Thanks David!
-Nick
David Barker wrote:
3.0.5.10 - Change was made to reset the winsock when the \proc directory
reached 0 messages
3.0.5.11 - Change was made to reset the winsock when the \proc directory
reached 0 messages and threads in the \work had completed processing
I will update docu
3.0.5.10 - Change was made to reset the winsock when the \proc directory
reached 0 messages
3.0.5.11 - Change was made to reset the winsock when the \proc directory
reached 0 messages and threads in the \work had completed processing
I will update documentation etc. and post changes for releases
From: "Andy Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005 4:52 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] 3.0.5.10
Well, that's just plain wrong.
When there's enough time to update versions and a web site, it should be
time enough to either send an email to the
g resolved, and stabilize the product.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005 8:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] 3.0.5.10
I would consider 3.0.5.10/11 interim releases... Scott would never have
docu
From: "Scott Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005 8:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] 3.0.5.10
I would consider 3.0.5.10/11 interim releases... Scott would never have
documented them.
I too would like to see the release notes updated with each
Count me in
George
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.Virus-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
> Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005 9:02 PM
> To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
> Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] 3.0.5.10
>
> Since this appe
7;s a long long standing issue.
- Original Message - From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005 7:36 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] 3.0.5.10
On that note, I would also like to reraise the need for documentation on
reported/known issue
ECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005 7:36 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] 3.0.5.10
On that note, I would also like to reraise the need for documentation on
reported/known issues with a particular release. A simple page with a
quick
note about each reported issue would be very beneficial.
Totally agree... there are not enough announcements of bugs and
fixes/releases especially when there's an unused list for that purpose.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005 4:52 PM
Subjec
Well, that's just plain wrong.
When there's enough time to update versions and a web site, it should be
time enough to either send an email to the Declude announcement list - or to
update a simple "what's new" page with 3 or 4 lines of text.
It's important to know what was wrong with a release I
On that note, I would also like to reraise the need for documentation on
reported/known issues with a particular release. A simple page with a quick
note about each reported issue would be very beneficial.
Also, I would think each release would be reported on the Declude Releases
list like Scott
11 matches
Mail list logo
