Title: AVAFTERJM ?
Hello all,
We make use of the latest Declude version (spam+virus) Pro. What does the AVAFTERJM option do? Antivirus scanning after Junkmail I suppose? What is the default? First scanning viruses followed by scanning for spam?
Due to the large amounts of spam I would
I have some particular users for whom I want to virus scan their messages
but would like to by-pass the holding on banned extension under normal
circumstances. Is there anything in the current release or the beta that
would allow this?
If not, my suggestion would be
BYPASSBAN Sender
Marcel,
AVAFTERJM ON goes in the virus.cfg file and it makes AV run after JM as
you suspected. Several of us run this mode for the reason you cited. The
only deal you have to remember is if something is trapped by JM and you put
it back in the queue it will not be virus scanned.
Darrell
Title: AVAFTERJM ?
If using the AVAFTERJM option in Declude Virus, Declude
Virus will run after Declude JunkMail.
this is the
Processing Order for Imail (taken form the manual). the
default is that Declude Virus runs before Declude JunkMail
Both IMail and Declude have a number of different
2 new Directives
WAITFORTHREADS 1500
Located in the Declude.cfg - Defined in milliseconds eg. 1500 = 1.5 seconds
this can be changed so that when the maximum threads are in use this time
specifics the wait before checking to launch more threads.
WAITBETWEENTHREADS 1
David,
Are these to be used to correct issues with Dual-proc, or is
that still an ongoing issue still be looking at? Thanks for the time.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 11:41
Yes, these are to help adjust for timing with Dual-proc
Different systems / configuration respond differently to these settings.
In particular they to fine tune through-put with CPU utilization.
1. SLOW server that is heavily loaded
You may want to try to increase WAITBETWEENTHREADS and
Is anyone using Declude Confirm with success in this beta version? Was just
curious if it is working properly now in this newer version. I am still
running version 2.0.6.16 as I don't have a test box to play with. But I
really need to get Declude Confirm working so was thinking of going with
Grant, contact me off list and we can test this.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Grant Griffith
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 10:58 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude
There is an issue with both Hijack and Confirm with Beta 3.0.4.4. The issue
has to do with the handling of domain aliases. Declude is aware of the issue
and is working on it.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of
Hi David,
I can't help but ask...
You are proposing options that will help with the dual processor issue.
But, are you REPRODUCING the issue and fixing it? I understand that the
problem is that the service goes to sleep for 30 seconds, even though there
are messages in the PROC folder. Clearly
Hi Andy,
The directives are for tuning both single and multiprocessor systems. They
are not meant as a tradeoff. Some multiprocessor systems do not exhibit the
reported sleep for 30 seconds behavior. We have not been able to reproduce
it ourselves. This doesn't mean that we do not take it
Thanks Bill. I had gotten the impression as if everyone with dual-processor
system was reporting this and that people were still seeing it with the
latest version.
I have so far not installed the beta, because of those issues - I just don't
have a single-processor system to use and was waiting
The directives are for tuning both single and multiprocessor systems.
They
are not meant as a tradeoff. Some multiprocessor systems do not exhibit
the
reported sleep for 30 seconds behavior. We have not been able to
reproduce
it ourselves.
I can produce it on my machine even on version
14 matches
Mail list logo
