@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 12:00
PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Whitelisted address getting trapped anyway
You might need WHITELIST from .xx.com
(the smtp sender address looks to be in the fromat [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Original Message -
From
:
[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted address getting trapped
anyway
have an addres that I have
whitelisted
WHITELIST FROM @.com in
global.cfg
Yet somehow it got marked as spam
There was a matchin a filter file
How is this possible?
Should whitelisting not take
Of Harry Vanderzand
Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 11:18 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted address getting trapped anyway
have an addres that I have whitelisted
WHITELIST FROM @.com in global.cfg
Yet somehow it got marked as spam
There was a match
You might need WHITELIST from .xx.com
(the smtp sender address looks to be in the fromat [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Original Message -
From:
Harry Vanderzand
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 10:17
AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail
Here are the headers from a message that
was forwarded to my spam email account. It shows that its whitelisted
but it was still caught.
X-Declude-Sender:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1]
X-Declude-Spoolname: D5E8705DC5A1F.GSC
X-Declude-Note: Scanned by Declude 2.0.6
: Monday, June 06, 2005 1:57 PMTo:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted
but not
Here are the headers
from a message that was forwarded to my spam email account. It shows
that its whitelisted but it was still caught.
X-Declude-Sender:
[EMAIL
: Monday, June 06, 2005 1:57
PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]
whitelisted but not
Here are the headers from
a message that was forwarded to my spam email account. It shows that
its whitelisted but it was still caught.
X-Declude-Sender:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1
It likely means that the sender also uses Declude and scans
outgoing email.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan
DuncanSent: Monday, June 06, 2005 3:05 PMTo:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
whitelisted
Hi all,
We tag email with the subject tag "SPAM*-" when
email gets a score of higher than 10.
What happened here. It says that it was
whitelisted but it still tagged with "SPAM*-"
Message Headers.
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]From: "Eddie
Jacob" [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
[EMAIL
We tag email with the subject tag SPAM*- when email gets a score of
higher than 10.
What happened here. It says that it was whitelisted but it still tagged
with SPAM*-
What happened here is that someone got an E-mail with *SPAM in the
subject, and replied to it:
Subject: RE: *SPAM -FW:
Nevermind!
Is it Friday yet?
- Original Message -
From:
Jay
Calvert
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 1:17
PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]
Whitelisted[0]
Hi all,
We tag email with the subject tag "SPAM*-" when
email ge
1:44 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted- getting thru
Andy,
This works because the action on the Postmaster test is ROUTETO back to
the
postmaster.
How it works
[1] Lowers the weight of the email by 100 so that the message will not be
held
or deleted in our system
[2] Re
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 1:44 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted- getting thru
Andy,
This works because the action on the Postmaster test is ROUTETO back to
the
postmaster.
How it works
[1] Lowers the weight of the email by 100 so
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted- getting thru
Richard,
In my experience it is not a good idea to whitelist the postmaster account
for the exact reasons you posted below. If you have the postmaster account
whitelisted any incoming spam with multiple recipients listed
I have noticed that some of the spam getting thru
is because a I have several in my whitelist and even though it is not addressed
to them it sends it on because the whitelisted email is in the CC or
BCC...
Isn't there any way to whitelist only if it is
addressed to that person in the To:
On 19 May 2004 at 9:04, Richard Farris wrote:
Kinda - there is a test called
BYPASSWHITELIST
http://www.mail-
archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg17561.html
Hope this helps!
-Nick Hayer
I have noticed that some of the spam getting thru is because a I have
several in my whitelist and even
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 12:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted- getting thru
Richard,
This is a common problem especially when dealing with postmaster account.
Most people whitelist
]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted- getting thru
Richard,
This is a common problem especially when dealing with postmaster account.
Most people whitelist postmaster and because spammers know this they often
include a postmaster address because they know the message (even
201 934-9206
http://www.HM-Software.com/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 02:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted- getting thru
Andy,
This works
I have spam that is getting through. The headers show Whitelisted
(0) .
From: Terrell Vann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Terrell Vann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LOw Cost Som@, X(a)[EMAIL PROTECTED], Valï(u)m, Viagr@ Di3t Pills Many M3ds
kyrqbxh
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004
, CISSPSystem EngineerTime Inc.
Information Technology[5957 F27C 9C71 E9A7 274A 0447 C9B9 75A4 9B41
D4D1]
- Original Message -
From:
Todd
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 5:33
PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]
Whitelisted?
I have spam that is getting
HI,
I'm getting spam, and it is being whitelisted because of HABEAS... Here are
the headers.
These emails are definately spam. Looks like HABEAS has been compromised?
Comments Please.
thanks, Andy
Received: from cs78191007.pp.htv.fi [62.78.191.7] by thumpernet.com
(SMTPD32-6.06) id
I'm getting spam, and it is being whitelisted because of HABEAS... Here are
the headers.
These emails are definately spam. Looks like HABEAS has been compromised?
Yes; the pharmacourt.biz spammers have infringed on the Habeas intellectual
property rights. Habeas is going after them. Until
These emails are definately spam. Looks like HABEAS has been compromised?
More like spammers are forging habeas headers and challenging habeus'
ability to prosecute.
Larry Craddock
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of andyb
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 12:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted
HI,
I'm getting spam, and it is being whitelisted because of
HABEAS... Here are the headers.
These emails are definately spam
:
#WHITELIST HABEAS
HABEAS habeas x x -5 0
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of andyb
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 12:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted
HI,
I'm
I got that this morning as well.
I commented out the HABEAS test.
- Original Message -
From: andyb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 1:13 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted
HI,
I'm getting spam, and it is being whitelisted because
configurations that have
shared.
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: andyb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 10:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted
HI,
I'm getting spam
This was whitelisted as it is/was part of the default config file...
- Original Message -
From: Rick Klinge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 1:25 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted
Fwiw.. I would never whitelist any email based solely
I have been reporting as they come up.
Thanks, Andy
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted
I'm getting spam, and it is being whitelisted because of HABEAS
-
From: Colbeck, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 1:46 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted
Andy, Habeas has not been compromised. Since Saturday, a spammer has been
using the Habeas warrant in the headers to get his junk past
configurations
9C71 E9A7 274A 0447 C9B9 75A4 9B41 D4D1]
- Original Message -
From: andyb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 1:13 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted
HI,
I'm getting spam, and it is being whitelisted because of HABEAS... Here
are
the headers
Ok I admit I'm pretty weak in the area of tweaking declude but why was this
whitelisted? I have three whitelist lines in my global.cfg ... they are
WHITELIST HABEAS
and 2 WHITELIST[EMAIL PROTECTED] lines ...
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 04:44:57 +0400
X-Mailer: PIPEX NetMail 2.2.0-pre13
Ok I admit I'm pretty weak in the area of tweaking declude but why was this
whitelisted? I have three whitelist lines in my global.cfg ... they are
WHITELIST HABEAS
and 2 WHITELIST[EMAIL PROTECTED] lines ...
What does the Declude JunkMail log file say?
Is one of those two WHITELIST
. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 7:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted?
Ok I admit I'm pretty weak in the area of tweaking declude but why was
this
whitelisted? I have three whitelist lines in my global.cfg ... they are
WHITELIST
Well I'm not sure how I missed this ... but here's the *rest* of the header
info:
...
X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this
X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to http://www.habeas.com/report/.
Now what do I do?
Have you reported it yet?
The Habeas headers are a legal
Cool ... I'll report it right now.
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 8:04 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted?
Well I'm not sure how I missed this ... but here's the *rest* of the
header
info
At 06:04 AM 1/12/2004, R. Scott Perry wrote:
The Habeas headers are a legal means of whitelisting E-mail. In this
case, a spam illegally used the Habeas headers -- something that the
people that are behind Habeas have been waiting years for. Now is the
true test of Habeas -- if they go after
Hello,
One of our clients has been forwarding e-mails that have made it
through the cracks and found something interesting.
I have our network whitelisted, and have the secdns entry so that it
checks the ip of the originating server when it comes through the sec mail
server. But
Scott,
any chance that the "FROM hm-software.com" whitelist
picked up on the
Return-Path: 36-809-hm-software.com?[EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
Obviously, the intent is to ONLY whitelist things that
END with "hm-software.com".
WHITELISTANYWHERE [EMAIL
WHITELIST FROM hm-software.com
Change it to:
WHITELIST FROM @hm-software.com
I believe this will do what you need. At least I hope so as this is what I
have been doing...
Sheldon
Sheldon Koehler, Owner/Partnerhttp://www.tenforward.com
Ten Forward Communications
41 matches
Mail list logo
