http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Lrge-cover-alt-3.png
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
All messages sent to this list
On Sat, 2011-04-23 at 00:12 +0200, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Hi Drew,
I proposed to try to write a short comment even if I don't have the time
to write much...
drew schrieb:
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 11:10 -0400, Marc Paré wrote:
[...]
The only other criticism I would have is the
On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 19:53 -0400, Marc Paré wrote:
Not sure if I like the placement of the two logos on the front cover.
Howdy Mark.
Here I disagree - IMO the two new elements on the front make a large
improvement.
I
think, strategically speaking, that all logos (pdf, odf, svg, cc
Hi Drew:
Le 2011-04-23 04:39, drew a écrit :
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Lrge-cover-alt-3.png
Looks like your post showed in my mailing list before I posted my
previous note.
Anyway, yes, these logos now look great! The slogan looks a little
strange with the Suite!, alone,
On Sat, 2011-04-23 at 04:39 -0400, drew wrote:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Lrge-cover-alt-3.png
NOTE - I cheated and shrunk the logo on the back cover as a bitmpap - if
this new size looks good (I think you where right it does look better)
and doesn't need resizing again then I'll go
Le 2011-04-23 04:52, drew a écrit :
On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 19:53 -0400, Marc Paré wrote:
Not sure if I like the placement of the two logos on the front cover.
Howdy Mark.
Here I disagree - IMO the two new elements on the front make a large
improvement.
No problem then.
I
think,
Hi Drew,
Drew Jensen wrote:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Lrge-cover-alt-3.png
I won't comment anything more - even if I told you that it would
not be necessary from my point of view, you implemented my
thoughts in a breathtaking time... ;-)
But I don't see any reasons to nit-pick
Le 2011-04-23 05:26, Bernhard Dippold a écrit :
PS: When you finished the label, we should ask the other
LibreOffice-Box teams, if they would feel comfortable with a
similar design - so we can define an official community DVD
design...
+1
Marc
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 11:10 -0400, Marc Paré wrote:
Le 2011-04-21 10:34, drew a écrit :
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 10:30 -0400, Marc Paré wrote:
Le 2011-04-20 21:20, drew a écrit :
Hi,
One more change to the label for the NA-Comm-DVD.
Addressed some concerns on trademark, from the US
Hi Drew -- Sorry, I had originally only posted to the US-Marketing but
re-sent it to all the lists you have posted
Le 2011-04-22 11:25, drew a écrit :
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 11:10 -0400, Marc Paré wrote:
Le 2011-04-21 10:34, drew a écrit :
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 10:30 -0400, Marc Paré wrote:
Hi Bernhard and especially Drew
We are really down to nit-picking but some of these points do seem valid.
Le 2011-04-22 18:12, Bernhard Dippold a écrit :
Hi Drew,
Finally, the ODF logo screamed so I borrowed from here and there, did a
little aggregating and a little touch with the airbrush
Le 2011-04-20 21:20, drew a écrit :
Hi,
One more change to the label for the NA-Comm-DVD.
Addressed some concerns on trademark, from the US mktg ml.
Swapped SVG logo for one a bit more descriptive and moved a few things
around, per Marc's comments.
Removed overall green frame, except spine
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 10:30 -0400, Marc Paré wrote:
Le 2011-04-20 21:20, drew a écrit :
Hi,
One more change to the label for the NA-Comm-DVD.
Addressed some concerns on trademark, from the US mktg ml.
Swapped SVG logo for one a bit more descriptive and moved a few things
around,
Le 2011-04-21 10:34, drew a écrit :
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 10:30 -0400, Marc Paré wrote:
Le 2011-04-20 21:20, drew a écrit :
Hi,
One more change to the label for the NA-Comm-DVD.
Addressed some concerns on trademark, from the US mktg ml.
Swapped SVG logo for one a bit more descriptive and
14 matches
Mail list logo
