On 26.11.2016 05:11, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>
> On 11/25/2016 10:17 AM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>>
With the updated first line:
SCRIPT2C/
The snowdrift dilemma: Regardless of who clears the snow, we all
benefit. So, who will do the work?
This public goods pro
Hm, ok, I understand. I think I now know why I had the feeling there was
something missing and why I added in those questions.
The first section ends with: "So, who will do the work?" For me that somehow
implies that the problem is to find the people doing the work. But that's not
really the pr
I really like this script and I also think that this works better for the short
version. Well done Michael!
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Snowdrift-design] Intro video script
Local Time: November 26, 2016 5:11 AM
UTC Time: November 26, 2016 4:11 AM
From: m...@techdesignpsy
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Michael Siepmann
wrote:
I'm thinking that in this super-short intro, it would be better to
omit
any reference to a snowdrift. It's just too confusing, not necessary
enough, and doesn't help to engage people right away. People can find
out why we're called S
Hi All,
I skimmed through the thread and have a few comments based on the most
recent script. Overall, I am happy that we dropped any deep
explaination and most of the snow analogy. Below is my suggestion
followed by the inline comments that built it.
---
SUGGESTION/
When goods such as software
Quick note: glad to see everyone weighing in. I plan to think through
this soon and consolidate ideas.
In short: I don't like losing the snowdrift dilemma concept entirely,
but I think it's the right direction. We'll keep "clearing the path…"
which can be illustrated with snowdrift / road visuals.
