006 11:10 AM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Weighting based on some Imail
> Tests...?
>
> Jim,
>
> It depends on the Imail test -Some are processed before
> Declude. I am not exactly sure which ones run before Declude
> as I do not use any o
m Comerford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 1:10 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Weighting based on some Imail Tests...?
I'm relatively new to Declude, but have been using Imail and many of its
test for quite a while.
I'm curious if it is possi
AIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 1:10 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Weighting based on some Imail Tests...?
I'm relatively new to Declude, but have been using Imail and many of its
test for quite a while.
I'm curious if it is possible to use some of imail'
I'm relatively new to Declude, but have been using Imail and many of its
test for quite a while.
I'm curious if it is possible to use some of imail's antispam tests
(specifically Baysean filter, and url-blacklist) to add weight to declude
tests. We have had great results with these two tests and
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 1:55 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] weighting domains
>>I would suggest you look to add a URI filtering product like out
invURIBL.
David of D
, December 01, 2005 1:55 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] weighting domains
>>I would suggest you look to add a URI filtering product like out
invURIBL.
David of Declude -
Will this feature be available in a future release?
Thanks
-Nick
> All of these do
> Will this feature be available in a future release?
Nick,
Darrel's InvURIBL is everything else then expensive and very usefull.
Markus
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just
>>I would suggest you look to add a URI filtering product like out
invURIBL.
David of Declude -
Will this feature be available in a future release?
Thanks
-Nick
All of these domains are listed on SURBL/URIBL. URI filtering is very
effective at capturing these patterns well before these h
Kevin,
I would suggest you look to add a URI filtering product like out invURIBL.
All of these domains are listed on SURBL/URIBL. URI filtering is very
effective at capturing these patterns well before these hosts get listed in
traditional RBL's.
Example:
Non-authoritative answer:
Name:
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Hayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] weighting domains
Hi Kevin
Lots you could do - to wack this guy you could have a filter that that
said
REMOTEIP END NOTCONTA
Hi Kevin
Lots you could do - to wack this guy you could have a filter that that said
REMOTEIP END NOTCONTAINS 65.249.245.
REVDNS 0 CONTAINS csh.
I am not sure if REMOTEIP or REVDNS or MAILFROM is appropriate but you
get the idea..
In addition you could have an ipfile that you could list the
Some of our users are getting a lot of spam from various domains that
all have this in the beginning: csh
Like:
csh.dbfm.org [65.249.245.172]
csh.mdcg.net [65.249.245.159]
csh.jtdz.org [65.249.245.150]
csh.xmdc.org [65.249.245.168]
csh.kvyh.com [65.249.245.204]
I have the Pro versions of ever
dfn Systems wrote:
I need to give a negative weight to a range of IP addresses. (actually 5
class C networks) Can I use an IP Blacklist with a negative weight using
the test type "ipfile"?
That's how I do it:
GOODIPipfile C:\IMail\Declude\GOODIP.TXT x -25 0
--
---
An "ipfile" can be used with a negative weight, or you can also
construct in the most recent beta version of JunkMail Pro, a custom
filter using the following
REMOTEIP -5 CIDR 200.150.125.0/24
You can also weight each line at zero and apply the weight in the
Global.cfg.
In ip
I need to give a negative weight to a range of IP addresses. (actually 5
class C networks) Can I use an IP Blacklist with a negative weight using
the test type "ipfile"?
Bill Green
dfn Systems
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Dec
Gene,
Sounds like you may have the weights configured as "weight" instead of
"weightrange".
Darrell
Check Out DLAnalyzer a comprehensive reporting tool for
Declude Junkmail Logs - http://www.dlanalyzer.com
Gene Head writes:
I have 4 entrie
ECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Weighting action problem
Gee Kami, you are as bad as I am. ;)
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan
&g
EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Weighting action problem
>
> Gene:
>
> You have to remember that when you state Weight10- you are in essence
> saying
> Weight 10+
>
> That is 10 to infinity
>
> Then Weight20 is the same.
>
> Your best bet in d
> WEIGHT10 WARN
> WEIGHT20 WARN
> weight35 copyto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> weight50 routeto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The problem I'm having is that the email for weight 35 is getting email
> with weight numbers in excess of 50.
>
> The weight 50 email is also getting the emails over
ject: [Declude.JunkMail] Weighting action problem
I have 4 entries in my declude default junkmail file to send email to
different accounts for review:
WEIGHT10WARN
WEIGHT20WARN
weight35copyto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
weight50routeto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The problem I'm having is that
I have 4 entries in my declude default junkmail file to send email to
different accounts for review:
WEIGHT10WARN
WEIGHT20WARN
weight35copyto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
weight50routeto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The problem I'm having is that the email for weight 35 is getting emai
x27;m sure we can help you.
Regards,
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Darryl Koster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2003 6:44 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Weighting System (help, DUH!)
>
> Can I get a quick tutorial
Can I get a quick tutorial about the weighting in the global config file
please.
In the following example what does x 7 0 do?
OBFUSCATION filter E:\IMail\Declude\Obfuscation.txt x 7 0
Is the x just a place hold for the IP address I see in other examples?
In your Obfuscation exa
I am fairly new to declude junkmail product and am having fairly good success, but
what I am running into is a few accounts that can not get email from certain accounts
such as aol or yahoo and I think this is due to some of my weightings
...I was wondering if someone could provide their we
>Where can I find setup info for weighting...
It's a beta feature, so you can check the archives of this list (at
http://www.mail-archive.com ).
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from th
Hi,
Where can I find setup info for weighting...
Thanks,
Andy Baldwin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.thumpernet.com
315-282-0020
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, ju
>Is it possible to include the weighting (see below) at the Mid Log
>level? I'd like to see it, but I'd also like to avoid running the log at High.
>
>Weighting from Log (High):
>BADHEADERS:5 SPAMHEADERS:5 HEUR10:5 . Total weight = 15
That will be done for the next release.
Scott,
Is it possible to include the weighting (see below) at the Mid Log
level? I'd like to see it, but I'd also like to avoid running the log at High.
Weighting from Log (High):
BADHEADERS:5 SPAMHEADERS:5 HEUR10:5 . Total weight = 15
Thanks,
Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Intern
28 matches
Mail list logo
