Hi Maguerite,
Thanks for the detailed response!
It's hard for me to talk about the pros and cons of fcitx and IBus -
sadly I don't speak or write Chinese, and I haven't investigated the
technical operations of these systems either.
But what I do want to talk about is the user experience we try
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Maguerite,
Thanks for the detailed response!
It's hard for me to talk about the pros and cons of fcitx and IBus -
sadly I don't speak or write Chinese, and I haven't investigated the
technical operations of these
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Maguerite,
Thanks for the detailed response!
It's hard for me to talk about the pros and cons of fcitx and IBus -
sadly I don't speak or write Chinese, and I haven't investigated the
technical operations of these
We only have the development resources to ship one input method. It's
going to need special code to integrate with Clutter and the St
toolkit. If IBus is bad right now, we need to fix it.
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Marguerite Su i...@marguerite.su wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:51 PM,
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Jasper St. Pierre
jstpie...@mecheye.net wrote:
We only have the development resources to ship one input method. It's
going to need special code to integrate with Clutter and the St
toolkit. If IBus is bad right now, we need to fix it.
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at
Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
We only have the development resources to ship one input method. It's
going to need special code to integrate with Clutter and the St
toolkit. If IBus is bad right now, we need to fix it.
Or use fcitx instead of IBus? I honestly do not know the topic, but I
read the
We only have the development resources to ship one input method. It's
going to need special code to integrate with Clutter and the St
toolkit. If IBus is bad right now, we need to fix it.
Some while ago when I started libxklavier, there was idea to create
some kind of abstraction layer for xkb
Input Methods need to display custom widgets in the overview. That
means they need access to St, which is (for now) a private toolkit to
the Shell. DBus would not work, unless we want to do something really
dumb[0]. The only thing that I could think of would either be a
special kind of GNOME Shell
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Jasper St. Pierre
jstpie...@mecheye.net wrote:
Input Methods need to display custom widgets in the overview. That
means they need access to St, which is (for now) a private toolkit to
the Shell. DBus would not work, unless we want to do something really
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Sergey Udaltsov
sergey.udalt...@gmail.com wrote:
We only have the development resources to ship one input method. It's
going to need special code to integrate with Clutter and the St
toolkit. If IBus is bad right now, we need to fix it.
Some while ago when I
Hi,
I just updated to gnome 3.4 and then fired up Anjuta to fix all those
applets in my gnome-panel that have become broken after the update
(which sadly is most of them). But to my surprise I can not use the
scrollwheel in to scroll up any more. When I scroll down everything is
fine, but
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Weng Xuetian wen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Jasper St. Pierre
jstpie...@mecheye.net wrote:
Input Methods need to display custom widgets in the overview. That
means they need access to St, which is (for now) a private toolkit to
the
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Jasper St. Pierre
jstpie...@mecheye.net wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Weng Xuetian wen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Jasper St. Pierre
jstpie...@mecheye.net wrote:
Input Methods need to display custom widgets in the overview.
Frederic Peters fpet...@gnome.org wrote:
Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
We only have the development resources to ship one input method. It's
going to need special code to integrate with Clutter and the St
toolkit. If IBus is bad right now, we need to fix it.
Or use fcitx instead of IBus? I
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote:
Frederic Peters fpet...@gnome.org wrote:
Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
We only have the development resources to ship one input method. It's
going to need special code to integrate with Clutter and the St
toolkit. If IBus is
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Jasper St. Pierre
jstpie...@mecheye.net wrote:
We only have the development resources to ship one input method. It's
going to need special code to integrate with Clutter and the St
toolkit. If IBus is bad right now, we need to fix it.
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote:
Frederic Peters fpet...@gnome.org wrote:
Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
We only have the development resources to ship one input method. It's
going to need special code to integrate with Clutter and the St
toolkit. If IBus is
I'm a end-user of Gnome and Fcitx, and co-developer of this extension (
https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/261/kimpanel/)
One year ago i was still using iBus as my first-choice input method, but it
has bugs and runs slowly, so i turned to fcitx. Fcitx is now growing up
smoothly and has a lot
Please not that the arguments I am stating below apply for all areas of
software, and are not particularly about the choice between IBUS and fcitx.
On 12/05/12 16:51, Owen Taylor wrote:
Hi Maguerite,
Thanks for the detailed response!
It's hard for me to talk about the pros and cons of fcitx
Hi,
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Maguerite,
Thanks for the detailed response!
It's hard for me to talk about the pros and cons of fcitx and IBus -
sadly I don't speak or write Chinese, and I haven't investigated the
technical operations of
On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 00:03 +0800, Weng Xuetian wrote:
Actually I see this is an impossible mission for gnome.
I see no one here really understand the real needs of input method.
Fix UI? That's not the main problem of ibus.
I'm having a very hard time following this. Can somebody who knows
1. ibus is buggy
2. Even though iBus is perfect, it should not be the integrated IM of
gnome, if only ibus is integrated, the only thing i can do is just give
up gnome because ibus cannot meet my need, if only fcitx is integrated,
maybe ibus users would give up gnome because they need ibus
3.
5. there has been solutions to integrate IM frameworks with gnome
https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/261/kimpanel/
https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/68/input-method-status-indicator/
in which kimpanel extension can work with both ibus and fcitx. there is no
dark magic.
On Sun, May 13,
hi;
On 12 May 2012 22:39, Justin Wong justin.w...@gmail.com wrote:
5. there has been solutions to integrate IM frameworks with gnome
https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/261/kimpanel/
https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/68/input-method-status-indicator/
in which kimpanel extension can
Marguerite Su i at marguerite.su writes:
what if after one or two years, a brand-new IM comes.
then you guys will remove all ibus codes and start what you do today again?
and after another one or two years, again again.
then it becomes you guys' life-time career to fix bugs and reinvent
在 2012年5月13日 星期日 02:19:25，Benjamin Otte 写道：
Marguerite Su i at marguerite.su writes:
what if after one or two years, a brand-new IM comes.
then you guys will remove all ibus codes and start what you do today
again?
and after another one or two years, again again.
then it
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 00:03 +0800, Weng Xuetian wrote:
Actually I see this is an impossible mission for gnome.
I see no one here really understand the real needs of input method.
Fix UI? That's not the main problem of
Hi,
I am a Fedora Packager, maintaining fcitx and its related packages for
Fedora. I am working for submitting review requests for fcitx related
pacakges.
Two months ago I joined in offline meeting of Hong Kong Linux User Group. I
heard from Linuxers in Hong Kong that ibus-table-quick could not
Well this is how ibus is done, as u can see, ugly.
but i should say users would never see this long long menu, because this
menu provides 13 kinds of input methods for users, where normal users use
less than 3 input methods, this screenshot is just to show ibus can provide
so many IMs
I
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Benjamin Otte o...@gnome.org wrote:
Marguerite Su i at marguerite.su writes:
what if after one or two years, a brand-new IM comes.
then you guys will remove all ibus codes and start what you do today again?
and after another one or two years, again again.
30 matches
Mail list logo
