Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT- Getting a URL de-listed on AOL

2004-01-30 Thread Sanford Whiteman
If his company is large enough to have several dozens of commissioned individuals taking upon themselves to become small-time spammers... Then it's large enough for the admin not to have to do the executives' dirty work. PrudentialRand is a large company. A contract- and

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT- Getting a URL de-listed on AOL

2004-01-30 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Now, real-estate agents in general are the most technologically challenged group forced to use technology. I imagine that agents nation wide kept sending listing information to people even after they requested to stop getting e-mail. I almost don't want to help them... Oh my. Not

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MAXWEIGHT not ending when reached

2004-01-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
When we initially discussed MAXWEIGHT (and MINWEIGHT) functionality, you indicated that when the MAXWEIGHT was reached, the processing of that filter would be stopped. I've noted that a filter capable of producing multiple matches, each at the MAXWEIGHT limit, it will show in the warning

[Declude.JunkMail] ANTI-AV updated, v1.0.1

2004-01-30 Thread Matt
I've been updating the filter, adding new strings and having very good success at stopping most anti-virus bounces as well as some of the undeliverable and 'banned attachment' messages without breaking other legitimate bounces. This version now has code in it that will detect non-standard

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MAXWEIGHT not ending when reached

2004-01-30 Thread Matt
Scott, I'm running 1.77i23 currently. I have verified in other situations that this seems to work, even with this same filter, however in the example below, it definitely didn't. Matt - KAMI-COMBINED - SKIPIFWEIGHT28 MAXWEIGHT 8 MAILFROM 8ENDSWITH

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MAXWEIGHT not ending when reached

2004-01-30 Thread Matt
Ok, I see it now :) Damned if I didn't double check that one twice and made the same mistake both times. Sorry, I didn't mean to send you on a wild goose chase on this one. Matt Matt wrote: Scott, I'm running 1.77i23 currently. I have verified in other situations that this seems to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT- Getting a URL de-listed on AOL

2004-01-30 Thread marc catuogno
Thanks for the discussion. I have my webmaster trying to create an alternate flyer directly from our website that will not include the URL of the software that so many agents across the country use. That is the problem, I have no control over what real-estate agents do with their mailings from

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT- Getting a URL de-listed on AOL

2004-01-30 Thread Todd Holt
he'll probably use his AOL account to do his mailings (if they allow the volume) AOL will stop them from coming in, but not from going out!! AOL and Earthlink are 2 of the biggest SPAM sources we see. I wish they would practice what they preach! ;) Todd Holt Xidix

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT- Getting a URL de-listed on AOL

2004-01-30 Thread Matt
I love how you downstaters call that region the " Greater Hudson Valley" :) BTW, I'm blocking CBizOne mailers (recruiters) on my server due to the abuse of the application by importing crawled addresses. I will whitelist a source if someone asks me but no one has yet. If I was AOL, this

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT- Getting a URL de-listed on AOL

2004-01-30 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Title: Message http://www.cbizsoft.com/PoweredBy.asp -Original Message-From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 10:28 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT- Getting a URL de-listed on AOLI love how you downstaters call

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT- Getting a URL de-listed on AOL

2004-01-30 Thread Marc Catuogno
Hey I'm from JOISEY... The GHV MLS is just what the board here calls itself. : ) Maybe I can just offer all those AOL people who want to get listing info an e-mail account, for a nominal fee of course... -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT- Getting a URL de-listed on AOL

2004-01-30 Thread Keith Johnson
Marc, I had great succes with the AOL Postmaster line at: 1.888.212.5537 I worked with a guy named, John Rardin, he fixed a few client issues in a timely fashion. I emailed him a few of the client emails and he was able to figure out why it was being blocked by them and in 1 case they

[Declude.JunkMail] SpamDomains Question

2004-01-30 Thread Scott Fosseen
I have added a SpamDomains test to Global.cfg and junkmail.default file SpamDomains is set to warn. I am running a backup mail server that forwards mail to the system with Declude Junkmail. I do have an IPBYPASS entry for the backup mail server. My warn messages in the mail server look to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail - DecludeJunkmail/Virus Gateway

2004-01-30 Thread Mark Smith
Sorry Two drives in RAID 1 (Mirrored) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 10:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail - DecludeJunkmail/Virus Gateway

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ATTACH ROUTETO action?

2004-01-30 Thread Paul Fuhrmeister
I put this in the $default$.junkmail and it doesn't work. Things get routed but not attached. WEIGHT20ATTACH WEIGHT20ROUTETO [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Monday,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ATTACH ROUTETO action?

2004-01-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
According to the manual, it seems that only one action can be applied to a message. Is this correct? Any way we could get an ATTACH ROUTETO action? I believe both the ATTACH and ROUTETO actions can be combined, per the Multiple actions per test section of the manual. I put this in the

[Declude.JunkMail] Question about MAILBOX action.

2004-01-30 Thread Joshua Levitsky
Scott or anyone else that knows... Weird thing. I just started using MAILBOX JunkMail As an action for mail and I use the imail util that purges old messages to make it so junk stays for 7 days max in the JunkMail folder for any user. Since that change I've noticed that spam (like the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Question about MAILBOX action.

2004-01-30 Thread Matt
Hey Josh, MAILBOX follows the alias to the final destination. I believe that IMail writes this to the Q* file when the E-mail is received. It would not be a good idea to have it only work with the To address because these things don't always point to real accounts (think nobody alias and the

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Domain Registrar recommendation

2004-01-30 Thread Todd
Anyone using a registrar that they like? I want to get some of my clients accounts off of NetSol. I have some registered at www.dotearth.com but I would like a registrar that I can maintain multiple domains from a central interface like at NetSol. Thanks, Todd Hunter --- [This E-mail was

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Domain Registrar recommendation

2004-01-30 Thread Rick Klinge
http://www.famhost.com/website.htm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2004 12:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Domain Registrar recommendation Anyone using a registrar

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Domain Registrar recommendation

2004-01-30 Thread Gerald V. Livingston II
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 00:05:19 -0600 Todd said something about [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Domain Registrar recommendation: Anyone using a registrar that they like? I want to get some of my clients accounts off of NetSol. I have some registered at www.dotearth.com but I would like a registrar

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Domain Registrar recommendation

2004-01-30 Thread Matt
Tucows has always been more than good to me, though for smaller resellers they charge $10 per domain and it might require a $250 or $500 initial deposit. They run one of the tightest ships around and keep customers due to their service and not their price (who really cares if you save $3 damn