Sanford Whiteman wrote:
Do I target all bounces for deletion?
Not if you want to retain your customers.
Well, that's what this is about. I'm starting to get calls about people
wanting me to block this stuff. I'm not getting any calls asking about
where one's message went.
In
Just for clarification, im not using an IPBYPASS, im using HOP 1, which I
believe would lead to the same thing, thanks.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 3:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Just for clarification, im not using an IPBYPASS, im using HOP 1, which I
believe would lead to the same thing, thanks.
That is correct. HOP 1 will automatically bypass the IP that connects to
Declude JunkMail, and instead use the next IP. Since there is no next IP
in this case, 0.0.0.0 is
I think this is something that good use could be made of in general with
your conditional statements, i.e. NOTCONTAINS, NOTIS, NOTENDSWITH, etc.
I would have to really rethink filtering again though :) I've been
trying not to ask you for too much, but since the topic came up and you
agreed,
Ahh, great! Thanks again.
This will work nicely with the whitelisting capability that you
discussed as well.
Matt
R. Scott Perry wrote:
I'm sure this might have come up before, but it would be real nice,
especially with the new functionality, to have the ability to match
IP's to CIDR
Matt I like the way you bring topics up.
Scott agrees to NOTENDSWITH
you state: ..with your conditional statements, i.e. NOTCONTAINS, NOTIS,
NOTENDSWITH, etc.
:)
I am no legal expert but I don't see Scott saying he is going for
conditional statements.. He just agreed to one.
I think you
Is there anyway that I can get a count of the Number of Incoming messages
before Declude Junkmail/Virus gets them? I just need a count of incoming
messages on the server? If I run the Imail Log Analyzer will this give me
the number before or after declude?
Thanks,
Kris McElroy
[EMAIL
It was a suggestion though...or more like a request :)
I really wasn't assuming this was his plan, though I'm sure it crossed
his mind and he might have already decided to do it. How could he not
you know :)
But seriously, I've gotten my money's worth out of Declude and I can't
complain.
NOTENDSWITH will be added to the next release.
Thanks. :))
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send
Geez, am I the only one who's gotten a bunch of spam about a certain
'video'? Sheesh. What are you guys doing to block these? They're all Base64
coded, so regular body tests don't apply. I normally get 1 or 2 spams to my
inbox, but over the weekend I got almost 20 of these, all different IPs,
Geez, am I the only one who's gotten a bunch of spam about a certain
'video'? Sheesh. What are you guys doing to block these? They're all Base64
coded, so regular body tests don't apply.
Actually, with the latest version of Declude JunkMail, body filters will
normally work on base64 encoded
Hi Paul,
I didn't get many of them this past weekend, but I reviewed what I did get
and the messages
about a french city and a hotel chain were caught by
NJABLPROXIES
SORBS-HTTP
SORBS-SOCKS
NABLPROXIES
SPAMCOP
SNIFFER
Burzin
At 10:51 AM 12/29/2003, you wrote:
Geez, am I the only one who's
The hilton thing? I got a ton of them.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of paul
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 6:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] man, what the heck?
Geez, am I the only one who's gotten a bunch of
Here's what I've done. A subject filter for three points, a body filter
for 1 point, my FOREIGN/TLD filters (most of this comes from China), and
some body filters for about 4 different domain names. I had the body
and subject filters in the first day that I heard about the video :)
This was
All,
Well, the symptoms I described in
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg14623.html
have recurred with IMail 8.05/Declude 1.75.
As I mentioned in that thread, mail processes around these messages just fine, and
it does not bear the earmarks of the IMail usurping issue. The
Yes, I have seen these. This is on a high volume server where the CPU is
averaging 45% plus.
Looks like about 10 per 4 hours.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Well, the symptoms I described in
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg14623.html
have recurred with IMail 8.05/Declude 1.75.
Are you getting C:\Declude.gp1 and/or C:\Declude.gp2 files that have a
timestamp at or later than the time this is occurring?
Does this still seem to be
Thanks for coming on board. If you don't mind, I would like to jump
right into a early Christmas Eve discussion on the topic :)
I'm sorry that I didn't respond to this sooner. I had the last four
days off for the holidays and was unable to check e-mail.
So I'm wondering what your take is
Title: Message
I am new to declude
and I was wondering if someone could point me in the right direction to finding
the default settings (weights) in web form. I have not seen them in FAQ
for declude.
I do not have access
to the configuration files on the mail server only my hosting company
Title: Message
www.declude.com/junkmail/manual.htm.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Lukasiewicz
Sent: Monday,
December 29, 2003 1:16 PM
To: [EMAIL
Title: Message
Thanks
for the reply John, but I read the whole manual before posting anda
listing of the tests is in the manual but thedefault weights
forfailing these testsis not covered. Anyone else have any
ideas.
Adam
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: Message
Did you click on the Global.cfg link? That
is the default Global.cfg with the default tests with the default weights with
the default actions.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't remember seeing default weights, in my experience. Recommend you start with 0
or 1 and then
monitor the results very carefully before incrementing. Just one user's opinion.
Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator
VantageMed Operations (Kansas City)
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email
Title: Message
Adam..
If you look in your Global.cfg you will see two lines that look
like:
HELOBOGUS helovalid
x x
120
REVDNS
revdnsexistsx x
8 0
This (in our case) means HELOBOGUS has a weight of 12 and REVDNS a weight
of 8.
If this had failed in our system your email would have had
Title: Message
No I
had printed the manual... thanks John, with your direction and Kami's detail I
was able to figure out that the two tests that are failing are adding up to a
weight of 10 thus moving the mail to the spam box and not delivering it to the
intended recipient. I believe I can
On a fromfile type test, can Declude be configured to log in the header the
line number found to match when using WARN?
Example
Current:
X-RBL-Warning: GOODMAILFROM:
Desired:
X-RBL-Warning: GOODMAILFROM: (line 100)
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
---
[This E-mail
It would seem to be a bit of a kludge to have it both ways. It's
probably better to construct a filter type file if you want the warnings
to have line numbers in them, and that gives you other flexibility as
well such as MAXWEIGHT and END functionality, along with variable
weighting.
Are you getting C:\Declude.gp1 and/or C:\Declude.gp2 files that have
a timestamp at or later than the time this is occurring?
No, I'm not.
Does this still seem to be happening to E-mails with large numbers of
recipients?
These messages had 89 and 60 recipients each.
I'll send you the
Same here. No .gpx files. Multiple recipients.
Sending files to Scott off list.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman
Sent: Monday, December 29,
Does this still seem to be happening to E-mails with large numbers of
recipients?
These messages had 89 and 60 recipients each.
Are there any Declude log file entries for these E-mails? If so, what are
they? Do you know if there are any Declude.exe processes in memory when
this happens,
I my case, no declude processes are hung. (This is after the fact.) To my
knowledge, the SMTP service was not stopped/restarted. I can get some log
snippets later tonight and send them off list.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
Are there any Declude log file entries for these E-mails?
None at all.
Do you know if there are any Declude.exe processes in memory when
this happens, that are not going away (which could indicate that
Declude hung)?
There are no hung Declude processes.
Do you know if the
32 matches
Mail list logo
