On 3/31/24 7:16 AM, Bryan Pendleton wrote:
Hi all, it is time for our April report to the board.
Could you please send me any information about what the community has
been working on over the last three months, so I can include this in
the report?
thanks,
bryan
Hey Bryan,
Nothing big from
Hey Craig,
I don't know how DataNucleus tries to cancel a query.
jdbc.sql.Statement.cancel() is an optional method which some DBMSes
implement but Derby doesn't. The method raises a "Feature not supported"
exception according to
https://db.apache.org/derby/docs/10.17/ref/rrefjdbc40794.html
Thanks for the heads-up, David. Derby found no problems with this
release candidate. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7159
On 2/20/24 12:00 AM, David Delabassee wrote:
Welcome to the latest OpenJDK Quality Outreach update!
The first JDK 22 Release Candidates builds are now
d just before the failed COMMIT) returns the following result:
ij> SELECT talent_id FROM talent WHERE talent_id NOT IN (SELECT
talent_id FROM talentphoto);
TALENT_ID
---
0
1
2
It appears that you need to fix your data.
Hope this helps,
-Rick
On 1/31/24 1:06 PM, Bart van der Bilt wro
On 1/30/24 12:52 PM, jazz wrote:
Hi,
It would be great if this issue could be implemented, I have a use
case for testing. How do I get access to JIRA to update the ticket?
(to include the sql files for testing).
You can request a JIRA account here:
Producing an official Derby release involves a lot of checkins to the
Subversion-controlled source code. Only committers have the ability to
checkin source code.
What you could do is build an unofficial set of jars, sign them, and
post them on a public artifactory.
-Rick
On 1/28/24 8:29
Thanks, David. Derby found no problems with build 22-ea+33-2356. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7159
On 1/26/24 3:11 AM, David Delabassee wrote:
Greetings!
We are starting 2024 with JDK 22 as it has just entered Rampdown Phase 2 [1].
And with the initial JDK 22 Release
I added a 10.17.1.0 entry to doap_Derby.rdf at the root of the Derby
website source on 2023-11-10 with the derby-7157-13-aa-updateDOAP.diff
patch. 10.17.1.0 is the first release listed in that file. I seem to
recall that it takes a while for information in doap descriptors to
propagate across
Nothing from me. Thanks.
On 1/1/24 3:51 PM, Bryan Pendleton wrote:
Hi all, it is time for our January report to the board.
Could you please send me any information about what the community has
been working on over the last three months, so I can include them in
the report?
Two things I
Thanks, David. Derby has found no problems with build 22-ea+27-2262. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7159
On 12/13/23 6:08 AM, David Delabassee wrote:
Welcome to the final OpenJDK Quality Outreach update of 2023!
JDK 22, scheduled for General Availability on March 19, 2024, is
on the announce list from you. Did you try that
link I sent?
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 11:11 AM Rick Hillegas wrote:
Thanks, Bryan. I have re-tried sending the announcement, this time
setting my from address to my gmail acccount (which is the forwarding
account for my apache email account
you see the email which I sent to derby-dev,
derby-user, and general@db?
On 11/13/23 5:18 PM, Bryan Pendleton wrote:
Nope, didn't see either one.
bryan
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 4:27 PM Rick Hillegas wrote:
This morning, I sent an announcement message for the 10.17.1.0 release
to annou
The Apache Derby project is pleased to announce feature release 10.17.1.0.
Apache Derby is a sub-project of the Apache DB project. Derby is a pure
Java relational database engine which conforms to the ISO/ANSI SQL and
JDBC standards. Derby aims to be easy for developers and end-users to
work
This morning, I sent an announcement message for the 10.17.1.0 release
to annou...@apache.org and another announcement message to derby-dev,
derby-user, and general@db. I have not seen either of these messages in
my inboxes. Has anyone else seen these messages?
Thanks,
-Rick
On 11/10/23 12:11 PM, Bryan Pendleton wrote:
Derby 10.17.1.0 has been built and tested on the
Java SE 21 platform, and will run only on Java SE 21 and newer Java
platforms. Derby 10.17.1.0 cannot be used with older Java platforms.
Please seehttp://db.apache.org/derby/derby_downloads.html for
Here is a first draft. Please let me know how to improve it.
---
The Apache Derby project is pleased to announce feature release 10.17.1.0.
Apache Derby is a sub-project of the Apache DB project. Derby is a pure
Java relational database engine which conforms to
Thanks for everyone's work on coding, documenting, and testing
10.17.1.0. The polls have closed. The community has approved 10.17.1.0
as an official Derby release:
+1:
Bryan Pendleton (pmc)
Knut Anders Hatlen (pmc)
Rick Hillegas (pmc)
No other votes were cast.
can be built from the source distro.
+1
On 10/22/23 4:11 PM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
Please test-drive the 10.17.1.0 candidate, then vote on whether to
accept it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/db/derby/db-derby-10.17.1.0/
The polls close at 5
testing with
both Windows 10 and Windows 11.
Thanks for getting the RC together so quickly, Rick!
bryan
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 1:05 PM Rick Hillegas wrote:
I volunteer to be release manager for 10.17.1. I have posted a schedule
for this release:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DERBY
Please test-drive the 10.17.1.0 candidate, then vote on whether to
accept it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/db/derby/db-derby-10.17.1.0/
The polls close at 5:00 pm California time on Monday November 6.
10.17.1.0 is a feature release,
See https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/db/derby/code/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES.html
by
2023-11-10.
Thanks to everyone who has volunteered to vet this release.
-Rick
On 10/2/23 9:46 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
Our last release is dated May 2022. Would anyone be willing to vet a
new release if I produce it? The key features would be support for the
new LTS version of Java (Java
Thanks, Bryan. I'll see if I can scare up one of our alumnae to help vet
the release.
On 10/2/23 7:49 PM, Bryan Pendleton wrote:
I can definitely be a tester!
I have access to both Windows 10 and to Linux (Ubuntu 20.04) environments.
bryan
On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 9:46 AM Rick Hillegas wrote
Our last release is dated May 2022. Would anyone be willing to vet a new
release if I produce it? The key features would be support for the new
LTS version of Java (Java 21) plus a security fix we worked on earlier
this year.
Thanks,
-Rick
Derby builds and tests cleanly with Open JDK build 21+35-2513. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7155
Regards,
-Rick
On 8/22/23 7:15 AM, David Delabassee wrote:
Greetings!
JDK 21 is now in the Release Candidate Phase so everything is on track for the
Java 21 GA release on
Thanks, David. Derby builds and tests cleanly with Open JDK build
21-ea+33-2490. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7155
On 7/28/23 2:26 AM, David Delabassee wrote:
Welcome to the OpenJDK Quality Outreach summer update.
JDK 21 is now in Rampdown Phase Two [1], its overall feature
Nothing from me. Thanks, Bryan
On 6/29/23 7:04 AM, Bryan Pendleton wrote:
Hi all, it's time for our quarterly report, please let me
know of any updates about community activities in
April-June that we should include!
Our report isn't due for another 2 weeks, but I'll
be away from keyboard for
On 4/3/23 5:50 AM, Bryan Pendleton wrote:
Hi all, it's time for our quarterly report, please let me
know of any updates about community activities this
winter that we should include!
thanks,
bryan
Thanks, Bryan. Nothing from me.
Thanks for the heads-up, David. Derby builds and tests cleanly with Open
JDK build 20+36-2344.
On 2/14/23 9:32 PM, David Delabassee wrote:
Welcome to the latest OpenJDK Quality Outreach update!
The first Release Candidates of JDK 20 have been released [1] as per
the schedule [2]. At this
Thanks, David. I can confirm that Derby builds and tests cleanly using
Open JDK build 20-ea+32-2328. Cheers
On 1/24/23 9:11 PM, David Delabassee wrote:
Hi,
First off, on behalf of Oracle’s Java Team, I’d like to wish you a
happy and prosperous new year!
In 2023, two Java releases will be
--Original Message-----
From: Rick Hillegas
Sent: 09 January 2023 21:19
To: Kevin Walls ; derby-dev@db.apache.org
Cc: David Delabassee
Subject: Re: FW: Re: [External] : Re: JDK 20 Rampdown Phase 1 & Valhalla LW4
Early-Access builds
Thanks for running that experiment, Kevin. I have reproduced you
Hi Bryan,
Thanks again for taking care of this chore. Nothing comes to mind.
On 1/10/23 4:45 AM, Bryan Pendleton wrote:
Apparently, during the holiday season, I forgot about our reporting
schedule, and our quarterly report to the board is due tomorrow.
Please let me know of any topics we
Thanks for running that experiment, Kevin. I have reproduced your
results, re-enabled the skipped MBean tests, and documented this on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7149.
While I have your attention, what should developers do when they see a
"java.io.InvalidClassException: filter
://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8295938
(3)
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk20/commit/628820f47ef9c9ad3cc62e68db9c4dbc7e659154
Thanks,
--David
On 21/12/2022 02:36, Rick Hillegas wrote:
Hi David,
Open JDK build 20-ea+27-2213 introduces another problem. I see the
following error when unmarshalling an object
Happy New Year, Stanimir. I have not looked into this further. I gave up
after sinking a fair amount of time into a seemingly plausible solution.
The MERGE implementation is unfortunately limited and brittle. It is
hard to fix one problem without breaking something else. At this time, I
don't
JVM that is throwing the exception, right ?
Can you try to comment the filter in
`JDK/conf/management/management.properties` ?
--David
On 21/12/2022 19:25, Rick Hillegas wrote:
Thanks for those pointers, David. I'm afraid that my naive attempts
have failed to circumvent this filtering. All of the
4
Thanks,
--David
On 21/12/2022 02:36, Rick Hillegas wrote:
Hi David,
Open JDK build 20-ea+27-2213 introduces another problem. I see the
following error when unmarshalling an object on behalf of an MBean:
java.io.InvalidClassException: filter status: REJECTED
I do not see this problem under b
Hi David,
Open JDK build 20-ea+27-2213 introduces another problem. I see the
following error when unmarshalling an object on behalf of an MBean:
java.io.InvalidClassException: filter status: REJECTED
I do not see this problem under build 19+36-2238.
Can you point me at the experts who can
Thanks for the heads-up, David. I see many deprecation warnings and
javadoc warnings when I build Derby with Open JDK build 20-ea+27-2213.
Right now, I am trying to track down a fix for the problems introduced
by this change:
- JDK-8294241: Deprecate URL public constructors
My naive attempt
On 10/8/22 7:23 AM, Bryan Pendleton wrote:
Hi, it's time to compile our October report to the board.
Please let me know of anything in particular we should include.
thanks,
bryan
Nothing from me. Thanks.
Thanks, David. Derby built and tested cleanly with build 36 of Open JDK
19. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7133
On 8/22/22 6:16 AM, David Delabassee wrote:
Greetings!
I hope you had a chance to take some time off. On our side, and
despite the summer vacation, everything is
Thanks for the heads-up, David. Derby builds and tests cleanly with JDK
19 build 19-ea+32-2220. See the last comment on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7133.
On 7/25/22 7:56 AM, David Delabassee wrote:
Greetings!
JDK 19 is now in Rampdown Phase Two [1]. The overall feature set is
On 7/5/22 5:46 PM, Bryan Pendleton wrote:
Hi Derby-dev, I'm preparing our quarterly report to the Board.
For this quarter, I think the main item of interest for the
Derby sub-project is the 10.16.1.1 release.
Is there anything else we should include in our report?
thanks,
bryan
Can't think
Thanks, David. We have adjusted Derby so that it builds cleanly without
the new deprecation warnings introduced by Open JDK build 19-ea+27-2074.
For more details, see the discussion on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7133.
On 6/13/22 6:18 AM, David Delabassee wrote:
Greetings!
The Apache Derby project is pleased to announce feature release 10.16.1.1.
Apache Derby is a sub-project of the Apache DB project. Derby is a pure Java
relational database engine which conforms to the ISO/ANSI SQL and
JDBC standards. Derby aims to be easy for developers and end-users to work
Thanks for that suggestion, Bryan. Here is a second draft:
--
The Apache Derby project is pleased to announce feature release 10.16.1.1.
Apache Derby is a sub-project of the Apache DB project. Derby is a pure
Java relational database engine which conforms to the ISO/ANSI
Here is a first draft. Please let me know how to improve it.
---
The Apache Derby project is pleased to announce feature release 10.16.1.1.
Apache Derby is a sub-project of the Apache DB project. Derby is a pure
Java relational database engine which conforms to
ither.
My instinct is that your maven settings file is somehow incorrect, and
maven isn't helping you figure out what's wrong with it :(
bryan
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 9:17 AM Rick Hillegas wrote:
I am stuck at the step for using maven to publish 10.16.1.1 artifacts.
The details of the issue ca
I am stuck at the step for using maven to publish 10.16.1.1 artifacts.
The details of the issue can be found at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-23348
In a nutshell, I have uploaded artifacts and checksums but not gpg
signatures. I do not know how to generate/upload these
The publication of 10.16.1.1 cannot start until the cwiki is available.
That's where our release publication instructions live. The cwiki is
undergoing some kind of maintenance right now.
Thanks for catching that, Bryan. Re-sending...
On 6/2/22 5:43 PM, Bryan Pendleton wrote:
Not a huge deal, Rick, but the subject line of your message is wrong! :)
bryan
On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 5:28 PM Rick Hillegas wrote:
Thanks for everyone's work on coding, documenting, and testing
Thanks for everyone's work on coding, documenting, and testing
10.16.1.1. The polls have closed. The community has approved 10.16.1.1
as an official Derby release:
+1:
Dag Wanvik (pmc)
Bryan Pendleton (pmc)
Rick Hillegas (pmc)
No other votes were cast.
Bryan and Dag found additional flaws in this release candidate. I have
corrected those flaws on the trunk and in the 10.16 branch. I agree with
Bryan and Dag that these problems should not flunk the vote.
No product problems surfaced in the platform tests recorded at
the
regression tests using the packaged release? I munged around in the
Confluence wiki for a while but came up short.
bryan
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 2:22 PM Rick Hillegas wrote:
I have ticked off several of the release-vetting checklist items at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DERBY
I have ticked off several of the release-vetting checklist items at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DERBY/TenSixteenChecklist It
would be great if someone else could report on the following outstanding
items:
o Signatures and checksums. I don't think that I should be relied on to
Please test-drive the 10.16.1.1 candidate, then vote on whether to
accept it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/db/derby/db-derby-10.16.1.1/
The polls close at 5:00 pm California time on Thursday June 2.
10.16.1.1 is a feature release, described
release candidate.
On 5/18/22 8:24 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
Please test-drive the 10.16.1.0 candidate, then vote on whether to
accept it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/db/derby/db-derby-10.16.1.0/
The polls close at 5:00 pm California time
Please test-drive the 10.16.1.0 candidate, then vote on whether to
accept it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/db/derby/db-derby-10.16.1.0/
The polls close at 5:00 pm California time on Wednesday June 1.
10.16.1.0 is a feature release,
Thanks, Bryan. I don't have anything to add. Cheers
On 4/4/22 4:31 AM, Bryan Pendleton wrote:
Hi all, I am preparing the April 2022 report for the Board.
Can you please send me any updates that I should include?
So far, the only Derby-related topics I have are:
- the Derby community
On 3/28/22 6:07 AM, Bryan Pendleton wrote:
rototill away references to the Security Manager and update
the Security Guide accordingly. I estimate that this will take about a
month. My preference would be to delay the 10.16.1 release until this is
done.
This plan is fine with me. Glad to help,
The Open JDK regards the Java Security Manager as a large, brittle piece
of code whose further maintenance costs too much. In some imminent
release, the JVM will remove the Security Manager. See
https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/411,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7110, and
On https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7126, Bryan and I have
been discussing the need for a new Derby release to handle the
disruption introduced by the Open JDK's deprecation of the Java Security
Manager (see https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/411). Deprecation-related JDK
changes have
Thanks, David. Derby builds and tests cleanly against Open JDK build
19-ea+11-661. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7133 for
more detail.
On 2/28/22 12:19 PM, David Delabassee wrote:
Rick, All,
The Release Candidates of JDK 18 have been released [1]. At this
stage, only P1
On 2/4/22 7:06 AM, Bryan Pendleton wrote:
Much appreciated!
bryan
No problem, as the youngsters say. You might need to delete your old
website sandbox and recreate a new one from scratch (see
https://db.apache.org/derby/papers/derby_web.html). Alternatively, it
might work to just cd to
After suppressing the new build warnings introduced by this JDK, Derby
builds and tests cleanly. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7126
Regards,
-Rick
On 1/31/22 1:25 AM, David Delabassee wrote:
Greetings!
First off, on behalf of Oracle’s Java Team, I’d like to wish you a
Thanks, Bryan.
On 1/9/22 8:59 AM, Bryan Pendleton wrote:
Below is the quarterly report I submitted to the board.
Thanks all; please let me know of any errors or omissions.
bryan
## Description:
The mission of the Apache DB project is to create and maintain
On 1/5/22 5:48 AM, Bryan Pendleton wrote:
Hi all,
Our January report to the Apache Board is due, please let me know what
items you think we should include.
thanks,
bryan
Nothing from me. Thanks, Bryan.
Thanks, David. I looked at the lists of changes for builds 26 and 27 but
couldn't figure out which ones addressed our concerns. Could you provide
more detail?
Thanks,
-Rick
On 12/9/21 11:40 PM, David Delabassee wrote:
Rick,
Thank you for being part of the OpenJDK Quality Outreach Program.
Damodaran wrote:
Hi Rick,
Link to the latest builds was specified in the email as [5].
This is the link - https://jdk.java.net/18/
Thanks,
Deepak
On 17/11/21, 2:30 AM, "Rick Hillegas" wrote:
Thanks for the heads-up, David. The JEP 411 work will almost certainly
be a disruption
nk - https://jdk.java.net/18/
Thanks,
Deepak
On 17/11/21, 2:30 AM, "Rick Hillegas" wrote:
Thanks for the heads-up, David. The JEP 411 work will almost certainly
be a disruption for Derby. Is there a particular build which you want us
to test? I didn't see a link to the latest
Thanks, Deepak.
On 11/16/21 8:48 PM, Deepak Damodaran wrote:
Hi Rick,
Link to the latest builds was specified in the email as [5].
This is the link - https://jdk.java.net/18/
Thanks,
Deepak
On 17/11/21, 2:30 AM, "Rick Hillegas" wrote:
Thanks for the heads-up, David. The JE
Thanks for the heads-up, David. The JEP 411 work will almost certainly
be a disruption for Derby. Is there a particular build which you want us
to test? I didn't see a link to the latest builds in your email. Rory
used to include those links.
Thanks,
-Rick
On 11/16/21 3:01 AM,
Will do. Cheers.
On 10/31/21 11:55 AM, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
Thanks Rick, let us know if a Bug gets logged ?
Rgds,Rory
On 31/10/2021 16:45, Rick Hillegas wrote:
Hi Rory and David,
The Derby regressions tests discovered a security regression
introduced by this build of JDK 18. I have
Hi Rory and David,
The Derby regressions tests discovered a security regression introduced
by this build of JDK 18. I have started a discussion on security-dev
titled "previously prevented exploit now possible with JDK 18". More
information can be found at
their own
project-specific activities which is nice to capture on the
development lists.
Do you think this is an improper approach?
bryan
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 7:30 AM Rick Hillegas wrote:
I have nothing to add. Did you want to send this message to the DB pmc
mailing list also? I didn't receive
I have nothing to add. Did you want to send this message to the DB pmc
mailing list also? I didn't receive a copy addressed to that list.
Thanks,
-Rick
On 9/30/21 11:46 AM, Bryan Pendleton wrote:
Hi all, I am preparing the October report for the Board.
Can you please send me any updates that
Welcome to the developers' list. Some responses inline...
On 8/19/21 3:09 AM, Zeyuan Hu wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to set up Derby development environment in Intellij and run
NetworkServerControl main and I got the following error message after I hit
run
---
Error occurred during initialization
Hi Rory,
No new issues were found with the first release candidate. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7110?focusedCommentId=17398033=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17398033
for more information.
-Rick
On 8/7/21 8:02 AM, Rory O'Donnell
Hi Rory,
Derby builds and tests cleanly with the rampdown phase 2 jdk. For more
detail, see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7110?focusedCommentId=17382573=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17382573
Thanks,
-Rick
On 7/15/21 12:31 PM, Rory
On 7/5/21 9:43 AM, Bryan Pendleton wrote:
Hi all, our quarterly report to the Board needs to be prepared this week.
Please let me know the major topics we want to include, thanks!
bryan
I have nothing to add. Thanks, Bryan.
Hi Rory,
Derby builds and tests cleanly against Open JDK 17-ea+28-2534--after
making changes to compensate for recent Open JDK changes made to support
JEP 411. This included changes made to compensate for the affect of JEP
411 on the Apache ant build tool, which Derby uses. Our experience is
ing on you and others. Make sure to subscribe first.
Rgds,Rory
[1] security-...@openjdk.java.net <mailto:security-...@openjdk.java.net>
On 14/06/2021 16:43, Rick Hillegas wrote:
Hi Rory,
Copying the Tomcat developer community since this issue probably
affects them as well.
When I trie
Hi Rory,
Copying the Tomcat developer community since this issue probably affects
them as well.
When I tried to build Derby with the Rampdown Phase One build of open
JDK 17 (17-ea+26-2439), I saw many warnings related to the deprecation
of Security Manager classes and methods, undoubtedly
Hi Rory,
Derby builds and tests fine against build 23 of Open JDK 17. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7110?focusedCommentId=17350113=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17350113
Cheers,
-Rick
On 5/21/21 12:09 AM, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
Hi
Hi Rory,
Derby built and tested cleanly with early access build 21, except for
one probably transient or environmental problem. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7110?focusedCommentId=17342832=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17342832
Thanks, Rory. Derby builds and tests cleanly with this early access
distro. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7110?focusedCommentId=17326152=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17326152
Cheers,
-Rick
On 4/20/21 3:03 AM, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
Hi Rory,
Derby builds and the regression tests run cleanly with Open JDK
17-ea+16-1315. I tweaked Derby's javadoc so that it builds cleanly with
this JDK. See
Hi Rory,
For the record, the Derby build/test cycle found no problems with the GA
JDK 16:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7088?focusedCommentId=17303571=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17303571
Thanks,
-Rick
On 3/16/21 7:54 AM, Rory
Hi Rory,
No problems found with JDK 16 build 35. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7088?focusedCommentId=17280292=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17280292
Cheers,
-Rick
On 2/5/21 2:39 AM, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
*Hi Rick, *
*Per the JDK
not use CMS.
Infra can point you to the relevant pages on the wiki (I do not know them right
offhand).
Regards,
Craig
On Feb 4, 2021, at 10:11 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
Could someone please post pointers to the CMS migration effort so that I can
educate myself about what it entails? Once I
Could someone please post pointers to the CMS migration effort so that I
can educate myself about what it entails? Once I know more, I can start
a Derby community discussion about what, if anything, can be done before
this deadline.
Thanks,
-Rick
On 2/2/21 11:26 AM, Craig Russell wrote:
Hi,
I have not been following this issue. I believe that Bryan put some
effort into converting the Derby website, but I don't know where that
stands. A couple questions:
1) How much effort was required to migrate JDO?
2) Can we still manage our code repo with subversion?
Thanks,
-Rick
On 2/2/21
On 1/27/21 7:28 AM, Bryan Pendleton wrote:
Hi all, I'm preparing our quarterly report to the Apache board.
I missed our regular January report due to a personal problem (better now).
Please let me know of any Derby-related items that we should include
in this quarter's report!
thanks,
bryan
Hi Rory,
No problems found with early access build 32. For more detail, see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7088?focusedCommentId=1724=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-1724
Thanks,
-Rick
On 1/15/21 1:09 AM, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
Hi
Thanks, Rory. Derby builds and tests cleanly against JDK 16 build 28:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7088?focusedCommentId=17249888=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17249888
On 12/13/20 8:38 AM, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
Hi Rick,
*Per the JDK
Hi Rory,
Build 16-ea+26-1764 has deprecated two ThreadGroup methods which Derby
uses: destroy() and isDestroyed(). The JDK 16 javadoc indicates that
those two methods will be removed from the JDK sometime. Can you point
me at someone who can answer the following questions:
1) What rev of
Download machinery is broken for the two mirrored releases (10.15.2.0
and 10.14.2.0), that is, the ones with cgi scripts. Before asking INFRA
for advice on what has changed, I thought that I would ask derby-dev
first. Does anyone have a theory about what has changed and broken the
download
On 11/16/20 10:41 PM, Anurag Shekhar wrote:
2017-03-12 02:48:00.000
Thanks for pointing that out, Anurag!
Thanks, Rory. Derby builds and tests cleanly using JDK 16 build 24:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7088?focusedCommentId=17233021=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17233021
On 11/13/20 1:47 AM, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
Hi Rick,
OpenJDK 16
Thanks, Rory. Derby builds and tests cleanly with jdk 16 early access
build 22. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7088?focusedCommentId=17224958=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17224958
Cheers,
-Rick
On 11/1/20 9:14 AM, Rory O'Donnell
1 - 100 of 11787 matches
Mail list logo
