Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring Boundary Space Gap Vulnerability

2005-06-29 Thread Dan Geiser
- Original Message - From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 5:35 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring Boundary Space Gap Vulnerability Dan, I have been running 2.0.6 with no major issues that plague me on a daily basis

RE: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring Boundary Space Gap Vulnerability

2005-06-29 Thread Grant Griffith
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 8:28 AM To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring Boundary Space Gap Vulnerability Thanks for the info, Darrell. I'm sure that'll be enough to get me pointed in the right

Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring Boundary Space Gap Vulnerability

2005-06-29 Thread Darin Cox
: Dan Geiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 9:28 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring Boundary Space Gap Vulnerability Thanks for the info, Darrell. I'm sure that'll be enough to get me pointed in the right direction. I had another quick question

Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring Boundary Space Gap Vulnerability

2005-06-29 Thread Dan Geiser
to make sure before I upgraded to 2.0.6. TIA, Dan - Original Message - From: Darin Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 10:02 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring Boundary Space Gap Vulnerability Yep... I find that typically only a few

RE: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring Boundary Space Gap Vulnerability

2005-06-29 Thread David Barker
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 11:58 AM To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring Boundary Space Gap Vulnerability Hi, All, OK, then. Well since it may be some time before I hear anything from

Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring Boundary Space Gap Vulnerability

2005-06-29 Thread Darin Cox
, 2005 11:57 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring Boundary Space Gap Vulnerability Hi, All, OK, then. Well since it may be some time before I hear anything from Declude perhaps someone on here can help answer my question. We are currently running... Declude 1.82 Declude JunkMail Status

Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring Boundary Space Gap Vulnerability

2005-06-29 Thread Dan Geiser
Boundary Space Gap Vulnerability Hi, Again, I was able to find the ALLOWVULNERABILITIESFROM in the Declude Release Notes, http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=122. It looks like this feature was added in Declude 2.0. But it appears the current version of Declude 2.0.6. Since we are running

RE: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring Boundary Space Gap Vulnerability

2005-06-29 Thread David Barker
] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 3:00 PM To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring Boundary Space Gap Vulnerability Hello, All, I just upgraded to Declude 2.0.6 using the manual method. I had 2 questions... --- #1) I added the following test to my

Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring Boundary Space Gap Vulnerability

2005-06-28 Thread Dan Geiser
Hi, Again, I was able to find the ALLOWVULNERABILITIESFROM in the Declude Release Notes, http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=122. It looks like this feature was added in Declude 2.0. But it appears the current version of Declude 2.0.6. Since we are running 1.82 I assume that I'll have to

Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring Boundary Space Gap Vulnerability

2005-06-28 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Dan, I have been running 2.0.6 with no major issues that plague me on a daily basis. The only issue I have encountered is when the server is under high load and Declude spawns processes until the server starts generating errors. Since I upgraded the server it doesnt happen very often. For