: [Declude.Virus] Per user setting
Hi John,
There is no per user settings for virus other than on or off or allow
vulnerabilities. We can look at adding the new functionality to our development
wish list.
David Barker
VP Operations Declude
Your Email security is our business
<mailto:dbar...@declude.com> dbar...@declude.com
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of John T
Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 11:22 AM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Per user setting
Any ideas?
John T
eServices For You
-Or
Any ideas?John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: "John T"
Sent 12/11/2009 11:59:05 AM
To: "declude.virus"
Subject: [Declude.Virus] Per user setting
Is there a way possible to allow on a per user basis outgoing banned extensions
WITHOUT disabling outgoin
Is there a way possible to allow on a per user basis outgoing banned extensions
WITHOUT disabling outgoing virus scanning?
If not, could this be something that could be added?John T
eServices For You
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to
So if I put in a line in the virus_users.txt file like:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] OFF
That an email addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] would not be scanned and go
through to [EMAIL PROTECTED] even though scanning for [EMAIL PROTECTED] is
turned on.
In the case of conflicts, Declude Virus tries to make sure th
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 2:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Per-user configuration
>
>
>
> >How does declude determine
How does declude determine the user to filter? Specifically, if an email is
addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but that address is an alias for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you adjust the settings for [EMAIL PROTECTED] will
declude treat the alias the same as a user?
For Declude Virus, it will check both ad
How does declude determine the user to filter? Specifically, if an email is
addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but that address is an alias for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you adjust the settings for [EMAIL PROTECTED] will
declude treat the alias the same as a user?
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
303-421-5140
w
I saw some talk in the archives about this but since the virus writers have
forced a tighter file banning policys because of zip files are there any
plans to add support for more granular control over banned files on a per
user basis?
We are investigating the idea. It would likely require quite a
I saw some talk in the archives about this but since the virus writers have
forced a tighter file banning policys because of zip files are there any
plans to add support for more granular control over banned files on a per
user basis?
For example we need loan documents sent as exe files allowed th
If a per user configuration is used and virus scanning is disabled for a
user, and a e-mail comes in to a local user with the disabled user as the
forged from address, will the message be scanned for viruses?
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
---
[This E-mail was scanne
If a per user configuration is used and virus scanning is disabled for a
user, and a e-mail comes in to a local user with the disabled user as the
forged from address, will the message be scanned for viruses?
That depends on who it is sent to.
While the default will be not to scan it (since it is
> While the default will be not to scan it (since it is from an address you
> do not want scanning enabled for), if it is sent to a user that has virus
> scanning turned on, it will be scanned (ON has priority over OFF).
That is the answer I wanted. Thanks.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Own
You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.Virus-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 9:17 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Per user
>
> > While the defaul
On a user that is part of a S&F domain, all e-mail to or from that user is
considered outbound, correct?
Correct. However:
So, if you have in the virus_users.txt file [EMAIL PROTECTED] INONLY,
anything to or from that user will not be scanned, correct?
No. INONLY will scan any E-mail sent *to* a
> >So, if you have in the virus_users.txt file [EMAIL PROTECTED] INONLY,
> >anything to or from that user will not be scanned, correct?
>
> No. INONLY will scan any E-mail sent *to* a specific user/domain (whereas
> OUTONLY will scan E-mail sent *from* a specific user).
>
> It might be better if
> It might be better if instead of INONLY/OUTONLY, it was SENTTO/SENTFROM.
Acutually, if you just clarify this point in the manual and in the sample
virus_users.txt file, that would be less work for you than changing the
coding and everyone having to change their configurations.
Thanks for the su
17 matches
Mail list logo
