Log lines
01/21/2005 03:03:45 Qe18f09a600c0cf70 Using [incoming] CFG file
D:\IMAIL\Declude\$default$.junkmail.
01/21/2005 03:03:45 Qe18f09a600c0cf70 Redirecting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file D:\Imail\declude\junkmailfiles\standardabrasives.com.junkmail.
### first line in
Log lines
01/21/2005 03:03:45 Qe18f09a600c0cf70 Using [incoming] CFG file
D:\IMAIL\Declude\$default$.junkmail.
01/21/2005 03:03:45 Qe18f09a600c0cf70 Redirecting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file D:\Imail\declude\junkmailfiles\standardabrasives.com.junkmail.
Are there further log file entries?
###
Hello declude,
ping
Thanks,
_M
Pete McNeil (Madscientist)
President, MicroNeil Research Corporation
Chief SortMonster (www.sortmonster.com)
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
Pong
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 10:48 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] ping
pong
- Original Message -
From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 1:48 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] ping
Hello declude,
ping
Thanks,
_M
Pete McNeil (Madscientist)
President, MicroNeil Research Corporation
Chief SortMonster
pong
Barry Simpson
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 1:48 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] ping
Hello declude,
ping
Thanks,
_M
Pete McNeil (Madscientist)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 10:39 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Not whitelisted, why
Log lines
01/21/2005 03:03:45 Qe18f09a600c0cf70
Scott,
Could you please let me know what condition causes E-mail to be left in
the overflow directory, and exactly how Declude determines how/when to
process such messages.
On a side note, I was forced to do a rebuild on a backup server running
Windows 2003. The DNS.exe process is a big-time
Declude 1.82 is continuing to use the wrong line for subject on these.
The common problem is the domain key header:
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple;
s=test1; d=earthlink.net;
h=Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSM
John,
It's fixed in the latest beta, but not 1.82. That version only fixed
the one issue with SPAMHEADERS, otherwise it is the same as 1.81.
Matt
John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote:
Declude 1.82 is continuing to use the wrong line for subject on these.
The common problem is the domain key header:
Matt, on the Windows 2003 DNS: You are aware of the time out issues and such
aren't you?
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Monday, January 24,
I know I'm not aware, care to expand?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 11:59 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow directory and a note about
Is anyone happily running Declude 2.0 beta for
Imail?
Could you please let me know what condition causes E-mail to be left in
the overflow directory, and exactly how Declude determines how/when to
process such messages.
The short version is that the situation is handled better than if the
overflow directory isn't used (many people don't get
So much for my memory.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 11:55 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re:
No it is not the last line of the file!
In that case, the next step would be to double-check all settings (such as
making sure that the paths are correct, no typos, etc.).
If that doesn't explain the problem, you can use LOGLEVEL DEBUG, and send
the results to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and we can see
My understanding is that this is an issue with just some firewalls and
not universal. Please correct me if I am wrong.
Thanks,
Matt
John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote:
Matt, on the Windows 2003 DNS: You are aware of the time out issues and such
aren't you?
John Tolmachoff
Hi,
We regularly use the whitelist feature with our clients, and it always
works. Now, however, when I try to use it with our own domain, it doesn't
seem to be operating.
When I connect to our mail server from home (using broadband cable) to send
messages, the system always gives me a high spam
So in the whitelist file for our domain name, I put
a line IP x.x.x.x, where x.x.x.x is my home IP address. However, the
Declude continues to scan messages sent from my home PC for spam, and to act
accordingly.
The problem is that whitelist files don't have an option of IP x.x.x.x.
In this case,
Matt-
I've been using W2003 on one of my DNS
servers for several months now, and I have not experienced what you descibe.
Have you checked the DNS event log? It's separate now from the App, Security,
and System event logs. Maybe there's a clue there.
-Dave Doherty
Skywaves, inc.
-
This was covered quite extensively on the Imail list oh probably a year ago.
From my memory (we all know what that means) there are 2 possible issues:
1. If there is more than 1 IP on the server, Imail was sending DNS tests
requests (ala Imail Anti-Spam) on one IP and the response was coming
Declude Queue is nice and was invaluable before the Queue
Manager service on Imail.
The only problem is this:
RSP than X. At that point, when an E-mail arrives, Declude will start enough
RSP Declude processes to hit the limit of X (each of which scans a single
E-mail).
DQ requires a continues
Scott,
Am I to assume a first in, first out type of scenario in the way that
it handles the overflow?
I have my server set to 60 delivery threads, up from the default 30.
Sandy I believe indicated that 64 was the limit due to the fact that
IMail is not multi-threaded or something to that
Scott Fisher wrote:
Is anyone happily running Declude 2.0 beta for Imail?
I asked about this last week and received an email from Declude saying
there would be news last week. So I dunno what the status is...
I'm running Smartermail and REALLY want to get Declude running again.
Jim
---
[This
Anyone seeing odd problems with hotmail and msn.com accounts being rejected.
I have a number of valid email's that are being rejected.
1:24 13:00 SMTPD(61d200c101cc4412) [66.162.138.13] connect 65.54.168.114
port 60403
01:24 13:00 SMTPD(61d200c101cc4412) [65.54.168.114] EHLO hotmail.com
01:24
Hi, all-
A colo customer's website was hacked to
include a bunch of movie files buried deep in his site. The directoriesuse
nonstandard Windows characters, and I can't get to the filesthrough the
command prompt or the Windows Explorer. The diruse.exe utility does see them,
however.
Does
TryDeleteFXPfiles available here... http://www.tucows.com/preview/335686.html
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Dave
DohertySent: Monday, January 24, 2005 4:23 PMTo:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - File
Hi Dave,
There is a posix utility called RM.EXE from the
Windows 2000 Resource Kit (in the apps/posixdirectoryon the CD) that
can be used to remove these. You first need to find out the 8.3 directory
and filenames from the command line for use with this old utility. I've
used this for
David,
We do the same thing. One thing you can do is fake mail coming in. I use a
batch file.
REM THIS WILL CLEAN OUT THE DECLUDE QUEUE
declude x:\imail\spool\Qa6da175e02447716.SMD
call x:\imail\cleandq.bat
The Q file I referenced does not exist and it does not matter that it does
not.
Thanks, Harry. I'll try it.
-Dave
- Original Message -
From:
Harry Palmer
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 5:29
PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - File
manager for nonstandard files
TryDeleteFXPfiles available
Thanks, Darin. I'll look for
it.
-d
- Original Message -
From:
Darin Cox
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 5:36
PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - File
manager for nonstandard files
Hi Dave,
There is a posix
Hello Darrell,
Monday, January 24, 2005, 5:38:51 PM, you wrote:
Dsic We do the same thing. One thing you can do is fake mail coming in. I
use a
Dsic batch file.
Dsic REM THIS WILL CLEAN OUT THE DECLUDE QUEUE
Thanks we'll give it a shot. This should be a great help.
--
Best regards,
Thanks, Scott. I also thought that whitelist files included all of the same
options as the whitelist commands that go into a global.cfg file. What
about @domain-name? Does that work in a whitelist file?
Thanks,
Ben
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Scott, thanks for the explanations. I still have a few follow-ups
though if you don't mind.
First off, since DNS is acting like such a hog on Windows 2003, I'm
going to guess that this is what is slowing down the processing of
E-mail and why I am suddenly getting steady overflow. I can
Thanks, Scott. I also thought that whitelist files included all of the same
options as the whitelist commands that go into a global.cfg file.
No:
The D:\IMail\Declude\mywhitelist.txt file would then contain either one
E-mail address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) or domain (@example.com) or subdomain
John,
I do recall seeing this stuff, but I came away with the impression that
it was only applicable if you were behind a particular type of firewall
that had issues with the size of the packets or something to that
tune. If this was causing many timeouts, I would have seen a slight
increase
This appears to be an issue with your IMail settings. It is unsafe to
use Mail From rejection for domains that fail a lookup unless you expect
everyone else's DNS to be operational and accessible 100% of the time
and perfectly configured. My suggestion would be to turn this off in
the IMail
You seemed to indicate that service launched processes count against the
threads...meaning that smtp32.exe launches declude.exe, which launches
F-Prot and McAfee. So would this count for 4 threads (not according to
Declude, but Windows/IMail)? What about Sniffer and each external test
that
SBC just blocked port 25 for their dynamically assigned DSL users. I can
have those users switch to SBC's SMTP servers but I have
been meaning to open up port 587 for my users that travel. I was wondering
what software solutions you guys have been using if any that could be run
on the IMail
I found MaxQueProc in the registry and changed that to 60. There is no
GUI config for this option.
I also looked at the issue with MS DNS 2003. After a restart of DNS,
utilization dropped from an average of about 25% to under 1% (I had it
in performance monitor)...but then over the next
Matt,
I seen a few articles about memory leaks in Win2K3 DNS. One specific one
comes to mind about a leak when adding zones via scripting. Another one
that we ran into (internally) was KB 830381. (Server Responsiveness
Degrades and Queries Time Out When You Run the DNS Server Service).
Thanks Darrell, that definitely sounds like it's the culprit:
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=830381
This didn't come up in my searches because it is described so
generically and I was searching for things like processor utilization
and memory leaks. I like the part where the describe
One way of checking for a work around is
to schedule a batch file say hourly to flush the cache.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Monday, January
43 matches
Mail list logo
