[Declude.Virus] Do you use the Declude email notification templates?

I’ve just always left these templates in place (the .eml files) that cause various notifications to be sent out. However, in recent years I’ve received complaints that these notifications are unnecessary or a nuisance. I was curious if anyone else bothered with these, or if you deleted them

[Declude.Virus] ClamAV and Declude problem

Hi All, We've been testing ClamAV with Declude AVA on our new mail server (running 2006.2). We only have a few mailboxes on this server because we're still testing it. Today, I ran into a problem where the D: drive ran out of space (100GB). It turns out the d:\temp folder was very large

Fw: [Declude.Virus] ? Name Voting Time

First, I vote AGAINST anything with 4 in it. Why 4? You were calling it version 4, but that's a complete misnomer. Currently, it represents the same feature set as the so-called version 3, so there is no reason to call it version 4. In addition, there are three components in it (AVA, JM, HJ),

Re: [Declude.Virus] [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0 / 4.0

Hi David, I've been reading the posts from you and Barry, and while I understand what you're saying, there are aspects that leave me confused, and are confusing others. Normally, when a software product version changes from 3.0 to 4.0, that represents a significant change in features, not

Re: [Declude.Virus] Are ActiveX controls considered viruses?

Hi Scott, and thanks for the reply. This leads to another issue: we haven't used your interim releases because these are either considered beta or alpha (according to your interim page). We normally try to use only the standard (final) releases on our production software. Following this

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot 3.14 de Rel. Notes

So what is the best command line to use with 3.14e? Ben BC Web - Original Message - From: Adrian Titei [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 2:03 PM Subject: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot 3.14 de Rel. Notes I thought that these notes for the last 2 releases

[Declude.Virus] [OT]: unexpected results with DNSreport.com

Hi Scott, I'm trying to understand the report results for one of our client's domain names. The name is ezrentnow.com. We host both DNS servers (primary is bcw4.bcwebhost.net and secondary is dns2.bcwebhost.net). I know that the registrar holding the name (gkg.net) has an error and lists the

Re: [Declude.Virus] [OT]: unexpected results with DNSreport.com

Thanks Scott, We've been trying to get this client to fix their registry settings for a while now (we have no direct access in this case), but this will give them the motivation to get it done. Ben - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: