[Bug 47134] Re: log text copy fails while filter engages

2008-10-10 Thread Hernando Torque
Attached a patch that fixes two things: 1.) If the filter is used, the selection paths refer to the child tree model (three lines that fix this bug...), and 2.) Replaced the range selection thingy with an index list since multiple selection != range selection. There are still minor issues when

[Bug 282199] [NEW] New logout/shut down dialogs not showing after upgrade from Hardy

2008-10-12 Thread Hernando Torque
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel In Hardy I was using the compact upstream dialogs for shut down and logout: http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/1803/bildschirmfotognomepanekk5.png I enabled them by creating the gconf key upstream_session in apps/panel/global and setting it

[Bug 282199] Re: New logout/shut down dialogs not showing after upgrade from Hardy

2008-10-12 Thread Hernando Torque
I finally fixed it. I had not only to remove --purge gnome-panel but also to delete everything gnome-panel related I could find with gnome- search-tool. I'll do an hardy install tomorrow and see if I can reproduce this problem. -- New logout/shut down dialogs not showing after upgrade from

[Bug 282199] Re: New logout/shut down dialogs not showing after upgrade from Hardy

2008-10-13 Thread Hernando Torque
All-clear. I could not reproduce the described situation on the same laptop via a Hardy = Intrepid upgrade. ** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- New logout/shut down dialogs not showing after upgrade from Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282199 You received

[Bug 297793] [NEW] Inconsistent naming of root partition in Nautilus

2008-11-13 Thread Hernando Torque
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gvfs The names for the root partition in Nautilus' Places panel and main panel (Computer view) differ. Screenshot: http://img.xrmb2.net/images/242451.png Not sure this is gvfs related, though. gvfs: Installed: 1.0.2-0ubuntu1 Candidate:

[Bug 363298] [NEW] Debug messages in .xsession-errors

2009-04-18 Thread Hernando Torque
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel Gnome-panel, nm-applet, and update-notifier put messages prefixed with DEBUG in the .xsession-errors file. As those aren't errors or warnings, I ask you to remove them for the release. There's already enough noise in this file. Example: **

[Bug 363298] Re: Debug messages in .xsession-errors

2009-04-18 Thread Hernando Torque
I see. Should I report this for the other two applications too? -- Debug messages in .xsession-errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363298 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 363298] Re: Debug messages in .xsession-errors

2009-04-18 Thread Hernando Torque
Perfectly clear now. I reported them w/o touching the nominate feature. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-notifier/+bug/363349 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-applet/+bug/363350 -- Debug messages in .xsession-errors

[Bug 363298] Re: Debug messages in .xsession-errors

2009-04-18 Thread Hernando Torque
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 363349 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363349 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 363349 Debug messages in .xsession-errors -- Debug messages in .xsession-errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363298 You received this bug notification

[Bug 363298] Re: Debug messages in .xsession-errors

2009-04-18 Thread Hernando Torque
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 363349 Debug messages in .xsession-errors -- Debug messages in .xsession-errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363298 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs

[Bug 363349] Re: Debug messages in .xsession-errors

2009-04-18 Thread Hernando Torque
Wasn't me. Marking them as invalid and removing the duplicate status of the other bugs (which again will spam I guess - sorry about that). ** Changed in: network-manager-applet (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- Debug

[Bug 328903] Re: Opening file-roller causes a warning in ~/.xsession-errors

2009-04-21 Thread Hernando Torque
** Changed in: file-roller (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- Opening file-roller causes a warning in ~/.xsession-errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328903 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs

[Bug 328903] Re: Opening file-roller causes a warning in ~/.xsession-errors

2009-04-21 Thread Hernando Torque
file-roller: Installed: 2.26.1-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.26.1-0ubuntu1 Still there. -- Opening file-roller causes a warning in ~/.xsession-errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328903 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

[Bug 387573] Re: Drop-down calendar does not close unless you click on it

2009-06-25 Thread Hernando Torque
@17 What about another gconf-key? There already are keys like 'gmt_time' and 'format' that don't confuse users by not being present in the preferences dialog. -- Drop-down calendar does not close unless you click on it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387573 You received this bug notification

[Bug 390733] Re: Process gconfd-2 causes cpu overuse and overheat

2009-06-27 Thread Hernando Torque
For me it was fusion-icon, which I had in the startup applications list. Disabling it fixed the problem. Manually starting it brought it back. -- Process gconfd-2 causes cpu overuse and overheat https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390733 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 390733] Re: Process gconfd-2 causes cpu overuse and overheat

2009-06-27 Thread Hernando Torque
Sorry for spamming but I was too quick with blaming fusion-icon. In my case it is a problem between metacity and compiz like described in this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/+bug/389686 -- Process gconfd-2 causes cpu overuse and overheat

[Bug 389686] Re: compiz --replace fails to kill metacity, resulting in cpu overload

2009-06-27 Thread Hernando Torque
I can confirm this using a Nvidia 6600 GT with Nvidia 185.18.14 drivers. *) Starting compiz via fusion-icon in the startup applications causes 100% CPU load. Killing either compiz.real or metacity reduces CPU load back to normal. *) Starting compiz manually after session start with 'compiz

[Bug 389686] Re: compiz --replace fails to kill metacity, resulting in cpu overload

2009-06-27 Thread Hernando Torque
Ok, this gconfd-2 thing seems to be the result of 'compiz --replace' starting a loop that triggers this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/+bug/150721 Addition to above points: *) Starting compiz via setting 'Visual Effects' to 'Normal' in 'Appearance Preferences' (and

[Bug 395591] [NEW] Installing GDM 2.26 doesn't update /etc/X11/default-display-manager

2009-07-04 Thread Hernando Torque
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm Opposed to KDM and XDM, GDM doesn't update the file /etc/X11/default- display-manager (or creates it if missing), so I have to manually change (or create) it to contain: /usr/sbin/gdm Also there is no configuration dialog when installing it along

[Bug 395861] [NEW] gdm 2.26 custom configuration file: wrong filename

2009-07-05 Thread Hernando Torque
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm GDM installs a file /etc/gdm/custom.conf which apparently does not do what its filename suggests: configure GDM. Instead GDM seems to use the file /etc/gdm/gdm.conf-custom for configuration. gdm 2.26.1-0ubuntu2 ** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu)

[Bug 395698] Re: Autologin gets disabled on upgrade

2009-07-05 Thread Hernando Torque
Are you sure you didn't delete the gdm.conf-custom file manually? I cannot confirm this bug: *) Purged GDM 2.26 (including all GDM related files a file search returned) *) Installed GDM 2.20.10-0ubuntu5, /etc/gdm contained the (empty) gdm.conf-custom *) Used gdmsetup to enable autologin,

[Bug 395861] Re: gdm 2.26 custom configuration file: wrong filename

2009-07-05 Thread Hernando Torque
After reading the documentation (http://library.gnome.org/admin/gdm/stable/configuration.html.en) it's in fact custom.conf that should be used to config GDM. I suggest renaming the bug to something like gdm 2.26 wrong configuration file used. -- gdm 2.26 custom configuration file: wrong filename

[Bug 395861] Re: gdm 2.26 custom configuration file: wrong filename

2009-07-06 Thread Hernando Torque
Issue #1: Upgrading from 2.20 to 2.26 leaves you with two configuration files. Pretty confusing I'd say - especially because you have to manually configure GDM since there is no graphical tool (yet?) to do it. Issue #2: Fresh installations just install 'custom.conf', which isn't used (yet?) by

[Bug 363298] Re: Debug messages in .xsession-errors

2009-07-07 Thread Hernando Torque
This is no longer an issue. ** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- Debug messages in .xsession-errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363298 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. --

[Bug 363349] Re: Debug messages in .xsession-errors

2009-07-07 Thread Hernando Torque
This is no longer an issue. ** Changed in: update-notifier (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- Debug messages in .xsession-errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363349 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 396489] [NEW] gdm 2.26 Unable to log out with autologin enabled

2009-07-07 Thread Hernando Torque
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm When the autologin-user tries to log out he automatically gets logged in again. So you cannot log out user A and log in with user B (switching users works, though). GDM 2.20 always showed the login screen after logging out the autologin- user. gdm

[Bug 397192] Re: nautilus becomes non-responsive during video-playback

2009-07-13 Thread Hernando Torque
Downloaded the above linked file (4.2GB). When opening the containing folder (icon view, preview enabled) and clicking on the file, nautilus is gone: 100% CPU (actually 50% of my core duo system), ~1GB RAM usage, unresponsive. I've waited half an hour before killing it. Attaching gdb output while

[Bug 397192] Re: nautilus becomes non-responsive during video-playback

2009-07-13 Thread Hernando Torque
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #588446 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588446 ** Also affects: nautilus via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588446 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- nautilus becomes non-responsive during video-playback

[Bug 398826] Re: alt f2 not working when panel background color set to solid color

2009-07-13 Thread Hernando Torque
** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- alt f2 not working when panel background color set to solid color https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398826 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in

[Bug 403723] Re: gdm 2.27.4 floods daemon.log

2009-07-23 Thread Hernando Torque
** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- gdm 2.27.4 floods daemon.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403723 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 384439] Re: GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed

2009-07-27 Thread Hernando Torque
The error is caused by the patch 100_load_desired_settings.patch by adding: /* return NULL if the file doesn't exist */ if (!g_file_test (filename, G_FILE_TEST_EXISTS)) { result = NULL; return result; } to the function configurations_read_from_file() in libgnome-desktop

[Bug 335864] Re: Gnome-keyring logs status messages to ~/.xsession-errors

2009-02-28 Thread Hernando Torque
** Changed in: gnome-keyring (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = gnome-keyring -- Gnome-keyring logs status messages to ~/.xsession-errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335864 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 318689] Re: gnome-system-log attempts to open bogus/inexistent logfiles

2009-03-02 Thread Hernando Torque
That only fixes the warning for the first startup. Non existant files still cannot be removed via the application (you either have to remove them from the gconf list or recreate them on disk and then close them in the log viewer). -- gnome-system-log attempts to open bogus/inexistent logfiles

[Bug 318689] Re: gnome-system-log attempts to open bogus/inexistent logfiles

2009-03-04 Thread Hernando Torque
As I said it's only fixed for the first startup. If you've already started the log viewer (with an earlier version) you need to unset the loglist in gconf-editor under /apps/gnome-system-log to realize the difference. Making this list editable within the application would probably fix the

[Bug 297793] Re: Inconsistent naming of root partition in Nautilus

2009-03-13 Thread Hernando Torque
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #575320 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=575320 ** Also affects: nautilus via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=575320 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Inconsistent naming of root partition in Nautilus

[Bug 335864] Re: Gnome-keyring logs status messages to ~/.xsession-errors

2009-03-20 Thread Hernando Torque
Seems this is not an upstream bug. -- Gnome-keyring logs status messages to ~/.xsession-errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335864 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 335867] Re: Nautilus-share logs status messages to ~/.xsession-errors

2009-03-20 Thread Hernando Torque
Problem is that GDM redirects all output to .xsession-errors so this is not a nautilus bug and I have no idea if this will get fixed. Maybe they should rename .xsession-errors to .xsession-debug. ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: nautilus-share = gdm -- Nautilus-share logs status

[Bug 346420] Re: error while Setting up gedit-plugins (2.25.3-0ubuntu1)

2009-03-22 Thread Hernando Torque
** Changed in: gedit-plugins (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- error while Setting up gedit-plugins (2.25.3-0ubuntu1) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346420 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gedit-plugins in

[Bug 348536] Re: gedit crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()

2009-03-26 Thread Hernando Torque
** Visibility changed to: Public -- gedit crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348536 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gedit in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 328903] [NEW] Opening file-roller causes a warning in ~/.xsession-errors

2009-02-12 Thread Hernando Torque
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: file-roller Whenever I open file-roller following entries show up in ~/.xsession- errors Window manager warning: meta_window_activate called by a pager with a 0 timestamp; the pager needs to be fixed. Window manager warning: Buggy client sent a

[Bug 328903] Re: Opening file-roller causes a warning in ~/.xsession-errors

2009-02-12 Thread Hernando Torque
Doesn't seem to happen, when I double-click a compressed file but happens when opening it via gnome-open file or file-roller file. -- Opening file-roller causes a warning in ~/.xsession-errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328903 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 328903] Re: Opening file-roller causes a warning in ~/.xsession-errors

2009-02-13 Thread Hernando Torque
Sorry for the missing info: file-roller: Installed: 2.25.90-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.25.90-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 2.25.90-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status I think you meant file-roller and not gedit? A. Opening a

[Bug 329028] [NEW] gnome-keybinding-properties: Cannot edit examples for custom keybindings

2009-02-13 Thread Hernando Torque
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-control-center In gnome-keybinding-properties I have three disabled keybindings under Custom Shortcuts: 1. binding - Disabled starts gconftool-2 --toggle /desktop/gnome/applications/at/screen_magnifier_enabled 2. binding - Disabled starts

[Bug 331292] Re: gdmgreeter crashed with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main()

2009-02-18 Thread Hernando Torque
Here too using vesa (my nvidia GPU is half dead, nv and nvidia won't work). -- gdmgreeter crashed with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.

[Bug 329028] Re: gnome-keybinding-properties: Cannot edit examples for custom keybindings

2009-02-19 Thread Hernando Torque
Reproducible with today's live CD. 1. Open System Preferences Keyboard Shortcuts. 2. Under Custom Shortcuts there are three disabled shortcuts (just called binding). 3. Change the command of one of the three entries, close Keyboard Shortcuts, reopen. 4. The initial command will be there

[Bug 329028] Re: gnome-keybinding-properties: Cannot edit examples for custom keybindings

2009-02-19 Thread Hernando Torque
Seems to be two issues: 1. Every custom shortcut that's disabled will fail to parse as valid binding in gsd-keybindings-manager.c and therefor throw this warning (to reproduce add a shortcut, restart GDM, look in ~/.xsession-errors). 2. The command of a custom shortcut can't be changed - it's

[Bug 318689] Re: gnome-system-log attempts to open bogus/inexistent logfiles

2009-02-20 Thread Hernando Torque
How can I get rid of gnome-system-log in gconf? Uninstalling (and purging) gnome-utils didn't fix it. I think you just need to check the existence of default_logfiles[i] in logview_prefs_fill_defaults (I did it with fopen - maybe overkill?) but as long as I have the gconf entry present it's not

[Bug 318689] Re: gnome-system-log attempts to open bogus/inexistent logfiles

2009-02-26 Thread Hernando Torque
Really strange. I always thought it's sufficient to purge a package to get rid of all gconf data but I needed to restart GDM for a clean gconf. Ok, I tested the trivial fix (as already said I just check if default_logfiles[i] exist with fopen) and it seems to work. Only Xorg.0.log gets added,

[Bug 318689] Re: gnome-system-log attempts to open bogus/inexistent logfiles

2009-02-27 Thread Hernando Torque
As for the user added files that no longer exist: I'd rather leave them in the log list (grayed out to visualize their absence) so the user can close them (which will permanently remove them from gconf) than remove them directly, but I don't know how to do that (lack of GTK programming

[Bug 327859] Re: (gnome-panel:3700): libglade-WARNING

2009-02-28 Thread Hernando Torque
It's coming from the clock applet. Trivial fix is to remove the requires-version-field but I don't know if that breaks anything. Patch attached. ** Attachment added: clock_glade.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23215311/clock_glade.patch -- (gnome-panel:3700): libglade-WARNING

[Bug 327859] Re: (gnome-panel:3700): libglade-WARNING

2009-02-28 Thread Hernando Torque
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=573536 -- (gnome-panel:3700): libglade-WARNING https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327859 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 328903] Re: Opening file-roller causes a warning in ~/.xsession-errors

2009-06-08 Thread Hernando Torque
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #585160 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585160 ** Changed in: fileroller Importance: Undecided = Unknown ** Changed in: fileroller Status: New = Unknown ** Changed in: fileroller Remote watch: None = GNOME Bug Tracker #585160 --

[Bug 384439] Re: GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed

2009-06-09 Thread Hernando Torque
Output of gnome-settings-daemon --no-daemon --debug attached. ** Attachment added: debug.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27713499/debug.log ** Attachment removed: debug.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27713499/debug.log -- GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL'

[Bug 384439] Re: GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed

2009-06-09 Thread Hernando Torque
** Attachment added: gsd-debug.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27713572/gsd-debug.log -- GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384439 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is

[Bug 384439] Re: GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed

2009-06-10 Thread Hernando Torque
Removing that file doesn't change a thing here. Attaching a strace of g-s-d until the messages appear (no crash here, so no bt). gnome-settings-daemon: Installed: 2.27.1-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.27.1-0ubuntu1 ** Attachment added: strace-gsd.log

[Bug 384439] Re: GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed

2009-06-10 Thread Hernando Torque
Finally got a stacktrace (some debugging symbols seem to be missing, don't know which ones). ** Attachment added: btfull-gsd.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27727670/btfull-gsd.log -- GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384439

[Bug 384439] Re: GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed

2009-06-10 Thread Hernando Torque
Franciscovega's bug seems unrelated and happens earlier than the error message in this bug. Also there is no segmentation fault. Xrandr plugin just causes above mentioned errors. Looking at the strace output right before the messages... [pid 4818] 01:06:07.208872

[Bug 297793] Re: non consistant filesystem spelling in GNOME

2009-06-12 Thread Hernando Torque
** Also affects: hundredpapercuts Importance: Undecided Status: New -- non consistant filesystem spelling in GNOME https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297793 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. --

[Bug 384439] Re: GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed

2009-06-13 Thread Hernando Torque
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #585690 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585690 ** Also affects: gstreamer via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585690 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL'

[Bug 387912] [NEW] gdk_x11_xatom_to_atom_for_display: assertion `xatom != None' failed

2009-06-16 Thread Hernando Torque
Public bug reported: ~/.xsession-errors is filled with following error message: Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_xatom_to_atom_for_display: assertion `xatom != None' failed According to this package's changelog this should already be fixed (upstream bug 580511:

[Bug 387912] Re: gdk_x11_xatom_to_atom_for_display: assertion `xatom != None' failed

2009-06-17 Thread Hernando Torque
With 2.17.2-0ubuntu2 this bug seems really fixed. ** Changed in: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- gdk_x11_xatom_to_atom_for_display: assertion `xatom != None' failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387912 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 297793] Re: Inconsistent spelling of Filesystem (vs. File system)

2009-06-22 Thread Hernando Torque
If you decide not to call it File System/Filesystem you may want to change it in the filebrowser (or file browser ;)) plugin in Gedit too (plugins/filebrowser/gedit-file-bookmarks-store.c, end of function init_special_directories). -- Inconsistent spelling of Filesystem (vs. File system)

[Bug 662513] Re: File Size of Shared Folder Not Correct

2010-10-18 Thread Hernando Torque
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 453747 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453747 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #598920 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=598920 ** Also affects: nautilus via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=598920 Importance: Unknown

[Bug 663820] [NEW] Inconsistency: link to folder Desktop translated in side pane

2010-10-20 Thread Hernando Torque
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus In the German translation the folder Desktop is named Arbeitsfläche in the side pane but shows up as Desktop in the main pane (see first screenshot). At first I though this is because I changed from the installation language (English) to the

[Bug 663820] Re: Inconsistency: link to folder Desktop translated in side pane

2010-10-20 Thread Hernando Torque
** Attachment added: en-to-de.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663820/+attachment/1702952/+files/en-to-de.png -- Inconsistency: link to folder Desktop translated in side pane https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663820 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 663820] Re: Inconsistency: link to folder Desktop translated in side pane

2010-10-20 Thread Hernando Torque
** Attachment added: de.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/663820/+attachment/1702956/+files/de.png -- Inconsistency: link to folder Desktop translated in side pane https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663820 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 493811] Re: gnome-system-log uses 100%+ Cpu usage

2010-10-22 Thread Hernando Torque
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #632886 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=632886 ** Also affects: gnome-utils via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=632886 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- gnome-system-log uses 100%+ Cpu usage

[Bug 549935] Re: gnome-screenshot ignores --area if called from shortcut

2010-11-12 Thread Hernando Torque
Confirming in Natty with 2.32.0-0ubuntu1. However, I'm not sure which package is to blame, as I successfully can run that command form a launcher in the panel. So maybe gnome-settings- daemon is another package to suspect. -- gnome-screenshot ignores --area if called from shortcut

[Bug 549935] Re: gnome-screenshot ignores --area if called from shortcut

2010-11-12 Thread Hernando Torque
Pressing the shortcut twice (fast) seems to work. -- gnome-screenshot ignores --area if called from shortcut https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/549935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-utils in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs

[Bug 745989] [NEW] Unlock screen shown before system has finished suspending

2011-03-30 Thread Hernando Torque
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager When moving the mouse after clicking 'Suspend' from the session indicator, the unlock screen is shown until the system is suspended. I'd say that the unlock screen should not pop up in that scenario. Happening on two Natty

[Bug 745989] Re: Unlock screen shown before system has finished suspending

2011-03-30 Thread Hernando Torque
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745989 Title: Unlock screen shown before system has finished suspending -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 745989] Re: Unlock screen shown before system has finished suspending

2011-03-31 Thread Hernando Torque
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 599351 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599351 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 599351 suspend + unlock dialog * You can subscribe to bug 599351 by following this link:

[Bug 546583] Re: Button pressed event registered by wrong window

2010-06-10 Thread Hernando Torque
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 494096 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494096 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 494096 Clicking the title of a window is bringing a window underneath it into focus -- Button pressed event registered by wrong window

[Bug 494096] Re: Clicking the title of a window is bringing a window underneath it into focus

2010-06-10 Thread Hernando Torque
** Changed in: metacity Importance: Unknown = Undecided ** Changed in: metacity Status: Invalid = New ** Changed in: metacity Remote watch: GNOME Bug Tracker #608296 = None ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #599181 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599181 ** Changed

[Bug 598623] Re: Gimp: menu item missing

2010-06-29 Thread Hernando Torque
The item is there, confirming bug fixed. :-) -- Gimp: menu item missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598623 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 602238] [NEW] Calculator mode not remembered

2010-07-06 Thread Hernando Torque
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gcalctool With the latest version 5.31.4-0ubuntu3 gcalctool always starts in the basic mode. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: gcalctool 5.31.4-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-6.9-generic 2.6.35-rc3 Uname: Linux

[Bug 602238] Re: Calculator mode not remembered

2010-07-06 Thread Hernando Torque
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51457879/Dependencies.txt -- Calculator mode not remembered https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/602238 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gcalctool in

[Bug 494096] Re: Clicking the title of a window is bringing a window underneath it into focus

2010-07-22 Thread Hernando Torque
The upstream status is Priority: High, Severity: critical - there's a working patch attached but it's not yet committed (neither to metacity nor mutter). -- Clicking the title of a window is bringing a window underneath it into focus https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494096 You received this bug

[Bug 706563] Re: Resize grip in Nautilus desktop

2011-01-31 Thread Hernando Torque
I can only see it for a split second (move lower panel to the top and run 'nautilus -q'). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/706563 Title: Resize grip in Nautilus

[Bug 291463] Re: gnome-panel: main menu: arrow icon blemish

2011-02-16 Thread Hernando Torque
The main menu is now the default menu in Natty - this really should be taken care of. ** Attachment added: main_menu_arrow.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-panel/+bug/291463/+attachment/1855639/+files/main_menu_arrow.png -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 688661] Re: gnome-screenshoot contains mask, when doing screensshot by selecting area

2011-02-23 Thread Hernando Torque
Yeah, it seems to lag somehow, e.g., if you continue to move your mouse after pressing the button, you'll get a screenshot with more captured than marked (see attachment). Note, that all this only seems to happen with Compiz running. ** Attachment added: gnome-utils-screenshot-area-lag.png

[Bug 675108] Re: gnome-power-manager adds battery to indicator twice when battery hot-unplugged and plugged back in

2010-12-21 Thread Hernando Torque
I can confirm this with up-to-date Natty. You might not want to remove the battery when running a 2.6.37-rc6 based kernel, as this can cause a system crash/oops: https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/12/19/90 To reproduce, I simply boot without the battery attached and then attach it while running. **

[Bug 675108] Re: gnome-power-manager adds battery to indicator twice when battery hot-unplugged and plugged back in

2010-12-21 Thread Hernando Torque
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #636915 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636915 ** Also affects: gnome-power via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636915 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 790338] [NEW] Menu: first pixel column not opening 'Applications' menu

2011-05-30 Thread Hernando Torque
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel The menu seems to start at (1, 0) as the first pixel row of the panel doesn't open the 'Applications' menu. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: gnome-panel 1:3.0.2-0ubuntu3 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-rc1-light x86_64 Architecture:

[Bug 790338] Re: Menu: first pixel column not opening 'Applications' menu

2011-05-30 Thread Hernando Torque
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790338 Title: Menu: first pixel column not opening 'Applications' menu -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 790338] Re: Menu: first pixel column not opening 'Applications' menu

2011-05-30 Thread Hernando Torque
Works fine with the Adwaita theme - seems to be a theming issue with the Ambiance port from lucazade. ** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in

[Bug 494096] Re: Clicking the title of a window is bringing a window underneath it into focus

2010-08-03 Thread Hernando Torque
** Also affects: mutter via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599181 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Clicking the title of a window is bringing a window underneath it into focus https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494096 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 507263] Re: Light 1px border around desktop

2010-08-12 Thread Hernando Torque
It's back again. nautilus: Installed: 1:2.31.6-0ubuntu3.1 ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = New -- Light 1px border around desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507263 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is

[Bug 507263] Re: Light 1px border around desktop

2010-08-12 Thread Hernando Torque
Like with the original bug, the thickness and color of the border changes with the theme, but it's there for all of them. -- Light 1px border around desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507263 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is

[Bug 507263] Re: Light 1px border around desktop

2010-08-13 Thread Hernando Torque
Compiled Nautilus with that commit reverted and the border is gone. Nice find! -- Light 1px border around desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507263 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. --

[Bug 617434] [NEW] Light border around desktop

2010-08-13 Thread Hernando Torque
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus This bug shows the same symptoms (and is triggered the same) as bug 507263. Luke Symes found a suspicious commit that turned out to be the culprit: Add a border around info bars (#621366):

[Bug 617434] Re: Light border around desktop

2010-08-13 Thread Hernando Torque
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/617434/+attachment/1488278/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: GConfNonDefault.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/617434/+attachment/1488279/+files/GConfNonDefault.txt ** Attachment added:

[Bug 617434] Re: Light border around desktop

2010-08-13 Thread Hernando Torque
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #626856 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=626856 ** Changed in: nautilus Importance: Undecided = Unknown ** Changed in: nautilus Status: New = Unknown ** Changed in: nautilus Remote watch: None = GNOME Bug Tracker #626856 -- Light

[Bug 622163] Re: rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in rb_shell_player_get_playback_state()

2010-08-22 Thread Hernando Torque
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 620430 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620430 ** Changed in: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in rb_shell_player_get_playback_state() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622163 You received this bug

[Bug 622163] Re: rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in rb_shell_player_get_playback_state()

2010-08-22 Thread Hernando Torque
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 620430 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620430 Getting this every time I press the shuffle button. Attaching a more useful stacktrace. ** Attachment added: rhythmbox-shuffle-crash.log

[Bug 622163] Re: rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in rb_shell_player_get_playback_state()

2010-08-22 Thread Hernando Torque
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 620430 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620430 Oh, seems this bug has already been reported: #620430 Marking as duplicate. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 620430 Pressing shuffle button in Rhytmbox causes it to crash -- rhythmbox

[Bug 620430] Re: Pressing shuffle button in Rhytmbox causes it to crash

2010-08-22 Thread Hernando Torque
Yes, omitting that patch fixes the problem. -- Pressing shuffle button in Rhytmbox causes it to crash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620430 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing

[Bug 622025] Re: Opening nautilus takes 20 seconds

2010-08-24 Thread Hernando Torque
I can reproduce this after installing appmenu-gtk and indicator-appmenu on a fresh daily install, so it's likely a duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appmenu-gtk/+bug/604668 -- Opening nautilus takes 20 seconds https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622025 You received this bug

[Bug 586132] [NEW] Failed to parse default value `' for gconf schema

2010-05-26 Thread Hernando Torque
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: f-spot I've seen following messages during an upgrade: $ sudo gconf-schemas --register f-spot.schemas WARNING: Failed to parse default value `' for schema (/schemas/desktop/gnome/f-spot/ui/main_window_x) WARNING: Failed to parse default value `' for

[Bug 586132] Re: Failed to parse default value `' for gconf schema

2010-05-26 Thread Hernando Torque
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49170225/Dependencies.txt -- Failed to parse default value `' for gconf schema https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586132 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to

  1   2   3   >