On ו', 2013-08-16 at 04:13 -0300, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On 15 Aug 2013, at 22:20, Richard Stallman r...@gnu.org wrote:
[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider
[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,
[ foreign or domestic,
Il giorno gio, 15/08/2013 alle 12.07 +0200, Alexandre Franke ha scritto:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote:
I really don't care much about my code being mirrored anywhere. At
least gitorious would be ethically acceptable, so it wouldn't bother
me, but I
This is a great idea, but only if enough maintainers cooperate with it.
Otherwise, the Gnome officially using GitHub message is stronger than
a few small modules having your README.md file, while all other modules
have READMEs of the common kind.
Judging by replies here, I'm afraid there's no
Il giorno ven, 16/08/2013 alle 12.22 +0300, fr33domlover ha scritto:
This is a great idea, but only if enough maintainers cooperate with it.
Otherwise, the Gnome officially using GitHub message is stronger than
a few small modules having your README.md file, while all other modules
have
On ו', 2013-08-16 at 12:00 +0200, Matteo Settenvini wrote:
Il giorno ven, 16/08/2013 alle 12.22 +0300, fr33domlover ha scritto:
This is a great idea, but only if enough maintainers cooperate with it.
Otherwise, the Gnome officially using GitHub message is stronger than
a few small modules
Hey,
the 3.9.90 release is coming up next week - it marks the beginning of
our freezes, so this is a good time to review the blocker bug list
again. After my first post earlier this week, I got some
contributions, so the list is well-populated now.
To everybody who closed a blocker bug since the
On 16 August 2013 07:48, fr33domlover fr33domlo...@mailoo.org wrote:
True, I don't suggest to prevent the mirrors: Just not automate. Anyone
can create a mirror manually, and it's their freedom to do so. But I
don't think maintainers should have their modules automatically synced
to GitHub
On 08/16/2013 02:24 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Hey,
As far as I see, the list are all the bugs marked as 3.10. So just
adding to the list one already marked as 3.10 but skipped.
gnome-settings-daemon
--
705507 Merge the wip/wayland-display branch
705929
As I've said before, GNOME uses proprietary services for collaboration and
outreach.
We have active presences on the proprietary communication services Google+,
Facebook, and Twitter. We displayed a large Twitter wall at GUADEC showing
tweets tagged with the hashtag #guadec.
GitHub is just
On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 21:20 -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider
[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,
[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example.
Is it advisable to use
On 16/08/13 05:22 AM, fr33domlover wrote:
Judging by replies here, I'm afraid there's no enough interest. All the
names I recognized here support the GitHub mirrors, while the voices
against them are people whose name I never saw, or are maintainers of
less popular modules.
Please, tell us
Quoting Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com:
Hey,
the 3.9.90 release is coming up next week - it marks the beginning of
our freezes, so this is a good time to review the blocker bug list
again. After my first post earlier this week, I got some
contributions, so the list is
Il giorno ven, 16/08/2013 alle 10.17 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre ha
scritto:
As I've said before, GNOME uses proprietary services for collaboration
and outreach.
We have active presences on the proprietary communication services
Google+, Facebook, and Twitter. We displayed a large Twitter wall
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 04:50:14PM +0200, Matteo Settenvini wrote:
those services have the same problems of github, and free alternatives
do exist.
So, for starters ...
- What is the free alternative to Google Hangouts?
- What is the free alternative to Twitter with the same user base?
This
On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 10:17 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
There's possibly a discussion to have about whether GNOME should use
proprietary services for outreach, but GitHub isn't really anything
new here. In my opinion, if you feel strongly about the use of
proprietary services for
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Matteo Settenvini
matteo...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Il giorno ven, 16/08/2013 alle 10.17 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre ha
scritto:
As I've said before, GNOME uses proprietary services for collaboration
and outreach.
We have active presences on the proprietary
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a. Dimstar
dims...@opensuse.org wrote:
701078 Port NM to BlueZ 5
IMHO, this is very late to happen 'just before RC' (3.9.90 is on Aug 20)
with a full ABI/API freeze.
This did not appear 'just before RC - it has been the plan for
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 10:17 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
There's possibly a discussion to have about whether GNOME should use
proprietary services for outreach, but GitHub isn't really anything
new here. In my
Hi Dominique,
Bastien Nocera, who's been leading the GNOME effort to switch to BlueZ 5
is currently on vacation. I don't know all the details but I'll try to
reply with what I know.
I'll add Gustavo Padovan to CC as well if he wants to add anything.
In Fedora, we've decided to bite the bullet
On Fre, 2013-08-16 at 11:28 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
701078 Port NM to BlueZ 5
IMHO, this is very late to happen 'just before RC' (3.9.90 is on Aug 20)
with a full ABI/API freeze.
This did not appear 'just before RC - it has been the plan for a
while. This bug is just on the
Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
If you're not happy with that, we can certainly bring it up to the board
and talk about it, but from how I see things, I don't think we'll remove
GNOME Online Accounts integration or stop our Twitter marketing campaigns.
So, I'm saying that if you're not happy with
On Fre, 2013-08-16 at 17:51 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
Hi Dominique,
Bastien Nocera, who's been leading the GNOME effort to switch to BlueZ 5
is currently on vacation. I don't know all the details but I'll try to
reply with what I know.
Thanks for taking the time!
I'll add Gustavo
On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 17:51 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
Hi Dominique,
Bastien Nocera, who's been leading the GNOME effort to switch to BlueZ 5
is currently on vacation. I don't know all the details but I'll try to
reply with what I know.
I'll add Gustavo Padovan to CC as well if he wants
On 08/16/2013 05:36 PM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org
mailto:sha...@gnome.org wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 10:17 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
There's possibly a discussion to have about whether GNOME should use
Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
There's possibly a discussion to have about whether GNOME should use
proprietary services for outreach, but GitHub isn't really anything
new here. In my opinion, if you feel strongly about the use of
proprietary services for outreach, perhaps GNOME isn't
[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider
[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,
[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example.
When you say that GitHub is nonfree, what do you mean by that?
We do not
Hi,
On 16/08/13 17:51, Kalev Lember wrote:
not getting ported for 3.10:
gnome-user-share
This got ported, although there are a couple of glitches, see
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694347
Cheers,
Emilio
___
desktop-devel-list
On Fre, 2013-08-16 at 19:01 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
The NM patches add a configure switch for bluez 5. If you don't pass it,
bluez 4
support is compiled.
As for the other modules, if you want 3.10 with bluez 4:
gnome-shell: you need to revert a trivial patch
Il giorno ven, 16/08/2013 alle 12.55 -0400, Richard Stallman ha scritto:
[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider
[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,
[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example.
Until
On ו', 2013-08-16 at 10:11 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
On 16 August 2013 07:48, fr33domlover fr33domlo...@mailoo.org wrote:
True, I don't suggest to prevent the mirrors: Just not automate. Anyone
can create a mirror manually, and it's their freedom to do so. But I
don't think maintainers
Hi,
Any opinions on:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706155
?
(I use gerrit for some work projects and am quite happy with it in
general; the interdiff support in particular is incredibly useful)
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Matteo Settenvini mat...@member.fsf.orgwrote:
Il giorno ven, 16/08/2013 alle 11.27 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre ha
scritto:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Matteo Settenvini
matteo...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Besides, while github is not free, gitorious
[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider
[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,
[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example.
I believe the mentioned article answers your question: GitHub is
essentially
I wrote:
If users can avoid the nonfree JS by using the API, that solves the
problem.
but I should have written
If users can avoid the nonfree JS by using the API, that
potentially solves the problem.
Which is why I asked
Is this a real option or only a theoretical one?
[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider
[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,
[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example.
To Richard: I would like a clarification in this respect. If I use a
non-free
On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 19:09 -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
Hosting services in general are not SaaSS. Maybe some specific thing
about GitHub is SaaSS; if so, can you explain the details?
Please take discussions of GitHub off-list. The Foundation Board will
discuss the GNOME mirror during its
36 matches
Mail list logo
