RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot missing viruses and is slow (renamed)

2005-04-29 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
e.Virus@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot missing viruses and is slow (renamed)Ok, follow-up time. It appears that Declude is detecting this with VIRUSCODE 8 and I was just merely confused by the logs. I set things to Debug and found the following: 04/29/2005 00:06:48.652

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot missing viruses and is slow (renamed)

2005-04-29 Thread Matt
Otherwise, Matt, I agree on both of your conclusions regarding how F-Prot falls short. Andrew 8) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 9:16 PM To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Subject: Re

RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot missing viruses and is slow (renamed)

2005-04-29 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
, 2005 12:20 AMTo: Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot missing viruses and is slow (renamed)Andrew,I'm still up doing maintenance...While you are correct about what happens with the error code when only one virus scanner is used, when two are configured like

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot missing viruses and is slow (renamed)

2005-04-29 Thread Matt
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 12:20 AM To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot missing viruses and is slow (renamed) Andrew, I'm still up doing maintenance... While you are correct about

[Declude.Virus] F-Prot missing viruses and is slow (renamed)

2005-04-28 Thread Matt
Ok, I've captured one of these files and confirmed from a manual scan that it is still taking an excessive amount of time...but wait, there's more. The report.txt file that it creates shows that it detected Mytob, but every test where I send this to myself in E-mail results in no virus

RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot missing viruses and is slow (renamed)

2005-04-28 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Thursday, April 28, 2005 3:13 PMTo: Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot missing viruses and is slow (renamed) Ok, I've captured one of these files and confirmed from a manual scan that it is still taking an excessive amount of time...but wait, there's more. The report.txt

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot missing viruses and is slow (renamed)

2005-04-28 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
and Virus. Try it out - http://www.invariantsystems.com - Original Message - From: Colbeck, Andrew To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:18 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot missing viruses and is slow (renamed) I downloaded

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot missing viruses and is slow (renamed)

2005-04-28 Thread Matt
Colbeck, Andrew wrote: F-Prot is indeed returning an errorlevel of 8 on this, and it's definitely way out of line with the scanning time on this file. Your script no doubt shows that F-Prot returns an error level of 8 when run on this file, however there is one big issue here...I have

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot missing viruses and is slow (renamed)

2005-04-28 Thread Matt
for Declude Junkmail and Virus. Try it out - http://www.invariantsystems.com - Original Message - From: Colbeck, Andrew To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:18 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot missing viruses and is slow (renamed

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot missing viruses and is slow (renamed)

2005-04-28 Thread Matt
Ok, follow-up time. It appears that Declude is detecting this with VIRUSCODE 8 and I was just merely confused by the logs. I set things to Debug and found the following: 04/29/2005 00:06:48.652 QB2D6AB7001342A79 [6224] Virus Scanner Started: C:\Progra~1\FSI\F-Prot\fpcmd.exe -SILENT -NOBOOT

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-prot missing viruses

2004-06-16 Thread Bill Landry
- Original Message - From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Another one is BitDefender. Their free scanner has just the right features for Declude Virus. Does not look like it can be called by command line. The following Declude Virus configuration works with the

[Declude.Virus] F-prot missing viruses - Revisited

2004-06-15 Thread Keith Purtell
. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Purtell Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.Virus] F-prot missing viruses We've had two incidents where a virus got through our mail server

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-prot missing viruses

2004-06-15 Thread R. Scott Perry
We've had two incidents where a virus got through our mail server, apparently during the time lag while F-Prot was writing/distributing a new virus definition. (We update every hour.) What does the Declude Virus log file say for one of these E-mails?

RE: [Declude.Virus] F-prot missing viruses - Revisited

2004-06-15 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.Virus] F-prot missing viruses - Revisited My immediate manager has some previous experience using a gateway device to deal with viruses and other issues. He wants general information about putting something like that in front of our IMail server (which

RE: [Declude.Virus] F-prot missing viruses

2004-06-15 Thread Keith Purtell
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 3:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-prot missing viruses We've had two incidents where a virus got through our mail server, apparently during the time lag while F-Prot

RE: [Declude.Virus] F-prot missing viruses

2004-06-15 Thread R. Scott Perry
06/13/2004 15:38:49 Qbb483a9701d225cb Scanned: Virus Free [MIME: 3 23323] That means that F-Prot didn't detect a virus (and didn't report any error). I'm doubting that it would have reported that there was no virus unless it really didn't see the virus. Could it be that the E-mail arrived

RE: [Declude.Virus] F-prot missing viruses

2004-06-15 Thread Keith Purtell
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-prot missing viruses 06/13/2004 15:38:49 Qbb483a9701d225cb Scanned: Virus Free [MIME: 3 23323] That means that F-Prot didn't detect a virus (and didn't report any error). I'm doubting that it would have reported that there was no virus unless

RE: [Declude.Virus] F-prot missing viruses

2004-06-15 Thread Brad Morgan
That is most likely what happened. Now I just have to make sure management understands that this is a fact of life on the Internet. By the way, the URL you posted was a very interesting article. Thanks! If you are running Declude Virus Pro, then you could add one or more of the free virus

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-prot missing viruses

2004-06-15 Thread Bill Landry
- Original Message - From: Brad Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you are running Declude Virus Pro, then you could add one or more of the free virus scanners to your configuration. I added ClamAV after seeing an article that said it was very high on the list of who gets updates out the

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-prot missing viruses

2004-06-15 Thread R. Scott Perry
Another one is BitDefender. Their free scanner has just the right features for Declude Virus. It doesn't appear to be free for commercial use. I was sure that it allowed commercial use (or rather commercial use was not prohibited), but after going to http://www.bitdefender.com/ (and finding

RE: [Declude.Virus] F-prot missing viruses

2004-06-15 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
: [Declude.Virus] F-prot missing viruses Another one is BitDefender. Their free scanner has just the right features for Declude Virus. It doesn't appear to be free for commercial use. I was sure that it allowed commercial use (or rather commercial use was not prohibited), but after

RE: [Declude.Virus] F-prot missing viruses

2004-06-15 Thread Brad Morgan
Another one is BitDefender. Their free scanner has just the right features for Declude Virus. Does not look like it can be called by command line. I'm using the Free BitDefender for Windows and it does have a command line scanner. I don't remember seeing any licensing restrictions.

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-prot missing viruses

2004-06-15 Thread Bill Landry
- Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Another one is BitDefender. Their free scanner has just the right features for Declude Virus. It doesn't appear to be free for commercial use. I was sure that it allowed commercial use (or rather commercial use was