[Declude.JunkMail] Beta 3.0.4 not Processing Files in 'proc' Folder

2005-09-15 Thread Kim Premuda
IMail 8.05 HF3 I installed the JunkMail beta 3.0.4, and had the same results as with 3.0.3.8. That is, the 'decludeproc.exe' service was running (as indicated by Task Manager), however, nothing was being processed ('decludeproc.exe' was near the bottom of the Task Manager list when sorted by CP

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] stock global.cfg

2005-09-15 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
With the 3.0 beta there is no global.cfg - they are just posting the exe's and how to install them. I suspect when the beta is over the release package will have all the files in it. Darrell John Carter writes: Darrell Before 3.x, to get the default global.cfg file, I downloaded Declu

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] stock global.cfg

2005-09-15 Thread John Carter
Darrell Before 3.x, to get the default global.cfg file, I downloaded Declude.exe and ran it "don't install". It dumped everything to a folder for examination. Is 3.x the same? Couldn't tell from the Beta page. Thanks, John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS RBL's

2005-09-15 Thread Nick Hayer
Hi Matt - Matt wrote: Nick, I think that it is worth while to point out that your stats are likely skewed by dictionary attacks and backscatter.  The overwhelming predominance of SURBL and Sniffer-Pharmacy hits (named slightly differently on your system), along with the massive number

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS RBL's

2005-09-15 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Matt, I am in the process of adding ORF into the mix for address validation. Can you or others describe the process that you employ with ORF? Also, I seem to remember you were considering setting up postfix? Would that replace ORF for you? Darrell -

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS RBL's

2005-09-15 Thread Matt
Nick, I think that it is worth while to point out that your stats are likely skewed by dictionary attacks and backscatter.  The overwhelming predominance of SURBL and Sniffer-Pharmacy hits (named slightly differently on your system), along with the massive number of NDR's suggests to me that a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS RBL's

2005-09-15 Thread Nick Hayer
Hi Tim, Timothy Bohen wrote: Thats pretty cool, so which ones should I be running in my global.cfg? Your mileage will vary! Here are the stats from my site for yesterday: http://mdlp.madriveraccess.com/ I would suggest score low - check results often - and tune to fit your needs. -Ni

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] stock global.cfg

2005-09-15 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Tim, That statement is 100% accurate :) Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log P

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS RBL's

2005-09-15 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Here are the one's I use on my system (best if viewed with a fixed width font). Looking at your global.cfg I would add the following: SBL, XBL, MXRATE, UCE, DSBL, and SPAMCOP. I would also add in CMDSPACE as thats pretty good. Looking at your global.cfg you have a lot of the default RBL's th

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer actions

2005-09-15 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
It's best not to delete on one test. Although I weight sniffer very high on my system. Darrell - DLAnalyzer - Comprehensive reporting on Declude Junkmail and Virus. Try it today - http://www.invariantsystems.com Timothy Bohen writes: I "thought

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] stock global.cfg

2005-09-15 Thread Timothy Bohen
The more I look at this, aren't almost all of my tests disabled? I assume my former network admin did this, but it "appears" to me like declude is pretty well crippled by the way my global.cfg is setup. -- Original Message -- From: "Timothy Bohen" <[EMAI

[Declude.JunkMail] Beta 3.0.3.8 update

2005-09-15 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
I have been running the latest beta for about 9 hours now. The previously reported problem by me with false triggers on External tests appears to be resolved. Currently, Hijack is not working reporting can not find Declude Console. Declude is aware of this and working on it. Windows Server 2000

[Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer actions

2005-09-15 Thread Timothy Bohen
I "thought" I used to have declude delete everything that sniffer found, now when I went into my $default$.junkmail file I find its set to LOG. I assume one of my network admins changed this at some time. Am I relatively safe in setting it to "delete" or is this a bad idea? __ __

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS RBL's

2005-09-15 Thread Timothy Bohen
Thats pretty cool, so which ones should I be running in my global.cfg? -- Original Message -- From: "Scott Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:15:38 -0500 >I've got my monthly results listed here:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.3 update

2005-09-15 Thread Heimir Eidskrem
Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: So, we can not really use this list to know whats going on with the beta since they do not post it here? We have to use the beta site? No, I would not say that. I post each and every issue I have with the beta to this list as well as to Declude. I would

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS RBL's

2005-09-15 Thread Scott Fisher
I've got my monthly results listed here: http://it.farmprogress.com/declude/spamtestbymonth.html - Original Message - From: "Timothy Bohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 9:58 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS RBL's Which ones still work?

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] stock global.cfg

2005-09-15 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Tim, You can grab a new copy out of any of the new versions through your account logon. If that is not possible post your global.cfg to the list (of course removing any license codes) and we can see what your missing. Darrell -

[Declude.JunkMail] DNS RBL's

2005-09-15 Thread Timothy Bohen
Which ones still work? __ __ __ __ Sent via the CMS Internet Webmail system at mail1.cmsinter.net --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and

[Declude.JunkMail] stock global.cfg

2005-09-15 Thread Timothy Bohen
Where do I get one, I want to compare an updated stock version to my hacked up, 4 year old one. Thanks __ __ __ __ Sent via the CMS Internet Webmail system at mail1.cmsinter.net --- This E-mail came from the Declude.Junk

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.3 update

2005-09-15 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
So, we can not really use this list to know whats going on with the beta since they do not post it here? We have to use the beta site? No, I would not say that. I post each and every issue I have with the beta to this list as well as to Declude. I would hope that others do they same as we

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.3 update

2005-09-15 Thread Heimir Eidskrem
Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I am still holding off though on this Beta - I just do not see it as trustworthy and Declude is not forthcoming with its bugs. For example I just saw some posts about issues w/multiprocessor environments - which is scary because that is what I have, you hav

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.3 update

2005-09-15 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
I am still holding off though on this Beta - I just do not see it as trustworthy and Declude is not forthcoming with its bugs. For example I just saw some posts about issues w/multiprocessor environments - which is scary because that is what I have, you have just uncovered another bug, Nick

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.3 update

2005-09-15 Thread Nick Hayer
Hi Kim, Kim Premuda wrote: I experienced the maxed out processor(s) - I only tried it for a few min and then went back to 2.0.16. Haven't tried it since! -Nick Nick, The beta version 3.0.3 does not automatically create the 'work' folder below the 'proc' folder (ie. 'proc\