I have been using the SPAM filters from MailPure and I have notices that
the Anti-Gibberish Test has been triggered a lot more than the Gibberish
test (5:1 ratio) The Anti-Gibberish Test has been causing a lot of SPAM
to go through by applying negative weight to the message. I was
wondering if
on 4/14/04 10:57 AM, TC Online Support wrote:
I was
wondering if there was a way to skip the Anti-Gibberish Test if the
Gibberish is not triggered. (This goes to all the test that contain an
Anti- test)
If/when we get a NOTCONTAINS filter command a lot of things like this could
be done very
I know [EMAIL PROTECTED] has new filters out in his Beta area that don't utilize the
anti-gibberish test.
There is just a gibberish and a gibberish-sub tests.
Scott Fisher
Director of IT
Farm Progress Companies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/14/04 09:57AM
I have been using the SPAM filters from
I know [EMAIL PROTECTED] has new filters out in his Beta area that
don't utilize the anti-gibberish test. There is just a gibberish and
a gibberish-sub tests.
I was beginning to wonder as nothing new has been posted at
http://www.mailpure.com/software/decludefilters/ since last year.
Sheldon
They are posted in the beta section. See this link for the link:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg17542.html
Scott Fisher
Director of IT
Farm Progress Companies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/14/04 12:02PM
I know [EMAIL PROTECTED] has new filters out in his Beta area that
don't utilize
Scott is of course correct. If you are using Declude 1.78+ (beta and
interim releases), there are single file versions of these filters that
will only show a hit when they actually score, and they are also a lot
more efficient. They can be found in the following location:
Sheldon,
I did decide last year not to try to keep two different sets of files
updated at the same time. Those using 1.78+ should definitely be using
the versions in the beta directory because they have additional
counterbalances and other improvements.
Matt
Sheldon Koehler wrote:
