DLAnalyzer version 4.0 is now
released. With version 4.0 we have
integrated Declude Virus log processing into DLAnalyzer giving you the ability
to generate one report that encompasses both spam and virus statistics. In
addition, to the virus processing we have added many other features to
Hello Mark,
Monday, December 13, 2004, 10:04:38 AM, you wrote:
MES> Has anyone experienced a problem when using Imail/Declude as a gateway
where
MES> some random messages just seem to backup in the queue for no reason? We'll
MES> go into Imail's queue manager, select them and hit send now and th
Umm, Wouldn't the 0 9 setting put a Positive weight on a good clean email?
shouldn't it be like
SNIFFER external nonzero "c:\sniffer\win32\licenseid.exe authcode" 7 -7
You are correct -- it was set up to put a positive weight on E-mail that
passed the test, and not affecting the weight of E-mail
I think I was seeing n9 in the log...which, now, I'm inferring was maybe
negative nine due to my having a 9 at the end of the line?
At this point, though, I'm really thinking that it was adding ipnotinmx and
nolegitcontent as bad cholesterol instead of good cholesterol... Meaning,
they were addin
On Monday, December 13, 2004, 5:42:08 PM, Bill wrote:
BL> - Original Message -
BL> From: "William Stillwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Umm, Wouldn't the 0 9 setting put a Positive weight on a good clean email?
>>
>> shouldn't it be like
>>
>> SNIFFER external nonzero "c:\sniffer\win32\lice
- Original Message -
From: "William Stillwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Umm, Wouldn't the 0 9 setting put a Positive weight on a good clean email?
>
> shouldn't it be like
>
> SNIFFER external nonzero "c:\sniffer\win32\licenseid.exe authcode" 7 -7
>
> which would put a Positive 7 on a nonze
Umm, Wouldn't the 0 9 setting put a Positive weight on a good clean email?
shouldn't it be like
SNIFFER external nonzero "c:\sniffer\win32\licenseid.exe authcode" 7 -7
which would put a Positive 7 on a nonzero return, and a -7 on a Zero Return
?
Also, when posting your global.cfg file, I would re
I have commented out sniffer, ipnotinmx and nolegitcontent as those are my
suspects... Everything else is how the configuration was when I became
aware I had problems.
#IPNOTINMX ipnotinmx x x 0 -3
#NOLEGITCONTENT nolegitcontent x x 0 -5
#SNIFFER
Here's my global.cfg.
I have commented out sniffer, ipnotinmx and nolegitcontent as those are my
suspects... Everything else is how the configuration was when I became
aware I had problems.
Thanks!
AHBLip4rdnsbl.ahbl.org * 6
0
BLITZEDALL
Okay, upon further review, and if I'm reading things right, it looks like
MessageSniffer is *not* getting a false postive (logs shows "clean") but
Declude is penalizing by applying the weight as though the test was failed.
I sent an example to [EMAIL PROTECTED] earlier today. It looks like
maybe
If you post those relevant sections of your Global.cfg, we can help figure
it out.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Katie LaSalle-Lowery
> Sent: Monday, De
Okay, upon further review, and if I'm reading things right, it looks like
MessageSniffer is *not* getting a false postive (logs shows "clean") but
Declude is penalizing by applying the weight as though the test was failed.
I sent an example to [EMAIL PROTECTED] earlier today. It looks like
maybe D
Katie,
Report your false positives to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You must include
the full source of the E-mail for this to work appropriately. You can
simply copy and paste the content from a MBX or SMD file into the body
of an E-mail and send it. You must send the E-mail from the account
that you h
Thurs evening I upgraded our Declude installation to version 1.81 (we had
been at 1.65). I have become aware of a number of false positives in
MessageSniffer since Friday. We had not seen any false positives in
MessageSniffer previously.
Any thoughts or suggestions?
Katie LaSalle-Lowery
Centri
It is done by scheduled batch file, or by trigger using a program alias in
Imail. There are instructions on the MessageSniffer site, as well as support
from SortMonster.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Dec
Do you have to configure a service with FireDaemon to check every hour or
does it do it automatically by itself?
At 01:07 PM 12/13/2004, you wrote:
Hi,
It's highly recommended. I accounts for 70% of my "hold" weight and it is
very much on target with very few false positives.
Rules are updated i
> It looks like it scores pretty well...
>
> http://www2.spamchk.com/public.html
Yes I can confirm this. (The results you can see on the link above are
results on my Mailserver)
I can highly recommend Messagesniffer because the rules are always up to
date (2 - 4 each day) and as you can see hig
Chris,
Sniffer will catch ~96% of all spam with 99.8% accuracy (on my system at
least). While building redundancies is important in any system, it is
the single most effective tool that is available to Declude users, and
it fulfills a large part of the content filtering that you have been
atte
Hi Chris,
I suspect that you'll find that many of the Declude users are this list are
also using MessageSniffer. We only recently began using it and can tell you
that we saw a dramatic increase in spam catches when we did so.
If you look in your global.cfg file, you'll see there is already a
Hi,
It's highly recommended. I accounts for 70% of my "hold" weight and it is
very much on target with very few false positives.
Rules are updated in a "rules" file and I check for updates hourly.
It has really helped with dealing with "new outbreaks" of SPAM before the
Ips are on various black
I use, recommend, support, sell (Sniffer) both Message Sniffer and
SpamCheck.
Message Sniffer is subscription based and includes updated rule bases.
Updates are generally 3-4 a day.
SpamCheck is free, and is configuration file based. What SpamCheck does
amoung others is check a lot of body codin
Does anyone know if relays.visi.com is officially down? I havent had a hit
against it since early November.
RSL - relays.visi.com
Darrell
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And
Imail.
I have this line in my config.
MTLDB ip4rmtldb.declude.com* 8 0
One of my IP numbers is failing this test.
How can I find out why.
If you go to http://www.mtldb.org/ it should have the information there.
-Scott
---
Dec
Chris,
I forgot one important comment: Customer service from MessageSniffer has
been fantastic!
Katie LaSalle-Lowery
Centric Internet Services
1410 Reserve St.
Missoula, MT 59801
Local Phone 549-3337 ext. 21
Toll Free (888)593-2776 ext. 21
Fax (406)721-3438
-Original Message-
From:
It looks like it scores pretty well...
http://www2.spamchk.com/public.html
That said, and I'm embarrassed to ask two questions in one day, but what
experiences have people had with
SpamChk as well? Are people running the "stable version" (dated 7/29/03)
or the "beta" (dated 1/31/04)
Doesn't see
I've never heard of it.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Ulrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 12:45 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Question on SortMonster/MessageSniffer
> Is anyone using this product as part of their filtering?
>
> http:/
Is anyone using this product as part of their filtering?
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer
Any feedback?
Does it download "definition updates" or something similar, or is it purely
rules based and the only update would be to the program itself?
How would you integrate this in to the confi
Has anyone experienced a problem when using Imail/Declude as a gateway where
some random messages just seem to backup in the queue for no reason? We'll
go into Imail's queue manager, select them and hit send now and the queue
opens up a flood gate of messages.
I wish I had more info but I'm not su
I have this line in my config.
MTLDB ip4rmtldb.declude.com* 8 0
One of my IP numbers is failing this test.
How can I find out why.
Fred
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mai
R. Scott Perry wrote:
Can we use @domain.com in our webmail adress book to whitelist all
mail from specific domain ?
No, IMail won't allow that, but you can add "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". The
"all@" indicates that every E-mail address at the domain should be
whitelisted.
That is not completely tru
Can we use @domain.com in our webmail adress book to whitelist all mail
from specific domain ?
No, IMail won't allow that, but you can add "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". The "all@"
indicates that every E-mail address at the domain should be whitelisted.
also, if one of the recepient has the sender in hi
31 matches
Mail list logo
