Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Road Runner

2005-04-15 Thread Scott Fisher
Could there be another hop that was being detected and checked by DSBL. Vould be it was on the lsit and then was later removed. - Original Message - From: Kyle Fisher To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 9:34 AM Subject:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Road Runner

2005-04-15 Thread Kyle Fisher
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 10:13 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Road Runner You might be scanning on multiple hops, and this might be picking up the client PC instead of the connecting server. Look for the HOP setting and see

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Road Runner

2005-04-15 Thread Matt
lf Of Matt Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 10:13 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Road Runner You might be scanning on multiple hops, and this might be picking up the client PC instead of the connecting server. Look for the HOP setting and see if it i

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Road Runner

2005-04-15 Thread Kyle Fisher
Ok thanks. I think I will just comment out HOPHIGH. Kyle From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 10:44 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Road Runner The HOPHIGH setting

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results

2003-06-19 Thread Harry Vanderzand
Ave. W. Kitchener, ON N2M 1L2 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 4:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results If you want IMail to do these tests

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results

2003-06-19 Thread Bill Landry
to Declude. Bill - Original Message - From: Harry Vanderzand [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 5:43 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results Is it possible to have declude do a test on the following: HEADERS 20 CONTAINS X-IMAIL-SPAM

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results

2003-06-16 Thread Markus Gufler
Hi all, Over the weekend I've configured the following ip4r-tests from Bill.B's config file that we haven't used until now. This are the results after 10 hours (4 hours business time) In this time we've catched around 300 spam messages. BLITZEDALL ip4r opm.blitzed.org * 3 0 95 positive test

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results

2003-06-16 Thread Serge
* 3 0 - Original Message - From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:14 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results Hi all, Over the weekend I've configured the following ip4r-tests from Bill.B's config file

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results

2003-06-16 Thread Bill Landry
to everyone. Bill - Original Message - From: Serge [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 5:50 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results Thanks for the valuable info are all the test below free and can be used by all of us ? and, if yes, why

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results

2003-06-16 Thread R. Scott Perry
sbl.spamhaus.org* 3 0 - Original Message - From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:14 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results Hi all, Over the weekend I've configured the following ip4r-tests from Bill.B's

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results

2003-06-16 Thread Bill Landry
: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:38 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results All of those tests are free. The ones you list have just been added to the default configuration files, except for IPWHOIS (which has a lot of false

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL

2002-04-10 Thread Greg Foulks
]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 9:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL It appears that DSBL is now three lists ... the two confirmed ones are: list.dsbl.org for single-stage relays tested by trusted users, multihop.dsbl.org

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL

2002-04-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
I'm new to Declude JunkMail these two lists that you mention. Should I add them to my GLOBAL.cfg file? That's up to you -- different companies have different needs, so I would recommend going to http://www.dsbl.org to see if DSBL tests may suit your needs. Where do I go to get updates for

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL

2002-04-10 Thread Eje Gustafsson
Not many hits yet for dsbl but seen a few Delog Version 1.05b Detailed Report for: 04/10/2002 10:10:46 Log file examined: I:\IMail\spool\dec0409.log Unique Message Count: 7957 Failed Message Count: 4891 Total Percentage of Spam: 61%

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL setup?

2002-03-29 Thread Bill Landry
: Friday, March 29, 2002 11:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL setup? Has anyone been able to get successful responses from either of the new DSBLs, list.dsbl.org or unconfirmed.dsbl.org? They are both non-responsive to my queries. We've had it set up here since yesterday

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL setup?

2002-03-29 Thread R. Scott Perry
Scott, shouldn't these return A records when an NS lookup is done on list.dsbl.org or unconfirmed.dsbl.org. Yes, if the IP is listed. Looking up the A record for 2.0.0.127.lists.dsbl.org should return 127.0.0.2, but it is not. All I get is a response that the data does not exist, even when

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL setup?

2002-03-28 Thread R. Scott Perry
Can DSBL be used with Declude yet? If so, what are the configuration lines? Wow -- I just went to their site about 15 minutes ago, hoping they would have the zone information available now, and somehow missed it. Yes, it can work with Declude. You can add the following lines to your