RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF and MTLDB Issue?

2004-07-13 Thread Grant Griffith - Declude JM
] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 9:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF and MTLDB Issue? I know the list has been flooded, but I can not get any of these tests working, anyone have any advice? What lines do you have in your global.cfg that begin

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF and MTLDB Issue?

2004-07-13 Thread Scott Fisher
Management A Division of ETC http://www.getafreewebsite.com 877-483-3393 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott Fisher Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 10:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF and MTLDB Issue? You are missing

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF and MTLDB Issue?

2004-07-13 Thread Grant Griffith - Declude JM
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott Fisher Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 9:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF and MTLDB Issue? A static spammer purchases a domain name. He then sets up a SPF record for the domain name. E-mail sent out from the domain name will pass

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF and MTLDB Issue?

2004-07-13 Thread Scott Fisher
: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 9:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF and MTLDB Issue? A static spammer purchases a domain name. He then sets up a SPF record for the domain name. E-mail sent out from the domain name will pass the SPF test. Scott Fisher Director of IT Farm

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF and MTLDB Issue?

2004-07-13 Thread Goran Jovanovic
Scott, When you say: SPPFFAIL 2006 e-mails (99.7% SPAM) SPFPASS 1027 e-mails (38% SPAM) SPFUNKNOWN 99126 e-mails (91% SPAM) And say that 91% of SPFUNKNOWN are SPAM how are you calculating that? Are you comparing it to another test or weight? I am sure that you did not personally review

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF and MTLDB Issue?

2004-07-13 Thread Scott Fisher
Based on the final weight of the e-mail: 91% of the e-mails that were SPFUNKNOWN ended up in my hold or delete weights. It's very, very rare for a not-spam e-mail to end up here. I haven't seen one in months. 9% of the e-mails that were SPFUNKNOWN ended up in my not-spam or subject line tags

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF and MTLDB Issue?

2004-07-12 Thread Grant Griffith - Declude JM
I know the list has been flooded, but I can not get any of these tests working, anyone have any advice? Sincerely, Grant Griffith EI8HT LEGS Enhanced Web Management A Division of ETC http://www.getafreewebsite.com 877-483-3393 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF and MTLDB Issue?

2004-07-12 Thread R. Scott Perry
I know the list has been flooded, but I can not get any of these tests working, anyone have any advice? What lines do you have in your global.cfg that begin with SPF? We are looking into an issue where the MTLDB may not be returning positive responses, and should have more information later

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF and MTLDB Issue?

2004-07-12 Thread Grant Griffith - Declude JM
Perry Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 9:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF and MTLDB Issue? I know the list has been flooded, but I can not get any of these tests working, anyone have any advice? What lines do you have in your global.cfg that begin with SPF? We

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF and MTLDB Issue?

2004-07-12 Thread Scott Fisher
: Monday, July 12, 2004 9:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF and MTLDB Issue? I know the list has been flooded, but I can not get any of these tests working, anyone have any advice? What lines do you have in your global.cfg that begin with SPF? We are looking

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF and MTLDB Issue?

2004-07-12 Thread Bud Durland
Scott Fisher wrote: Personally, I don't recommend crediting any points for an SPF pass result. Too many spammers can set up SPF records for their system (and they do. Yesterday 58% of the SPF Pass results were spam). That pretty much reflects my results here; Right now SPF pass is, more often