Title: Message
Declude is not a simple thing to implement and configure.
Those of us running it are more than capable of adding a line to our config
files and deciding how to weight it/configure it/otherwise implement it. We
don't NEED a "click OK to install" GUI that does something to our
: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail]
Fw: New Multiple Threat Lookup Database test for Declude JunkMail
Declude is not a simple thing to implement and configure.
Those of us running it are more than capable of adding a line to our config
files and deciding how to weight it/configure it/otherwise
Maybe, since this was such a different item than what we are used to, a
small group of invited beta tests would have been prudent.
There was a beta test -- just not quite as thorough as it might have been.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The
Let me clarify to fix the 3592 during install, I had to stop blocking the ICMP
protocol on my router.
After the install, I was able to resume blocking the ICMP protocol.
It looks like the install program attempts to ping home to see if the admin server is
available.
Not as ideal as I would like
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Fw: New Multiple Threat Lookup Database
test for Declude JunkMail
Allow ICMP packets fixed this for me.
That's a pretty big issue, IMO. Lots of SOHO routers don't allow you
to pick-and-choose different ICMP traffic types, so if you're blocking
any, you end up
Hi Scott:
Considering that most administrators will block ANY TCP/IP traffic from/to a
server and only open exactly those 2 or 3 ports that are needed for its
primary function, you can assume that trying to ping will not be permitted
- thus preventing install.
Whoever wrote this doesn't seem to
[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Fw: New Multiple Threat Lookup
Database test for Declude JunkMail
M Why a 5 MB download for an IP4R test?
Yea, I don't get this. Does this harvest virus IPs from our system and
report them back to Declude?
No.
A beta version of Declude Virus released about 6 months ago
is going to happen in the future or does the
management just taking suggestions?
Jay
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 1:30 PM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Fw: New Multiple Threat Lookup
Database test
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I recommend in the future to just tell us what line to add.
So do I. :) But management won this one.
A 5mb download seems overkill for this.
Agreed. I didn't even know until today that the install program was going
to
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Fw: New Multiple Threat Lookup
Database
test for Declude JunkMail
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I recommend in the future to just tell us what line to add.
So do I. :) But management won this one
- Original Message -
From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It appears from posts over others there are some dlls involved.
Ah, okay, I will download then. Thanks!
Bill
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came
] Behalf Of Bill Landry
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 4:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Fw: New Multiple Threat Lookup
Database test for Declude JunkMail
- Original Message -
From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It appears from posts over
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Bilbee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 4:41 PM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Fw: New Multiple Threat Lookup
Database test for Declude JunkMail
Nope it is just a line in the conifig it is an ip4r test
We know the Computer Horizons was sold, how much control do you have over
Declude these days?
That depends on how you define control (no, I'm not a politician!).
In this case, the level of control isn't clearly defined. The transition
of management can be tricky, and needs to be handled
Put another way, while the new owners do some things differently than I
would have (as is always the case with a transition in management), I
haven't seen them do anything that I would really disapprove of. If I
did,
though, I am sure that they would listen to me and give serious thought to
Well, I think this new test is maybe testing the waters, as so far, even
though I like the idea, I do not like the implementation of this test, and
have not yet done it on my server, nor on the other Imail/Declude servers I
consult/maintain on. The reports so far from those that have implemented
[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Fw: New Multiple Threat Lookup
Database test for Declude JunkMail
We know the Computer Horizons was sold, how much control do you have
over
Declude these days?
That depends on how you define control (no, I'm not a politician!).
In this case, the level of control isn't
Well, I think this new test is maybe testing the waters, as so far,
even
though I like the idea, I do not like the implementation of this test,
and
have not yet done it on my server, nor on the other Imail/Declude servers
I
consult/maintain on. The reports so far from those that have
18 matches
Mail list logo
