Huh? What? Not useful? IPSwitch is charging thousands of dollars for
that very feature on steroids ..
Jonathan
Darin Cox wrote:
Was the webmail vulnerability only with web calendaring? We might be able
to get away with turning it off. It hasn't been a very useful product for
our cust
ey may be
out of touch on even the most basic things.. :\
Jonathan
Kevin Bilbee wrote:
Best thing to do is call SmarterMail Sales. They are knowledgable on the
product and the features slated for the 3.0 release but definitly call htem
and let them know you would like to see Program Aliases.
Ke
Rats. I was hoping I was totally off-base, and all these features were
actually hidden in the program or configs somewhere. Not really sure how
thrilled I am about moving our customers' servers over without some of
these items.
Jonathan
Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango wro
for December. So, I guess we should realistically assume 2006.
Any thoughts?
Jonathan
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
he results
from all the scanners, and makes a decision on whether or not it's a
virus or a false-positive. Back in the early days, I had a hunch they
would come out with a "Pro" version, and stuff like this would be in
there .. but then they did come out with a Pro, and still no d
I think you're looking for virus_domains.txt - it has inbound only,
outbound only, both, etc options.
Jonathan
Evans Martin wrote:
So there is no way to turn off outbound scanning?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beha
Yeah, I haven't played with smartermail in much depth, but I assumed a
global filter could be created based on header, then have Declude mark
up the headers accordingly..
Jonathan
David Franco-Rocha [ Declude ] wrote:
Declude does not currently plug directly into SmarterMail's spam
t
Yup, I've seen that in your sig for years .. just never had a use for it. :)
Jonathan
Sanford Whiteman wrote:
No it does not have this feature built in but Sandy wrote some nifty
scripts that make this task a bit easier.
. . . see my sig for details.
--
Bummer... seems like they could make it work hand in hand, Declude and
SM seem to be all buddy buddy .. that'd make a pretty powerful tool.
Jonathan
Kevin Bilbee wrote:
No declude does not pluginto SM's spam filtering. Delcude works pretymuch
just like it does on Imail.
Ke
No prob - being a dev myself, I tend to try to find the most complex
ways to do things. ;)
Jonathan
Dave Doherty wrote:
Hi Jonathan-
Thanks for pointing that out. I'm really surprised their tech support
folks didn't recommend it.
-d
- Original Message ----- From: "Jo
Seems like it'd be trivial to write, hooking their svcUserAdmin.asmx and
svcDomainAliasAdmin.asmx (GetAliases and GetUsers). Yeah, it'd be nice
if they do it natively, but it looks like a 1 hour project to do it
"manually". Guess I wouldn't be too worked up about tha
Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Sidenote, I assume SmarterMail can act as a domain filtering gateway
with Declude, right? Pretty sure I saw some marketing spam saying it
could ..
Yes, that is absolutly correct - Declude will work on Smartermail.
So I was just playing with the SM web inte
domains, but I've never seen a way to load user
accounts. Am I missing something?
Sidenote, I assume SmarterMail can act as a domain filtering gateway
with Declude, right? Pretty sure I saw some marketing spam saying it
could ..
Jonathan
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mail
Hanging on the new licensing routines?
This is why I never run stuff in production till it's "old" and tested.
Jonathan
At 11:30 PM 2/1/2005, you wrote:
I had the same problem today while installing v2.0. All Declude functions
stopped. I called them and went back to the
ind this
ironic, since one of their new features, is whitelisting publicly traded
companies. :)
Jonathan
At 12:30 AM 1/9/2005, you wrote:
Hi,
Today I finally took the time (I didn't have)
and ran both Sniffer and SURBL Tests (using
http://www.invariantsystems.com/invURIBL/).
Result:
1,860
grep? :)
Jonathan
At 09:45 PM 1/4/2005, you wrote:
Is there a utility that you can type the message ID and get back the
reasons a test failed tests..instead of going into the logs and pulling it
out..
Richard Farris
Ethixs Online
1.270.247. Office
1.800.548.3877 Tech Support
"Crossroa
Thanks, but I doubt that's the issue.
They're on one of our IP blocks, and have had that IP for .. I dunno ..
several years. Surely somewhere in Yahoo! there's a department where you
can address these issues. I haven't been able to find out where, though.
Jonathan
At 11
wingly). Does
anyone know the best way to get out of Yahoo's filters?
Thanks in advance,
Jonathan
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAI
As much as I believe Fox&Friends morning show tells no lies .. I'd rather
verify it with a reputable source:
- Google does in fact own Gmail.com
- It sits on the Google network
- gmail.google.com == gmail.com
- and www.Gmail.com says 1000 MB.
I'd say that makes it official.
Jona
acks upstream anyway.
Nutsehell, I'd say there are some performance benefits on 2k3, especially
on larger hardware .. but overall, your install *should* be so tweaked,
that it really doesn't matter.
Jonathan
At 02:56 PM 2/4/2004, you wrote:
2003.
It's MUCH more secure than
Imail web stuff never gets scanned anyway, does it? I thought it hit
imail1.exe directly ..
Jonathan
At 06:44 AM 1/7/2004, you wrote:
on 1/7/04 6:35 AM, Matthew Bramble wrote:
> BADHEADERS will FP a whole lot more,
Over 95% of the outgoing messages from our subscribers are failing
ctly-formatted stuff like that .. *shrugs*
Jonathan
At 05:06 AM 1/7/2004, you wrote:
Scott,
It took about 1 minute to figure out that this will be a very valuable
test as I'm seeing similar hit rates. What matters most though is the
type of thing that will FP, and what other tests will gener
Can't imagine why you'd need to restart .. it hooks the EXE each time it
spawns an smtp thread, so the next message after the EXE is in place,
should use the new exe.
Jonathan
At 07:20 PM 1/6/2004, you wrote:
It has been a while since I upgrade my versionare there any specia
That's
quite a bit, considering it's mostly text.
Is there a compelling reason to go with win2k3?
Jonathan
At 12:12 PM 12/19/2003, you wrote:
For the majority, W2K3 is the way to go if you are able to. Ipswitch does
support running Imail on W2K3.
There are some possible issues.
1.
il doesn't
support it well yet.
grrrr
Thoughts?
Jonathan
At 05:04 PM 12/4/2003, you wrote:
The issues seem to appear at high volumes.
Besides, I am more than willing to use those licenses for you. ;)
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
> -Original Message--
ngs stable
(and *robust*) now? Relatively high volumes of email ..
Jonathan
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type &q
Me too. :)
Jonatjan
At 08:49 AM 11/18/2003, you wrote:
Sandy,
I am definitely interested!
-Nick Hayer
> > All,
> >
> > I believe I've gotten one of our sites up and running with SPAMD
> > under Cygwin (server implementation of SpamAssassin that's much,
> > much faster than nat
He wants 2,000 IPs? Sure, no problem .. in fact, I'll give him a whole class B.
10.123.x.x :)
Jonathan
At 05:22 PM 11/12/2003, you wrote:
Hi Scott-
Where on the tools page is this nifty test located?
:)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beha
I'm sorry, when I said the help files .. I meant the online manual. Those
are the files I used as a reference.
Jonathan
At 08:13 PM 11/11/2003, you wrote:
In an effort to clean up our junkmail configs, and only use valid tests,
we cleaned out our previous tests (old services that were
have
some good configs they'd be willing to share? Good RBLs to use/etc. I'd
really appreciate it, it's gettin pretty bad here. :)
Jonathan
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing l
aaah .. bummer.
So I suppose doing filesystem links would be the best way?
Jonathan
At 12:11 PM 11/7/2003, you wrote:
I don't understand - I thought you said if it was a "gateway" domain
(presuming that means it doesn't actually have a host entry in imail,
just that
I don't understand - I thought you said if it was a "gateway" domain
(presuming that means it doesn't actually have a host entry in imail, just
that imail is acting as a relay for it), to put the REDIRECT in global.cfg.
But now you're saying it doesn't look there
uld be
used)?
I see. So is it safe to put *all* the redirects in global.cfg?
Jonathan
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTE
I'm sure I'm missing something, but that doesn't seem to be working.
In my D:\Imail\Declude\$default$.junkmail, I have:
REDIRECT @domain.com d:\Imail\Declude\templates\group1.cfg
and, in that group1.cfg file, I have copied the file that used to work in:
d:\imail\declude\domain.com.
I removed the
hmm.. I was under the impression that was per-user. So I would stick these
in the root $default$? :
REDIRECT domain.com c:\blah\template-1.cfg
REDIRECT domain2.com c:\blah\template-1.cfg
Jonathan
At 12:43 PM 10/31/2003, you wrote:
We've got several folders for custom $default$ files
tried
using filesystem links for these? Or am I missing the obvious? Maybe a way
to point domains to a certain file within the global config?
Thanks for any tips,
Jonathan
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came fro
At 01:15 PM 9/27/2003, you wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
> Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 5:12 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Auto White Listing
>
>
>
> >With the auto whitelist
ich resolves to that user. Is
the "spam" blocked when it comes into the alias? or does it see that it
ultimately hits that user, and allow it?
Thanks,
Jonathan
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.J
The MS example I saw was to use a domain
that ended .local if you did not want
to use a real/public domain. This seems to work, let’s hope that
.local never becomes a real tld.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Miller
Internet Service Department
ACCS.net
Advanced Computer & Communica
39 matches
Mail list logo
