Op za, 07-10-2006 te 20:45 +0200, schreef Chipzz:
And those still should be updated by the distribution (in case they came
with the distribution in the first place).
I disagree.
In the specific case of Epiphany-extensions, it's a great advantage that
Epiphany users who are locked into a
Le mardi 10 octobre 2006 à 10:49 +0200, Reinout van Schouwen a écrit :
In the specific case of Epiphany-extensions, it's a great advantage that
Epiphany users who are locked into a certain older distro for whatever
reason, can benefit from new features that are shipped with newer
Epiphany
Hi,
vino has branched - 2.16 stuff on the gnome-2-16 branch.
Hopefully we'll get some of the patches languishing in bugzilla into
HEAD soon. I'd list which ones I'm hoping to get in, including the one I
was just looking at (#333752), but bugzilla has chosen this exact
instant to
Hi!
I released a new version that already contains some of the suggestions
made here:
* Support for GnuPG signatures (the XML file must contain an element
signaturehttp://www.example.com/path/to/myfile.tar.gz.sig/signature).
The public key will be automatically imported from a key server,
* XML
Hi
After a few days left for the discussion to die, here's a summary of
what has been said in that long thread, and my conclusions, hopefully
the next step, if we all agree, is to start working on them:
* Gdk/GtkSession as a replacement for GnomeClient. I think we all agree
on this, and Dan is
Rodrigo Moya wrote:
* Call it libgtkdesktop and include in GTK source? Or in GTK proper?
This makes sense for some of the stuff, like:
* screensaver (see http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=305688).
This could be merged with Dan's work on Gtk/GdkSession, and we could add
there all
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 08:09:37AM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hopefully we'll get some of the patches languishing in bugzilla into
HEAD soon. I'd list which ones I'm hoping to get in, including the one I
was just looking at (#333752), but bugzilla has chosen this exact
instant to ban
On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 17:04 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
So, anything else? Where do we start from to solve all this?
I wanted to talk about this at the summit, but failed.
Would session management be a good place to put something like
application hibernation? For example when a system is
Hi Tristan,
(cc'ing d-d-l since this needs to be a community decision)
Le samedi 07 octobre 2006, à 11:06, Tristan Van Berkom a écrit :
Hello release team,
I would like to formally propose that glade be included in
a gnome developer tools release suite, I think we can all benefit
from
Le vendredi 29 septembre 2006, à 22:46, Tristan Van Berkom a écrit :
to say do we want glade as part of some gnome module set ? any ideas
on that ?
Straight question: if we integrate an interface builder in GNOME, how
can we choose between glade, gazpacho and stetic?
Vincent
--
Les gens
On 10/10/06, Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would session management be a good place to put something like
application hibernation?
I'd think it should be possible to save the application state in
general, not necessarily only in terms of hibernation.
If only one could trigger the
Vincent Untz wrote:
Le vendredi 29 septembre 2006, à 22:46, Tristan Van Berkom a écrit :
to say do we want glade as part of some gnome module set ? any ideas
on that ?
Straight question: if we integrate an interface builder in GNOME, how
can we choose between glade, gazpacho and stetic?
On 10/10/06, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As there is currently no developer tools suite - I am also requesting
that one be created - I've spoken to Richard (devhelp) and Naba (anjuta)
and they will be willing to be a part of such a release suite - others too
have expressed thier
Vincent Untz wrote:
[...]
As there is currently no developer tools suite - I am also requesting
that one be created - I've spoken to Richard (devhelp) and Naba (anjuta)
and they will be willing to be a part of such a release suite - others too
have expressed thier interest by adding thier module
Vincent Untz wrote:
Le vendredi 29 septembre 2006, à 22:46, Tristan Van Berkom a écrit :
to say do we want glade as part of some gnome module set ? any ideas
on that ?
Straight question: if we integrate an interface builder in GNOME, how
can we choose between glade, gazpacho and stetic?
Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
Vincent Untz wrote:
Le vendredi 29 septembre 2006, à 22:46, Tristan Van Berkom a écrit :
to say do we want glade as part of some gnome module set ? any ideas
on that ?
Straight question: if we integrate an interface builder in GNOME, how
can we choose between
Vincent Untz wrote:
Le vendredi 29 septembre 2006, à 22:46, Tristan Van Berkom a écrit :
to say do we want glade as part of some gnome module set ? any ideas
on that ?
Straight question: if we integrate an interface builder in GNOME, how
can we choose between glade, gazpacho and stetic?
On 10/4/06, Rob Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The effort required to add eye candy effects to metacity is much
smaller, in my opinion, than the effort required to make compiz a good,
usable window manager. Most of the effects code is likely to be
reusable in metacity and KWin; compiz makes
BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
On 10/4/06, Rob Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The effort required to add eye candy effects to metacity is much
smaller, in my opinion, than the effort required to make compiz a good,
usable window manager. Most of the effects code is likely to be
reusable in metacity
Johan Dahlin wrote:
Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
Vincent Untz wrote:
Le vendredi 29 septembre 2006, à 22:46, Tristan Van Berkom a écrit :
to say do we want glade as part of some gnome module set ? any ideas
on that ?
Straight question: if we integrate an interface builder in GNOME, how
can we
On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 15:33 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
On 10/4/06, Rob Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The effort required to add eye candy effects to metacity is much
smaller, in my opinion, than the effort required to make compiz a good,
usable window manager.
Op dinsdag 10-10-2006 om 11:29 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Josselin
Mouette:
As Epiphany extensions are tightly dependent on the Epiphany version, I
don't think it would be very useful.
Tighly dependent? What makes you think so?
Not all recent extension may be compatible with earlier
Ritesh Khadgaray wrote:
Tried metacity compositor. affects look cleaner than compiz except for
one small thing : all windows look blue :(
I don't think there's any expectation that the current code in CVS is
working, though I could be wrong.
Havoc
On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 17:51 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
Ritesh Khadgaray wrote:
Tried metacity compositor. affects look cleaner than compiz except for
one small thing : all windows look blue :(
I don't think there's any expectation that the current code in CVS is
working,
24 matches
Mail list logo
