RE: [Declude.Virus] Bannotify and SKIPIFFORGING

2004-04-28 Thread John Carter
Thanks, Greg.  Will consider this.   John   -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Little Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 4:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Bannotify and SKIPIFFORGING   I assume you

RE: [Declude.Virus] Bannotify and SKIPIFFORGING

2004-04-28 Thread John Carter
with us around the ban. Thanks, John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 3:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Bannotify and SKIPIFFORGING >I guess take me back to Decl

Re: [Declude.Virus] Bannotify and SKIPIFFORGING

2004-04-28 Thread Greg Little
I assume you don't want to send useless (or confusing) messages as the result of a virus. Unfortunately most of the banned extension hits are nothing but trash that should be thrown away. What I've gone to here is sending the Banned e-mails only to the techs (mostly me). Then I get to make the

RE: [Declude.Virus] Bannotify and SKIPIFFORGING

2004-04-28 Thread R. Scott Perry
I guess take me back to Declude 101 class. I ban numerous extensions, like many others on the list. I would like a Bannotify.eml to out as long as it does not contain a forging virus. How do I accomplish that? The problem is that if your virus scanner detects a virus, the BANnotify.eml file is n