RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Outbound Port 25, was -> Virginia Indicts Indicts

2003-12-19 Thread Pete McNeil
|Pete McNeil wrote: | |>A tip-off is that the counter to this argument is up-front in their |>proposal. Specifically that they will create and manage a mechanism |>that tracks the end-user's subscrbe/unsubscribe requests... I think |>this is a lot like putting the foxes in charge of the hen hous

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Outbound Port 25, was -> Virginia Indicts Indicts

2003-12-19 Thread Matthew Bramble
Pete McNeil wrote: A tip-off is that the counter to this argument is up-front in their proposal. Specifically that they will create and manage a mechanism that tracks the end-user's subscrbe/unsubscribe requests... I think this is a lot like putting the foxes in charge of the hen house. I thoug

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Outbound Port 25, was -> Virginia Indicts Indicts

2003-12-19 Thread Pete McNeil
02. _M |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of |Burzin Sumariwalla |Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 2:12 PM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Outbound Port 25, was -> |Virginia Indicts Indicts | | |Does any one have

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Outbound Port 25, was -> Virginia Indicts Indicts

2003-12-18 Thread Andy Schmidt
www.HM-Software.com/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Burzin Sumariwalla Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 02:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Outbound Port 25, was -> Virginia Indicts Indicts Does any one have

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Outbound Port 25, was -> Virginia Indicts Indicts

2003-12-18 Thread Burzin Sumariwalla
Does any one have comments on any of the following: http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/software/groupware/story/0,10801,80626,00.html Project Lumos http://www.camram.org CANRAM Burzin At 09:01 PM 12/15/2003, you wrote: How about some new suggestions for methods to combat the spammer