[Bug 1917514] Re: Add support for AVIF images

2021-03-02 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
** Summary changed:

- Add support of AVIF images
+ Add support for AVIF images

** Description changed:

- Please add support of AVIF image file format:
+ Please add support for the AVIF image file format:
  - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AV1#AV1_Image_File_Format_(AVIF)
  
  The latest Chrome and Firefox 87 support AVIF images, but GIMP won't
  open them.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: gimp 2.10.18-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-66.74-generic 5.4.86
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-66-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.16
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  Date: Tue Mar  2 13:17:37 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-26 (310 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
  ProcEnviron:
-  TERM=xterm-256color
-  PATH=(custom, no user)
-  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
-  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  TERM=xterm-256color
+  PATH=(custom, no user)
+  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
+  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: gimp
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gimp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917514

Title:
  Add support for AVIF images

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/1917514/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1917514] [NEW] Add support of AVIF images

2021-03-02 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Public bug reported:

Please add support of AVIF image file format:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AV1#AV1_Image_File_Format_(AVIF)

The latest Chrome and Firefox 87 support AVIF images, but GIMP won't
open them.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: gimp 2.10.18-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-66.74-generic 5.4.86
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-66-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.16
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CurrentDesktop: KDE
Date: Tue Mar  2 13:17:37 2021
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-26 (310 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gimp
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: gimp (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gimp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917514

Title:
  Add support of AVIF images

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/1917514/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1832812] Re: Locking and unlocking the screen is slow and stuttery

2020-01-22 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Will that fix change this issue?:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues/757

Other links:

- https://askubuntu.com/questions/1187437/override-gnome-3s-slow-screen-
lock-recovery

-
https://www.reddit.com/r/gnome/comments/eocpga/unnecessary_delays_recovering_from_screen_lock/

** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues #757
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues/757

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1832812

Title:
  Locking and unlocking the screen is slow and stuttery

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1832812/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1774188] Re: Unlocking the screen takes 5 seconds in Xorg sessions (not so much in Wayland sessions)

2019-11-03 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
I recently submitted a bug about this topic for Ubuntu 19.10:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues/757

** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues #757
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues/757

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774188

Title:
  Unlocking the  screen takes 5 seconds in Xorg sessions (not so much in
  Wayland sessions)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1774188/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1851067] Re: Screen Lock Recovery has Unnecessary Delays

2019-11-02 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
** Description changed:

  You can turn "Sreen Lock" off using gnome-control-center > Privacy >
- Screen Lock : Off.
+ Screen Lock : Off:
  
- However, this is bad terminology because you screen will still go into
- the exact same "Screen Lock" state upon an inactivity timeout, but the
- only difference is that you don't have to enter your password to regain
- access to the desktop.
+ https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-
+ center/uploads/62e176ed49faf1defaf6e4a36ad86f77/ScreenLock.png
+ 
+ **Side-note:** this is bad terminology because your screen will still go
+ into the exact same state that "Screen Lock: On" accomplishes (upon an
+ inactivity timeout), but the only difference is that you won't have to
+ enter your password to regain access to the desktop. I would have named
+ this "Require Password Authentication After Inactivity Timeout" (to me
+ wordy is better than unclear).
  
  While this accomplishes "not having to re-enter your password when
  coming back from an inactivity timeout", I'm very dissatisfied with a
- couple of behaviors.
+ couple of things.
  
  1) After reaching an "inactivity timeout" that "locks" your screen, you
  cannot unlock your screen by simply moving your mouse; you have to press
- enter. I want to be able to accomplish this also by moving my mouse.
+ the "enter" key. I want to be able to accomplish this also by moving my
+ mouse.
  
  2) Even if you press the enter key, to come out of "lock mode", it takes
  too long before you can interact with the applications you had open. I
  expect this to be instantaneous! If I were coming out of a suspended
  state, I could understand some delay. However, I'm not coming out of a
  suspended state, I just coming out of a screen lock.
  
  I do not like how this works. The whole purpose of this, as far as I'm
  concerned, is to increase the lifespan of my display monitors. All I
  want this to do, when a inactivity timeout occurs, is turn off all my
  monitor, and the only delay I expect, when coming back to my desktop, is
  what ever delay my monitor causes; the desktop should be fully available
  even before my monitor starts to display the desktop again.
  
  Having to press Enter and waiting 5 or 10 seconds before I can start
  working is NOT something that anyone wants.
  
+ Also, there should be separate setting for "blank screen x time", and
+ "monitor power off after x time".
+ 
+ My ideal settings would to make the screen go black after 5 minutes of
+ inactively and to turn my monitors completely off after 15 minutes of
+ inactively, and I'd like to control whether each of these requires
+ password authentication or not. On the 5 minute one, I personally would
+ note require a password, but I would require a password after monitor
+ going off. However, on either of these, I expect the desktop to be fully
+ functional immediately after coming out of these states. At the very
+ least please remove these unnecessary delays.
+ 
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.10
  Package: gnome-control-center 1:3.34.1-1ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.3.0-19.20-generic 5.3.1
  Uname: Linux 5.3.0-19-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu8.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sat Nov  2 16:58:25 2019
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-10-30 (3 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191017)
  ProcEnviron:
-  TERM=xterm-256color
-  PATH=(custom, no user)
-  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
-  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  TERM=xterm-256color
+  PATH=(custom, no user)
+  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
+  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: gnome-control-center
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Summary changed:

- Screen Lock Recovery has Unnecessary Delays
+ Unnecessary Delays Recovering from Screen Lock

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1851067

Title:
  Unnecessary Delays Recovering from Screen Lock

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1851067/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1851067] Re: Screen Lock Recovery has Unnecessary Delays

2019-11-02 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues #757
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues/757

** Also affects: gnome-control-center via
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues/757
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1851067

Title:
  Unnecessary Delays Recovering from Screen Lock

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1851067/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1851067] [NEW] Screen Lock Recovery has Unnecessary Delays

2019-11-02 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Public bug reported:

You can turn "Sreen Lock" off using gnome-control-center > Privacy >
Screen Lock : Off.

However, this is bad terminology because you screen will still go into
the exact same "Screen Lock" state upon an inactivity timeout, but the
only difference is that you don't have to enter your password to regain
access to the desktop.

While this accomplishes "not having to re-enter your password when
coming back from an inactivity timeout", I'm very dissatisfied with a
couple of behaviors.

1) After reaching an "inactivity timeout" that "locks" your screen, you
cannot unlock your screen by simply moving your mouse; you have to press
enter. I want to be able to accomplish this also by moving my mouse.

2) Even if you press the enter key, to come out of "lock mode", it takes
too long before you can interact with the applications you had open. I
expect this to be instantaneous! If I were coming out of a suspended
state, I could understand some delay. However, I'm not coming out of a
suspended state, I just coming out of a screen lock.

I do not like how this works. The whole purpose of this, as far as I'm
concerned, is to increase the lifespan of my display monitors. All I
want this to do, when a inactivity timeout occurs, is turn off all my
monitor, and the only delay I expect, when coming back to my desktop, is
what ever delay my monitor causes; the desktop should be fully available
even before my monitor starts to display the desktop again.

Having to press Enter and waiting 5 or 10 seconds before I can start
working is NOT something that anyone wants.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.10
Package: gnome-control-center 1:3.34.1-1ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.3.0-19.20-generic 5.3.1
Uname: Linux 5.3.0-19-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu8.1
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Sat Nov  2 16:58:25 2019
InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-10-30 (3 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191017)
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gnome-control-center
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug eoan

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1851067

Title:
  Screen Lock Recovery has Unnecessary Delays

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1851067/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1849930] Re: Additional L2TP VPN Breaks First VPN

2019-10-31 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
I confirm that the packages provided by Douglas Kosovic's PPA work successfully:
https://github.com/nm-l2tp/NetworkManager-l2tp/issues/112#issuecomment-548593238

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849930

Title:
  Additional L2TP VPN Breaks First VPN

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1849930/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1849930] Re: Additional L2TP VPN Breaks First VPN

2019-10-29 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
The actual programmer of this module says we need to upgrade-software-
version.

1) 
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues/746#note_634394
2) 
https://github.com/nm-l2tp/NetworkManager-l2tp/issues/112#issuecomment-547218557


He believes that this issue is fixed in NetworkManager-l2tp 1.2.12 and later.

Who at Ubuntu can accomplish getting this upgraded in 19.10 instead of
having to wait for 20.04?

Ideally, the upgrade should just be provided via the standard Ubuntu Update GUI 
or CLI:
sudo apt update ; sudo apt upgrade

At this point, upstream has already addressed this bug in a later
version, and it is now up to Ubuntu to upgrade the package in the
repositories.

What is the likelihood that this will be upgraded in Upgraded 19.10?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849930

Title:
  Additional L2TP VPN Breaks First VPN

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1849930/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1849930] Re: Additional L2TP VPN Breaks First VPN

2019-10-29 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
** Tags added: upgrade-software-version

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849930

Title:
  Additional L2TP VPN Breaks First VPN

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1849930/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1849930] Re: Additional L2TP VPN Breaks First VPN

2019-10-28 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
@seb128 : By default, GNOME provides the gnome-control-center for
accomplishing this in Ubuntu 19.10.

I didn't know I could still use the nm-connection-editor GUI in Ubuntu
19.10. I was simply using what GNOME provided. I'm a big fan of Unity 7,
so I'm glad to see that nm-connection-editor GUI  again. Thanks.

Here are the VPN related packages that I've added to the default Ubuntu 19.10 
installation:
sudo apt install network-manager-l2tp network-manager-l2tp-gnome strongswan

Of these packages, launchpad will not allow specifying these two packages:
network-manager-l2tp
network-manager-l2tp-gnome

I submitted a bug here, but couldn't associate it in the bug header above:
https://github.com/nm-l2tp/NetworkManager-l2tp/issues/112

** Bug watch added: github.com/nm-l2tp/NetworkManager-l2tp/issues #112
   https://github.com/nm-l2tp/NetworkManager-l2tp/issues/112

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849930

Title:
  Additional L2TP VPN Breaks First VPN

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1849930/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1849930] Re: Additional L2TP VPN Breaks First VPN

2019-10-28 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
** Also affects: l2tp-ipsec-vpn
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849930

Title:
  Additional L2TP VPN Breaks First VPN

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1849930/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1849930] Re: Additional VPN Breaks First VPN

2019-10-26 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
This doesn't fix the underlying bug, but I was able to find a workaround that 
repairs the corruption caused by the bug. See here:
https://askubuntu.com/a/1184070/256054

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849930

Title:
  Additional VPN Breaks First VPN

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1849930/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1849930] Re: Additional VPN Breaks First VPN

2019-10-26 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
** Description changed:

  When I add only one L2TP VPN profile to gnome-control-center's Network >
  VPN settings, it works fine.
  
  However, if I add a 2nd L2TP VPN, the 2nd L2TP VPN, not only doesn't
  work, but it corrupts the first L2TP VPN so that it too stops working.
  
  Furthermore, if I remove 2nd L2TP VPN profile (that corrupted the first
  L2TP VPN) this does NOT repair the corruption to the first L2TP VPN, it
  remains corrupted.
  
  Additionally, removing all VPN profiles and re-adding the first one
  back, doesn't repair the corruption. Rebooting and adding them back
  doesn't work either.
  
  The only thing that works, that I've found, is completely reinstalling
  Ubuntu 19.10. Please advise better workarounds than reinstalling.
+ 
+ In case it matters, these additional packages were also required for my
+ initial VPN setup:
+ 
+ sudo apt-get install -y network-manager-l2tp network-manager-l2tp-gnome
+ strongswan
  
  Here's what's in the syslog on a failed VPN Connection attempt:
  
  Oct 26 02:58:35 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]:   [1572076715.5632] 
audit: op="connection-activate" uuid="1942cf95-93b1-4e74-a44a-947a46bffb5a" 
name="L2TP VPN1" pid=3531 uid=1000 result="success"
  Oct 26 02:58:35 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]:   [1572076715.5702] 
vpn-connection[0x5642f421c750,1932cf95-91b1-4e85-a44a-498a56befb5a,"L2TP 
VPN1",0]: Started the VPN service, PID 7273
  Oct 26 02:58:35 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]:   [1572076715.5747] 
vpn-connection[0x5642f421c750,1932cf95-91b1-4e85-a44a-498a56befb5a,"L2TP 
VPN1",0]: Saw the service appear; activating connection
  Oct 26 02:58:35 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]:   [1572076715.6566] 
vpn-connection[0x5642f421c750,1932cf95-91b1-4e85-a44a-498a56befb5a,"L2TP 
VPN1",0]: VPN connection: (ConnectInteractive) reply received
  Oct 26 02:58:35 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: Stopping strongSwan IPsec 
failed: starter is not running
  Oct 26 02:58:37 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: Starting strongSwan 5.7.2 
IPsec [starter]...
  Oct 26 02:58:37 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: Loading config setup
  Oct 26 02:58:37 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: Loading conn 
'1942cf95-93b1-4e74-a44a-947a46bffb5a'
  Oct 26 02:58:37 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: found netkey IPsec stack
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: Stopping strongSwan 
IPsec...
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: initiating Main Mode 
IKE_SA 1942cf95-93b1-4e74-a44a-947a46bffb5a[1] to 49.230.24.121
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: generating ID_PROT request 
0 [ SA V V V V V ]
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: sending packet: from 
192.168.1.2[500] to 49.230.24.121[500] (236 bytes)
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: received packet: from 
49.230.24.121[500] to 192.168.1.2[500] (156 bytes)
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: parsed ID_PROT response 0 
[ SA V V V V ]
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: received XAuth vendor ID
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: received DPD vendor ID
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: received FRAGMENTATION 
vendor ID
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: received NAT-T (RFC 3947) 
vendor ID
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: selected proposal: 
IKE:3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: generating ID_PROT request 
0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ]
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: sending packet: from 
192.168.1.2[500] to 49.230.24.121[500] (244 bytes)
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: received packet: from 
49.230.24.121[500] to 192.168.1.2[500] (244 bytes)
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: parsed ID_PROT response 0 
[ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ]
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: local host is behind NAT, 
sending keep alives
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: generating ID_PROT request 
0 [ ID HASH ]
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: sending packet: from 
192.168.1.2[4500] to 49.230.24.121[4500] (68 bytes)
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: received packet: from 
49.230.24.121[500] to 192.168.1.2[500] (68 bytes)
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: invalid HASH_V1 payload 
length, decryption failed?
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: could not decrypt payloads
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: message parsing failed
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: ignore malformed 
INFORMATIONAL request
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 
with message ID 3016741680 processing failed
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: sending retransmit 1 of 
request message ID 0, seq 3
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: sending packet: from 

[Bug 1849930] Re: Additional VPN Breaks First VPN

2019-10-26 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
How is it possible that adding an additional VPN profile can corrupted
an "already added and working" vpn? Which packages would be responsible
for that type of corruption?

Most importantly, short of reinstalling Ubuntu 19.10 what would be a
workaround that may remove this corruption?

For example, many times in the past, when I've had applications get
corrupted, I could usually delete some .hiddenFolder or configuration
file, and it would repair the corruption after rebooting.

Do any of you know which files would have to be deleted to get my VPN
situation back to "fresh install quality" (short of actually
reinstalling)?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849930

Title:
  Additional VPN Breaks First VPN

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1849930/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1849930] Re: Additional VPN Breaks First VPN

2019-10-26 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
** Also affects: strongswan
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849930

Title:
  Additional VPN Breaks First VPN

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1849930/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1849930] Re: Additional VPN Breaks First VPN

2019-10-26 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues #746
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues/746

** Also affects: gnome-control-center via
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues/746
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849930

Title:
  Additional VPN Breaks First VPN

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1849930/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1849930] Re: Additional VPN Breaks First VPN

2019-10-26 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
I've attached the syslog for easier viewing.

** Attachment added: "syslog.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/network-manager/+bug/1849930/+attachment/5300267/+files/syslog.txt

** Description changed:

  When I add only one L2TP VPN profile to gnome-control-center's Network >
- VPN setting, it works fine.
+ VPN settings, it works fine.
  
  However, if I add a 2nd L2TP VPN, the 2nd L2TP VPN, not only doesn't
  work, but it corrupts the first L2TP VPN so that it too stops working.
  
  Furthermore, if I remove 2nd L2TP VPN profile (that corrupted the first
  L2TP VPN) this does NOT repair the corruption to the first L2TP VPN, it
  remains corrupted.
  
  Additionally, removing all VPN profiles and re-adding the first one
  back, doesn't repair the corruption. Rebooting and adding them back
  doesn't work either.
  
  The only thing that works, that I've found, is completely reinstalling
  Ubuntu 19.10. Please advise better workarounds than reinstalling.
  
  Here's what's in the syslog on a failed VPN Connection attempt:
  
  Oct 26 02:58:35 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]:   [1572076715.5632] 
audit: op="connection-activate" uuid="1942cf95-93b1-4e74-a44a-947a46bffb5a" 
name="L2TP VPN1" pid=3531 uid=1000 result="success"
  Oct 26 02:58:35 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]:   [1572076715.5702] 
vpn-connection[0x5642f421c750,1932cf95-91b1-4e85-a44a-498a56befb5a,"L2TP 
VPN1",0]: Started the VPN service, PID 7273
  Oct 26 02:58:35 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]:   [1572076715.5747] 
vpn-connection[0x5642f421c750,1932cf95-91b1-4e85-a44a-498a56befb5a,"L2TP 
VPN1",0]: Saw the service appear; activating connection
  Oct 26 02:58:35 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]:   [1572076715.6566] 
vpn-connection[0x5642f421c750,1932cf95-91b1-4e85-a44a-498a56befb5a,"L2TP 
VPN1",0]: VPN connection: (ConnectInteractive) reply received
  Oct 26 02:58:35 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: Stopping strongSwan IPsec 
failed: starter is not running
  Oct 26 02:58:37 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: Starting strongSwan 5.7.2 
IPsec [starter]...
  Oct 26 02:58:37 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: Loading config setup
  Oct 26 02:58:37 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: Loading conn 
'1942cf95-93b1-4e74-a44a-947a46bffb5a'
  Oct 26 02:58:37 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: found netkey IPsec stack
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: Stopping strongSwan 
IPsec...
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: initiating Main Mode 
IKE_SA 1942cf95-93b1-4e74-a44a-947a46bffb5a[1] to 49.230.24.121
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: generating ID_PROT request 
0 [ SA V V V V V ]
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: sending packet: from 
192.168.1.2[500] to 49.230.24.121[500] (236 bytes)
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: received packet: from 
49.230.24.121[500] to 192.168.1.2[500] (156 bytes)
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: parsed ID_PROT response 0 
[ SA V V V V ]
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: received XAuth vendor ID
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: received DPD vendor ID
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: received FRAGMENTATION 
vendor ID
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: received NAT-T (RFC 3947) 
vendor ID
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: selected proposal: 
IKE:3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: generating ID_PROT request 
0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ]
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: sending packet: from 
192.168.1.2[500] to 49.230.24.121[500] (244 bytes)
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: received packet: from 
49.230.24.121[500] to 192.168.1.2[500] (244 bytes)
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: parsed ID_PROT response 0 
[ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ]
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: local host is behind NAT, 
sending keep alives
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: generating ID_PROT request 
0 [ ID HASH ]
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: sending packet: from 
192.168.1.2[4500] to 49.230.24.121[4500] (68 bytes)
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: received packet: from 
49.230.24.121[500] to 192.168.1.2[500] (68 bytes)
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: invalid HASH_V1 payload 
length, decryption failed?
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: could not decrypt payloads
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: message parsing failed
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: ignore malformed 
INFORMATIONAL request
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 
with message ID 3016741680 processing failed
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: sending retransmit 1 of 
request message ID 0, seq 3
  Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: sending 

[Bug 1849930] [NEW] Additional VPN Breaks First VPN

2019-10-26 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Public bug reported:

When I add only one L2TP VPN profile to gnome-control-center's Network >
VPN settings, it works fine.

However, if I add a 2nd L2TP VPN, the 2nd L2TP VPN, not only doesn't
work, but it corrupts the first L2TP VPN so that it too stops working.

Furthermore, if I remove 2nd L2TP VPN profile (that corrupted the first
L2TP VPN) this does NOT repair the corruption to the first L2TP VPN, it
remains corrupted.

Additionally, removing all VPN profiles and re-adding the first one
back, doesn't repair the corruption. Rebooting and adding them back
doesn't work either.

The only thing that works, that I've found, is completely reinstalling
Ubuntu 19.10. Please advise better workarounds than reinstalling.

Here's what's in the syslog on a failed VPN Connection attempt:

Oct 26 02:58:35 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]:   [1572076715.5632] 
audit: op="connection-activate" uuid="1942cf95-93b1-4e74-a44a-947a46bffb5a" 
name="L2TP VPN1" pid=3531 uid=1000 result="success"
Oct 26 02:58:35 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]:   [1572076715.5702] 
vpn-connection[0x5642f421c750,1932cf95-91b1-4e85-a44a-498a56befb5a,"L2TP 
VPN1",0]: Started the VPN service, PID 7273
Oct 26 02:58:35 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]:   [1572076715.5747] 
vpn-connection[0x5642f421c750,1932cf95-91b1-4e85-a44a-498a56befb5a,"L2TP 
VPN1",0]: Saw the service appear; activating connection
Oct 26 02:58:35 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]:   [1572076715.6566] 
vpn-connection[0x5642f421c750,1932cf95-91b1-4e85-a44a-498a56befb5a,"L2TP 
VPN1",0]: VPN connection: (ConnectInteractive) reply received
Oct 26 02:58:35 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: Stopping strongSwan IPsec 
failed: starter is not running
Oct 26 02:58:37 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: Starting strongSwan 5.7.2 
IPsec [starter]...
Oct 26 02:58:37 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: Loading config setup
Oct 26 02:58:37 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: Loading conn 
'1942cf95-93b1-4e74-a44a-947a46bffb5a'
Oct 26 02:58:37 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: found netkey IPsec stack
Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: Stopping strongSwan IPsec...
Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: initiating Main Mode IKE_SA 
1942cf95-93b1-4e74-a44a-947a46bffb5a[1] to 49.230.24.121
Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: generating ID_PROT request 0 
[ SA V V V V V ]
Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: sending packet: from 
192.168.1.2[500] to 49.230.24.121[500] (236 bytes)
Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: received packet: from 
49.230.24.121[500] to 192.168.1.2[500] (156 bytes)
Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ 
SA V V V V ]
Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: received XAuth vendor ID
Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: received DPD vendor ID
Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: received FRAGMENTATION 
vendor ID
Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: received NAT-T (RFC 3947) 
vendor ID
Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: selected proposal: 
IKE:3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: generating ID_PROT request 0 
[ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ]
Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: sending packet: from 
192.168.1.2[500] to 49.230.24.121[500] (244 bytes)
Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: received packet: from 
49.230.24.121[500] to 192.168.1.2[500] (244 bytes)
Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ 
KE No NAT-D NAT-D ]
Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: local host is behind NAT, 
sending keep alives
Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: generating ID_PROT request 0 
[ ID HASH ]
Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: sending packet: from 
192.168.1.2[4500] to 49.230.24.121[4500] (68 bytes)
Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: received packet: from 
49.230.24.121[500] to 192.168.1.2[500] (68 bytes)
Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: invalid HASH_V1 payload 
length, decryption failed?
Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: could not decrypt payloads
Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: message parsing failed
Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: ignore malformed 
INFORMATIONAL request
Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 
with message ID 3016741680 processing failed
Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: sending retransmit 1 of 
request message ID 0, seq 3
Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: sending packet: from 
192.168.1.2[4500] to 49.230.24.121[4500] (68 bytes)
Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: received packet: from 
49.230.24.121[500] to 192.168.1.2[500] (68 bytes)
Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 NetworkManager[1241]: invalid HASH_V1 payload 
length, decryption failed?
Oct 26 02:58:48 workstation5 

[Bug 1849880] Re: Mouse-Scrolling Changes Drop-Down Selections During Scroll Navigation

2019-10-25 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
** Description changed:

  The Gnome Sound Settings tab contains enough options to where you have
  to scroll down to see them all.
  
  Since the scrollbar is so narrow, I use my mouse-scroll-wheel to achieve
  this scroll navigation.
  
  However, while scrolling with the intention of "navigation", if the
- mouse-cursor passes over the Output Device drop-down-menu, it
- inadvertently changes the drop-down's selection.
+ mouse-cursor passes over the Output Device drop-down-menu, or any of the
+ slider controls, it inadvertently changes those options.
  
  The ability to change drop-down-menu selections, using the mouse-scroll-
- wheel is convenient in some cases, but it become problematic when the
+ wheel is convenient in some cases, but it becomes problematic when the
  user is simply intending to do scroll navigation.
  
  I can see a non-advance user accidentally changing sound settings that
  they had no intention of changing in this design. Plus, even if they do
  notice the inadvertent changes, they might not know "what to change it
  back to".
  
  It may be better to disable scroll driven option selection changes in
  these menus.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.10
  Package: gnome-control-center 1:3.34.1-1ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.3.0-19.20-generic 5.3.1
  Uname: Linux 5.3.0-19-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu8
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Fri Oct 25 12:29:32 2019
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-10-19 (6 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191017)
  ProcEnviron:
-  TERM=xterm-256color
-  PATH=(custom, no user)
-  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  TERM=xterm-256color
+  PATH=(custom, no user)
+  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: gnome-control-center
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849880

Title:
  Mouse-Scrolling Changes Drop-Down Selections During Scroll Navigation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1849880/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1849880] Re: Mouse-Scrolling Changes Drop-Down Selections During Scroll Navigation

2019-10-25 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Video Showcasing the issue:
https://youtu.be/Z6jNCCxC4hA

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849880

Title:
  Mouse-Scrolling Changes Drop-Down Selections During Scroll Navigation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1849880/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1849880] Re: Mouse-Scrolling Changes Drop-Down Selections During Scroll Navigation

2019-10-25 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Upstream Bug Report:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues/745

** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues #745
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues/745

** Also affects: gnome-control-center via
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues/745
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849880

Title:
  Mouse-Scrolling Changes Drop-Down Selections During Scroll Navigation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1849880/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1849880] Re: Mouse-Scrolling Changes Drop-Down Selections During Scroll Navigation

2019-10-25 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
I've attached a screenshot. Each drop-down-menu you see can received
unintended selection changes during mouse-scroll navigation.

** Attachment added: "sound.png"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1849880/+attachment/5300169/+files/sound.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849880

Title:
  Mouse-Scrolling Changes Drop-Down Selections During Scroll Navigation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1849880/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1849880] [NEW] Mouse-Scrolling Changes Drop-Down Selections During Scroll Navigation

2019-10-25 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Public bug reported:

The Gnome Sound Settings tab contains enough options to where you have
to scroll down to see them all.

Since the scrollbar is so narrow, I use my mouse-scroll-wheel to achieve
this scroll navigation.

However, while scrolling with the intention of "navigation", if the
mouse-cursor passes over the Output Device drop-down-menu, it
inadvertently changes the drop-down's selection.

The ability to change drop-down-menu selections, using the mouse-scroll-
wheel is convenient in some cases, but it become problematic when the
user is simply intending to do scroll navigation.

I can see a non-advance user accidentally changing sound settings that
they had no intention of changing in this design. Plus, even if they do
notice the inadvertent changes, they might not know "what to change it
back to".

It may be better to disable scroll driven option selection changes in
these menus.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.10
Package: gnome-control-center 1:3.34.1-1ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.3.0-19.20-generic 5.3.1
Uname: Linux 5.3.0-19-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu8
Architecture: amd64
Date: Fri Oct 25 12:29:32 2019
InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-10-19 (6 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191017)
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gnome-control-center
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug eoan

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849880

Title:
  Mouse-Scrolling Changes Drop-Down Selections During Scroll Navigation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1849880/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1849391] [NEW] Can't Persist Sound Output Selection Between Reboots

2019-10-22 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1847570 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847570

Public bug reported:

Each time I reboot Ubuntu 19.10, I have to open gnome-control-center and
set the sound output device back to my Laptop's Built-in speakers.
Otherwise, it will typically default to HDMI devices that don't even
appear to have speakers.

Which file are these settings saved to? I'm thinking that maybe that
file is corrupted and that if I delete that file maybe Ubuntu 19.10 will
start remembering my sound output preferences. I'm also open to other
suggestions.

Also submitted at AskUbuntu:
https://askubuntu.com/questions/1183052/

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.10
Package: gnome-control-center 1:3.34.1-1ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.3.0-19.20-generic 5.3.1
Uname: Linux 5.3.0-19-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu8
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Tue Oct 22 16:39:58 2019
InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-10-19 (3 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191017)
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gnome-control-center
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug eoan

** Description changed:

  Each time I reboot Ubuntu 19.10, I have to open gnome-control-center and
  set the sound output device back to my Laptop's Built-in speakers.
  Otherwise, it will typically default to HDMI devices that don't even
  appear to have speakers.
  
- Which file are these settings saved to? I'm think that maybe that file
- is corrupted and that if I delete that file maybe Ubuntu 19.10 will
+ Which file are these settings saved to? I'm thinking that maybe that
+ file is corrupted and that if I delete that file maybe Ubuntu 19.10 will
  start remembering my sound output preferences. I'm also open to other
  suggestions.
  
  Also submitted at AskUbuntu:
  https://askubuntu.com/questions/1183052/
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.10
  Package: gnome-control-center 1:3.34.1-1ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.3.0-19.20-generic 5.3.1
  Uname: Linux 5.3.0-19-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu8
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Oct 22 16:39:58 2019
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-10-19 (3 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191017)
  ProcEnviron:
-  TERM=xterm-256color
-  PATH=(custom, no user)
-  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
-  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  TERM=xterm-256color
+  PATH=(custom, no user)
+  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
+  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: gnome-control-center
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849391

Title:
  Can't Persist Sound Output Selection Between Reboots

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1849391/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1846499] Re: e2scrub_all.service is a disabled or a static unit not running, not starting it.

2019-10-03 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
I'm going to start tagging by number instead of codenames. Code-names
are stupid.

** Tags removed: eel eely
** Tags added: 19.10 eoan

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846499

Title:
  e2scrub_all.service is a disabled or a static unit not running, not
  starting it.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1846499/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1846499] [NEW] e2scrub_all.service is a disabled or a static unit not running, not starting it.

2019-10-03 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Public bug reported:

Upon attempting to upgrade form Ubuntu 19.04 to Ubuntu 19.10. The
installation got stuck with this being the last command line output:

"e2scrub_all.service is a disabled or a static unit not running, not
starting it."

** Affects: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: eel eely

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846499

Title:
  e2scrub_all.service is a disabled or a static unit not running, not
  starting it.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1846499/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 413357] Re: file-roller "An error occurred while adding files to the archive."

2019-09-05 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
In Ubuntu 19.04, using Nemo, I'm getting this error for most of the
formats that it list I can compress to.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413357

Title:
  file-roller "An error occurred while adding files to the archive."

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/file-roller/+bug/413357/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1825447] Re: Indicators Scroll events are not emitted in 19.04

2019-06-26 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Thank you for fixing this. The app-level volume control is working great
now by scrolling on top of the RadioTray icon.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell-extension-appindicator
in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825447

Title:
  Indicators Scroll events are not emitted in 19.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-appindicator/+bug/1825447/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1825447] Re: Indicators Scroll events are not emitted in 19.04

2019-05-07 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
https://bugs.launchpad.net/radiotray/+bug/1828069

Screenshot here:
https://github.com/ebruck/radiotray-ng/issues/112

** Bug watch added: github.com/ebruck/radiotray-ng/issues #112
   https://github.com/ebruck/radiotray-ng/issues/112

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell-extension-appindicator
in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825447

Title:
  Indicators Scroll events are not emitted in 19.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-appindicator/+bug/1825447/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1768078] Re: gnome-control-center network panel missing DNS search

2019-04-23 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Also see:

- https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues/485

- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-
center/+bug/1825959

** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues #485
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues/485

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768078

Title:
  gnome-control-center network panel missing DNS search

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1768078/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1825971] [NEW] Scroll to Switch Between Windows of a Single Application

2019-04-23 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Public bug reported:

First of All, you guys have done a fine job at getting the dock in GNOME
3 to be like the wonderful dock from Unity 7.

With that said, there is one missing feature that I'm having a hard time
doing without.

In the Unity7 dock, you could hover over an application's launcher, and
then scroll your mouse-wheel to switch between every window instance of
that particular application. You cannot do this in the dock provide in
Ubuntu 19.04.

I'm aware that I can click the launcher to see a list of open window
instances, and that's fine (leave that there too), however please at
that scroll functionally (like Ubuntu 16.04 had); its a killer feature.

Please, pretty please, add that same feature back into this new dock.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.04
Package: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock 64ubuntu7
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.0.0-13.14-generic 5.0.6
Uname: Linux 5.0.0-13-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu27
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Tue Apr 23 05:44:22 2019
InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-01-07 (105 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.5 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20180731)
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to disco on 2019-04-21 (2 days ago)

** Affects: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug disco

** Description changed:

  First of All, you guys have done a fine job at getting the dock in GNOME
  3 to be like the wonderful dock from Unity 7.
  
  With that said, there is one missing feature that I'm having a hard time
  doing without.
  
  In the Unity7 dock, you could hover over an application's launcher, and
  then scroll your mouse-wheel to switch between every window instance of
  that particular application. You cannot do this in the dock provide in
  Ubuntu 19.04.
+ 
+ I'm aware that I can click the launcher to see a list of open window
+ instances, and that's fine (leave that there too), however please at
+ that scroll functionally (like Ubuntu 16.04 had); its a killer feature.
  
  Please, pretty please, add that same feature back into this new dock.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.04
  Package: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock 64ubuntu7
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.0.0-13.14-generic 5.0.6
  Uname: Linux 5.0.0-13-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu27
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Apr 23 05:44:22 2019
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-01-07 (105 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.5 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20180731)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
-  TERM=xterm-256color
-  PATH=(custom, no user)
-  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
-  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  TERM=xterm-256color
+  PATH=(custom, no user)
+  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
+  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to disco on 2019-04-21 (2 days ago)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock
in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825971

Title:
  Scroll to Switch Between Windows of a Single Application

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1825971/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1825965] Re: Missing "Additional DNS Servers"

2019-04-23 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Actually, I think this does work, it is just labeled differently.

As long as it allows you to have both the "automatically acquired DNS
server" (from DHCP) and at the same time have "Additional DNS Servers",
I think we're good here.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825965

Title:
  Missing "Additional DNS Servers"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1825965/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1825965] [NEW] Missing "Additional DNS Servers"

2019-04-23 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Public bug reported:

Ubuntu 19.04 uses the gnome-control-panel's network manager, and it is
missing the feature for adding "Additional DNS Servers".

Here's that feature as it looked in Ubuntu 16.04:
https://i.imgur.com/j3nF1nu.png

Notice the "Additional DNS Servers" feature above. Here's that same tab as 
shown in Ubuntu 19.04 via gnome-control-panel:
https://i.imgur.com/XwRPnRS.png

When you auto-connect to a LAN, you will automatically receive a DNS
server from dhcp. While that DNS server may be really good at resolving
local computers, it may not be able to resolve everything. So, it is
nice to both "be able to keep that dns server issued by dhcp" and also
"add additional DNS servers" for resolving non-local domains that the
issued dns server may not be able to resolve.

Essentially, it tells the network manager, if you can't resolve this
domain from this local DNS server, try checking with these DNS servers
too.

This is a regression of functionality (compared to Ubuntu 16.04). Please
add it back.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.04
Package: gnome-control-center 1:3.32.1-1ubuntu4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.0.0-13.14-generic 5.0.6
Uname: Linux 5.0.0-13-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu27
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Tue Apr 23 05:08:01 2019
InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-01-07 (105 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.5 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20180731)
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gnome-control-center
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to disco on 2019-04-21 (2 days ago)

** Affects: gnome-control-center
 Importance: Unknown
 Status: Unknown

** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Confirmed


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug disco

** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues #486
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues/486

** Also affects: gnome-control-center via
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues/486
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825965

Title:
  Missing "Additional DNS Servers"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1825965/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1825959] Re: Missing "Additional Search Domain" Feature

2019-04-23 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues #485
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues/485

** Also affects: gnome-control-center via
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues/485
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825959

Title:
  Missing "Additional Search Domain" Feature

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1825959/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1825959] [NEW] Missing "Additional Search Domain" Feature

2019-04-23 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Public bug reported:

Ubuntu 19.04 uses the gnome-control-panel's network manager, and it is
missing the feature of adding "Additional Search Domains".

Here's that feature as it looked in Ubuntu 16.04:
https://i.imgur.com/ZVMknmP.png

Here's that same tab as shown in Ubuntu 19.04 via gnome-control-panel:
https://i.imgur.com/XwRPnRS.png

And, very importantly, it is also missing for VPN settings:
https://i.imgur.com/5x769jY.png

This feature helps you ping a computer by name without having to type in
the full domain address of that computer. If you are connected to just
one network, it might not be necessary. But when you are connected to
multiple networks it is very useful because you can put in all the
domains you are connected to and then be able to just ping a computer's
name without having to type its whole domain too.

Essentially, it tells the network manager, if you do not find a computer
with this name on the first domain you look for it at, then also look
for that computer name on these other domains.

This is a regression of functionality (compared to Ubuntu 16.04). Please
add it back.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.04
Package: gnome-control-center 1:3.32.1-1ubuntu4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.0.0-13.14-generic 5.0.6
Uname: Linux 5.0.0-13-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu27
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Tue Apr 23 04:07:24 2019
InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-01-07 (105 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.5 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20180731)
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gnome-control-center
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to disco on 2019-04-21 (2 days ago)

** Affects: gnome-control-center
 Importance: Unknown
 Status: Unknown

** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug disco

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825959

Title:
  Missing "Additional Search Domain" Feature

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1825959/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1825708] Re: Please Include Package Names

2019-04-21 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/issues #644
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/issues/644

** Also affects: gnome-software via
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/issues/644
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825708

Title:
  Please Include Package Names

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1825708/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1568056] Re: Official Package-Names Not Shown in Gnome-Software

2019-04-21 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1825708 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825708

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1825708
   Please Include Package Names

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568056

Title:
  Official Package-Names Not Shown in Gnome-Software

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1568056/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1581760] Re: name of package

2019-04-21 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1825708 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825708

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1568056
   Official Package-Names Not Shown in Gnome-Software
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1825708
   Please Include Package Names

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1581760

Title:
  name of package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1581760/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1687246] Re: GNOME Shell should support fractional (non-integer) Hi-DPI scaling

2019-04-21 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
So now we have another Ubuntu release: 19.04.

Xorg is still the default desktop and you cannot do fractional scaling. No 
progress to be seen!
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome/+bug/1723411

** Tags added: disco

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1687246

Title:
  GNOME Shell should support fractional (non-integer) Hi-DPI scaling

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/1687246/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1825708] [NEW] Please Include Package Names

2019-04-21 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Public bug reported:

Gnome-Software does not include a software package's name in the details
section of each software it catalogs and I want this to be added for the
following reasons.

1) When submitting bug reports and feature requests, it is necessary to
know the package name. When I use gnome-software to install a piece of
software, I expect to be able to go back to gnome-software to discover
software's package name. Since it doesn't include this pertinent detail,
I'm having to use a number of command to discover it.

2) Although I use gnome-software to discover available software, I
always like to collect that software's package name, so I can add to my
"sudo apt install" list, so that when I set up my computer from scratch,
I can use one command to reinstall all the software packages I've
installed previously.

These are my two reason, but I'm sure others have more. The bottom line
is, the package name is a very pertinent piece of information that
gnome-software should include in the details section of each software it
catalogs. Look at what is in the details section right now. Hardly any
of those details are anything I'll ever be interested in, but the
package name is VERY pertinent to me.

Please add this.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.04
Package: gnome-software 3.30.6-2ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.0.0-13.14-generic 5.0.6
Uname: Linux 5.0.0-13-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu27
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Sun Apr 21 05:03:55 2019
InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-01-07 (103 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.5 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20180731)
InstalledPlugins:
 gnome-software-plugin-flatpak N/A
 gnome-software-plugin-snap3.30.6-2ubuntu3
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gnome-software
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to disco on 2019-04-21 (0 days ago)

** Affects: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug disco

** Description changed:

  Gnome-Software does not include a software package's name in the details
- section of each software it catalogs and I want this added for the
+ section of each software it catalogs and I want this to be added for the
  following reasons.
  
  1) When submitting bug reports and feature requests, it is necessary to
- know the package name. I use gnome-software to install a piece of
+ know the package name. When I use gnome-software to install a piece of
  software, I expect to be able to go back to gnome-software to discover
- the package name of the software it installed. Since it doesn't include
- this pertinent detail, I'm having to use a number of command to discover
- it.
+ software's package name. Since it doesn't include this pertinent detail,
+ I'm having to use a number of command to discover it.
  
  2) Although I use gnome-software to discover available software, I
- always like to add its package name to my "sudo apt install" list, so
- that when I set up my computer from scratch, I can use one command to
- reinstall all the software packages I had previously.
+ always like to collect that software's package name, so I can add to my
+ "sudo apt install" list, so that when I set up my computer from scratch,
+ I can use one command to reinstall all the software packages I've
+ installed previously.
  
  These are my two reason, but I'm sure others have more. The bottom line
  is, the package name is a very pertinent piece of information that
  gnome-software should include in the details section of each software it
  catalogs. Look at what is in the details section right now. Hardly any
  of those details are anything I'll ever be interested in, but the
  package name is VERY pertinent to me.
  
  Please add this.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.04
  Package: gnome-software 3.30.6-2ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.0.0-13.14-generic 5.0.6
  Uname: Linux 5.0.0-13-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu27
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sun Apr 21 05:03:55 2019
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-01-07 (103 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.5 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20180731)
  InstalledPlugins:
-  gnome-software-plugin-flatpak N/A
-  gnome-software-plugin-snap3.30.6-2ubuntu3
+  gnome-software-plugin-flatpak N/A
+  gnome-software-plugin-snap3.30.6-2ubuntu3
  ProcEnviron:
-  TERM=xterm-256color
-  PATH=(custom, no user)
-  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
-  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  TERM=xterm-256color
+  PATH=(custom, no user)
+  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
+  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: gnome-software
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to disco on 2019-04-21 (0 days ago)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1292041] Re: Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen

2019-03-10 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Please open this bug back up. It is not fixed!

All monitors go off initially, but as soon as the lock-screen happens,
my laptop's built-in monitor comes back on and stays on forever. This is
an expensive 4K monitor and this bug is burning it up.

The only work-around I've found is to turn off screen-lock, which is not
acceptable from a security perspective.

Please help!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292041

Title:
  Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1292041/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1292041] Re: Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen

2019-03-10 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Maybe lock screen should always happen before the screen turns off?

Or, anytime lock screen happens it should also turn off the monitors?

Is there any work around that I can apply?

My cron job trick no longer works:
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/505488/ubuntu-16-04-5-ruining-monitors-by-never-turning-them-off

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292041

Title:
  Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1292041/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1687246] Re: GNOME Shell should support fractional (non-integer) Hi-DPI scaling

2019-03-03 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
I just install Ubuntu 18.04 in a virtual machine and updated it. I don't see a 
fix, I see the same disappointment:
https://i.imgur.com/tTanPlv.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1687246

Title:
  GNOME Shell should support fractional (non-integer) Hi-DPI scaling

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/1687246/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1687246] Re: GNOME Shell should support fractional (non-integer) Hi-DPI scaling

2019-03-03 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Is this really fixed in Ubuntu 18.04? I don't want to waste my time
upgrading again unless fractional scaling truly supported.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1687246

Title:
  GNOME Shell should support fractional (non-integer) Hi-DPI scaling

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/1687246/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1687246] Re: GNOME Shell should support fractional (non-integer) Hi-DPI scaling

2018-11-28 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
I agree with sergeiS 225%. Not 200%! Long live Ubuntu 16.04.5 and Unity
7!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1687246

Title:
  GNOME Shell should support fractional (non-integer) Hi-DPI scaling

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/1687246/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1568056] Re: Official Package-Names Not Shown in Gnome-Software

2018-10-06 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
I do recall posting upstream at some point, but those damn idiots at
GNOME rarely grant any suggestion. I'm done with GNOME!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568056

Title:
  Official Package-Names Not Shown in Gnome-Software

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1568056/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1687246] Re: GNOME Shell should support fractional (non-integer) Hi-DPI scaling

2018-08-06 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
** Tags removed: xenial

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1687246

Title:
  GNOME Shell should support fractional (non-integer) Hi-DPI scaling

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/1687246/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1687246] Re: GNOME Shell should support fractional (non-integer) Hi-DPI scaling

2018-08-06 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
** Tags added: bionic xenial

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1687246

Title:
  GNOME Shell should support fractional (non-integer) Hi-DPI scaling

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/1687246/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1687246] Re: GNOME Shell should support fractional (non-integer) Hi-DPI scaling

2018-07-29 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
I noticed that 18.04.1 has been released. Has there been any progress
for providing fractional scaling (via the default GUI) like was offered
in Ubuntu 16.04?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1687246

Title:
  GNOME Shell should support fractional (non-integer) Hi-DPI scaling

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/1687246/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1292041] Re: Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen

2018-05-26 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
** Tags added: xenial

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292041

Title:
  Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1292041/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1292041] Re: Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen

2018-05-26 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
sudo crontab -e

0,10,20,30,40,50 * * * * /usr/bin/xset dpms force off

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292041

Title:
  Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1292041/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1292041] Re: Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen

2018-05-26 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
This bug needs to be reopened.

I'm using a freshly installed and updated Ubuntu 16.04.4, with a laptop
and an external monitor.

When the Brightness & Lock timeout occurs, my monitors do go off at
first, but my laptop's built-in monitor wakes backup up permanently to
the ubuntu login screen.

I'm worried that it is going to eventually ruin my monitor. Due to this bug, 
I'm going to have to create a cron job to run this command routinely:
xset dpms forceoff

Please mark this bug as NOT FIXED!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292041

Title:
  Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1292041/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1687246] Re: GNOME Shell should support fractional (non-integer) Hi-DPI scaling

2018-05-07 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Doesn't that work-around only apply to Wayland, while the default GNOME3
desktop in Ubuntu 18.04 is Xorg?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1687246

Title:
  GNOME Shell should support fractional (non-integer) Hi-DPI scaling

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/1687246/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1687246] Re: GNOME Shell should support fractional (non-integer) Hi-DPI scaling

2018-05-03 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
You should not only be able to have different fractal scaling for each
monitor, but you should also be able to have fractal scaling for each
separate window you launch.

Back around 2008, Mandriva released a desktop called Metisse that allowed 
(seemingly infinite) fractional scaling for each window! (much less is per 
monitor granularity) Here's a video of that in action:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dxsUKX6xXyE=40s

To accomplish this, using Metisse, you'd simply hold down shift (or was
it ctrl) while resizing the window.

You could do almost anything to that window, and all your mouse actions
on that window would still work accurately no matter how you scaled it.
You could even do silly impractical things like turn the window up-side-
down, pivot it, push the left side of the window deeper into the
background than the right side, etc. And, all your interactions with
that window would still work accurately. It was amazing (and done on
Linux first -- 10 years ago).

When will the world catch up with what Metisse accomplished in 2008? It
was way ahead of its time.

Here's an academic paper on Metisse:
https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00533597/document

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1687246

Title:
  GNOME Shell should support fractional (non-integer) Hi-DPI scaling

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/1687246/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1568056] Re: Official Package-Names Not Shown in Gnome-Software

2018-05-02 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
** Tags added: bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568056

Title:
  Official Package-Names Not Shown in Gnome-Software

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1568056/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1687246] Re: GNOME Shell should support fractional (non-integer) Hi-DPI scaling

2018-04-25 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
This is my number one complaint for 18.04 and GNOME3. I'll be using
16.04.4 until 2021, or until it can compete with the perfection that is
the Unity desktop (which supports fractal scaling).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1687246

Title:
  GNOME Shell should support fractional (non-integer) Hi-DPI scaling

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/1687246/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 465689] Re: Ubuntu Clock Won't Show Year

2018-04-06 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
I was ultimately able to achieve my exactly desired format using a GNOME
extension made by Daniel Khodabakhsh. Thank you Daniel!

I found that here:
https://github.com/Daniel-Khodabakhsh/datetime-format

Screenshot:
http://neartalk.com/ss/2018-04-06_003_1919x1079.png

Format:
%A | %m-%d-%G | %I:%M %p

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/465689

Title:
  Ubuntu Clock Won't Show Year

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-panel/+bug/465689/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 465689] Re: Ubuntu Clock Won't Show Year

2018-04-06 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Will I ever be able to convenience people that "show year" is actually a
useful feature when taking screenshots over time?

Now, that I've upgraded to Ubuntu 18.04 and GNOME 3.28, it looks like
I'll have to start this 2009 battle all over again. It will not allow me
to format the clock the way I want it to display.

In Unity, I could at least achieved my desired clock format with a
command:

gsettings set com.canonical.indicator.datetime time-format "'custom'" ;
gsettings set com.canonical.indicator.datetime custom-time-format "'%A |
%m-%d-%Y | %l:%M%p'"

In GNOME 3.28 on Ubuntu 18.04, I've yet to figure out a way to achieved
my desired format. The GUI doesn't offer "show year" and I've yet to
discover a command (like the one above) that achieves the exact custom
format I desire.

** Tags added: bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/465689

Title:
  Ubuntu Clock Won't Show Year

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-panel/+bug/465689/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1210788] Re: gnome-system-monitor won't launch - Timeout was reached

2018-01-25 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
No problem. Thanks your quick attention to the issue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-system-monitor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210788

Title:
  gnome-system-monitor won't launch - Timeout was reached

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-monitor/+bug/1210788/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1723403] [NEW] Gedit doesn't Gain Focus Upon Opening a File in Nautilus

2017-10-13 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Public bug reported:

If you already have one tab open in gedit, and then minimize gedit, if
you double click on another file in nautilus, gedit should regain focus,
but it does not.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10
Package: gedit 3.22.1-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-15.16-generic 4.13.4
Uname: Linux 4.13.0-15-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu3
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Fri Oct 13 06:26:01 2017
InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-10-13 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Beta amd64 (20171012)
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gedit
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: gedit (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug artful wayland-session

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gedit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1723403

Title:
  Gedit doesn't Gain Focus Upon Opening a File in Nautilus

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/1723403/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1677198] [NEW] OpenVPN not Working in 17.04

2017-03-29 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Public bug reported:

I can definitely confirm that Network Manager's OpenVPN is not working
yet in Ubuntu 17.04.

I set up my configuration via import:
http://neartalk.com/ss/2017-03-29_001_633x332.png

On all earlier versions of Ubuntu, after importing the configuration,
I'm able to connect to the VPN. However, in 17.04, connection attempt
always give this error immediately:

"The VPN Connection disconnected because the VPN Service has stopped"

Clearly the VPN Service has NOT stopped. I confirmed this be taking the
exact same import-file and imported it into an Ubuntu 16.04 computer and
then the VPN connected without issue. Also, with this same import-file I
had no issues in Ubuntu 16.10.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04
Package: network-manager-openvpn-gnome 1.2.6-2ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-14.16-generic 4.10.3
Uname: Linux 4.10.0-14-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.4-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: Unity:Unity7
Date: Wed Mar 29 05:25:14 2017
InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-01-30 (58 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20160719)
SourcePackage: network-manager-openvpn
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to zesty on 2017-03-27 (2 days ago)

** Affects: network-manager
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: network-manager-openvpn (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug zesty

** Description changed:

  I can definitely confirm that Network Manager's OpenVPN is not working
  yet in Ubuntu 17.04.
  
  I set up my configuration via import:
  http://neartalk.com/ss/2017-03-29_001_633x332.png
  
  On all earlier versions of Ubuntu, after importing the configuration,
  I'm able to connect to the VPN. However, in 17.04, connection attempt
  always give this error immediately:
  
  "The VPN Connection disconnected because the VPN Service has stopped"
+ 
+ Clearly the VPN Service has NOT stopped. I confirmed this be taking the
+ exact same import-file and imported it into an Ubuntu 16.04 computer and
+ then the VPN connected without issue. Also, with this same import-file I
+ had no issues in Ubuntu 16.10.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04
  Package: network-manager-openvpn-gnome 1.2.6-2ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-14.16-generic 4.10.3
  Uname: Linux 4.10.0-14-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.4-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: Unity:Unity7
  Date: Wed Mar 29 05:25:14 2017
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-01-30 (58 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20160719)
  SourcePackage: network-manager-openvpn
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to zesty on 2017-03-27 (2 days ago)

** Also affects: network-manager
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to network-manager-openvpn in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1677198

Title:
  OpenVPN not Working in 17.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/network-manager/+bug/1677198/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 986189] Re: Missing "Always Use" checkbox in "Open With" Dialog

2016-06-08 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Generally I favor "fewer steps" to "more steps".

Your conclusion that this cannot be undone is not correct. It can always be
undone in the same step-intensive way you currently have to do it in the first
place.

5 steps:
Right-click > Properties > Open With > Set Default Application > "Close"
http://neartalk.com/ss/2016-06-07_003_742x636.png

Currently you have do all these non-intuitive steps anytime you want to change
the default application, when usually it would be nicer to set this in one step
as proposed, the first time you open the file type, and then only do the longer
steps in the event that you "change you mind".

I favor "fewer steps" to "more steps". Especially when it is more intuitive (as
what I've proposed is). Concept: "Put settings closer where they're
used".

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986189

Title:
  Missing "Always Use" checkbox in "Open With" Dialog

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/986189/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1579712] Re: Refresh hangs due to strdup on non-NULL terminated string

2016-05-19 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Thanks. "Medium" importance for this bug? This seems like the most
critical bug I've ever encountered, considering that if I had left my
laptop alone to "finish updating" it might have melted and caused a
forest fire before I got back :)

Yeah, I think this one deserves a critical status; the fix needs to be
in the main repo ASAP.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579712

Title:
  Refresh hangs due to strdup on non-NULL terminated string

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1579712/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1579712] Re: Refresh hangs due to strdup on non-NULL terminated string

2016-05-19 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
I tried to update after a fresh install and could not get past the appstreamcli 
infinite 100% processor utilization:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1583845

My laptop got almost smoking hot before I finally killed the
appstreamcli process!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579712

Title:
  Refresh hangs due to strdup on non-NULL terminated string

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1579712/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1583845] Re: Can't "apt-get update" - appstreamcli stuck at 100% Processor Utilization

2016-05-19 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
** Description changed:

  I did a fresh install of Ubuntu 16.04 without being connected to the
  internet because when connected to the internet the install would lock
  up at the point that ubuntu was "Retrieving 56 of 56".
  
- Installation (without internet) was successful, then I connected to the 
internet and tried to update:
- sudo apt-get update
+ Installation (without internet) was successful, then I connected to the
+ internet and tried to update:
  
- The update-process seemed to be stuck, so I discovered that the command
- appstreamcli was at 100% processor utilization indefinitely.
+ user@pc:~$ sudo apt-get update
+ Get:1 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security InRelease [94.5 kB]
+ Hit:2 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial InRelease
+ Get:3 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates InRelease [94.5 kB]  
  
+ Get:4 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-backports InRelease [92.2 
kB]   
+ Fetched 281 kB in 0s (387 kB/s)
+ Terminated
+ Reading package lists... Done
+ E: Problem executing scripts APT::Update::Post-Invoke-Success 'if 
/usr/bin/test -w /var/cache/app-info -a -e /usr/bin/appstreamcli; then 
appstreamcli refresh > /dev/null; fi'
+ E: Sub-process returned an error code
+ 
+ 
+ The update-process seemed to be stuck, so I discovered that the command 
appstreamcli was at 100% processor utilization indefinitely.
  
  When I kill that process the update fails. This is clearly a bug, but
  hopefully someone can suggest a work-around until it is fixed.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: appstream 0.9.4-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-22.40-generic 4.4.8
  Uname: Linux 4.4.0-22-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Thu May 19 19:08:30 2016
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-05-19 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20160420.1)
  ProcEnviron:
-  LANGUAGE=en_US
-  TERM=xterm-256color
-  PATH=(custom, no user)
-  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  LANGUAGE=en_US
+  TERM=xterm-256color
+  PATH=(custom, no user)
+  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: appstream
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Description changed:

  I did a fresh install of Ubuntu 16.04 without being connected to the
  internet because when connected to the internet the install would lock
  up at the point that ubuntu was "Retrieving 56 of 56".
  
  Installation (without internet) was successful, then I connected to the
  internet and tried to update:
  
+ The update-process seemed to be stuck, so I discovered that the command
+ appstreamcli was at 100% processor utilization indefinitely.
+ 
+ When I kill that process the update fails. This is clearly a bug, but
+ hopefully someone can suggest a work-around until it is fixed.
+ 
  user@pc:~$ sudo apt-get update
  Get:1 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security InRelease [94.5 kB]
  Hit:2 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial InRelease
- Get:3 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates InRelease [94.5 kB]  
  
- Get:4 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-backports InRelease [92.2 
kB]   
- Fetched 281 kB in 0s (387 kB/s)
+ Get:3 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates InRelease [94.5 kB]
+ Get:4 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-backports InRelease [92.2 kB]
+ Fetched 281 kB in 0s (387 kB/s)
  Terminated
  Reading package lists... Done
  E: Problem executing scripts APT::Update::Post-Invoke-Success 'if 
/usr/bin/test -w /var/cache/app-info -a -e /usr/bin/appstreamcli; then 
appstreamcli refresh > /dev/null; fi'
  E: Sub-process returned an error code
  
- 
- The update-process seemed to be stuck, so I discovered that the command 
appstreamcli was at 100% processor utilization indefinitely.
- 
- When I kill that process the update fails. This is clearly a bug, but
- hopefully someone can suggest a work-around until it is fixed.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: appstream 0.9.4-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-22.40-generic 4.4.8
  Uname: Linux 4.4.0-22-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Thu May 19 19:08:30 2016
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-05-19 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20160420.1)
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=en_US
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: appstream
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1583845

Title:
  Can't "apt-get update" - appstreamcli stuck at 100% Processor
  Utilization

To manage notifications about this bug go 

[Bug 1554023] Re: Perform an apt update if there is no appstream available

2016-05-19 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
I wonder if I'm suffering from this issue. Please take a look at the bug I 
submitted:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1583845

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1554023

Title:
  Perform an apt update if there is no appstream available

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1554023/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1583845] [NEW] Can't "apt-get update" - appstreamcli stuck at 100% Processor Utilization

2016-05-19 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Public bug reported:

I did a fresh install of Ubuntu 16.04 without being connected to the
internet because when connected to the internet the install would lock
up at the point that ubuntu was "Retrieving 56 of 56".

Installation (without internet) was successful, then I connected to the 
internet and tried to update:
sudo apt-get update

The update-process seemed to be stuck, so I discovered that the command
appstreamcli was at 100% processor utilization indefinitely.

When I kill that process the update fails. This is clearly a bug, but
hopefully someone can suggest a work-around until it is fixed.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: appstream 0.9.4-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-22.40-generic 4.4.8
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-22-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
Date: Thu May 19 19:08:30 2016
InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-05-19 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20160420.1)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: appstream
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: appstream (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug xenial

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1583845

Title:
  Can't "apt-get update" - appstreamcli stuck at 100% Processor
  Utilization

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1583845/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1568056] Re: Official Package-Names Not Shown in Gnome-Software

2016-05-16 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
The fact that I (and others) want to know the package-name is reason enough, 
but I already gave other good reasons in post 4:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1568056/comments/4

Post 6 was to emphasize how difficult it can be to find the package name and to 
emphasize the convenience gained from "simply providing that information in the 
details section" here:
http://neartalk.com/ss/2016-05-16_002_1200x1011.png

I will take you suggestion of posting this upstream as well.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568056

Title:
  Official Package-Names Not Shown in Gnome-Software

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1568056/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1568056] Re: Official Package-Names Not Shown in Gnome-Software

2016-05-16 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Use Case:

Today, I discovered "auovia" in gnome-software:
http://neartalk.com/ss/2016-05-16_002_1200x1011.png

Before installing it, I'd like to take note of its package name. Since
gnome-software doesn't provide that information, I attempted to find it
myself:

user@pc:~$ sudo apt-get install audovia
[sudo] password for user: 
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
E: Unable to locate package audovia
user@pc:~$ apt-cache search audovia
user@pc:~$ apt-cache search "audovia"

As you can see, none of these efforts returned the package-name. I shouldn't 
have to do a google search to discover what package gnome-software will be 
installing onto my computer when I click the "Install" button. This information 
should be in the "Details" sections shown here:
http://neartalk.com/ss/2016-05-16_002_1200x1011.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568056

Title:
  Official Package-Names Not Shown in Gnome-Software

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1568056/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1067876] Re: Missing "Safely Remove Drive" option from Quicklists. Only have "Eject".

2016-05-16 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Ubuntu 16.04 is also missing "Safely Remove Drive" option. Instead it
has the "Eject" option, but after selecting this option on an ESATA
external hard-drive it offers no feedback to indicate that the
"ejection" was successfully.

Because of this, I always have to shutdown my computer before unplugging
my ESATA external hard drive. Nothing else gives me any indication that
it is safe to unplug it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1067876

Title:
  Missing "Safely Remove Drive" option from Quicklists. Only have
  "Eject".

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gvfs/+bug/1067876/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1067876] Re: Missing "Safely Remove Drive" option from Quicklists. Only have "Eject".

2016-05-16 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
** Tags added: xenial

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1067876

Title:
  Missing "Safely Remove Drive" option from Quicklists. Only have
  "Eject".

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gvfs/+bug/1067876/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1573408] Re: GNOME Software does not install third-party .deb packages

2016-04-28 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Ok, well, that's is probably a separate issue that is no fault of the
gnome-software package. Thanks for confirming that the fix in xenial-
proposed is working for you.

For the issue with "sudo apt-get update" getting weak-signature-key-rejections, 
I'm not sure what the canonical bug will become, but I've discover it already 
reported here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1562733

As the gnome-software bug seems on its way to becoming "fix-released",
my focus will be shifting towards the weak-signature-key-rejections
issue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573408

Title:
  GNOME Software does not install third-party .deb packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1573408/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1573408] Re: GNOME Software does not install third-party .deb packages

2016-04-28 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
@gernophil: After you successfully installed these, have you yet tried
doing a "sudo apt-get update"?

I'm wondering if the respective repositories (of the debs you are installing) 
are getting the weak-key-rejections described here:
http://askubuntu.com/a/760348/256054

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573408

Title:
  GNOME Software does not install third-party .deb packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1573408/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1568056] Re: Official Package-Names Not Shown in Gnome-Software

2016-04-25 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
1) Previous software managers, in Ubuntu, indicated the package-name
upon viewing the details of software, and therefore it has become my go-
to-GUI for discovering package-names.

2) Even when I use a GUI to install software, I like to take note of the
official package name so that I can add that package-name to my notes,
and so that I can later install *all my software* (on a fresh install)
with one "sudo apt-get install" command (without having to relocate each
software again via a Software Manager: gnome-software).

3) When I have an issue with a program, I report bugs using this command:
ubuntu-bug packageName
I like having a GUI for discovering the package name: If I installed it using 
the GUI, that's where I want to go back to in order to see the package name I 
installed via that GUI. I don't want to memorize a command for discovering 
which package I initially used gnome-software to install; the GUI that I 
searched from (originally -- when I installed the software) is the same GUI I 
want to search to discover what I originally installed.

4) The official package name is pertinent information to advance users
(who may know commands, but prefer GUIs).

5) Including the package name doesn't take up much room; it does not
clutter the interface for users who don't care about package names,
while also providing pertinent information to advance user.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568056

Title:
  Official Package-Names Not Shown in Gnome-Software

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1568056/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1573206] Re: Ubuntu Software does not install third-party .deb packages

2016-04-23 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
As Stanislav mentioned, in post #6, there are other ways you can
installed these deb packages.

However, even after you get the deb package installed, it breaks your
ability to sudo apt-get update.

See here:
http://askubuntu.com/a/760348/256054

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573206

Title:
  Ubuntu Software does not install third-party .deb packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1573206/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1573408] Re: Can't install Google-Talk deb plugin

2016-04-22 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
** Description changed:

- Unlike previous versions of Ubuntu Unity, I'm unable to install the 
google-talk-plugin in Ubuntu 16.04, which it (the deb) can be downloaded here:
+ Unlike previous versions of Ubuntu Unity, I'm unable to install the 
google-talk-plugin in Ubuntu 16.04, where it (the deb) can be downloaded here:
  https://www.google.com/tools/dlpage/hangoutplugin
  
  After downloading, I open the deb file from Firefox and it launches the
  gnome-software package (used in Unity now).
  
  The first time I click the install button in gnome-software, I notice a
  strange repositioning of the layout, but nothing else happens.
  
- Clicking the install button a second time put a 
question-mark-progress-launcher onto the launcher (task) bar, but it never 
progresses:
+ Clicking the install button a second time puts a 
question-mark-progress-launcher onto the launcher (task) bar, but it never 
progresses:
  http://neartalk.com/ss/2016-04-22_001_1262x740.png
  
  So far, no one has offered a workaround:
  
http://askubuntu.com/questions/760305/how-to-install-google-hangouts-plugin-in-ubuntu-16-04
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: gnome-software 3.20.1+git20160420.1.ca63436.ubuntu-xenial-0ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-21.37-generic 4.4.6
  Uname: Linux 4.4.0-21-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Fri Apr 22 01:02:45 2016
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-04-22 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20160420.1)
  SourcePackage: gnome-software
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573408

Title:
  Can't install Google-Talk deb plugin

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1573408/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1573408] Re: Can't install Google-Talk deb plugin

2016-04-22 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
More about this here:
http://askubuntu.com/questions/760305/how-to-install-google-talkplugin-deb-in-ubuntu-16-04

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573408

Title:
  Can't install Google-Talk deb plugin

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1573408/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1573408] Re: Can't install Google-Talk deb plugin

2016-04-22 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
This work-around isn't perfect, because it prevent you from being able to sudo 
apt-get update until you uncheck this:
http://neartalk.com/ss/2016-04-22_003_1070x468.png

How do you install the plugin where it will receive updates from from
the Google repository in Ubuntu 16.04?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573408

Title:
  Can't install Google-Talk deb plugin

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1573408/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1573408] Re: Can't install Google-Talk deb plugin

2016-04-22 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
I was able to install the plug-in using the command line like this:

sudo dpkg -i google-talkplugin_current_amd64.deb

That produced this:

Selecting previously unselected package google-talkplugin.
(Reading database ... 196768 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack google-talkplugin_current_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking google-talkplugin (5.41.0.0-1) ...
Setting up google-talkplugin (5.41.0.0-1) ...

After this, I restarted Firefox. I went to Gmail to make a phone call,
and after clicking the "Allow" button prompted at the top of Firefox
(under the address bar), it worked.

However, in previous versions of Ubuntu, I was able to install this with
the GUI exclusively.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573408

Title:
  Can't install Google-Talk deb plugin

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1573408/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1573408] [NEW] Can't install Google-Talk deb plugin

2016-04-22 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Public bug reported:

Unlike previous versions of Ubuntu Unity, I'm unable to install the 
google-talk-plugin in Ubuntu 16.04, which it (the deb) can be downloaded here:
https://www.google.com/tools/dlpage/hangoutplugin

After downloading, I open the deb file from Firefox and it launches the
gnome-software package (used in Unity now).

The first time I click the install button in gnome-software, I notice a
strange repositioning of the layout, but nothing else happens.

Clicking the install button a second time put a question-mark-progress-launcher 
onto the launcher (task) bar, but it never progresses:
http://neartalk.com/ss/2016-04-22_001_1262x740.png

So far, no one has offered a workaround:
http://askubuntu.com/questions/760305/how-to-install-google-hangouts-plugin-in-ubuntu-16-04

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: gnome-software 3.20.1+git20160420.1.ca63436.ubuntu-xenial-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-21.37-generic 4.4.6
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-21-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: Unity
Date: Fri Apr 22 01:02:45 2016
InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-04-22 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20160420.1)
SourcePackage: gnome-software
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug xenial

** Description changed:

- Unlike previous versions of Ubuntu Unity, I'm unable to install the 
google-talk-plugin in Ubuntu 16.04, which can it (the deb) can be downloaded 
here:
+ Unlike previous versions of Ubuntu Unity, I'm unable to install the 
google-talk-plugin in Ubuntu 16.04, which it (the deb) can be downloaded here:
  https://www.google.com/tools/dlpage/hangoutplugin
  
  After downloading, I open the deb file from Firefox and it launches the
  gnome-software package (used in Unity now). The first time I click the
  install button in gnome-software, I notice a strange repositioning of
  the layout, but nothing else happens.
  
  Clicking the install button a second time put a 
question-mark-progress-launcher onto the launcher (task) bar, but it never 
progresses:
  http://neartalk.com/ss/2016-04-22_001_1262x740.png
  
  So far, no one has offered a workaround:
  
http://askubuntu.com/questions/760305/how-to-install-google-hangouts-plugin-in-ubuntu-16-04
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: gnome-software 3.20.1+git20160420.1.ca63436.ubuntu-xenial-0ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-21.37-generic 4.4.6
  Uname: Linux 4.4.0-21-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Fri Apr 22 01:02:45 2016
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-04-22 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20160420.1)
  SourcePackage: gnome-software
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Description changed:

  Unlike previous versions of Ubuntu Unity, I'm unable to install the 
google-talk-plugin in Ubuntu 16.04, which it (the deb) can be downloaded here:
  https://www.google.com/tools/dlpage/hangoutplugin
  
  After downloading, I open the deb file from Firefox and it launches the
- gnome-software package (used in Unity now). The first time I click the
- install button in gnome-software, I notice a strange repositioning of
- the layout, but nothing else happens.
+ gnome-software package (used in Unity now).
+ 
+ The first time I click the install button in gnome-software, I notice a
+ strange repositioning of the layout, but nothing else happens.
  
  Clicking the install button a second time put a 
question-mark-progress-launcher onto the launcher (task) bar, but it never 
progresses:
  http://neartalk.com/ss/2016-04-22_001_1262x740.png
  
  So far, no one has offered a workaround:
  
http://askubuntu.com/questions/760305/how-to-install-google-hangouts-plugin-in-ubuntu-16-04
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: gnome-software 3.20.1+git20160420.1.ca63436.ubuntu-xenial-0ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-21.37-generic 4.4.6
  Uname: Linux 4.4.0-21-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Fri Apr 22 01:02:45 2016
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-04-22 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20160420.1)
  SourcePackage: gnome-software
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573408

Title:
  Can't install Google-Talk deb plugin

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1573408/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 1573206] Re: Ubuntu Software does not install third-party .deb packages

2016-04-21 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
The same is true for this hangouts plugin I use in Firefox. It require this deb:
https://www.google.com/tools/dlpage/hangoutplugin

But, it won't install.

Same is true for this deb:
http://torrent-search.sourceforge.net/download

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573206

Title:
  Ubuntu Software does not install third-party .deb packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1573206/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1572871] Re: gnome-software (ubuntu-software) doesn't install third party applications

2016-04-21 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1573206 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573206

Also, this deb installed in previous versions of Ubuntu:
http://torrent-search.sourceforge.net/download

It does not install in the Ubuntu 16.04 release.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1573206
   Ubuntu Software does not install third-party .deb packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572871

Title:
  gnome-software (ubuntu-software) doesn't install third party
  applications

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1572871/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1573206] Re: Ubuntu Software does not install third-party .deb packages

2016-04-21 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1572871
   gnome-software (ubuntu-software) doesn't install third party applications

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573206

Title:
  Ubuntu Software does not install third-party .deb packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1573206/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1571904] Re: Google Chrome won't install from .deb - missing package

2016-04-21 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1573206 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573206

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1573206
   Ubuntu Software does not install third-party .deb packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1571904

Title:
  Google Chrome won't install from .deb - missing package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome/+bug/1571904/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1571904] Re: Google Chrome won't install from .deb - missing package

2016-04-21 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1573206 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573206

The same is true for this hangouts plugin I use in Firefox. It require this deb:
https://www.google.com/tools/dlpage/hangoutplugin

But, it won't install.

Same is true for this deb:
http://torrent-search.sourceforge.net/download

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1571904

Title:
  Google Chrome won't install from .deb - missing package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome/+bug/1571904/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1572871] Re: gnome-software (ubuntu-software) doesn't install third party applications

2016-04-21 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
In earlier versions of Ubuntu, I had no issue installing this deb:
https://www.google.com/tools/dlpage/hangoutplugin

I haven't yet figured out a way to do it in Ubuntu 16.04:
http://askubuntu.com/questions/760305/how-to-install-google-hangouts-plugin-in-ubuntu-16-04

I really need this plug-in, because allows my to do all my phone calls
at work via Gmail and my Laptop.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572871

Title:
  gnome-software (ubuntu-software) doesn't install third party
  applications

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1572871/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1573206] Re: Ubuntu Software does not install third-party .deb packages

2016-04-21 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1572871 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572871

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1572871
   gnome-software (ubuntu-software) doesn't install third party applications

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573206

Title:
  Ubuntu Software does not install third-party .deb packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1573206/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1568056] [NEW] Official Package-Names Not Shown in Gnome-Software

2016-04-08 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Public bug reported:

The names of a packages (as you would type them when installing via a
command prompt) are not indicated in gnome-software.

Even when I use gnome-software to locate a package, I still want to know
the package's official Ubuntu name, because I usually want to add that
package-name to an command install list (sudo apt-get install package1
package2 package3), so that I can install all my packages at once the
next time I do a fresh install.

That fact that gnome-software can locate packages for me is great. The
fact that it doesn't reveal the official name of the packages is lacking
(for me).

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: gnome-software 3.20.1~git20160331.78d1aab-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-17.33-generic 4.4.6
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-17-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: Unity
Date: Fri Apr  8 12:18:43 2016
InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-03-14 (25 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Alpha amd64 (20160307)
SourcePackage: gnome-software
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug xenial

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568056

Title:
  Official Package-Names Not Shown in Gnome-Software

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1568056/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1557981] Re: Selected-Tab Hard to Distinguish in Default Ambiance Theme

2016-03-19 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
** Also affects: unity
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-system-monitor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1557981

Title:
  Selected-Tab Hard to Distinguish in Default Ambiance Theme

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/light-themes/+bug/1557981/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1557981] [NEW] Selected-Tab Hard to Distinguish in Default Ambiance Theme

2016-03-16 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Public bug reported:

The default Theme in Ubuntu 16.04 is called "Ambiance":
http://neartalk.com/ss/2016-03-16_005_565x390.png

When Gnome-System-Monitor is running under the Ambiance theme, you can barely 
distinguish which tab is selected:
http://neartalk.com/ss/2016-03-16_003_679x497.png

Compare this with the non-default theme called "Radiance", where the 
selected-tab (in Gnome-System-Monitor) is clearly distinguishable at a glance 
(without eye strain):
http://neartalk.com/ss/2016-03-16_004_687x497.png

Which package would be responsible for making the selected-tab more
distinguishable to the eye in gnome-system-monitor under the default
Ambiance theme?

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: gnome-system-monitor 3.18.2-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-13.29-generic 4.4.5
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-13-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20-0ubuntu3
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: Unity
Date: Wed Mar 16 04:38:11 2016
InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-03-14 (1 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Alpha amd64 (20160307)
SourcePackage: gnome-system-monitor
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: light-themes
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: light-themes-colors
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: gnome-system-monitor (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug xenial

** Also affects: light-themes
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: light-themes-colors
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-system-monitor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1557981

Title:
  Selected-Tab Hard to Distinguish in Default Ambiance Theme

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/light-themes/+bug/1557981/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1549250] Re: Numerous Empty Categories

2016-03-02 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Now the categories are back, but some are still empty. Here's an example of an 
empty one:
http://neartalk.com/ss/2016-03-02_001_1200x800.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1549250

Title:
  Numerous Empty Categories

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1549250/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1549250] Re: Numerous Empty Categories

2016-03-01 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Recent updates show no categories at all:
http://neartalk.com/ss/2016-03-01_001_1830x1043.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1549250

Title:
  Numerous Empty Categories

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1549250/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1549250] [NEW] Numerous Empty Categories

2016-02-24 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Public bug reported:

I suspect it is already known that many of the categories list no corresponding 
software. For example:
http://i.imgur.com/Opx4o0a.png

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: gnome-software 3.19.91~git20160224.0779986-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-7.22-generic 4.4.2
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-7-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20-0ubuntu3
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: Unity
Date: Wed Feb 24 05:28:50 2016
InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-02-10 (13 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Alpha amd64 (20160210)
SourcePackage: gnome-software
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug xenial

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1549250

Title:
  Numerous Empty Categories

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1549250/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1545026] [NEW] Video Progress Too Subtle on Apple Movie Trailers

2016-02-12 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Public bug reported:

Look where the red arrow is pointing in this screenshot:
http://neartalk.com/ss/Totem.png

This orange on orange it too subtle to indicate the video is 21 seconds
along. I notices that this occurs on the Apple Movie Trailers inclued
with Totem. Videos I play from the local file system are orange and
white (clearly indicating progress).

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: totem 3.18.1-1ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-4.19-generic 4.4.1
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-4-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.19.4-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: Unity
Date: Fri Feb 12 08:57:50 2016
InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-02-10 (1 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Alpha amd64 (20160210)
SourcePackage: totem
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: totem (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug xenial

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545026

Title:
  Video Progress Too Subtle on Apple Movie Trailers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/1545026/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1545026] Re: Video Progress Too Subtle on Apple Movie Trailers

2016-02-12 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
** Description changed:

  Look where the red arrow is pointing in this screenshot:
  http://neartalk.com/ss/Totem.png
  
  This orange on orange it too subtle to indicate the video is 21 seconds
- along. I notices that this occurs on the Apple Movie Trailers inclued
+ along. I noticed that this occurs on the Apple Movie Trailers included
  with Totem. Videos I play from the local file system are orange and
  white (clearly indicating progress).
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: totem 3.18.1-1ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-4.19-generic 4.4.1
  Uname: Linux 4.4.0-4-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.19.4-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Fri Feb 12 08:57:50 2016
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-02-10 (1 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Alpha amd64 (20160210)
  SourcePackage: totem
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545026

Title:
  Video Progress Too Subtle on Apple Movie Trailers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/1545026/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1527590] Re: gedit unusable when menu can't be displayed

2016-02-08 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Temporarily, I'm using pluma instead of gedit as a work-around for the 
menu-not-displaying-in-title-bar-issue:
sudo apt-get install pluma

Pluma seems to be some previous fork of gedit, and looks like gedit did about 
two versions ago. Here's a screen shot of pluma, where you can see the correct 
behavior regarding the title-bar-menu:
http://neartalk.com/ss/pluma.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gedit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1527590

Title:
  gedit unusable when menu can't be displayed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/1527590/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1527590] Re: gedit unusable when menu can't be displayed

2016-02-08 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Here's a screen-shot of the issue where the typical menu cannot be shown in the 
title-bar, because gedit is currently utilizing the title bar itself at the 
application-level (which is overriding the "desktop-environment-level):
http://neartalk.com/ss/Gedit-No-Menu.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gedit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1527590

Title:
  gedit unusable when menu can't be displayed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/1527590/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1542489] Re: New Gedit Can't Show Menu in Title Bar

2016-02-05 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
For now, here's a work-around that seems to work like gedit did before the gui 
upgrade:
sudo apt-get install pluma

Pluma seems just like the old gedit, perhaps it is some fork?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gedit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1542489

Title:
  New Gedit Can't Show Menu in Title Bar

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1542489/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1542489] [NEW] New Gedit Can't Show Menu in Title Bar

2016-02-05 Thread Lonnie Lee Best
Public bug reported:

Take a look at this screen shot:
http://neartalk.com/ss/Gedit-No-Menu.png

I like for application menus to show in the Title Bar (not at the top-
panel). However, in the new Gedit GUI, the menu is inaccessible if your
desktop preference is to show menus in title bar.

Unless this changes, I won't use gedit anymore because my preference of
showing menus in title bars outweighs my desire to use gedit. Perhaps
Ubuntu should consider using Geany as the default text-editor or
leafpad.

It doesn't make sense for gedit to remain the default text-editor if it
cannot play nice with Unity's Desktop-Level menu settings.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: gedit 3.18.3-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-2.16-generic 4.4.0
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-2-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.19.4-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: Unity
Date: Fri Feb  5 15:13:29 2016
InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-10-28 (100 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 15.10 "Wily Werewolf" - Release amd64 (20151021)
SourcePackage: gedit
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to xenial on 2016-02-05 (0 days ago)

** Affects: unity
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: gedit (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug xenial

** Also affects: unity
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Description changed:

  Take a look at this screen shot:
  http://neartalk.com/ss/Gedit-No-Menu.png
  
  I like for application menus to show in the Title Bar (not at the top-
  panel). However, in the new Gedit GUI, the menu is inaccessible if your
  desktop preference is to show menus in title bar.
  
  Unless this changes, I won't use gedit anymore because my preference of
  showing menus in title bars outweighs my desire to use gedit. Perhaps
- Ubuntu should consider using Geany as the default text-editor or leaf.
+ Ubuntu should consider using Geany as the default text-editor or
+ leafpad.
  
  It doesn't make sense for gedit to remain the default text-editor if it
  cannot play nice with Unity's Desktop-Level menu settings.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: gedit 3.18.3-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-2.16-generic 4.4.0
  Uname: Linux 4.4.0-2-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.19.4-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Fri Feb  5 15:13:29 2016
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-10-28 (100 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 15.10 "Wily Werewolf" - Release amd64 (20151021)
  SourcePackage: gedit
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to xenial on 2016-02-05 (0 days ago)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gedit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1542489

Title:
  New Gedit Can't Show Menu in Title Bar

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1542489/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


  1   2   3   >