-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of decjunkmail
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 7:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AutoWhite by eServices
Here's why we are converting our monolithic Imail/Declude servers to a
multi-tier
store forward configuration as follows:
Incoming MX
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AutoWhite by eServices
Here's why we are converting our monolithic Imail/Declude servers to a
multi-tier
store forward configuration as follows:
Incoming MX servers:
Receives inbound mail from Internet
Runs Declude anti-virus to delete all viruses
Anyone using the AutoWhite application from eServices? Care to give
feedback as to how well/poorly it works?
Thanks,
Greg
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an
PROTECTED] Behalf Of Greg Foulks
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 10:17 AM
To: Declude JunkMail
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] AutoWhite by eServices
Anyone using the AutoWhite application from eServices? Care to give
feedback as to how well/poorly it works?
Thanks,
Greg
---
[This E-mail
Anyone using the AutoWhite application from eServices? Care
to give feedback as to how well/poorly it works?
On our server it's able to whitelist around 5% of all incomming email
traffic. It's very reliable but keep in mind that there must pass at least
one message from remote to the local
on 6/23/04 11:16 AM, Greg Foulks wrote:
Anyone using the AutoWhite application from eServices? Care to give
feedback as to how well/poorly it works?
We've been using it for many months and it works well. It does exactly what
it's supposed to do.
Greg
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses
Also keep in mind that this test should be disabled as soon as we hear
about
spam messages using real existing recipient addresses that was already in
contact with your local customer. Sober.G was close to do that.
Generally speaking, you should not have to do that. This is because
AutoWhite
Generally speaking, you should not have to do that.
Hopefully! ;-)
As said as soon as we can see such a behavior, but not at the moment.
Markus
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing
] AutoWhite by eServices
Also keep in mind that this test should be disabled as soon as we hear
about
spam messages using real existing recipient addresses that was already
in
contact with your local customer. Sober.G was close to do that.
Generally speaking, you should not have to do
John, have you come up with a way to use this on a gateway for gateway'd
domains?
As far as AutoWhite for Declude is concerned that is local to local.
AutoWhite for Declude does not currently support that, by way of error of
emission during creation. (I forgot about that scenario.) That
John, have you come up with a way to use this on a gateway for gateway'd
domains?
You mean _between_ gatewayed domains, or from remote wildcard domains
to remote gatewayed domains?
--Sandy
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a
Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 1:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AutoWhite by eServices
Also keep in mind that this test should be disabled as soon as we
hear
about
spam messages using real existing recipient addresses that was
already
in
contact
This is only going to work for domains hosted on the IMail server
and not domains that are store and forwarded. Right?
AutoWhite does work for store-and-forwarded domains. However, the
catch is that if the destination domain is an AutoWhite-protected
domain (either local or
This is only going to work for domains hosted on the IMail server and
not domains that are store and forwarded. Right?
No. :)
AutoWhite for Declude works for both domains hosted on the Imail server as
well as Store and Forward Domains.
The only thing that does not work right now is local to
and forward device and therefore demand will
not be high enough to justify the change.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford
Whiteman
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 11:59 AM
To: Dave Marchette
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] AutoWhite
A client has a pair of generic incoming MX servers. These then feed
into a Declude server, storing and forwarding to the mailbox server.
The mailbox server does its own outbound mail.
I'd like to know if it will ever be possible to do this, perhaps by a
routine that can parse the log on the
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 6:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] AutoWhite by eServices
A client has a pair of generic incoming MX servers. These then feed
into a Declude server, storing
17 matches
Mail list logo
