No messages here since Friday? Just checking.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 1:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Are spammers idiots??
>The odd this is, I m
The odd this is, I made several posts today, as well as sent numerous
e-mails. SOME were delivered right away, others, like this one, just seemed
to vanish. Until 3:41 in this case
Hmmm...
I'd start by checking the IMail SMTP log file, to see if there are any
clues in there.
> If you show the headers, we can tell you where the delay was.
I don't NEED the headers to know where the delay was. now, WHY it was
delayed, can you tell me THAT???
Received: from declude.com [66.189.58.123] by mail.2khiway.net with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-7.13) id AD6F37700DE; Fri, 15 Nov 2002
yeowch, I sent this mail at 8:57, and see it in the inbox at 4:07. what a
turnaround.. LOL!
If you show the headers, we can tell you where the delay was.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail ca
2:59 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Are spammers idiots??
>
>
> You forgot the arbitrary "Dude - we're so busted"
>
> -Original Message-
> From: paul [mailto:paul@;2khiway.net]
> Sent: Friday, November 15,
yeowch, I sent this mail at 8:57, and see it in the inbox at 4:07. what a
turnaround.. LOL!
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Are spammers idiot
You forgot the arbitrary "Dude - we're so busted"
-Original Message-
From: paul [mailto:paul@;2khiway.net]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 7:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Are spammers idiots??
LOL! I like that,
Tonight, on COPS! watch th
LOL! I like that,
Tonight, on COPS! watch the downfall of a SPAM ring.
ding-dong - hello! DELL here with your new PC.
spammer: dude! we're gettin a DELL!
COPS - FREEZE DIRTBAG!
Paul
> Well, if police can bust con artists and prostitutes, why can't they drag
away spammers? Thirty days
>
>i'm sold where do I signup to be a spammer LOL! kidding of course...
>does everyone remember that line in the movie gone in 60 seconds where the
>girls says " i discovered you have to work twice as hard when it's honest,"
>who's she kidding it's more like 3 times LOL!
I think your 3 times i
LOL!
Sheldon
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Kratka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 3:20 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Are spammers idiots??
> Well, if you haven't seen it here is an article about a
> Well, if you haven't seen it here is an article about a spammer
> in Florida.
> http://online.wsj.com/article_email/0,,SB1037138679220447148,00.html
Thanks for posting the link, it eliminated the need for me to find it.
The page was too long to post here for it is a long read.
Regards,
Tom
I
Well, if you haven't seen it here is an article about a spammer in Florida.
http://online.wsj.com/article_email/0,,SB1037138679220447148,00.html
Jeff
**
TymeWyse Internet
P.O.Box 84 - 583 N. Main St., Canyonville, OR 97417
tel/fax:
and destroy all copies of the original message.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner@;declude.com]On Behalf Of paul
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 4:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Are spammers idiots??
Keith,
Well, it
Keith,
Well, it wouldn't matter if there was legislation or not, it's not going to
stop. If you tell them they HAVE to add ADV to the front of all "spam" it
wouldn't work. There would still be plenty who wouldn't. So more laws won't
help. Thankfully we have products like Declude and IMgate to help
>My guess is that most spammers make no money (or
>just enough so that they can make some spare change when they can't work
>overtime at McDonalds). But the suckers are told that they'll make $50K
>("If you don't believe me, look at your inbox -- do you think there would
>be all those spams there
And of course, a fair bit of the spam at times seems to be
selling spamming services or spamming software itself. :)
At 04:41 PM 11/14/2002, R. Scott Perry wrote:
I
saw a recent television news magazine piece about spam, where a
businessperson described it as the
"crack cocaine of marketing"; cert
I saw a recent television news magazine piece about spam, where a
businessperson described it as the
"crack cocaine of marketing"; certain desperate/foolish people know it's
bad, but they just can't
resist the temptation.
That's my line of thought on the issue.
The idea of sending 10,000,000
I saw a recent television news magazine piece about spam, where a businessperson
described it as the
"crack cocaine of marketing"; certain desperate/foolish people know it's bad, but they
just can't
resist the temptation.
Also, at the risk of provoking a controversy, it would be nice to see some
One
word: MONEY.
For
every 1000 or so mailboxes they tar up, one poor unsuspecting sap sends them
money for whatever they're peddling. If you could, essentially for free,
blast out 100,000,000 emails knowing that 0.1% of them would send you $10 bucks
- do the math... I think that's $100
We just
reclaimed an old domain name. We had it for a couple of years, then it expired
and some bandits in the Philippines grabbed it and held it hostage, and when it
expired again we grabbed it back. The day, and I mean the very day, that I put
that domain in as an alias for our primary dom
Back when the mailbox size limit wasn't working in IMail, some mailboxes got up
to 70 MB. I cleared a dormant one and 3 weeks later it was up to 30 MB. In
some cases, spammers consider a response rate of 0.001% as great. Even the
marketeers are beginning to admin that people are so overloade
21 matches
Mail list logo
