Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE continued

2005-03-07 Thread S.J.Stanaitis




Not a high priority? Crap. I normally have about 1100 emails to fish
through after the weekend, now I've got nearly 8,000 because of this
delete bug. Maybe I should forward the difference to Declude, see how
well their configs are set up. :) Thankfully the 7K+ of messages were
caught with SpamAssassin which as of yet hasn't yeilded a false
positive.

Sam

Andy Schmidt wrote:

  Hi,

Yes, cross-posting seems like a good idea - so that we can monitor for
developing patterns.

Also, I did check my weight settings (I don't use the CATCHALL test) - and I
don't think the previous explanations fit my scenario:

WEIGHTKILL	weight   	x	x	20	0
WEIGHT10	weightrange   	x	x	10	19
WEIGHT8 	weightrange   	x	x	8	9
WEIGHTHDR	weightrange	x	x	5	7
WEIGHTFOOTER weightrange	x	x	5	7

I'm currently swamped - but eventually I'll have to find the time to
identify a new case and then re-submit that one to their tech support
reporting channels...

Best Regards
Andy Schmidt

Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206 



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 08:47 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE continued 


On 1 Mar 2005 at 12:07, Andy Schmidt wrote:

  
  
I have noticed from day one, that suddenly really obvious Spam that 
had failed countless tests and should have been deleted (with REALLY 
high weights) was actually being delivered.

  
  I have seen the same thing with v2.05, sent log snippits TWICE and 
have not had ANY response from Declude support.

For me the bigger troubling issue is not that these spams are being 
passed its that Declude is not sharing its obvious bugs on the list - 
so like in this example there is no 'me too' when we encounter a 
problem - its like we are the lone ranger when we encounter a problem 
with the tech support folks telling us 'run debug'...  Software has 
bugs - oh well - but not sharing these bugs with us is a much bigger 
problem

Hopefully these are just growing pains with the new administration 
and not the way it will remain.

For now any requests to tech support cc'd to the list?

-Nick Hayer


  
  
I had mentioned it on the list twice right after I was finally able to 
upgrade to 2.04 (after the crashes were fixed).

I thought I was dreaming and have not yet found the time to debug it.

Thanks for the pointer.

If letting through high-weight Spam is "low priority" on the "to be 
fixed list", then I guess I just have different priorities G?


Best Regards
Andy Schmidt

HM Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846

Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206

http://www.HM-Software.com/


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Fritz Squib
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 08:42 AM To: 
Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and 
DELETE


Apparently I missing something bloody obvious, but with 2.0 running it 
seems like my delete action doesn't work as expected any more.

Running the latest 2.x release downloaded last night.

--Global Config--

WEIGHT20	weight		x	x	20	0
WEIGHT30	weight		x	x	32	0

--Default.junkmail--

WEIGHT20	HOLD
WEIGHT30	DELETE

In a brief conversation with Declude the response I got was:

"The problem is probably the change in the way the DELETE action 
works.  In the past, it would delete the E-mail for all recipients. 
Now, it only deletes the E-mail for recipients that use the DELETE 
action."

It still seems like the HOLD action is taking precedence over the 
DELETE action since mail with weight over my WEIGHT30 test winds up in 
the hold folder even though the log file says:



  02/01/2005 12:25:06 Qbb6c48770128853b Msg failed WEIGHT30 (Weight of 
44
  

reaches or exceeds the limit of 32.). Action=""

I has sent Scott debug log files but I still haven't figure out what 
I'm missing.

Yes there are a *few* per user .junkmail files, with an action of 
WARN, but most of the held mail is either not for them (nor are they 
CC'd or BCC'd as far as I can tell) and/or (may or may not be related) 
in the spam review application there is no To: field reported.

I have also tried changing 'weight' to 'weightrange' with the 
appropriate scores, and still see the same results

Anyone else ?

Fritz

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type 
"unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found at 
http://www.mail-archive.com.


  
  

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To un

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE continued

2005-03-02 Thread Nick Hayer
On 1 Mar 2005 at 12:07, Andy Schmidt wrote:

 I have noticed from day one, that suddenly really obvious Spam that
 had failed countless tests and should have been deleted (with REALLY
 high weights) was actually being delivered.
I have seen the same thing with v2.05, sent log snippits TWICE and 
have not had ANY response from Declude support.

For me the bigger troubling issue is not that these spams are being 
passed its that Declude is not sharing its obvious bugs on the list - 
so like in this example there is no 'me too' when we encounter a 
problem - its like we are the lone ranger when we encounter a problem 
with the tech support folks telling us 'run debug'...  Software has 
bugs - oh well - but not sharing these bugs with us is a much bigger 
problem

Hopefully these are just growing pains with the new administration 
and not the way it will remain.

For now any requests to tech support cc'd to the list?

-Nick Hayer


 
 I had mentioned it on the list twice right after I was finally able to
 upgrade to 2.04 (after the crashes were fixed).
 
 I thought I was dreaming and have not yet found the time to debug it.
 
 Thanks for the pointer.
 
 If letting through high-weight Spam is low priority on the to be
 fixed list, then I guess I just have different priorities G? 
 
 
 Best Regards
 Andy Schmidt
 
 HM Systems Software, Inc.
 600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
 Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
 
 Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
 Fax:+1 201 934-9206
 
 http://www.HM-Software.com/
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz Squib
 Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 08:42 AM To:
 Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and
 DELETE
 
 
 Apparently I missing something bloody obvious, but with 2.0 running it
 seems like my delete action doesn't work as expected any more.
 
 Running the latest 2.x release downloaded last night.
 
 --Global Config--
 
 WEIGHT20  weight  x   x   20  0
 WEIGHT30  weight  x   x   32  0
 
 --Default.junkmail--
 
 WEIGHT20  HOLD
 WEIGHT30  DELETE
 
 In a brief conversation with Declude the response I got was:
 
 The problem is probably the change in the way the DELETE action
 works.  In the past, it would delete the E-mail for all recipients. 
 Now, it only deletes the E-mail for recipients that use the DELETE
 action.
 
 It still seems like the HOLD action is taking precedence over the
 DELETE action since mail with weight over my WEIGHT30 test winds up in
 the hold folder even though the log file says:
 
  02/01/2005 12:25:06 Qbb6c48770128853b Msg failed WEIGHT30 (Weight of
  44
 reaches or exceeds the limit of 32.). Action=DELETE.
 
 I has sent Scott debug log files but I still haven't figure out what
 I'm missing.
 
 Yes there are a *few* per user .junkmail files, with an action of
 WARN, but most of the held mail is either not for them (nor are they
 CC'd or BCC'd as far as I can tell) and/or (may or may not be related)
 in the spam review application there is no To: field reported.
 
 I have also tried changing 'weight' to 'weightrange' with the
 appropriate scores, and still see the same results 
 
 Anyone else ?
 
 Fritz
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE continued

2005-03-02 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi,

Yes, cross-posting seems like a good idea - so that we can monitor for
developing patterns.

Also, I did check my weight settings (I don't use the CATCHALL test) - and I
don't think the previous explanations fit my scenario:

WEIGHTKILL  weight  x   x   20  0
WEIGHT10weightrange x   x   10  19
WEIGHT8 weightrange x   x   8   9
WEIGHTHDR   weightrange x   x   5   7
WEIGHTFOOTER weightrangex   x   5   7

I'm currently swamped - but eventually I'll have to find the time to
identify a new case and then re-submit that one to their tech support
reporting channels...

Best Regards
Andy Schmidt

Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206 



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 08:47 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE continued 


On 1 Mar 2005 at 12:07, Andy Schmidt wrote:

 I have noticed from day one, that suddenly really obvious Spam that 
 had failed countless tests and should have been deleted (with REALLY 
 high weights) was actually being delivered.
I have seen the same thing with v2.05, sent log snippits TWICE and 
have not had ANY response from Declude support.

For me the bigger troubling issue is not that these spams are being 
passed its that Declude is not sharing its obvious bugs on the list - 
so like in this example there is no 'me too' when we encounter a 
problem - its like we are the lone ranger when we encounter a problem 
with the tech support folks telling us 'run debug'...  Software has 
bugs - oh well - but not sharing these bugs with us is a much bigger 
problem

Hopefully these are just growing pains with the new administration 
and not the way it will remain.

For now any requests to tech support cc'd to the list?

-Nick Hayer


 
 I had mentioned it on the list twice right after I was finally able to 
 upgrade to 2.04 (after the crashes were fixed).
 
 I thought I was dreaming and have not yet found the time to debug it.
 
 Thanks for the pointer.
 
 If letting through high-weight Spam is low priority on the to be 
 fixed list, then I guess I just have different priorities G?
 
 
 Best Regards
 Andy Schmidt
 
 HM Systems Software, Inc.
 600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
 Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
 
 Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
 Fax:+1 201 934-9206
 
 http://www.HM-Software.com/
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz Squib
 Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 08:42 AM To: 
 Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and 
 DELETE
 
 
 Apparently I missing something bloody obvious, but with 2.0 running it 
 seems like my delete action doesn't work as expected any more.
 
 Running the latest 2.x release downloaded last night.
 
 --Global Config--
 
 WEIGHT20  weight  x   x   20  0
 WEIGHT30  weight  x   x   32  0
 
 --Default.junkmail--
 
 WEIGHT20  HOLD
 WEIGHT30  DELETE
 
 In a brief conversation with Declude the response I got was:
 
 The problem is probably the change in the way the DELETE action 
 works.  In the past, it would delete the E-mail for all recipients. 
 Now, it only deletes the E-mail for recipients that use the DELETE 
 action.
 
 It still seems like the HOLD action is taking precedence over the 
 DELETE action since mail with weight over my WEIGHT30 test winds up in 
 the hold folder even though the log file says:
 
  02/01/2005 12:25:06 Qbb6c48770128853b Msg failed WEIGHT30 (Weight of 
  44
 reaches or exceeds the limit of 32.). Action=DELETE.
 
 I has sent Scott debug log files but I still haven't figure out what 
 I'm missing.
 
 Yes there are a *few* per user .junkmail files, with an action of 
 WARN, but most of the held mail is either not for them (nor are they 
 CC'd or BCC'd as far as I can tell) and/or (may or may not be related) 
 in the spam review application there is no To: field reported.
 
 I have also tried changing 'weight' to 'weightrange' with the 
 appropriate scores, and still see the same results
 
 Anyone else ?
 
 Fritz
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type 
 unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at 
 http://www.mail-archive.com.
 


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE

2005-03-01 Thread Fritz Squib
Apparently I missing something bloody obvious, but with 2.0 running it seems
like my delete action doesn't work as expected any more.

Running the latest 2.x release downloaded last night.

--Global Config--

WEIGHT20weight  x   x   20  0
WEIGHT30weight  x   x   32  0

--Default.junkmail--

WEIGHT20HOLD
WEIGHT30DELETE

In a brief conversation with Declude the response I got was:

The problem is probably the change in the way the DELETE action works.  In
the past, it would delete the E-mail for all recipients.  Now, it only
deletes the E-mail for recipients that use the DELETE action.

It still seems like the HOLD action is taking precedence over the DELETE
action since mail with weight over my WEIGHT30 test winds up in the hold
folder even though the log file says:

 02/01/2005 12:25:06 Qbb6c48770128853b Msg failed WEIGHT30 (Weight of 44
reaches or exceeds the limit of 32.). Action=DELETE.

I has sent Scott debug log files but I still haven't figure out what I'm
missing.

Yes there are a *few* per user .junkmail files, with an action of WARN, but
most of the held mail is either not for them (nor are they CC'd or BCC'd as
far as I can tell) and/or (may or may not be related) in the spam review
application there is no To: field reported.

I have also tried changing 'weight' to 'weightrange' with the appropriate
scores, and still see the same results 

Anyone else ?

Fritz

Frederick P. Squib, Jr.
Network Operations/Mail Administrator
Citizens Telephone Company of Kecksburg
http://www.wpa.net

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html email 
/\- against microsoft attachments

---
[This E-mail scanned by Citizens Internet Services with Declude Virus.]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE

2005-03-01 Thread Erik
Fritz,
We've experienced the same problem as you and for us, it was narrowed down
to the catchall account in Imail.

If you have a catchall account in the Imail setup, Declude will not work
correctly.

After many emails to Declude about this, they confirmed to me this IS a
problem and one of not a high priority to fix.  We've reverted back to 1.82
until it's fixed.

Also, Decludes' COMFIRM.CFG does not work correctly either when there is a
catchall account.  The local Declude will intercept any confirmation
email that going to another Imail/Declude Confirm system (thus the email
never reaches it's intended source.  Again, response from Declude was:
it's not a high priority.

Erik


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz Squib
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 2:42 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE


Apparently I missing something bloody obvious, but with 2.0 running it seems
like my delete action doesn't work as expected any more.

Running the latest 2.x release downloaded last night.

--Global Config--

WEIGHT20weight  x   x   20  0
WEIGHT30weight  x   x   32  0

--Default.junkmail--

WEIGHT20HOLD
WEIGHT30DELETE

In a brief conversation with Declude the response I got was:

The problem is probably the change in the way the DELETE action works.  In
the past, it would delete the E-mail for all recipients.  Now, it only
deletes the E-mail for recipients that use the DELETE action.

It still seems like the HOLD action is taking precedence over the DELETE
action since mail with weight over my WEIGHT30 test winds up in the hold
folder even though the log file says:

 02/01/2005 12:25:06 Qbb6c48770128853b Msg failed WEIGHT30 (Weight of 
 44
reaches or exceeds the limit of 32.). Action=DELETE.

I has sent Scott debug log files but I still haven't figure out what I'm
missing.

Yes there are a *few* per user .junkmail files, with an action of WARN, but
most of the held mail is either not for them (nor are they CC'd or BCC'd as
far as I can tell) and/or (may or may not be related) in the spam review
application there is no To: field reported.

I have also tried changing 'weight' to 'weightrange' with the appropriate
scores, and still see the same results 

Anyone else ?

Fritz

Frederick P. Squib, Jr.
Network Operations/Mail Administrator
Citizens Telephone Company of Kecksburg
http://www.wpa.net

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html email 
/\- against microsoft attachments

---
[This E-mail scanned by Citizens Internet Services with Declude Virus.]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE

2005-03-01 Thread Darin Cox
What exactly is the problem with the catchall account, and when is a fix
expected?

We haven't yet upgraded to 2.0 because of the periodic mention of problems
with it on this list, but would like to as soon as all known issues are
resolved.  We don't have many nobody aliases, but we haven't been able to
convince a couple of customers to remove them yet.

Darin.


- Original Message - 
From: Erik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 8:54 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE


Fritz,
We've experienced the same problem as you and for us, it was narrowed down
to the catchall account in Imail.

If you have a catchall account in the Imail setup, Declude will not work
correctly.

After many emails to Declude about this, they confirmed to me this IS a
problem and one of not a high priority to fix.  We've reverted back to 1.82
until it's fixed.

Also, Decludes' COMFIRM.CFG does not work correctly either when there is a
catchall account.  The local Declude will intercept any confirmation
email that going to another Imail/Declude Confirm system (thus the email
never reaches it's intended source.  Again, response from Declude was:
it's not a high priority.

Erik


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz Squib
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 2:42 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE


Apparently I missing something bloody obvious, but with 2.0 running it seems
like my delete action doesn't work as expected any more.

Running the latest 2.x release downloaded last night.

--Global Config--

WEIGHT20 weight x x 20 0
WEIGHT30 weight x x 32 0

--Default.junkmail--

WEIGHT20 HOLD
WEIGHT30 DELETE

In a brief conversation with Declude the response I got was:

The problem is probably the change in the way the DELETE action works.  In
the past, it would delete the E-mail for all recipients.  Now, it only
deletes the E-mail for recipients that use the DELETE action.

It still seems like the HOLD action is taking precedence over the DELETE
action since mail with weight over my WEIGHT30 test winds up in the hold
folder even though the log file says:

 02/01/2005 12:25:06 Qbb6c48770128853b Msg failed WEIGHT30 (Weight of
 44
reaches or exceeds the limit of 32.). Action=DELETE.

I has sent Scott debug log files but I still haven't figure out what I'm
missing.

Yes there are a *few* per user .junkmail files, with an action of WARN, but
most of the held mail is either not for them (nor are they CC'd or BCC'd as
far as I can tell) and/or (may or may not be related) in the spam review
application there is no To: field reported.

I have also tried changing 'weight' to 'weightrange' with the appropriate
scores, and still see the same results

Anyone else ?

Fritz

Frederick P. Squib, Jr.
Network Operations/Mail Administrator
Citizens Telephone Company of Kecksburg
http://www.wpa.net

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html email
/\- against microsoft attachments

---
[This E-mail scanned by Citizens Internet Services with Declude Virus.]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE

2005-03-01 Thread Erik
I should confirm my post... By the catchall account, I'm referring to the
Copy All Mail enabled setting in IMAIL.

Erik


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 3:04 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE


What exactly is the problem with the catchall account, and when is a fix
expected?

We haven't yet upgraded to 2.0 because of the periodic mention of problems
with it on this list, but would like to as soon as all known issues are
resolved.  We don't have many nobody aliases, but we haven't been able to
convince a couple of customers to remove them yet.

Darin.


- Original Message - 
From: Erik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 8:54 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE


Fritz,
We've experienced the same problem as you and for us, it was narrowed down
to the catchall account in Imail.

If you have a catchall account in the Imail setup, Declude will not work
correctly.

After many emails to Declude about this, they confirmed to me this IS a
problem and one of not a high priority to fix.  We've reverted back to 1.82
until it's fixed.

Also, Decludes' COMFIRM.CFG does not work correctly either when there is a
catchall account.  The local Declude will intercept any confirmation
email that going to another Imail/Declude Confirm system (thus the email
never reaches it's intended source.  Again, response from Declude was: it's
not a high priority.

Erik


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz Squib
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 2:42 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE


Apparently I missing something bloody obvious, but with 2.0 running it seems
like my delete action doesn't work as expected any more.

Running the latest 2.x release downloaded last night.

--Global Config--

WEIGHT20 weight x x 20 0
WEIGHT30 weight x x 32 0

--Default.junkmail--

WEIGHT20 HOLD
WEIGHT30 DELETE

In a brief conversation with Declude the response I got was:

The problem is probably the change in the way the DELETE action works.  In
the past, it would delete the E-mail for all recipients.  Now, it only
deletes the E-mail for recipients that use the DELETE action.

It still seems like the HOLD action is taking precedence over the DELETE
action since mail with weight over my WEIGHT30 test winds up in the hold
folder even though the log file says:

 02/01/2005 12:25:06 Qbb6c48770128853b Msg failed WEIGHT30 (Weight of 
 44
reaches or exceeds the limit of 32.). Action=DELETE.

I has sent Scott debug log files but I still haven't figure out what I'm
missing.

Yes there are a *few* per user .junkmail files, with an action of WARN, but
most of the held mail is either not for them (nor are they CC'd or BCC'd as
far as I can tell) and/or (may or may not be related) in the spam review
application there is no To: field reported.

I have also tried changing 'weight' to 'weightrange' with the appropriate
scores, and still see the same results

Anyone else ?

Fritz

Frederick P. Squib, Jr.
Network Operations/Mail Administrator
Citizens Telephone Company of Kecksburg
http://www.wpa.net

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html email
/\- against microsoft attachments

---
[This E-mail scanned by Citizens Internet Services with Declude Virus.]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE

2005-03-01 Thread Jason Fullen
I've run into this problem too.  My solution was to setup another delete 
test two points lower than your original delete test.  So with a WEIGHT30 
test, setup a WEIGHT28 test with the action of delete.  I don't know how 
reliable it is, but it worked for me.

Jason
- Original Message - 
From: Fritz Squib [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 7:42 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE


Apparently I missing something bloody obvious, but with 2.0 running it 
seems
like my delete action doesn't work as expected any more.

Running the latest 2.x release downloaded last night.
--Global Config--
WEIGHT20 weight x x 20 0
WEIGHT30 weight x x 32 0
--Default.junkmail--
WEIGHT20 HOLD
WEIGHT30 DELETE
In a brief conversation with Declude the response I got was:
The problem is probably the change in the way the DELETE action works. 
In
the past, it would delete the E-mail for all recipients.  Now, it only
deletes the E-mail for recipients that use the DELETE action.

It still seems like the HOLD action is taking precedence over the DELETE
action since mail with weight over my WEIGHT30 test winds up in the hold
folder even though the log file says:
02/01/2005 12:25:06 Qbb6c48770128853b Msg failed WEIGHT30 (Weight of 44
reaches or exceeds the limit of 32.). Action=DELETE.
I has sent Scott debug log files but I still haven't figure out what I'm
missing.
Yes there are a *few* per user .junkmail files, with an action of WARN, 
but
most of the held mail is either not for them (nor are they CC'd or BCC'd 
as
far as I can tell) and/or (may or may not be related) in the spam review
application there is no To: field reported.

I have also tried changing 'weight' to 'weightrange' with the appropriate
scores, and still see the same results
Anyone else ?
Fritz
Frederick P. Squib, Jr.
Network Operations/Mail Administrator
Citizens Telephone Company of Kecksburg
http://www.wpa.net
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html email
/\- against microsoft attachments
---
[This E-mail scanned by Citizens Internet Services with Declude Virus.]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE

2005-03-01 Thread Fritz Squib
Nope, not using that either.

Fritz

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 9:11 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE


I should confirm my post... By the catchall account, I'm referring to the
Copy All Mail enabled setting in IMAIL.

Erik


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 3:04 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE


What exactly is the problem with the catchall account, and when is a fix
expected?

We haven't yet upgraded to 2.0 because of the periodic mention of problems
with it on this list, but would like to as soon as all known issues are
resolved.  We don't have many nobody aliases, but we haven't been able to
convince a couple of customers to remove them yet.

Darin.


- Original Message - 
From: Erik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 8:54 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE


Fritz,
We've experienced the same problem as you and for us, it was narrowed down
to the catchall account in Imail.

If you have a catchall account in the Imail setup, Declude will not work
correctly.

After many emails to Declude about this, they confirmed to me this IS a
problem and one of not a high priority to fix.  We've reverted back to 1.82
until it's fixed.

Also, Decludes' COMFIRM.CFG does not work correctly either when there is a
catchall account.  The local Declude will intercept any confirmation
email that going to another Imail/Declude Confirm system (thus the email
never reaches it's intended source.  Again, response from Declude was: it's
not a high priority.

Erik


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz Squib
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 2:42 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE


Apparently I missing something bloody obvious, but with 2.0 running it seems
like my delete action doesn't work as expected any more.

Running the latest 2.x release downloaded last night.

--Global Config--

WEIGHT20 weight x x 20 0
WEIGHT30 weight x x 32 0

--Default.junkmail--

WEIGHT20 HOLD
WEIGHT30 DELETE

In a brief conversation with Declude the response I got was:

The problem is probably the change in the way the DELETE action works.  In
the past, it would delete the E-mail for all recipients.  Now, it only
deletes the E-mail for recipients that use the DELETE action.

It still seems like the HOLD action is taking precedence over the DELETE
action since mail with weight over my WEIGHT30 test winds up in the hold
folder even though the log file says:

 02/01/2005 12:25:06 Qbb6c48770128853b Msg failed WEIGHT30 (Weight of
 44
reaches or exceeds the limit of 32.). Action=DELETE.

I has sent Scott debug log files but I still haven't figure out what I'm
missing.

Yes there are a *few* per user .junkmail files, with an action of WARN, but
most of the held mail is either not for them (nor are they CC'd or BCC'd as
far as I can tell) and/or (may or may not be related) in the spam review
application there is no To: field reported.

I have also tried changing 'weight' to 'weightrange' with the appropriate
scores, and still see the same results

Anyone else ?

Fritz

Frederick P. Squib, Jr.
Network Operations/Mail Administrator
Citizens Telephone Company of Kecksburg
http://www.wpa.net

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html email
/\- against microsoft attachments

---
[This E-mail scanned by Citizens Internet Services with Declude Virus.]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE

2005-03-01 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
One of the best things to try is to stop using WEIGHT and use WEIGHTRANGE.
This is much more precise in action handling.

John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz Squib
 Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 6:23 AM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE
 
 Nope, not using that either.
 
 Fritz
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik
 Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 9:11 AM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE
 
 
 I should confirm my post... By the catchall account, I'm referring to
the
 Copy All Mail enabled setting in IMAIL.
 
 Erik
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
 Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 3:04 PM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE
 
 
 What exactly is the problem with the catchall account, and when is a fix
 expected?
 
 We haven't yet upgraded to 2.0 because of the periodic mention of problems
 with it on this list, but would like to as soon as all known issues are
 resolved.  We don't have many nobody aliases, but we haven't been able to
 convince a couple of customers to remove them yet.
 
 Darin.
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Erik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 8:54 AM
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE
 
 
 Fritz,
 We've experienced the same problem as you and for us, it was narrowed down
 to the catchall account in Imail.
 
 If you have a catchall account in the Imail setup, Declude will not work
 correctly.
 
 After many emails to Declude about this, they confirmed to me this IS a
 problem and one of not a high priority to fix.  We've reverted back to
1.82
 until it's fixed.
 
 Also, Decludes' COMFIRM.CFG does not work correctly either when there is
a
 catchall account.  The local Declude will intercept any confirmation
 email that going to another Imail/Declude Confirm system (thus the email
 never reaches it's intended source.  Again, response from Declude was:
it's
 not a high priority.
 
 Erik
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz Squib
 Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 2:42 PM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE
 
 
 Apparently I missing something bloody obvious, but with 2.0 running it
seems
 like my delete action doesn't work as expected any more.
 
 Running the latest 2.x release downloaded last night.
 
 --Global Config--
 
 WEIGHT20 weight x x 20 0
 WEIGHT30 weight x x 32 0
 
 --Default.junkmail--
 
 WEIGHT20 HOLD
 WEIGHT30 DELETE
 
 In a brief conversation with Declude the response I got was:
 
 The problem is probably the change in the way the DELETE action works.
In
 the past, it would delete the E-mail for all recipients.  Now, it only
 deletes the E-mail for recipients that use the DELETE action.
 
 It still seems like the HOLD action is taking precedence over the DELETE
 action since mail with weight over my WEIGHT30 test winds up in the hold
 folder even though the log file says:
 
  02/01/2005 12:25:06 Qbb6c48770128853b Msg failed WEIGHT30 (Weight of
  44
 reaches or exceeds the limit of 32.). Action=DELETE.
 
 I has sent Scott debug log files but I still haven't figure out what I'm
 missing.
 
 Yes there are a *few* per user .junkmail files, with an action of WARN,
but
 most of the held mail is either not for them (nor are they CC'd or BCC'd
as
 far as I can tell) and/or (may or may not be related) in the spam review
 application there is no To: field reported.
 
 I have also tried changing 'weight' to 'weightrange' with the appropriate
 scores, and still see the same results
 
 Anyone else ?
 
 Fritz
 
 Frederick P. Squib, Jr.
 Network Operations/Mail Administrator
 Citizens Telephone Company of Kecksburg
 http://www.wpa.net
 
 ()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html email
 /\- against microsoft attachments
 
 ---
 [This E-mail scanned by Citizens Internet Services with Declude Virus.]
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
 just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
 Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
 http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
 just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
 Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
 http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE

2005-03-01 Thread Goran Jovanovic
John,

If all I want to do is:

WEIGHT10   ATTACH
WEIGHT40   DELETE

Are you suggesting that I change that to:

WEIGHT1039  ATTACH
WEIGHT40DELETE

Where WEIGHT1039 is a weightrange and the rest are weights.

If so why is your suggestion more precise?

 
 
 
 Goran Jovanovic
 The LAN Shoppe

 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
 Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 9:56 AM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE
 
 One of the best things to try is to stop using WEIGHT and use
WEIGHTRANGE.
 This is much more precise in action handling.
 
 John Tolmachoff
 Engineer/Consultant/Owner
 eServices For You
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz Squib
  Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 6:23 AM
  To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
  Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE
 
  Nope, not using that either.
 
  Fritz
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik
  Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 9:11 AM
  To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
  Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE
 
 
  I should confirm my post... By the catchall account, I'm referring
to
 the
  Copy All Mail enabled setting in IMAIL.
 
  Erik
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
  Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 3:04 PM
  To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
  Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE
 
 
  What exactly is the problem with the catchall account, and when is a
fix
  expected?
 
  We haven't yet upgraded to 2.0 because of the periodic mention of
 problems
  with it on this list, but would like to as soon as all known issues
are
  resolved.  We don't have many nobody aliases, but we haven't been
able
 to
  convince a couple of customers to remove them yet.
 
  Darin.
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Erik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
  Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 8:54 AM
  Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE
 
 
  Fritz,
  We've experienced the same problem as you and for us, it was
narrowed
 down
  to the catchall account in Imail.
 
  If you have a catchall account in the Imail setup, Declude will
not
 work
  correctly.
 
  After many emails to Declude about this, they confirmed to me this
IS a
  problem and one of not a high priority to fix.  We've reverted back
to
 1.82
  until it's fixed.
 
  Also, Decludes' COMFIRM.CFG does not work correctly either when
there
 is
 a
  catchall account.  The local Declude will intercept any
confirmation
  email that going to another Imail/Declude Confirm system (thus the
email
  never reaches it's intended source.  Again, response from Declude
was:
 it's
  not a high priority.
 
  Erik
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz Squib
  Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 2:42 PM
  To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
  Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE
 
 
  Apparently I missing something bloody obvious, but with 2.0 running
it
 seems
  like my delete action doesn't work as expected any more.
 
  Running the latest 2.x release downloaded last night.
 
  --Global Config--
 
  WEIGHT20 weight x x 20 0
  WEIGHT30 weight x x 32 0
 
  --Default.junkmail--
 
  WEIGHT20 HOLD
  WEIGHT30 DELETE
 
  In a brief conversation with Declude the response I got was:
 
  The problem is probably the change in the way the DELETE action
works.
 In
  the past, it would delete the E-mail for all recipients.  Now, it
only
  deletes the E-mail for recipients that use the DELETE action.
 
  It still seems like the HOLD action is taking precedence over the
DELETE
  action since mail with weight over my WEIGHT30 test winds up in the
hold
  folder even though the log file says:
 
   02/01/2005 12:25:06 Qbb6c48770128853b Msg failed WEIGHT30 (Weight
of
   44
  reaches or exceeds the limit of 32.). Action=DELETE.
 
  I has sent Scott debug log files but I still haven't figure out what
I'm
  missing.
 
  Yes there are a *few* per user .junkmail files, with an action of
WARN,
 but
  most of the held mail is either not for them (nor are they CC'd or
BCC'd
 as
  far as I can tell) and/or (may or may not be related) in the spam
review
  application there is no To: field reported.
 
  I have also tried changing 'weight' to 'weightrange' with the
 appropriate
  scores, and still see the same results
 
  Anyone else ?
 
  Fritz
 
  Frederick P. Squib, Jr.
  Network Operations/Mail Administrator
  Citizens Telephone Company of Kecksburg
  http://www.wpa.net
 
  ()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html email
  /\- against microsoft attachments
 
  ---
  [This E-mail scanned by Citizens Internet Services with Declude

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE

2005-03-01 Thread Franco Celli
I had a similar problem with 2.0.4, in my case I had multiple DELETE actions
like the following:
WEIGHT20 HOLD
WEIGHT25 DELETE
WEIGHT30 DELETE

The solution that worked in my case was to remove (simply comment out) the
extra DELETE
WEIGHT20 HOLD
WEIGHT25 DELETE
#WEIGHT30 DELETE

I don't know if this is your case and if it is true also with latest version
as I didn't check further.

---
Franco Celli


- Original Message - 
From: Fritz Squib [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 2:42 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE


 Apparently I missing something bloody obvious, but with 2.0 running it
seems
 like my delete action doesn't work as expected any more.

 Running the latest 2.x release downloaded last night.

 --Global Config--

 WEIGHT20 weight x x 20 0
 WEIGHT30 weight x x 32 0

 --Default.junkmail--

 WEIGHT20 HOLD
 WEIGHT30 DELETE


---
[Quipo ISP - Questa E-mail e' stata controllata dal programma Declude Virus]
[Quipo ISP - This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE

2005-03-01 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Goran, 

It's more precise because when you have two WEIGHTS that overlap Declude 
will evaluate the actions of both and pick the one with the highest 
programmed action.  When you use the weight range option than there is no 
conflict of actions since your weight ranges would not conflict. 

Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 

Goran Jovanovic writes: 

John, 

If all I want to do is: 

WEIGHT10   ATTACH
WEIGHT40   DELETE 

Are you suggesting that I change that to: 

WEIGHT1039  ATTACH
WEIGHT40DELETE 

Where WEIGHT1039 is a weightrange and the rest are weights. 

If so why is your suggestion more precise? 

 
 
 
 Goran Jovanovic
 The LAN Shoppe 

  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 9:56 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE 

One of the best things to try is to stop using WEIGHT and use
WEIGHTRANGE.
This is much more precise in action handling. 

John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz Squib
 Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 6:23 AM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE

 Nope, not using that either.

 Fritz

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik
 Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 9:11 AM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE


 I should confirm my post... By the catchall account, I'm referring
to
the
 Copy All Mail enabled setting in IMAIL.

 Erik


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
 Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 3:04 PM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE


 What exactly is the problem with the catchall account, and when is a
fix
 expected?

 We haven't yet upgraded to 2.0 because of the periodic mention of
problems
 with it on this list, but would like to as soon as all known issues
are
 resolved.  We don't have many nobody aliases, but we haven't been
able
to
 convince a couple of customers to remove them yet.

 Darin.


 - Original Message -
 From: Erik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 8:54 AM
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE


 Fritz,
 We've experienced the same problem as you and for us, it was
narrowed
down
 to the catchall account in Imail.

 If you have a catchall account in the Imail setup, Declude will
not
work
 correctly.

 After many emails to Declude about this, they confirmed to me this
IS a
 problem and one of not a high priority to fix.  We've reverted back
to
1.82
 until it's fixed.

 Also, Decludes' COMFIRM.CFG does not work correctly either when
there
is
a
 catchall account.  The local Declude will intercept any
confirmation
 email that going to another Imail/Declude Confirm system (thus the
email
 never reaches it's intended source.  Again, response from Declude
was:
it's
 not a high priority.

 Erik


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz Squib
 Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 2:42 PM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE


 Apparently I missing something bloody obvious, but with 2.0 running
it
seems
 like my delete action doesn't work as expected any more.

 Running the latest 2.x release downloaded last night.

 --Global Config--

 WEIGHT20 weight x x 20 0
 WEIGHT30 weight x x 32 0

 --Default.junkmail--

 WEIGHT20 HOLD
 WEIGHT30 DELETE

 In a brief conversation with Declude the response I got was:

 The problem is probably the change in the way the DELETE action
works.
In
 the past, it would delete the E-mail for all recipients.  Now, it
only
 deletes the E-mail for recipients that use the DELETE action.

 It still seems like the HOLD action is taking precedence over the
DELETE
 action since mail with weight over my WEIGHT30 test winds up in the
hold
 folder even though the log file says:

  02/01/2005 12:25:06 Qbb6c48770128853b Msg failed WEIGHT30 (Weight
of
  44
 reaches or exceeds the limit of 32.). Action=DELETE.

 I has sent Scott debug log files but I still haven't figure out what
I'm
 missing.

 Yes there are a *few* per user .junkmail files, with an action of
WARN,
but
 most of the held mail is either not for them (nor are they CC'd or
BCC'd
as
 far as I can tell) and/or (may or may not be related) in the spam
review
 application there is no To: field reported.

 I have

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE

2005-03-01 Thread Ncl Admin
At 02:54 PM 3/1/2005 +0100, Erik wrote:
After many emails to Declude about this, they confirmed to me this IS a
problem and one of not a high priority to fix.  We've reverted back to 1.82
until it's fixed.

We have as well.  I just tried 2.05 yesterday and spent 1 1/2 hours fixing
stuff this morning. Clearly the upgrade is still not working very well.


[This E-mail scanned for viruses by F-Prot using Declude Anti-virus ]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE

2005-03-01 Thread Goran Jovanovic
I put in the 2.0.5 upgrade on the weekend and so far have no seen any
problems. I did the manual install and copied the declude.exe over, did
the -diags and then started the SMTP service.

I have looked in the logs but see nothing unusual. What type of problems
did you spend time fixing?

With everyone saying there are problems I am starting to get paranoid as
I am not seeing any problems.

Now of course that I have written this I am sure something is going to
break really soon :(

 
 
 Goran Jovanovic
 The LAN Shoppe

 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ncl Admin
 Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 11:07 AM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE
 
 At 02:54 PM 3/1/2005 +0100, Erik wrote:
 After many emails to Declude about this, they confirmed to me this IS
a
 problem and one of not a high priority to fix.  We've reverted back
to
 1.82
 until it's fixed.
 
 We have as well.  I just tried 2.05 yesterday and spent 1 1/2 hours
fixing
 stuff this morning. Clearly the upgrade is still not working very
well.
 
 
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by F-Prot using Declude Anti-virus ]
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE

2005-03-01 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
The latest version of Declude is indeed working very well.

As in anything else in life, there is no such thing as perfect.

This bug is apparently as the result of customer requests, in that Declude
customers were requesting multiple actions and different actions for
different users.

Remember people, declude.exe started off being a simple yet powerful tool in
the war on spam. I highly doubt Scott could have fore sought all of the
added functions and features that are now present or are planned. As such,
the code could not have been written with planning for all of those features
and functions.

Come on now, how many of us and had to go back and redo/undo work that we
did one/two/three years ago because what we have to do now is changed and to
make it work we have to make changes to work we did in the past.

Remember, the Subject line bug did not come to light until Earthlink and
Gmail started using a new software that started putting in lines in the
header that no one had seen before.

As for the question of using WEIGHTRANGE over WEIGHT, any time you can take
steps to be more precise in defining what it is you intend to do will help
to reduce possible problems down the line. Using WEIGHTRANGE will help you
to clearly understand and change your intention into actual commands as it
leaves less room for mistakes and overlaps.

John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ncl Admin
 Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 8:07 AM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE
 
 At 02:54 PM 3/1/2005 +0100, Erik wrote:
 After many emails to Declude about this, they confirmed to me this IS a
 problem and one of not a high priority to fix.  We've reverted back to
1.82
 until it's fixed.
 
 We have as well.  I just tried 2.05 yesterday and spent 1 1/2 hours fixing
 stuff this morning. Clearly the upgrade is still not working very well.
 
 
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by F-Prot using Declude Anti-virus ]
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE

2005-03-01 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
We have deployed 2.0.5 as well using the manual.  We have had it running for 
well over a week now and have not seen any issues at all. 

Darrell 

Goran Jovanovic writes: 

I put in the 2.0.5 upgrade on the weekend and so far have no seen any
problems. I did the manual install and copied the declude.exe over, did
the -diags and then started the SMTP service. 

I have looked in the logs but see nothing unusual. What type of problems
did you spend time fixing? 

With everyone saying there are problems I am starting to get paranoid as
I am not seeing any problems. 

Now of course that I have written this I am sure something is going to
break really soon :( 

 
 
 Goran Jovanovic
 The LAN Shoppe 

  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ncl Admin
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 11:07 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE 

At 02:54 PM 3/1/2005 +0100, Erik wrote:
After many emails to Declude about this, they confirmed to me this IS
a
problem and one of not a high priority to fix.  We've reverted back
to
1.82
until it's fixed. 

We have as well.  I just tried 2.05 yesterday and spent 1 1/2 hours
fixing
stuff this morning. Clearly the upgrade is still not working very
well.
 

[This E-mail scanned for viruses by F-Prot using Declude Anti-virus ] 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE

2005-03-01 Thread Scott Fisher
How have your logs been Darrell?
When I was running it (I've since gone back to 1.82) I noticed lots more log 
corruption

- Original Message - 
From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 10:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE


We have deployed 2.0.5 as well using the manual.  We have had it running 
for well over a week now and have not seen any issues at all.
Darrell

Goran Jovanovic writes:
I put in the 2.0.5 upgrade on the weekend and so far have no seen any
problems. I did the manual install and copied the declude.exe over, did
the -diags and then started the SMTP service. I have looked in the logs 
but see nothing unusual. What type of problems
did you spend time fixing? With everyone saying there are problems I am 
starting to get paranoid as
I am not seeing any problems. Now of course that I have written this I am 
sure something is going to
break really soon :( Goran Jovanovic
 The LAN Shoppe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ncl Admin
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 11:07 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE At 02:54 PM 
3/1/2005 +0100, Erik wrote:
After many emails to Declude about this, they confirmed to me this IS
a
problem and one of not a high priority to fix.  We've reverted back
to
1.82
until it's fixed.
We have as well.  I just tried 2.05 yesterday and spent 1 1/2 hours
fixing
stuff this morning. Clearly the upgrade is still not working very
well.
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by F-Prot using Declude 
Anti-virus ] ---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)] ---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)] ---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, 
MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE

2005-03-01 Thread Kevin Bilbee
This is how you would setup a weight range with the last one being a weight
to place an action on all emails with a weight over that weight.

SPAM-LOWweightrange x   x   8   13
SPAM-MEDweightrange x   x   14  24
SPAM-HIGH   weight  x   x   25  0

Kevin Bilbee

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Goran Jovanovic
 Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 7:12 AM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE
 
 
 John,
 
 If all I want to do is:
 
 WEIGHT10   ATTACH
 WEIGHT40   DELETE
 
 Are you suggesting that I change that to:
 
 WEIGHT1039  ATTACH
 WEIGHT40DELETE
 
 Where WEIGHT1039 is a weightrange and the rest are weights.
 
 If so why is your suggestion more precise?
 
  
  
  
  Goran Jovanovic
  The LAN Shoppe
 
  
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
  Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 9:56 AM
  To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
  Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE
  
  One of the best things to try is to stop using WEIGHT and use
 WEIGHTRANGE.
  This is much more precise in action handling.
  
  John Tolmachoff
  Engineer/Consultant/Owner
  eServices For You
  
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz Squib
   Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 6:23 AM
   To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
   Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE
  
   Nope, not using that either.
  
   Fritz
  
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik
   Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 9:11 AM
   To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
   Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE
  
  
   I should confirm my post... By the catchall account, 
 I'm referring
 to
  the
   Copy All Mail enabled setting in IMAIL.
  
   Erik
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
   Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 3:04 PM
   To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
   Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE
  
  
   What exactly is the problem with the catchall account, 
 and when is a
 fix
   expected?
  
   We haven't yet upgraded to 2.0 because of the periodic mention of
  problems
   with it on this list, but would like to as soon as all 
 known issues
 are
   resolved.  We don't have many nobody aliases, but we haven't been
 able
  to
   convince a couple of customers to remove them yet.
  
   Darin.
  
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Erik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
   Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 8:54 AM
   Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE
  
  
   Fritz,
   We've experienced the same problem as you and for us, it was
 narrowed
  down
   to the catchall account in Imail.
  
   If you have a catchall account in the Imail setup, Declude will
 not
  work
   correctly.
  
   After many emails to Declude about this, they confirmed to me this
 IS a
   problem and one of not a high priority to fix.  We've 
 reverted back
 to
  1.82
   until it's fixed.
  
   Also, Decludes' COMFIRM.CFG does not work correctly either when
 there
  is
  a
   catchall account.  The local Declude will intercept any
 confirmation
   email that going to another Imail/Declude Confirm system (thus the
 email
   never reaches it's intended source.  Again, response from Declude
 was:
  it's
   not a high priority.
  
   Erik
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Fritz Squib
   Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 2:42 PM
   To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
   Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE
  
  
   Apparently I missing something bloody obvious, but with 
 2.0 running
 it
  seems
   like my delete action doesn't work as expected any more.
  
   Running the latest 2.x release downloaded last night.
  
   --Global Config--
  
   WEIGHT20 weight x x 20 0
   WEIGHT30 weight x x 32 0
  
   --Default.junkmail--
  
   WEIGHT20 HOLD
   WEIGHT30 DELETE
  
   In a brief conversation with Declude the response I got was:
  
   The problem is probably the change in the way the DELETE action
 works.
  In
   the past, it would delete the E-mail for all recipients.  Now, it
 only
   deletes the E-mail for recipients that use the DELETE action.
  
   It still seems like the HOLD action is taking precedence over the
 DELETE
   action since mail with weight over my WEIGHT30 test winds 
 up in the
 hold
   folder even though the log file says:
  
02/01/2005 12:25:06 Qbb6c48770128853b Msg failed 
 WEIGHT30 (Weight
 of
44
   reaches or exceeds the limit of 32.). Action=DELETE.
  
   I has sent Scott debug log files but I still haven't

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE

2005-03-01 Thread Ncl Admin
At 11:20 AM 3/1/2005 -0500, Goran Jovanovic wrote:
I put in the 2.0.5 upgrade on the weekend and so far have no seen any
problems. I did the manual install and copied the declude.exe over, did
the -diags and then started the SMTP service.

I have looked in the logs but see nothing unusual. What type of problems
did you spend time fixing?

Instead of deleting bad messages which exceed my weight it captured them.
Then I have to hand process all of them.  It also got a zillion of them
going to my catchall account which are normally not there so it was
double the trouble so to speak.

I have to hand process everything between my weight range of hold and
delete to make sure that false positives are not just deleted.  I also then
block spam ip's while I do it which really cuts down on the next batch.

I did send a low priority ticket to declude, as far as I am concerned I did
the auto install and if it needed to fix things from weight to weightrange
it should have done it.  I haven't really currently got the time to re-do
my settings.  But might take a look at it in the near future but I am
moving from Imail to Smartermail so not sure I should allocate the time.

Jay


[This E-mail scanned for viruses by F-Prot]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE

2005-03-01 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Scott, 

I have not seen too much log corruption yet.  In fact watching the logs 
scroll by it seems to be better than what we seen under earlier versions.  
Specially since the logs are not interleaved (I like that).  We are running 
logs in excess of 600MB.  I will have a better answer once I kick off all 
the monthly processing of logs. 

Darrell 

Scott Fisher writes: 

How have your logs been Darrell?
When I was running it (I've since gone back to 1.82) I noticed lots more 
log corruption 

- Original Message - From: Darrell 
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 10:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE 


We have deployed 2.0.5 as well using the manual.  We have had it running 
for well over a week now and have not seen any issues at all.
Darrell 

Goran Jovanovic writes:
I put in the 2.0.5 upgrade on the weekend and so far have no seen any
problems. I did the manual install and copied the declude.exe over, did
the -diags and then started the SMTP service. I have looked in the logs 
but see nothing unusual. What type of problems
did you spend time fixing? With everyone saying there are problems I am 
starting to get paranoid as
I am not seeing any problems. Now of course that I have written this I 
am sure something is going to
break really soon :( Goran Jovanovic
 The LAN Shoppe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ncl Admin
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 11:07 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE At 02:54 PM 
3/1/2005 +0100, Erik wrote:
After many emails to Declude about this, they confirmed to me this IS
a
problem and one of not a high priority to fix.  We've reverted back
to
1.82
until it's fixed. 

We have as well.  I just tried 2.05 yesterday and spent 1 1/2 hours
fixing
stuff this morning. Clearly the upgrade is still not working very
well.
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by F-Prot using Declude Anti-virus ] 
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)] ---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)] ---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, 
MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE

2005-03-01 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi,

Oh, so it's NOT just me.

Yes, there we virtually no corruptions before my upgrade from 1.82 to 2.04 -
now they are plentiful.

Best Regards
Andy 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 11:37 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE


How have your logs been Darrell?
When I was running it (I've since gone back to 1.82) I noticed lots more log

corruption

- Original Message - 
From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 10:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE


 We have deployed 2.0.5 as well using the manual.  We have had it 
 running
 for well over a week now and have not seen any issues at all.
 Darrell

 Goran Jovanovic writes:
 I put in the 2.0.5 upgrade on the weekend and so far have no seen any 
 problems. I did the manual install and copied the declude.exe over, 
 did the -diags and then started the SMTP service. I have looked in 
 the logs but see nothing unusual. What type of problems did you spend 
 time fixing? With everyone saying there are problems I am starting to 
 get paranoid as I am not seeing any problems. Now of course that I 
 have written this I am sure something is going to
 break really soon :( Goran Jovanovic
  The LAN Shoppe
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ncl Admin
 Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 11:07 AM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE At 02:54 PM
 3/1/2005 +0100, Erik wrote:
 After many emails to Declude about this, they confirmed to me this 
 IS
 a
 problem and one of not a high priority to fix.  We've reverted back
 to
 1.82
 until it's fixed.

 We have as well.  I just tried 2.05 yesterday and spent 1 1/2 hours
 fixing
 stuff this morning. Clearly the upgrade is still not working very
 well.
  [This E-mail scanned for viruses by F-Prot using Declude
 Anti-virus ] ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)] ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)] ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.



 --
 --
 Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
 Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, 
 MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type 
 unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at 
 http://www.mail-archive.com.
 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE

2005-03-01 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Andy/Scott, 

We are running 2.0.5 and I am not sure if that has anything to do with it.  
I have always had corruption with the previous versions when the server got 
to busy.  I just have not seen that with 2.0.5 yet. 

Darrell 

Andy Schmidt writes: 

Hi, 

Oh, so it's NOT just me. 

Yes, there we virtually no corruptions before my upgrade from 1.82 to 2.04 -
now they are plentiful. 

Best Regards
Andy  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 11:37 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE 

How have your logs been Darrell?
When I was running it (I've since gone back to 1.82) I noticed lots more log 

corruption 

- Original Message - 
From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 10:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE 


We have deployed 2.0.5 as well using the manual.  We have had it 
running
for well over a week now and have not seen any issues at all.
Darrell 

Goran Jovanovic writes:
I put in the 2.0.5 upgrade on the weekend and so far have no seen any 
problems. I did the manual install and copied the declude.exe over, 
did the -diags and then started the SMTP service. I have looked in 
the logs but see nothing unusual. What type of problems did you spend 
time fixing? With everyone saying there are problems I am starting to 
get paranoid as I am not seeing any problems. Now of course that I 
have written this I am sure something is going to
break really soon :( Goran Jovanovic
 The LAN Shoppe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ncl Admin
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 11:07 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE At 02:54 PM
3/1/2005 +0100, Erik wrote:
After many emails to Declude about this, they confirmed to me this 
IS
a
problem and one of not a high priority to fix.  We've reverted back
to
1.82
until it's fixed. 

We have as well.  I just tried 2.05 yesterday and spent 1 1/2 hours
fixing
stuff this morning. Clearly the upgrade is still not working very
well.
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by F-Prot using Declude
Anti-virus ] ---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)] ---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)] ---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

--
--
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, 
MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type 
unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at 
http://www.mail-archive.com. 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com. 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE

2005-03-01 Thread Andy Schmidt
Uh, so the WEIGHT text is the problem?

I have noticed from day one, that suddenly really obvious Spam that had
failed countless tests and should have been deleted (with REALLY high
weights) was actually being delivered.

I had mentioned it on the list twice right after I was finally able to
upgrade to 2.04 (after the crashes were fixed).

I thought I was dreaming and have not yet found the time to debug it.

Thanks for the pointer.

If letting through high-weight Spam is low priority on the to be fixed
list, then I guess I just have different priorities G? 


Best Regards
Andy Schmidt

HM Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846

Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206

http://www.HM-Software.com/


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz Squib
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 08:42 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE


Apparently I missing something bloody obvious, but with 2.0 running it seems
like my delete action doesn't work as expected any more.

Running the latest 2.x release downloaded last night.

--Global Config--

WEIGHT20weight  x   x   20  0
WEIGHT30weight  x   x   32  0

--Default.junkmail--

WEIGHT20HOLD
WEIGHT30DELETE

In a brief conversation with Declude the response I got was:

The problem is probably the change in the way the DELETE action works.  In
the past, it would delete the E-mail for all recipients.  Now, it only
deletes the E-mail for recipients that use the DELETE action.

It still seems like the HOLD action is taking precedence over the DELETE
action since mail with weight over my WEIGHT30 test winds up in the hold
folder even though the log file says:

 02/01/2005 12:25:06 Qbb6c48770128853b Msg failed WEIGHT30 (Weight of 
 44
reaches or exceeds the limit of 32.). Action=DELETE.

I has sent Scott debug log files but I still haven't figure out what I'm
missing.

Yes there are a *few* per user .junkmail files, with an action of WARN, but
most of the held mail is either not for them (nor are they CC'd or BCC'd as
far as I can tell) and/or (may or may not be related) in the spam review
application there is no To: field reported.

I have also tried changing 'weight' to 'weightrange' with the appropriate
scores, and still see the same results 

Anyone else ?

Fritz

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE

2005-03-01 Thread Kevin Bilbee
If you are moving form IMail to smartermail your declude files will transfer
over with out and issue, you may need to change path settings in your config
files. I have dont this on one live domain that I am testing declude and
smartermail with. Only problem at this point is the declude registration
which is not affecting spam processing.

As for the auto install it will not update or modify any of your config
files and that is as it should be. It would be scarry if it tried to
especially with the flexibility of declude.



Kevin Bilbee

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ncl Admin
 Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 8:47 AM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE


 At 11:20 AM 3/1/2005 -0500, Goran Jovanovic wrote:
 I put in the 2.0.5 upgrade on the weekend and so far have no seen any
 problems. I did the manual install and copied the declude.exe over, did
 the -diags and then started the SMTP service.
 
 I have looked in the logs but see nothing unusual. What type of problems
 did you spend time fixing?

 Instead of deleting bad messages which exceed my weight it captured them.
 Then I have to hand process all of them.  It also got a zillion of them
 going to my catchall account which are normally not there so it was
 double the trouble so to speak.

 I have to hand process everything between my weight range of hold and
 delete to make sure that false positives are not just deleted.  I
 also then
 block spam ip's while I do it which really cuts down on the next batch.

 I did send a low priority ticket to declude, as far as I am
 concerned I did
 the auto install and if it needed to fix things from weight to weightrange
 it should have done it.  I haven't really currently got the time to re-do
 my settings.  But might take a look at it in the near future but I am
 moving from Imail to Smartermail so not sure I should allocate the time.

 Jay


 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by F-Prot]

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.