions/deletions since the previous diff file.
If this was done in a distributed way, almost like DNS, where anyone
could get it from anyone else, there would simply be too many systems
running it to make it possible to kill it via DDOS.
At 02:52 PM 9/26/2003, Markus Gufler wrote:
 DNS blacklist databases are
very much larger than the Sniffer 
 rule set files.
A textfile containing only IP-Addresses can by zipped down to around
1/3
of his size.
A file containing 200 Ips has an original size of 3,1 kB
The zipped file has 1,1 kB
(Probably the zip algoritmus will work bether for larger files
because
there are more equal 3-digit-strings.)
Multiplicating it by 100.000 assuming a blacklist containing 20
million
bad IPs would create a 110 MB file.
But this 20 million IP's are a initial value. I have no exact idea but
I
assume there should be something between 1000 and 1 new/removed
IPs
per day. 
If my theory has no errors we can expect daily updates between 0,5
and
5,5 MB. 
That shouldn't be a problem.
Markus
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be
found
at
http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Attacks prompt shutdown of antispam lists

2003-09-26 Thread Bill Landry
Multiply times the number of databases you want to use, times the number of
times you would need to download them each day to stay current, times the
number of people that want to download the files--have you got a spare OC-3
laying around...?

Bill
- Original Message - 
From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 11:52 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Attacks prompt shutdown of antispam lists


  DNS blacklist databases are very much larger than the Sniffer
  rule set files.

 A textfile containing only IP-Addresses can by zipped down to around 1/3
 of his size.
 A file containing 200 Ips has an original size of 3,1 kB
 The zipped file has 1,1 kB
 (Probably the zip algoritmus will work bether for larger files because
 there are more equal 3-digit-strings.)

 Multiplicating it by 100.000 assuming a blacklist containing 20 million
 bad IPs would create a 110 MB file.

 But this 20 million IP's are a initial value. I have no exact idea but I
 assume there should be something between 1000 and 1 new/removed IPs
 per day.

 If my theory has no errors we can expect daily updates between 0,5 and
 5,5 MB.
 That shouldn't be a problem.

 Markus

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Foreign Characters and Declude

2003-09-26 Thread R. Scott Perry

Don't know if any one asked this, but we are seeing a flurry of
omlauted characters used in Subject fields:
RE: üS Döctor appröved RX Prëscríptíon

We are ring to filter on these, but Declude doesn't see to
recognize them?
That should trigger the NONENGLISH test (if you are using it).

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Foreign Characters and Declude

2003-09-26 Thread Roger Heath
Reply to: R. Scott Perry
  Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Foreign Characters and Declude on Friday 7:40:45 PM

I want to enable foreign characters but filter on their
exact words. It sounds like these character sets are not
'viewed' and filtered in Declude?

--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com


- Copy of Original Message(s): -


Don't know if any one asked this, but we are seeing a flurry of
omlauted characters used in Subject fields:

RE: üS Döctor appröved RX Prëscríptíon

We are ring to filter on these, but Declude doesn't see to
recognize them?

R That should trigger the NONENGLISH test (if you are using it).

R -Scott
R ---
R Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
R Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver
R vulnerability detection.
R Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

R ---
R [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

R ---
R This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
R unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
R type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
R at http://www.mail-archive.com.
R --
R ActivatorMail(tm) ver.00922031 Scanned for all viruses by
R www.activatormail.com intelligent anti-virus anti-spam service


--
ActivatorMail(tm) ver.00922031 Scanned for all viruses by 
www.activatormail.com intelligent anti-virus anti-spam service

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] OT - publishing solution Was: Attacks prompt shutdown of antispam lists

2003-09-26 Thread Pete McNeil


At 07:25 PM 9/26/2003 -0400, you wrote:
At 06:50 PM 09/26/2003, Pete McNeil
wrote:
At 02:30 PM 9/26/2003 -0700, you
wrote:
 I've said it before, I'll say
it again. It's time to leverage the power
 of the network agianst abuse on that same network.
Pete,
You are preaching to the choir ;)
When will it be ready?
Pedaling as fast as I can...
Anybody know how to eliminate the need for sleep?
 From CNN:
Stay-awake pill
The maker of a pill that helps people stay awake hopes government
regulators will OK wider use of the drug. CNN medical correspondent Dr.
Sanjay Gupta spoke with CNN’s Bill Hemmer about the pill. “The drug is
called Provigil and it's been around for some time now. … There’s going
to be an FDA advisory committee that's going to suggest that it be used
for shift workers, for people who have obstructive sleep apnea -- that's
people who have a breathing difficulty that keeps them up at night -- MS
as well, and insomnia. … I think what people are really rallying behind
is the fact that [the drug] is not a stimulant. … In fact, [they’re
saying] the side effects are actually less than that of even caffeine.”

Wow - thanks.
That said, here is a solution if somebody wants to pound it (I can't do
it right now, sorry). I can lay out a quick architecture - it moves fast,
keep up :-)
Take a look at entropy.
(http://entropy.stop1984.com/en/home.html).
This is not perfect, but it exists and it's good enough to start
with.
The key piece of this technology is that it is a distributed file system
- distributed meaning there is no single node to attack. This also means
that it scales well because, presumably, anybody using the service would
be operating as one of the nodes - so the load of all queries would be
split/balanced among all of the participants.
Segments of zone files can be stored into this distributed network with
file names matching the first two octets of the IP... so, File
MyFavoriteBL-216.88 would be a binary file containing say 64K bytes -
represented by a two byte array address for the next two octets. A ( 0 )
byte means no result. A ( 2 ) byte means block this (analagous to
127.0.0.2). Any other values would be defined by the provider (in this
case MyFavoriteBL). A non-existent file also means that the zone doesn't
exist. (I know I'm using zone the wrong way - but it's a handy term for
this work).
Trouble is this: This is a publicly available file so if you can get to
the key for the file you will/may be able to alter it. Spammers would
simply hack up the files - useless. What to do.
Solution: This is very much like rd work I've been doing on a
secure, distributed database architecture - what is required is more than
one key where each key is able to access the file (or file segment) with
specific access rights.
For this application there are only two key types required.
If you access the data through one path (user key) then you have
read-only access. If you access the data through the second path (admin
key) then you have write access. The publisher then uses the admin key to
publish their data from any accessible node on the 'net. Subscribers can
only read.
Next, publication with the admin key may not be performed at the source
of the request. (This prevents hacking). Instead, write requests are
handled by having a peer generate a random challenge - the challenge is
added to he admin key by the source of the write request and the sha1 of
that result (the access key) is added to the segments of the file that
are sent to that peer. The access key is recalculated at the peer
containing the data segment in question. If the access key matches then
the write is performed. If not then the request is rejected. If more than
some limit of rejections occurs then the requesting node is expelled from
the network.
There are two nearly identical file segments maintained in the file
system. The read access segment is encrypted only with the read access
key. The write segment is encoded with the write access key.
When a write access segment is overwritten/created, the read segment is
cloned from that segment. The read access key is encoded/replicated
within the write access segment to facilitate this.
The segments are encoded using an odd-even byte split, and encrypted with
a convolution stream encryption (like Mangler (see Sniffer2 source)) with
the key at the end of the segment so that it acts like a CRC -
specifically, if a segment is altered (or read bad from a disc) then it
will not be successfully decrypted - and a brute force attack requires
that the entire segment be decrypted with each trial-key before
validation can be achieved.
--- I tried not to be too technical - hope this is enough to get the ball
rolling.
If a version of Entropy (or another similar p2p engine) can be modified
to implement the above publish/subscribe protocols then we create an
environment where a publisher can access a widely distributed network of
peers maintained by the subscribers.
The publisher can create the file and 

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fwd: PERSONAL LETTER TO LEVITSKY JOSHUA

2003-09-26 Thread Karen D. Oland
I'll go you one better. I got one in the real mail (from Spain, I am in the
US). Says I won 650,000 in a lottery, all I need to do is fill in the
official looking ppage of personal info, bank acct and emergency contacts so
they can deposit it for me.  Of course, I have to act fast or it all goes
back to the bank holding it.

K
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Levitsky


Ok. This spam is scary. It has my actual home address and phone number. I'm
guessing they cropped it from WHOIS maybe... but that wouldn't make sense
since many WHOIS contacts are technical people that wouldn't fall for this.
Anyone else get this variation of the typical financial fraud with your
actual contact info? It is a little more disturbing.

-Josh

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.