Hi all,
As I can see the new owners of Declude has some people able to develope
dynamic websites and there is already a customer protected area.
Now the suggestion:
As there are out many different maintainers of excelent filter files and
much more different versions and methods to get this
Any idea why this message (here's the header) was delivered to the
user. I have WEIGHT10 WEIGHT20 set to HOLD and it
seems to be working great otherwise.
The reason is:
X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT10: Weight of 28 reaches or exceeds the limit of 10.
X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT20: Weight of 28 reaches or
Declude Folks,
I need some help figuring out why we are receiving e-mails from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject Line: Client TOS Notification, and the Sent To address
is [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am not sure if these are coming back to
me in our abuse or postmaster account? There is nothing in the body of the
Scott,
This was an incoming message and you are absolutely correct. I rechecked
their config file.
I had them set up with a per domain configuration and I missed changing
WARN to HOLD on this one. I now have
a template for the new domain specific configurations so I don't make this
mistake
Some one at your company signed up and registered to receive these feedback
loop messages.
http://postmaster.info.aol.com/tools/fbl.html
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kami John,
Thanks a ton guys! That was me that registered on the AOL feedback loop
using our abuse addy, but going back months ago and did not realize. So much
to keep up with battling Spam! Just a few more points on my Declude weight
and would not have made it to AOL - ohhh well - will keep
Essentially someone received an email in their AOL acount and marked it as
SPAM. Since you setup a feedback loop with AOL they will now send you
every instance of an email that was reported as SPAM by one of their
members.
Darrell
On this note, what are other's policy on forwarding client's addresses
to AOL accounts? We signed up with this feedback loop program quite
some time and realized that 95% of the reported spam's where coming
from forwarded messages to AOL accounts. In the event of forwarded
messages, our IMail
What I do if the message is legit is forward that notice to the sender and
recipient explaining the AOL report spam button to please take care of this
issue or forwarding messages to AOL addresses will be banned.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original
Good question and I am curious too. We actually have a no-forwarding
e-mail policy and not just to AOL. But... sometimes the customer
dictates what they want or will go elsewhere and we then allow on a
case-by-case basis. If we allowed for every customer I bet we would be
blacklisted already. I am
Has anyone ever seen this list and tried using it in their blacklist file?
http://www.joewein.de/sw/blacklist.htm#bl
Richard Farris
Ethixs Online
1.270.247. Office
1.800.548.3877 Tech Support
Crossroads to a Cleaner Internet
- Original Message -
From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Richard Farris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Has anyone ever seen this list and tried using it in their blacklist file?
http://www.joewein.de/sw/blacklist.htm#bl
Joe's data is included in the URIBL_JP_SURBL list, along with data from
Prolocation. Their data is very
So is URIBL_JP_SURBL supposed to be in our Global file..because I dont have
it..
Richard Farris
Ethixs Online
1.270.247. Office
1.800.548.3877 Tech Support
Crossroads to a Cleaner Internet
- Original Message -
From: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Not sure if this is an iMail (SMTP) or Declude question (or possibly
WAMCHECK).
We've notice that messages with multiple To, Cc and Bcc recipients are
all whitelisted if the first addressee whitelists -- the whitelisting
coming from WAMCHECK.
Is there a way to have a message 'burst' into
- Original Message -
From: Richard Farris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So is URIBL_JP_SURBL supposed to be in our Global file..because I dont
have
it..
No, Declude does not support SURBL lists yet. I use them with SpamAssassin.
However, others here download the SURBL lists and use them in body
So is URIBL_JP_SURBL supposed to be in our Global file..because I dont have
it..
URIBL_JP_SURBL is the default name of the SpamAssassin rule
corresponding to Joe's zone. AFAIK, it's the only zone directly
provided by SURBL that is _not_ activated by default in SA 3.0.
I am
You would need a gateway that splits the messages prior to being
received by IMail. I'm not aware of any systems running on Windows that
could do this on the same box, so you would likely need a new box with a
flavor of Linux or BSD. This can add significant processing overhead if
you don't
In the mean time, you can always setup a Linux mail gateway and use
SpamAssassin, or use the Win32 version of SpamAssassin with DJM (see
Sandy Whiteman's e-mail signature).
Or both! You can run the SPAMD daemon on any platform, but have
SPAMC32 query it from Declude Junkmail. Running
Sanford,
What type of CPU overhead do you experience with running SA/SPAMD with Declude?
I saw the tech doc and it mentioned that it takes up 20MB of memory for each config
file load in serial. Are you aware of anyone running this on machines pulling over
200K emails each day?
19 matches
Mail list logo
