[Declude.JunkMail] TextFilter file, how many entries ?

2003-10-30 Thread Giampiero Pagnoni
Hi,
I have create a text file with many BODY 0 CONTAINS   TextToFilter...

My question is,
How many entries can I put in the file before Declude slow down ?

Thanks in advance

Piero 
Italy
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] TextFilter file, how many entries ?

2003-10-30 Thread Markus Gufler

 My question is,
 How many entries can I put in the file before Declude slow down ?

I think this depends on
-what HW-ressources you have in use (CPU, storage,...)
-how much mail traffic you have during peak times


I've had a problem some days ago by adding two filter files having both
around 140 kB (one for body one for header filtering)

At midnight all worked fine but next morning at around 9:00 AM it was almost
not more possible to logon to the server. Ping whas ok, but it has taken
over a minute to display the Terminal services login screen. After logging
on I've had to wait for over 5 Minutes to see the desktop.
Other 2 Minutes to open the taskmanager and see that there was a lot of
declude.exe's having CPU-times of over 60 seconds and consuming all
disponible CPU-resources.

We've running Imail v7.15 on a Intel P4 2,6 GHz and IDE Raid mirroring
Declude Junkmail and Virus with 2 scan engines.

First I've tried to disable the second AV engine without a result.

After removing the two filter files all become normal.

We process around 4000 msgs/day.

Markus

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] TextFilter file, how many entries ?

2003-10-30 Thread John Shacklett
I posted a question two weeks ago asking if anyone knew a way to calculate
the amount of time it takes for individual messages to clear the entire
receive/virusscan/junkmailscan/deliver process, and this exactly why I
asked. My system doesn't have any filters quite as large as 140kb, or even
70k, but I keep adding steadily to them and it feels like things are
somewhat slower.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Markus Gufler
Sent: Thursday, 30 October 2003 3:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] TextFilter file, how many entries ?



 My question is,
 How many entries can I put in the file before Declude slow down ?

I think this depends on
-what HW-ressources you have in use (CPU, storage,...)
-how much mail traffic you have during peak times


I've had a problem some days ago by adding two filter files having both
around 140 kB (one for body one for header filtering)

At midnight all worked fine but next morning at around 9:00 AM it was almost
not more possible to logon to the server. Ping whas ok, but it has taken
over a minute to display the Terminal services login screen. After logging
on I've had to wait for over 5 Minutes to see the desktop.
Other 2 Minutes to open the taskmanager and see that there was a lot of
declude.exe's having CPU-times of over 60 seconds and consuming all
disponible CPU-resources.

We've running Imail v7.15 on a Intel P4 2,6 GHz and IDE Raid mirroring
Declude Junkmail and Virus with 2 scan engines.

First I've tried to disable the second AV engine without a result.

After removing the two filter files all become normal.

We process around 4000 msgs/day.

Markus

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT Outlook Express problem

2003-10-30 Thread paul
 Another thing to try, is delete the e-mail account on the client
completely.
 Restart the computer. Recreate the e-mail account.

Thanks John, I'll give that one a shot as well. I tried adding a return
address, but that didn't seem to work...

Thanks to all who have offered suggestions!

Out of all our users, just 4 or 5 are having this problem very odd
indeed.

Paul


---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] TextFilter file, how many entries ?

2003-10-30 Thread Markus Gufler

 I posted a question two weeks ago asking if anyone knew a way 
 to calculate the amount of time it takes for individual 
 messages to clear the entire 
 receive/virusscan/junkmailscan/deliver process, and this 
 exactly why I asked. My system doesn't have any filters quite 
 as large as 140kb, or even 70k, but I keep adding steadily to 
 them and it feels like things are somewhat slower.

I suggest to simply try it out.
Create a large filter list (definitively larger than you expect to use in
future) and assign to all (random) keywords a weight of 0 and no additional
action. This should create the same resource usage as with points.

Now set up something to send a little bit more mails then your average mail
processing rate (for example a Script sending out 20 messages as fast as
possible)

You can send it all to the same recipient. Imail/Decludes architecture will
not process it faster because the messages are all the same.

Put some tipical content (1 to 30 kB of text) in the message body.

Watch the cpu usage during normal processing and the simulated mail
bombardement.

If you want you can also set a line

PIDDEBUG ON

In your global.cfg file
This will write a .PID file for every declude process in you spool folder. 
Note: it's deleted after the process has finished his task so you have to
open it during processing (not easy)

In this PID file you can read in milliseconds how long any step takes to
finish.

All your results are something that can be interesting for multiple users on
this list but keep in mind to indicate also what CPU, storage system, ...
you've in use. Whats the average/peak message processing rate on your
server, ...

--

About CPU usage: 
I've had an idea some months ago and still search someone who can help.

The problem: certain spam-tests can be very CPU-intensive. This will prevent
us to keep filter files and programming logic as simple as possible. (For
example long text filter files, regular expressions)

The real problem: Any mailserver running a lot of tests before store or
forward the message to the final destination is much more vulnerable for
peak usage or also simple mailbomb attacks then a MTA configured to simple
deliver any message as fast and efficient as possible.

The idea: If declude (or our external spamchk test) could determine an
average CPU usage value before start all tests it should be possible to
dinamicaly exclude certain resource intensive tests if the CPU average is to
high.

For example:
In the global.cfg file a test could be configured like

%75 MYFILTER filter d:\imail\declude\large_bodyfilter.txt x 5 0

This test would run only if declude has determined an average cpu usage
below 75%

Another problem: declude is called as needed for any single message. It's
not a service running around the clock and so it's not able to determine
and provide a reliable CPU average value.

The solution: A small windows service that calculate and serves the 1, 5 or
10 minute CPU average value. Declude could connect over DCOM or a certain
TCP/UDP port to this service before run all other tests. If the average is
to high this will comment out automatically the big tests.

Such a solution will not decrease the detection rate because certain tests
will not run sometimes, but will increase the detection rate because this
new tests now can run everytime when it's possible.

Markus


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] PLEASE CONTACT ME OFFLIST

2003-10-30 Thread Ed McNichols
I would like to contract someone to help with a problem my mail server. We
have been wrestling with a problem now for several days which came on quite
suddenly and I would like to get it resolved.

My queue is accumulating huge amounts of files very quickly...
MY processors (2) are at almost 100% all of the time..
Mail is being lost..

This came on suddenly,without adding new loads to the server..

Please contact me offlist. Feel free to call
 


Ed McNichols, MCP
CEO
Archiventure, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.archiventure.net
Tel. 570.253.1986
Fax. 570.253.4343



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Shacklett
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 8:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] TextFilter file, how many entries ?

I posted a question two weeks ago asking if anyone knew a way to calculate
the amount of time it takes for individual messages to clear the entire
receive/virusscan/junkmailscan/deliver process, and this exactly why I
asked. My system doesn't have any filters quite as large as 140kb, or even
70k, but I keep adding steadily to them and it feels like things are
somewhat slower.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Markus Gufler
Sent: Thursday, 30 October 2003 3:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] TextFilter file, how many entries ?



 My question is,
 How many entries can I put in the file before Declude slow down ?

I think this depends on
-what HW-ressources you have in use (CPU, storage,...)
-how much mail traffic you have during peak times


I've had a problem some days ago by adding two filter files having both
around 140 kB (one for body one for header filtering)

At midnight all worked fine but next morning at around 9:00 AM it was almost
not more possible to logon to the server. Ping whas ok, but it has taken
over a minute to display the Terminal services login screen. After logging
on I've had to wait for over 5 Minutes to see the desktop.
Other 2 Minutes to open the taskmanager and see that there was a lot of
declude.exe's having CPU-times of over 60 seconds and consuming all
disponible CPU-resources.

We've running Imail v7.15 on a Intel P4 2,6 GHz and IDE Raid mirroring
Declude Junkmail and Virus with 2 scan engines.

First I've tried to disable the second AV engine without a result.

After removing the two filter files all become normal.

We process around 4000 msgs/day.

Markus

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by ezaccess.net]


---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by ezaccess.net]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] TextFilter file, how many entries ?

2003-10-30 Thread Frederick Samarelli
Could Declude be run as a Service?
- Original Message - 
From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 9:59 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] TextFilter file, how many entries ?



  I posted a question two weeks ago asking if anyone knew a way
  to calculate the amount of time it takes for individual
  messages to clear the entire
  receive/virusscan/junkmailscan/deliver process, and this
  exactly why I asked. My system doesn't have any filters quite
  as large as 140kb, or even 70k, but I keep adding steadily to
  them and it feels like things are somewhat slower.

 I suggest to simply try it out.
 Create a large filter list (definitively larger than you expect to use in
 future) and assign to all (random) keywords a weight of 0 and no
additional
 action. This should create the same resource usage as with points.

 Now set up something to send a little bit more mails then your average
mail
 processing rate (for example a Script sending out 20 messages as fast as
 possible)

 You can send it all to the same recipient. Imail/Decludes architecture
will
 not process it faster because the messages are all the same.

 Put some tipical content (1 to 30 kB of text) in the message body.

 Watch the cpu usage during normal processing and the simulated mail
 bombardement.

 If you want you can also set a line

 PIDDEBUG ON

 In your global.cfg file
 This will write a .PID file for every declude process in you spool folder.
 Note: it's deleted after the process has finished his task so you have to
 open it during processing (not easy)

 In this PID file you can read in milliseconds how long any step takes to
 finish.

 All your results are something that can be interesting for multiple users
on
 this list but keep in mind to indicate also what CPU, storage system, ...
 you've in use. Whats the average/peak message processing rate on your
 server, ...

 --

 About CPU usage:
 I've had an idea some months ago and still search someone who can help.

 The problem: certain spam-tests can be very CPU-intensive. This will
prevent
 us to keep filter files and programming logic as simple as possible. (For
 example long text filter files, regular expressions)

 The real problem: Any mailserver running a lot of tests before store or
 forward the message to the final destination is much more vulnerable for
 peak usage or also simple mailbomb attacks then a MTA configured to simple
 deliver any message as fast and efficient as possible.

 The idea: If declude (or our external spamchk test) could determine an
 average CPU usage value before start all tests it should be possible to
 dinamicaly exclude certain resource intensive tests if the CPU average is
to
 high.

 For example:
 In the global.cfg file a test could be configured like

 %75 MYFILTER filter d:\imail\declude\large_bodyfilter.txt x 5 0

 This test would run only if declude has determined an average cpu usage
 below 75%

 Another problem: declude is called as needed for any single message. It's
 not a service running around the clock and so it's not able to determine
 and provide a reliable CPU average value.

 The solution: A small windows service that calculate and serves the 1, 5
or
 10 minute CPU average value. Declude could connect over DCOM or a certain
 TCP/UDP port to this service before run all other tests. If the average is
 to high this will comment out automatically the big tests.

 Such a solution will not decrease the detection rate because certain tests
 will not run sometimes, but will increase the detection rate because this
 new tests now can run everytime when it's possible.

 Markus


 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] TextFilter file, how many entries ?

2003-10-30 Thread Markus Gufler

 Could Declude be run as a Service?

No.

Declude.exe is called from Imail'S SMTP-Service for every single incoming
message. Declude.exe is called in place of or before Imails original
exe-file and terminate after the message is delivered socessfully to the
destination.

The idea is to run a simple service (completely independent from imail or
declude) that calculates the average cpu usage value. 

This can be done be asking the current CPU-usage every one second. (for
example)

Sec.Cur%.   10s Avg%.
1   0   0
2   20  10
3   20  13
4   20  15
5   0   12
6   90  25
7   90  34
8   95  41
9   100 48
10  100 54
11  100 64
12  100 72
13  100 82 - don't start more resource intensive tests (RIT)
14  100 91
15  80  96
16  50  91
17  30  85
18  30  78
19  0   68 - begin starting RIT
20  10  59
21 ...


Maybe the 10 seconds average are not the definitively right time range and
maybe it's also necessary to define a trigger-on and trigger-off treshold as
used also in common tecnic regluation processes to guarantee a well balanced
regulation of the cpu-usage.

Markus

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] TextFilter file, how many entries ?

2003-10-30 Thread Matthew Bramble




I have two virus scanners with JunkMail Pro fully enabled plus 160 KB
of active filters (~10 KB in comments) on a dual 1 Ghz PIII/1 Ghz
memory/RAID 5/Win2k server also running a bunch of other Web services,
and it takes maybe 5-7 seconds for me to send a very short message to
myself and have it come back. If I sent a large executable file
though, it would take my server 20 seconds or so to get it back to me,
probably mostly because of the virus scanning (Declude only scans the
first 32K of the message with text filters). Currently we handle just
over 3,000 messages a day, and the processors normally don't go over
the 15%-20% range. Without the second scanner and all the custom
filters, that was more like 5%-7% as a peak. I certainly expect the
server to handle much more than 6 times the current traffic. I'll
probably be looking to optimize a bit more at that point though.

Matt



John Shacklett wrote:

  I posted a question two weeks ago asking if anyone knew a way to calculate
the amount of time it takes for individual messages to clear the entire
receive/virusscan/junkmailscan/deliver process, and this exactly why I
asked. My system doesn't have any filters quite as large as 140kb, or even
70k, but I keep adding steadily to them and it "feels" like things are
somewhat slower.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
Sent: Thursday, 30 October 2003 3:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] TextFilter file, how many entries ?



  
  
My question is,
How many entries can I put in the file before Declude slow down ?

  
  
I think this depends on
-what HW-ressources you have in use (CPU, storage,...)
-how much mail traffic you have during peak times


I've had a problem some days ago by adding two filter files having both
around 140 kB (one for body one for header filtering)

At midnight all worked fine but next morning at around 9:00 AM it was almost
not more possible to logon to the server. Ping whas ok, but it has taken
over a minute to display the Terminal services login screen. After logging
on I've had to wait for over 5 Minutes to see the desktop.
Other 2 Minutes to open the taskmanager and see that there was a lot of
declude.exe's having CPU-times of over 60 seconds and consuming all
disponible CPU-resources.

We've running Imail v7.15 on a Intel P4 2,6 GHz and IDE Raid mirroring
Declude Junkmail and Virus with 2 scan engines.

First I've tried to disable the second AV engine without a result.

After removing the two filter files all become normal.

We process around 4000 msgs/day.

Markus
  





---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink, AOL, HOTMAIL

2003-10-30 Thread Terry Parks
Is anybody else having trouble with mail being returned from these domains.
The returned email shows no consistent errors and well over half the time
only reports that mail was undeliverable. It's not consistent, and does not
affect all addresses, but it is wide spread.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink, AOL, HOTMAIL

2003-10-30 Thread Chuck Schick
The question is what do the Imail logs say?

Is the mail being bounced because you can't make a connection?

We have not seen any problem with bounces.

Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
303-421-5140
www.warp8.com
 



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Terry Parks
 Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:09 AM
 To: Declude. JunkMail
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink, AOL, HOTMAIL
 
 
 Is anybody else having trouble with mail being returned from 
 these domains.
 The returned email shows no consistent errors and well over 
 half the time
 only reports that mail was undeliverable. It's not 
 consistent, and does not
 affect all addresses, but it is wide spread.
 
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Filters

2003-10-30 Thread pholmes

Group,

Anyone have a good generic myfilter.txt they could send my way?  I'd
like do more screening based on content.
If so, please email it over.

Thanks in advance!

Best Regards,

mri_sr.consultant /
Phillip B. Holmes
Media Resolutions Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Macromedia Alliance Partner
http://www.mediares.com
1-888-395-4678 |Ext. 101
972-889-0201 |Ext. 101


---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] '+' Character in DJM Test Names

2003-10-30 Thread Dan Geiser
Hello, All,
Is it legit to use a '+' character in your DJM test names, e.g.
WEIGHTRANGE10+ ?  I just want to make sure it won't break anything.

Thanks, Much!
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Sign up for virus-free and spam-free e-mail with Nexus Technology Group 
http://www.nexustechgroup.com/mailscan

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Sender blacklists

2003-10-30 Thread Todd Holt
Can sender blacklists support wildcards?

ie. @*.abcdef.com

Todd Holt
Xidix Technologies, Inc
Las Vegas, NV  USA
www.xidix.com
702.319.4349



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry Parks
 Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 9:09 AM
 To: Declude. JunkMail
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink, AOL, HOTMAIL
 
 Is anybody else having trouble with mail being returned from these
 domains.
 The returned email shows no consistent errors and well over half the
time
 only reports that mail was undeliverable. It's not consistent, and
does
 not
 affect all addresses, but it is wide spread.
 
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]


---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] '+' Character in DJM Test Names

2003-10-30 Thread R. Scott Perry

Is it legit to use a '+' character in your DJM test names, e.g.
WEIGHTRANGE10+ ?  I just want to make sure it won't break anything.
Yes, that will work fine.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Sender blacklists

2003-10-30 Thread R. Scott Perry

Can sender blacklists support wildcards?

ie. @*.abcdef.com
From Tuesday:

 I don't believe any files (IMail Kill List or Declude JunkMail 
blacklists) allow for wildcards.

 In a Declude JunkMail sender blacklist, you can use .ps01.net to 
catch @*.ps0.net.

In response, though, IMail v8's SMTP Kill File can use wildcards.

Instead, you should use:

.abcdef.com

which will work exactly the same as what you show above.  Or, you can use:

.abcdef.com
@abcdef.com
which will catch anything from the abcdef.com domain.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink, AOL, HOTMAIL

2003-10-30 Thread R. Scott Perry

I've looked in the logs and found the following error reported:
DNS Server (gives the IP) returned a SERVER FAILURE error for MX or A for
(gives the domain).
It's actually the IMail SMTP log file entries (SMTP or SMTP-) that you 
want to look at for problems delivering mail to remote mailservers.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sender blacklists

2003-10-30 Thread Todd Holt
@abcdef.com will catch @.abcdef.com?  It would seem to imply a wildcard
between the @ and the rest of the domain name.  Is that true?

Todd Holt
Xidix Technologies, Inc
Las Vegas, NV  USA
www.xidix.com
702.319.4349



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
 Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:46 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Sender blacklists
 
 
 Can sender blacklists support wildcards?
 
 ie. @*.abcdef.com
 
  From Tuesday:
 
   I don't believe any files (IMail Kill List or Declude JunkMail
 blacklists) allow for wildcards.
 
   In a Declude JunkMail sender blacklist, you can use .ps01.net
to
 catch @*.ps0.net.
 
 In response, though, IMail v8's SMTP Kill File can use wildcards.
 
 Instead, you should use:
 
  .abcdef.com
 
 which will work exactly the same as what you show above.  Or, you can
use:
 
  .abcdef.com
  @abcdef.com
 
 which will catch anything from the abcdef.com domain.
 
 -Scott
 ---
 Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail
mailservers.
 Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver
 vulnerability detection.
 Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day
evaluation.
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]


---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sender blacklists

2003-10-30 Thread R. Scott Perry

@abcdef.com will catch @.abcdef.com?
No.  It will only catch E-mail with @abcdef.com in the return address, so 
it will not catch @.abcdef.com.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sender blacklists

2003-10-30 Thread Todd Holt
Thanks for the info.  I think we will be upgrading to 8.x to take
advantage of the wildcarded kill.lst.

Thanks to everyone for their input.

Todd Holt
Xidix Technologies, Inc
Las Vegas, NV  USA
www.xidix.com
702.319.4349



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
 Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:12 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sender blacklists
 
 
 @abcdef.com will catch @.abcdef.com?
 
 No.  It will only catch E-mail with @abcdef.com in the return
address,
 so
 it will not catch @.abcdef.com.
 
 -Scott
 ---
 Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail
mailservers.
 Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver
 vulnerability detection.
 Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day
evaluation.
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]


---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] SPAMCOP Account

2003-10-30 Thread Dan Geiser
Hello, All,
I signed up for a free Spamcop account a few weeks ago and I've been using
it to submit spam via their web-based form.  In addition to allowing spam
submittal via a web-based form they also give you a unique e-mail address
which you can forward spam to.  I was thinking about setting up Declude
JunkMail to send all the mail which I would normally just DELETE because of
High weight to this unique e-mail address.  Before I do this I had a few
questions...

1)  Does anyone else do what I am describing?  If so, does it work well?

2)  If I want to forward all mail above a certain weight, say a weight of
45, would the ROUTETO action be the correct action to use.  I don't want to
keep a copy of the e-mail in my HOLD directory.

3)  If ROUTETO is the correct action, when the message is sent to Spamcop
what will the FROM address be?  Will it be the original sender's e-mail
address or a special e-mail address which DJM assigns to itself?

I think that's all for now.

Thanks, Much!
Dan Geiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Sign up for virus-free and spam-free e-mail with Nexus Technology Group 
http://www.nexustechgroup.com/mailscan

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMCOP Account

2003-10-30 Thread Kami Razvan
Dan..

BE VERY CAREFUL IF YOU DO THIS...

We were doing this and once someone from the list sent me an email with
bunch of keywords in it.. The system automatically forwarded it to the
SPAMCop account.

If you do this make sure you review every spam that goes into your account
and approve them knowing it is a spam and not someone that just happen to
send you bunch of words in your filter file.

Regards,
Kami


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 4:53 PM
To: Declude JunkMail
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMCOP Account

Hello, All,
I signed up for a free Spamcop account a few weeks ago and I've been using
it to submit spam via their web-based form.  In addition to allowing spam
submittal via a web-based form they also give you a unique e-mail address
which you can forward spam to.  I was thinking about setting up Declude
JunkMail to send all the mail which I would normally just DELETE because of
High weight to this unique e-mail address.  Before I do this I had a few
questions...

1)  Does anyone else do what I am describing?  If so, does it work well?

2)  If I want to forward all mail above a certain weight, say a weight of
45, would the ROUTETO action be the correct action to use.  I don't want to
keep a copy of the e-mail in my HOLD directory.

3)  If ROUTETO is the correct action, when the message is sent to Spamcop
what will the FROM address be?  Will it be the original sender's e-mail
address or a special e-mail address which DJM assigns to itself?

I think that's all for now.

Thanks, Much!
Dan Geiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Sign up for virus-free and spam-free e-mail with Nexus Technology Group
http://www.nexustechgroup.com/mailscan

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMCOP Account

2003-10-30 Thread Jason Newland
Typically I only send SPAMCOP e-mails that pass through our Declude
filters.  The theory being that now SPAMCOP will know about that
address, list it, and it won't clear Declude again.

I don't see the reasoning behind sending SPAMCOP thousands of e-mails
per day that are already stopped by your system.  The benefit of
manually sending is exactly what Kami noted below.  You won't
inadvertently submit good guys.  Also, if you poke around SPAMCOPS site,
there is a program you can get called SpamSource that plugs into
Outlook.  Once installed/configured, all I have to do to report spam is
click on the SpamSource button, and it submits to SPAMCOP.  


Jason


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 4:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMCOP Account


Dan..

BE VERY CAREFUL IF YOU DO THIS...

We were doing this and once someone from the list sent me an email with
bunch of keywords in it.. The system automatically forwarded it to the
SPAMCop account.

If you do this make sure you review every spam that goes into your
account and approve them knowing it is a spam and not someone that just
happen to send you bunch of words in your filter file.

Regards,
Kami


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 4:53 PM
To: Declude JunkMail
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMCOP Account

Hello, All,
I signed up for a free Spamcop account a few weeks ago and I've been
using it to submit spam via their web-based form.  In addition to
allowing spam submittal via a web-based form they also give you a unique
e-mail address which you can forward spam to.  I was thinking about
setting up Declude JunkMail to send all the mail which I would normally
just DELETE because of High weight to this unique e-mail address.
Before I do this I had a few questions...

1)  Does anyone else do what I am describing?  If so, does it work well?

2)  If I want to forward all mail above a certain weight, say a weight
of 45, would the ROUTETO action be the correct action to use.  I don't
want to keep a copy of the e-mail in my HOLD directory.

3)  If ROUTETO is the correct action, when the message is sent to
Spamcop what will the FROM address be?  Will it be the original sender's
e-mail address or a special e-mail address which DJM assigns to itself?

I think that's all for now.

Thanks, Much!
Dan Geiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Sign up for virus-free and spam-free e-mail with Nexus Technology Group
http://www.nexustechgroup.com/mailscan

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMCOP Account

2003-10-30 Thread R. Scott Perry

I understand what you are saying here.  If there's any chance whatsoever
that I would send a legit e-mail to Spamcop as spam then I won't set it up.
I think the real problem is that the idea behind Spamcop is people 
reporting unsolicted E-mail.  The failure of enough Declude tests *should* 
indicate that an E-mail is spam.  However, that isn't guaranteed.

A good case in point is that Ipswitch made it into a spam database today 
simply because an E-mail they sent failed too many spam tests.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMCOP Account

2003-10-30 Thread Dan Geiser
Jason,
From what I can see on the Spamcop web site the way they decide whether a
message should be blacklisted is not solely based on one report.  Instead it
is based on how many different people submit it, among other things.  As
long as I'm only submitting unique messages that I am 100% sure are spam
then I think I would be helping to enforce the algorithm that Spamcop uses
to decide whether messages which are being submitted are spam or not.  I'm
not talking about submitting thousands of e-mails a day.  I think I my
current setup deletes about 1200 messages a week.

Any feedback on my other 2 questions?

Thanks,
Dan

- Original Message - 
From: Jason Newland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 5:17 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMCOP Account


 Typically I only send SPAMCOP e-mails that pass through our Declude
 filters.  The theory being that now SPAMCOP will know about that
 address, list it, and it won't clear Declude again.

 I don't see the reasoning behind sending SPAMCOP thousands of e-mails
 per day that are already stopped by your system.  The benefit of
 manually sending is exactly what Kami noted below.  You won't
 inadvertently submit good guys.  Also, if you poke around SPAMCOPS site,
 there is a program you can get called SpamSource that plugs into
 Outlook.  Once installed/configured, all I have to do to report spam is
 click on the SpamSource button, and it submits to SPAMCOP.


 Jason


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan
 Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 4:00 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMCOP Account


 Dan..

 BE VERY CAREFUL IF YOU DO THIS...

 We were doing this and once someone from the list sent me an email with
 bunch of keywords in it.. The system automatically forwarded it to the
 SPAMCop account.

 If you do this make sure you review every spam that goes into your
 account and approve them knowing it is a spam and not someone that just
 happen to send you bunch of words in your filter file.

 Regards,
 Kami


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser
 Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 4:53 PM
 To: Declude JunkMail
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMCOP Account

 Hello, All,
 I signed up for a free Spamcop account a few weeks ago and I've been
 using it to submit spam via their web-based form.  In addition to
 allowing spam submittal via a web-based form they also give you a unique
 e-mail address which you can forward spam to.  I was thinking about
 setting up Declude JunkMail to send all the mail which I would normally
 just DELETE because of High weight to this unique e-mail address.
 Before I do this I had a few questions...

 1)  Does anyone else do what I am describing?  If so, does it work well?

 2)  If I want to forward all mail above a certain weight, say a weight
 of 45, would the ROUTETO action be the correct action to use.  I don't
 want to keep a copy of the e-mail in my HOLD directory.

 3)  If ROUTETO is the correct action, when the message is sent to
 Spamcop what will the FROM address be?  Will it be the original sender's
 e-mail address or a special e-mail address which DJM assigns to itself?

 I think that's all for now.

 Thanks, Much!
 Dan Geiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ---
 Sign up for virus-free and spam-free e-mail with Nexus Technology Group
 http://www.nexustechgroup.com/mailscan

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
 unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
 http://www.mail-archive.com.

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
 unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
 http://www.mail-archive.com.

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 ---
 Sign up for virus-free and spam-free e-mail with Nexus Technology Group
 http://www.nexustechgroup.com/mailscan



---
Sign up for virus-free and spam-free e-mail with Nexus Technology Group 
http://www.nexustechgroup.com/mailscan

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the 

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMCOP Account

2003-10-30 Thread Dan Geiser
Scott,
I understand what you are saying.  But I am only going to be forwarding High
Weight spam to SPAMCOP.  This is just the spam that I would normally delete.
I'm talking about mail that is scored like 55 or higher in my current setup.
A message which scores 55 typically has to fail 7 or 8 tests.  In the case
of Ipswitch, they might have got on a Blacklist but there's no way in my
system that they would've failed enough other tests to be flagged as a high
weight spam message.

Any feedback on my other 2 questions?

Thanks,
Dan

- Original Message - 
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMCOP Account



 I understand what you are saying here.  If there's any chance whatsoever
 that I would send a legit e-mail to Spamcop as spam then I won't set it
up.

 I think the real problem is that the idea behind Spamcop is people
 reporting unsolicted E-mail.  The failure of enough Declude tests *should*
 indicate that an E-mail is spam.  However, that isn't guaranteed.

 A good case in point is that Ipswitch made it into a spam database today
 simply because an E-mail they sent failed too many spam tests.

 -Scott
 ---
 Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
 Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver
 vulnerability detection.
 Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 ---
 Sign up for virus-free and spam-free e-mail with Nexus Technology Group
 http://www.nexustechgroup.com/mailscan



---
Sign up for virus-free and spam-free e-mail with Nexus Technology Group 
http://www.nexustechgroup.com/mailscan

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] JM log entry missing

2003-10-30 Thread Todd Holt
Using LogLevel=MID, should there be at least one entry for each message
that is received (except IMail killed messages)?  If not, what would be
the conditions to cause no entry in the log file for a particular
message?

Thanks,

Todd Holt
Xidix Technologies, Inc
Las Vegas, NV  USA
www.xidix.com
702.319.4349



---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] JM log entry missing

2003-10-30 Thread R. Scott Perry

Using LogLevel=MID, should there be at least one entry for each message
that is received (except IMail killed messages)?
Yes, there should (unless Declude Virus or Declude Hijack blocks the 
E-mail).  If you see an SMTP or SMTP- line in the IMail log file, you 
should definitely see at least one entry in the Declude JunkMail log file 
(at LOGLEVEL LOW or higher, unless you use LOG_OK NONE).

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.